Abstract: Application to Revision Document for 1X Enhancement Notice Contributors grant a free, irrevocable license to 3GPP2 and its Organizational Partners to incorporate text or other copyrightable material contained in the contribution and any modifications thereof in the creation of 3GPP2 publications; to copyright and sell in Organizational Partner’s name any Organizational Partner’s standards publication even though it may include all or portions of this contribution; and at the Organizational Partner’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part such contribution or the resulting Organizational Partner’s standards publication. Contributors are also willing to grant licenses under such contributor copyrights to third parties on reasonable, non-discriminatory terms and conditions for purpose of practicing an Organizational Partner’s standard which incorporates this contribution. This document has been prepared by contributors to assist the development of specifications by 3GPP2. It is proposed to the Committee as a basis for discussion and is not to be construed as a binding proposal on Contributors. Contributors specifically reserves the right to amend or modify the material contained herein and nothing herein shall be construed as conferring or offering licenses or rights with respect to any intellectual property of Contributors other than provided in the copyright statement above. 1x Enhancement Documentation Strategy KDDI Jun Takada Recommendation: Review and Adopt Date: 25 Aug, 2008 SK telecom Sean Kwak NEC Toru Owai Airvana Doug Knisely NORTEL Ke-Chi Jang US Cellular Thalanany, Sebastian LG TeleCom Yeon-Sang Koo Alcatel-Lucent S.Vasudevan Motorola Rajeev Ranjan SAMSUNG Jungsoo Jung Qualcomm Tao Chen ZTE Xiaowu Zhao Kyocera Doug Dunn Huawei Anthony Soong

2 Application of Revision Document for 1X Enhancement The following document strategy options for 1x Enhancement are available: We propose the “Stand Alone approach” Add the feature on each Revision(Rev.0-D) Like C.S0072 (Interim MEID Solution) “Stand Alone approach” has several advantages over “New Revision approach” 1.Less “Development Complexity” 2.Less “Evaluation Complexity” 3.Less Impact on “Deployment Schedule” Rev.0Rev.ARev.BRev.CRev.D 1X Enhancement Rev.E 1X Enhancement “New Revision approach” “Stand Alone approach” Rev.0 Rev.A Rev.B Rev.C Rev.D

3 Advantages of “Stand Alone Approach” 1.Less “Development Complexity” Network upgrades can be supported for enhancements only and do not mandate inclusion of undesired features from Rev. A to Rev. E To upgrade new revision, only desired 1x Enhancement features are implemented, not all Rev. E features Most operators have 1X Rev.0 or Rev. A currently deployed in their networks New Revision approach need to re-develop PLCM_39 function C.S0072(Interim MEID Solution) is invalid on upper Rev. C re-develop PLCM_39(BS assigned PLCM) function for Rev. E MS 2.Less “Evaluation Complexity” Need to evaluate Enhanced MS Need to ensure no impact to Legacy MS operations Do not want reoccurrence of 1X Rev. A Sync channel issue in Less Impact on “Deployment Schedule” Desired for Early deployment 1x Enhancement needs the support of both network and mobile capacity effect depends on # of supported mobiles Unnecessary work should be eliminated for early deployment eliminate the work regarding dev/eval of undesired features Rev.0 Rev.A Rev.B Rev.C Rev.D Rev.E

4 Conclusion Conclusion: “Stand Alone approach” is preferred over “New Revision approach” for development and documentation of 1x Enhancements –Eliminate unnecessary work –Minimize system complexity –Shorten development/evaluation schedule Operators desire 1x Enhancement to increase system capacity of their current network deployments Minimize development/evaluation