A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan Vladimir Vassiliev UCLA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing Event Reconstruction for CTA R D Parsons (Univ. of Leeds) J Hinton (Univ. of Leicester)
Advertisements

Exploiting VERITAS Timing Information J. Holder a for the VERITAS Collaboration b a) School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, UK b) For full.
High Energy Gamma Ray Group
OBSERVATIONS OF AGNs USING PACT (Pachmarhi Array of Cherenkov Telescopes) Debanjan Bose (On behalf of PACT collaboration) “The Multi-Messenger Approach.
14.5m 100 m ~480 m Junction Box ~70 m String-based detector; Downward-looking (45°) PMTs; 2475 m deep; 12 detection lines 25 storeys / line 3 PMTs / storey.
Beam-Beam Effects for FCC-ee at Different Energies: at Different Energies: Crab Waist vs. Head-on Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk FCC-ee/TLEP physics.
Air Shower Simulations for ANITA K. Belov UCLA. Goals Approach Estimate the energy of the UHECRs detected by ANITA using MC simulations Use well known.
Stereo Spectrum of UHECR Showers at the HiRes Detector  The Measurement Technique  Event Reconstruction  Monte Carlo Simulation  Aperture Determination.
Eyes for Relighting Extracting environment maps for use in integrating and relighting scenes (Noshino and Nayar)
1Andrea Caliandro Search of Optimized Cuts for Pulsar Detection Andrea Caliandro - INFN Bari DC2 CloseOut May Goddard Space Flight Center.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Energy Reconstruction Algorithms for the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope J.D. Zornoza 1, A. Romeyer 2, R. Bruijn 3 on Behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 1.
Characterization of Orbiting Wide-angle Light-collectors (OWL) By: Rasha Usama Abbasi.
Source detection at Saclay Look for a fast method to find sources over the whole sky Provide list of positions, allowing to run maximum likelihood locally.
On A Large Array Of Midsized Telescopes Stephen Fegan Vladimir Vassiliev UCLA.
Sean Grullon with Gary Hill Maximum likelihood reconstruction of events using waveforms.
1 Tracking Reconstruction Norman A. Graf SLAC July 19, 2006.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
Five principles of design (in fast forward) You can find this and other helpful PowerPoints on my teacher web site at Hillsboro R-3 under teacher web sites.
Outrigger Timing Calibration & Reconstruction Milagro – 11/17/03 Shoup – 1 Purpose: To incorporate outrigger hits in event angle fitting Additionally incorporated.
DHCAL - Resolution (S)DHCAL Meeting January 15, 2014 Lyon, France Burak Bilki, José Repond and Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory.
28 th ICRC Tsukuba Conor Masterson, H.E.S.S. Observations of Galactic Sources with H.E.S.S. Conor Masterson, MPI-K, for the H.E.S.S. Collaboration.
Reconstruction techniques, Aart Heijboer, OWG meeting, Marseille nov Reconstruction techniques Estimators ML /   Estimator M-Estimator Background.
EAS Reconstruction with Cerenkov Photons Shower Simulation Reconstruction Algorithm Toy MC Study Two Detector Configuration Summary M.Z. Wang and C.C.
A statistical test for point source searches - Aart Heijboer - AWG - Cern june 2002 A statistical test for point source searches Aart Heijboer contents:
Quest for omega mesons by their radiative decay mode in √s=200 GeV A+A collisions at RHIC-PHENIX ~Why is it “Quest”?~ Simulation Study Real Data Analysis.
Point Source Search with 2007 & 2008 data Claudio Bogazzi AWG videconference 03 / 09 / 2010.
Analysis chain for MAGIC Telescope data Daniel Mazin and Nadia Tonello Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München D.Mazin, N.Tonello MPI for Physics, Munich.
Simulations of radio emission from cosmic ray air showers Tim Huege & Heino Falcke ARENA-Workshop Zeuthen,
Source catalog generation Aim: Build the LAT source catalog (1, 3, 5 years) Jean Ballet, CEA SaclayGSFC, 29 June 2005 Four main functions: Find unknown.
Gus Sinnis Asilomar Meeting 11/16/2003 The Next Generation All-Sky VHE Gamma-Ray Telescope.
1 Calorimeter in G4MICE Berkeley 10 Feb 2005 Rikard Sandström Geneva University.
AGASA Results Masahiro Teshima for AGASA collaboration
Background Subtraction and Likelihood Method of Analysis: First Attempt Jose Benitez 6/26/2006.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
Simulations Report E. García, UIC. Run 1 Geometry Radiator (water) 1cm x 2cm x 2cm with optical properties Sensitive Volume (hit collector) acrylic (with.
Data Analysis Markarian 421 – Crab Nebula – Crab Nebula –  2 dim plots : false source analysis  Miss-pointing study.
Extending the Sensitivity Of Air-Cerenkov Telescopes Steve Biller, Oxford University (de la Calle & Biller – astro-ph/ )
Optimization of  exclusion cut for the  + and  (1520) analysis Takashi Nakano Based on Draft version of Technical Note 42.
Photon reconstruction and matching Prokudin Mikhail.
Introduction Data analyzed Analysis method Preliminary results
June 6, 2006 CALOR 2006 E. Hays University of Chicago / Argonne National Lab VERITAS Imaging Calorimetry at Very High Energies.
2005 Unbinned Point Source Analysis Update Jim Braun IceCube Fall 2006 Collaboration Meeting.
Adam Blake, June 9 th Results Quick Review Look at Some Data In Depth Look at One Anomalous Event Conclusion.
Preliminary Profile Reconstruction of EA Hybrid Showers Bruce Dawson & Luis Prado Jr thanks to Brian Fick & Paul Sommers and Stefano Argiro & Andrea de.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Electron Spectrometer: Status July 14 Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon 1 st July 2014.
Status of QEL Analysis ● QEL-like Event Selection and Sample ● ND Flux Extraction ● Fitting for MINOS Collaboration Meeting FNAL, 7 th -10 th December.
Comparison of MC and data Abelardo Moralejo Padova.
In conclusion the intensity level of the CCD is linear up to the saturation limit, but there is a spilling of charges well before the saturation if.
All-sky source search Aim: Look for a fast method to find sources over the whole sky Selection criteria Algorithms Iteration Simulations Energy information.
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
Daniel Mazin and Nadia Tonello Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München
Muons in IceCube PRELIMINARY
Oil immersion objectives
Jean Ballet, CEA Saclay GSFC, 31 May 2006 All-sky source search
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Source Detection by Count Excess
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Update on TB 2007 Xtal Irradiation Studies at H4
2000 Diffuse Analysis Jessica Hodges, Gary Hill, Jodi Cooley
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
Sean A. McKinney, Chirlmin Joo, Taekjip Ha  Biophysical Journal 
ICRC2011, 32ND INTERNATIONAL COSMIC RAY CONFERENCE, BEIJING 2011
Dilepton Mass. Progress report.
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
IC59+40 Point Source Analysis
Lesson 4: Application to transport distributions
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan Vladimir Vassiliev UCLA

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev Data Analysis Flowchart Image conditioning. Geometry reconstruction. Event parameterization. Energy reconstruction. Data Selection.  Independent telescope parameters.  Array. Results. Standard approach. Picture/boundary cleaning. Has not been optimized. Has not been investigated. Array cuts, based on combining the various parameters from all images have not been investigated. To be investigated… Methods 1&2 from reconstruction memo of December. Parameterization from memo also. Cuts based on individual telescope images using parameters from memo. Simple “box” shaped cuts and multi- dimensional cuts using “NSpace”

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev Geometry reconstruction Method1: fit arrival direction and core from individual image axes, weighted “appropriately”. Method 2: Fit single shower axis to all images simultaneously. This axis is projected onto focal plane of each telescope. Method 3: Fit single shower axis to all images simultaneously. This axis is defined in real 3D space. Methods 1 and 2 give comparable results with two telescopes. Method 3 has not been investigated.

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev Event parameterization Once the shower axis has been reconstructed each image can be mapped into “physical space”, giving: 1)Mean emission height and track length. 2)Depth s of mean emission in atmosphere in g/cm 2. 3)Mean angle of emission with respect to trajectory. 4)Physical width of emission region. 5)Dispersion s in photon arrival times assuming emission along primary trajectory.

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev Data selection Simple cuts on parameters in Dec. memo:  Log 10 (size) > 2.5  Emission region width< 15m  Emission height> 5000m  Emission length> 750m Simulations suggest cuts should be energy dependent. Studies using n-dimensional cutting system NSpace 1 is ongoing. Preliminary results discussed here. 1 See T. Nagai’s thesis for write up of NSpace methodology

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev Results: Mrk 421 – 9 pairs Background rate of 16.4/min/deg 2 based on θ<0.2° (SIMPLE CUTS) Significance 29σ, rate 5.76/min

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev Results: table of Mrk421 pairs RunDurationONOFFRateSignificance TOTAL (SIMPLE CUTS)

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev Results: Mrk 421 – 10 wobble at 0.3° Theta 2 distribution with respect to source position Theta 2 distribution with respect to symmetric wobble position Source counts as they appear from off source location. No obvious spill over to theta=0 area. Wobble offset of 0.3º seems to be sufficient. (SIMPLE CUTS)

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev Results: table of Mrk421 wobble runs RunDurationONOFFRateSignificance TOTAL (SIMPLE CUTS)

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev Results: strong source optimization Photon dominated regime: For strong source, optimize theta cut for significance. Peak is quite broad. Theta cut from 0.15° to 0.25° gives high significance. We chose 0.2° for high rate. 9 Mrk421 pairs (SIMPLE CUTS)

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev Results: weak source optimization Background dominated regime: For weak source optimize theta cut for excess/sqrt(background) – Q- value. Shown is Q-value, normalized to 1 at theta=1. Peak is much narrower. Theta cut from 0.12° to 0.16° gives best significance on weak sources. 9 Mrk421 pairs (SIMPLE CUTS)

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev Results: Mrk421comparison with Whipple VERITAS Run VERITAS Rate VERITAS Significance Whipple Run Whipple Rate Whipple Significance Whipple results from J. Kildea 2 VERITAS and Whipple run numbers are similar after 40 years of Whipple operation (SIMPLE CUTS)

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev Results: Mrk501comparison with Whipple VERITAS Run VERITAS Rate VERITAS Significance Whipple Run Whipple Rate Whipple Significance Whipple results from J. Kildea (SIMPLE CUTS)

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev Results: aperture function Cosmic-ray acceptance as a function of off-axis angle, after cuts. These events are the most gamma-ray like CRs. Gamma-ray response will likely be somewhat similar. Quite flat to 0.8 degrees. Fast decline at 1.75 degrees (SIMPLE CUTS)

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev NSpace: basic ideas Form multi-dimensional histogram in space defined by event parameters. Fill two histograms: from ON & OFF runs or from SIM & OFF data. Order cells “according to significance (likelihood,…)” (many ordering schemes possible). Make “filter” by picking cells from ordering to maximize total significance (likelihood,…). Repeat all steps above varying bin sizes of the histogram until significance (likelihood,…) is maximized. Bin sizes and histogram dimension are your optimization parameters. Final filter is an effective volume in multidimensional space. Cut ON events according to whether they are inside or outside the filter.

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev NSpace: example in two dimensions log(size) width ON counts OFF counts Highest single cell significance(4.7 sigma) Two cell set with highest overall significance (6.5 sigma) Seven cell set with highest overall significance (9.9 sigma). Thereafter adding any more cells decreases significance.

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev NSpace: single telescope space Space based on three single telescope parameters:  Log 10 (λ c )*12 bins no 4 – 8  Emission width20 bins no 0 – 40 m  Emission depth10 bins no 0 – 1000 g/cm 2 ON histogram: 9 Mrk421 runs – theta<0.2 OFF histogram: 9 Mrk421 runs – theta<1.0 Optimize filter on T1 parameters Apply to both T1 & T2 when cutting * λ c : density of emitters in coherent regime [m -1 ], see December memo for details

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev NSpace: optimization results Filter with 70 cells gives close to the peak Q-value and gives good rate For comparison, straight cuts have Qmax=6 (with theta cut of 0.16°)

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev NSpace: optimization results Filter with 70 cells gives close to the peak Q-value and gives good rate For comparison, straight cuts have Qmax=6 (with theta cut of 0.16°)

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev Straight CutsNSpace Cuts Data SetONOFFRateSigmaONOFFRateSigma 9 Mrk421 Pairs Mrk421 Wobble Mrk501 Wobble Faint source improvement not as large as indicated from optimization ( =1.76 vs =1.51). This reflects some degree of “tuning” of space to specific runs used in optimization. NSpace: comparison with straight cuts (NSpace with theta cut of 0.15°) (Straight with theta cut of 0.14°) 1 Optimization done on these runs Bright source significance is approximately equal with this NSpace filter but rate is lower. A theta cut of 0.2 gives better significance and rate for both sets of cuts.

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev NSpace: 10 Mrk421 wobble runs Background rate of 5.0/min/deg 2

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev

RunDurationONOFFRateSignificance TOTAL NSpace: results for Mrk501 wobble 1 Using traditional Gaussian significance formula (somewhat inaccurately) If Crab is 5  /min then 4% Crab in 5  or 18% Crab in 5  HESS claimed 11% Crab in 5 

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev NSpace: 501 comparison with Whipple VERITAS Run VERITAS Significance VERITAS Rate Whipple Run Whipple Significance 1 Whipple Rate Whipple results from J. Kildea (NSpace)

VERITAS Collaboration Meeting June 29, 2006, Leeds, UK A First Look At VERITAS Data Stephen Fegan & Vladimir Vassiliev NSpace: future work Preliminary optimization done quickly for meeting, need to look in detail at:  Ordering strategy  Array/Energy parameters  Bin size optimization  Parameter choice/Dimension Optimization 9 runs are not enough to do filter selection properly. Need lots of CRAB data and/or simulations. NSpace provides flexible and robust frame of work for data analysis including detailed spectrum analysis. Optimistic about success of this method!