NRL 7333 Rb = 1-  1+  1+  2 Non- Linear b1- b2q3 influences We developed improved SeaWIFS coastal ocean color algorithms to derived inherent optical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for the GOCI Jae Hyun Ahn* Joo-Hyung Ryu* Young Jae Park* Yu-Hwan Ahn* Im Sang Oh** Korea Ocean Research & Development.
Advertisements

MODIS Ocean Products MODIS/AIRS Workshop Pretoria, South Africa April 4-7, 2006 Liam Gumley Space Science and Engineering Center University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Sherwin D. Ladner 1, Robert A. Arnone 2, Richard W. Gould, Jr. 2, Alan Weidemann 2, Vladimir I. Haltrin 2, Zhongping Lee 2, Paul M. Martinolich 3, and.
Welcome to the Ocean Color Bio-optical Algorithm Mini Workshop Goals, Motivation, and Guidance Janet W. Campbell University of New Hampshire Durham, New.
Phytoplankton absorption from ac-9 measurements Julia Uitz Ocean Optics 2004.
A framework for selecting and blending retrievals from bio-optical algorithms in lakes and coastal waters based on remote sensing reflectance for water.
Characterization of radiance uncertainties for SeaWiFS and Modis-Aqua Introduction The spectral remote sensing reflectance is arguably the most important.
Atmospheric correction using the ultraviolet wavelength for highly turbid waters State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics, Second Institute.
Uncertainty estimates in input (Rrs) and output ocean color data: a brief review Stéphane Maritorena – ERI/UCSB.
2 Remote sensing applications in Oceanography: How much we can see using ocean color? Adapted from lectures by: Martin A Montes Rutgers University Institute.
Menghua Wang NOAA/NESDIS/ORA E/RA3, Room 102, 5200 Auth Rd.
Water Level Sensor Physical processes related to bio-optical properties on the New York Bight inner continental shelf Grace C. Chang 1, Tommy D. Dickey.
Naval Research Laboratory Stennis Space Center Ocean Optics Section Code 7333 HyCODE January 2003 Miami, FL Richard W. Gould, Jr.Alan Weidemann Robert.
NRL 7343 Nov’97 Seasonal Variability of the surface bio-optical and Thermal Structure of the Japan/East Sea Using AVHRR and SeaWIFS Robert ArnoneRichard.
Results Sampling Locations Year 2000 LEO-15 site Methods (1) Satlantic, Inc. SeaWiFS Profiling Multichannel Radiometer (SPMR) on the Suitcase package (
Characterizing Surface and Subsurface Thermal and Bio-Optical Fields in the Japan/East Sea During a Spring Bloom: Shipboard Measurements and Satellite.
NRL 7333 HYCODE - January 2002 Hyperspectral Applications Ocean Optics Naval Research laboratory Stennis Space Center, MS Robert Arnone Alan Weidemann.
Evaluation of Recent VIIRS Sensor Performance in the Coastal Ocean
Center for Remote Sensing and Computational Ecology PREDICTION OF HYPERSPECTRAL IOPs ON THE WEST FLORIDA SHELF W. Paul Bissett Florida Environmental Research.
UNH Coastal Observing Center NASA GEO-CAPE workshop August 19, 2008 Ocean Biological Properties Ru Morrison.
A.B. VIIRS (Nov. 20, 2013).
Rrs Modeling and BRDF Correction ZhongPing Lee 1, Bertrand Lubac 1, Deric Gray 2, Alan Weidemann 2, Ken Voss 3, Malik Chami 4 1 Northern Gulf Institute,
Sherwin Ladner 1, Robert Arnone 2, Ryan Vandermeulen 2, Paul Martinolich 3, Adam Lawson 1, Jennifer Bowers 3, Richard Crout 1, Michael Ondrusek 4,Giulietta.
In situ science in support of satellite ocean color objectives Jeremy Werdell NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Science Systems & Applications, Inc. 6 Jun.
Ocean Color Observations and Their Applications to Climate Studies Alex Gilerson, Soe Hlaing, Ioannis Ioannou, Sam Ahmed Optical Remote Sensing Laboratory,
Atmospheric Correction Algorithms for Remote Sensing of Open and Coastal Waters Zia Ahmad Ocean Biology Processing Group (OBPG) NASA- Goddard Space Flight.
Chapter 7 Atmospheric correction and ocean color algorithm Remote Sensing of Ocean Color Instructor: Dr. Cheng-Chien LiuCheng-Chien Liu Department of Earth.
SeaDAS Training ~ NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group 1 Level-2 ocean color data processing basics NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group Goddard Space Flight.
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Atmospheric Correction using the MODIS SWIR Bands (1240 and 2130 nm) Menghua Wang (PI, NASA NNG05HL35I) NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Camp.
Retrieving Coastal Optical Properties from MERIS S. Ladner 1, P. Lyon 2, R. Arnone 2, R. Gould 2, T. Lawson 1, P. Martinolich 1 1) QinetiQ North America,
Monitoring Bio-Optical Processes Using NPP-VIIRS And MODIS-Aqua Ocean Color Products Robert Arnone (1), Sherwin Ladner (2), Giulietta Fargion (3), Paul.
Recent advances for the inversion of the particulate backscattering coefficient at different wavelengths H. Loisel, C. Jamet, and D. Dessailly.
Soe Hlaing *, Alex Gilerson, Samir Ahmed Optical Remote Sensing Laboratory, NOAA-CREST The City College of the City University of New York 1 A Bidirectional.
Estimating Water Optical Properties, Water Depth and Bottom Albedo Using High Resolution Satellite Imagery for Coastal Habitat Mapping S. C. Liew #, P.
Formerly Lecture 12 now Lecture 10: Introduction to Remote Sensing and Atmospheric Correction* Collin Roesler 11 July 2007 *A 30 min summary of the highlights.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Image: MODIS Land Group,
Diffuse reflection coefficient or diffuse reflectance of light from water body is an informative part of remote sensing reflectance of light from the ocean.
ASSESSMENT OF OPTICAL CLOSURE USING THE PLUMES AND BLOOMS IN-SITU OPTICAL DATASET, SANTA BARBARA CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA Tihomir S. Kostadinov, David A. Siegel,
Backscattering Lab Julia Uitz Pauline Stephen Wayne Slade Eric Rehm.
Evaluation of GOCI, MODIS, and VIIRS Imagery Richard L. Crout, Sherwin Ladner, Ruhul Amin, and Adam Lawson Ocean Sciences Branch - Oceanography Division.
Optical Water Mass Classification for Interpretation of Coastal Carbon Flux Processes R.W. Gould, Jr. & R.A. Arnone Naval Research Laboratory, Code 7333,
Sensing primary production from ocean color: Puzzle pieces and their status ZhongPing Lee University of Massachusetts Boston.
NRL 7343 Nov’97 Remote Sensing in the Japan East Sea Robert ArnoneRichard Gould Chistine Chan Sherwin Ladner Naval Research Laboratory Stennis Space Center.
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Refinement of MODIS Atmospheric Correction Algorithm Menghua Wang (PI, NASA NNG05HL35I) NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Camp Springs, MD.
Impact of Watershed Characteristics on Surface Water Transport of Terrestrial Matter into Coastal Waters and the Resulting Optical Variability:An example.
The effect of wind on the estimated plume extension of the La Plata River Erica Darken Summer 2004.
A processing package for atmospheric correction of compact airborne spectrographic imager (casi) imagery over water including a novel sunglint correction.
Naval Research Laboratory, Ocean Optics Section, Code 7333, Stennis Space Center, MS , USA, webpage:
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Satellite Observation and Model Simulation of Water Turbidity in the Chesapeake.
Estimating the uncertainties in the products of inversion algorithms or, how do we set the error bars for our inversion results? Emmanuel Boss, U. of Maine.
A semi-analytical ocean color inherent optical property model: approach and application. Tim Smyth, Gerald Moore, Takafumi Hirata and Jim Aiken Plymouth.
Coastal Optical Characterization Experiment (COCE) Activities at STAR NOAA 2013 Satellite Conference, April 7-12, 2013 M. Ondrusek,
Optical Properties in coastal waters change rapidly on very fine spatial scales. The existence of multiple ocean color systems provides a unique capability.
Lecture 12: Models of IOPs and AOPs Collin Roesler 11 July 2007.
OC3522Summer 2001 OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001 Ocean Color.
The Dirty Truth of Coastal Ocean Color Remote Sensing Dave Siegel & St é phane Maritorena Institute for Computational Earth System Science University of.
Feng Peng and Steven Effler
Remote Sensing of the Ocean and Coastal Waters
D e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e M N I R-S W I R a n d AA a t m o s p h e r I c c o r r e c t I o n a n d s u s p e n d e d s e d I m e n t c.
Coastal Water Algorithms
High Resolution Time Series Measurements of Bio-Optical and Physical Variability in the Coastal Ocean as Part of HyCODE Dickey Mooring.
Monitoring Water Chlorophyll-a Concentration (Chl-a) in Lake Dianchi,China from 2003 ~ 2009 by MERIS Data.
Hydrolight and Ecolight
Jian Wang, Ph.D IMCS Rutgers University
IMAGERY DERIVED CURRENTS FROM NPP Ocean Color Products 110 minutes!
Simulation for Case 1 Water
IOP inversion from shallow waters
Wei Yang Center for Environmental Remote Sensing
Assessment of Satellite Ocean Color Products of the Coast of Martha’s Vineyard using AERONET-Ocean Color Measurements Hui Feng1, Heidi Sosik2 , and Tim.
Presentation transcript:

NRL 7333 Rb = 1-  1+  1+  2 Non- Linear b1- b2q3 influences We developed improved SeaWIFS coastal ocean color algorithms to derived inherent optical properties, based on relationships between absorption, scattering and remote sensing reflectance. The linear remote sensing reflectance to scattering: absorption ratio (bb/a) is the basis for open ocean algorithms where absorption (predomoninantly from chlorophyll) is greater than backscattering. In coastal waters, where backscattering from sediment can dominate absorption, a non-linear and spectral dependence occurs between the reflectance and the backscatter: absorption ratio. These nonlinear influences affect not only the in water optical algorithms, but they are also coupled with the atmospheric correction in coastal waters. The removal of water leaving radiance in the near-IR (765 and 865 nm) is especially necessary in coastal waters. The non-linear relationship is used in estimating the water leaving radiance in the near-IR through an iterative pixel-by-pixel process using the 670 nm water leaving radiance. We used SeaWIFS imagery and insitu measurements to evaluate the effects the non-linear relationships have on coastal algorithms where backscattering dominates the absorption. We compare these new products with the more standard NASA products and we highlight areas where regional differences are greatest (bays, estuaries). Improved Algorithms for Retrieving Optical Properties in Coastal Waters from Ocean Color Sensors R. A. Arnone 1, R. W. Gould 1, P. A. Martinolich 2, S. Ladner 3, A. W. Weidemann 1, and V. Haltrin 1 1. Naval Research Laboratory, SSC, MS 2. Neptune Sciences SSC. MS 3. Planning Systems Inc, SSC. MS 1. Naval Research Laboratory, SSC, MS 2. Neptune Sciences SSC. MS 3. Planning Systems Inc, SSC. MS Where are These Relations Used in Remote Sensing Algorithms Used in Remote Sensing Algorithms - NIR – Iteration - NIR – Iteration Coupled Ocean – Atm Algorithm - extension of Gordon- atm into - extension of Gordon- atm into Coastal waters by Lu765 = 0 - Bio – optical Algorithms - Bio – optical Algorithms bb and a(total) bb ~ RRS bb ~ RRS MISSISSIPPI Bight- SeaWIFS processing April 18,2001 Chlorophyll OC4 Objective : - Determine the affect of linear and non-linear relationships Which IOP’s (backscattering and absorption) have on reflectance. RRS ~ bb/a ~ bb/(a+bb) RRS ~ bb/a ~ bb/(a+bb) - Apply these relationships to SeaWIFS processing and determine their affect Coastal and offshore waters. Chlorophyll, backscattering (550) and Total Absorption Chlorophyll, backscattering (550) and Total Absorption - Determine where (water type) and how magnitude these relationships - Determine where (water type) and how magnitude these relationships affect Ocean Color “SeaWIFS” Algorithms. b0-b1 - b0-b1 - b1- b2q3 b1- b2q3 b1-b2q4 b1-b2q4 b2-q3-b2q4 Maxium Non linear b2q3-b2q6 b2q3-b2q6 bb_555_arnone bb_555_arnone b0-b1 – b0-b1 – b1-b2-q3 b1-b2-q3 b1-b2q4 b1-b2q4 Total Absorption “Carder” b0-b1- Oc4 b0-b1- Oc4 b1-b2q4 b1-b2q4 b1-b2q6 b2q3-b2q4 b2q4-b2q6 b2q4-b2q6 Summary  A linear g –RRS relationship effectively changes the Q-value in the non-linear relationship. Q changes from to 6.0 the non-linear relationship. Q changes from to 6.0 with increasing “g” in coastal waters.. with increasing “g” in coastal waters..  Insitu shows high variability of the RRS - “g” relationship associated with non-linear and bb-b relationship  Significant differences occur in SeaWIFS products (bb) in high scattering water (coastal and shelf waters ) that are associated with Q. Small changes in CHL and “a”. and shelf waters ) that are associated with Q. Small changes in CHL and “a”.  Improved algorithms will require estimate of Q in coastal waters for bb products. Origin of the Remote Sensing Reflectance? Rb = 0.33 bb a+ bb Rb= Diffuse Reflectance Linear 1-g 1-g  = 1+2g + g (4+5g) 1+2g + g (4+5g) g = bb g = bb a + bb a + bbWhere Haltrin Appl. Opt. 37, (1998) Q= 3.14 a = Q = 4 a = Q = 6 a = Remote Sensing Reflectance Conversion of Rb to RRS for non-linear RRS = F T 2 bb Q n 2 a+bb typically typically g RRS = 1 T 2 Rb Q n 2 Q= Changes in Water type Use the Non-linear Rb and Convert to the RRS Changes from bb/a to bb/(a+bb) is significant in High scattering (bb) waters. Insitu Observations in Coastal Waters 90 stations - RRS – ASD (Above water) RRS - RRS – ASD (Above water) RRS - absorption – ac9 - absorption – ac9 - bb – ac9 converted b to bb (Petzold) - bb – ac9 converted b to bb (Petzold) bb to b *53 (1.97%) bb to b *53 (1.97%) (Source of Error) (Source of Error) Insitu data from different Cruises Large variability in coastal Waters. Influence of Q variability ? bb –b conversion ?? Spectral Dependence of Insitu nm 440 nm 670 nm nm 440 nm 670 nm Red has lower “g” from attenuation Green has largest variation in coastal Waters. g = g = bb/a bb/a bb Q =3.14 bb Q =3.14 a+bb a+bb bb Q =4.0 bb Q =4.0 a+bb a+bb bb Q =6.0 bb Q =6.0 a+bb a+bb bb bb(a+bb) LinearLinear Non-linearNon-linearNon-linear SeaWIFS Imagery was processes using the NIR – which is a coupled ocean - atmospheric Correction (Gordon). We varied the linear – and non-linear RRS with different Q parameters and determined the affect on coastal optical products. 1. Chlorophyll - NASA –OC4 algorithms 1. Chlorophyll - NASA –OC4 algorithms 2. bb550 – Arnone algorithms 2. bb550 – Arnone algorithms 3. absorption 440 Total – Carder Algorithm 3. absorption 440 Total – Carder Algorithm The coupled ocean-atm algorithm is triggered by the Lu670 where high scattering has significant influence on the Lt765 and Lt865, which are used for atmospheric correction. Therefore, the nonlinear RRS and g will affect Therefore, the nonlinear RRS and g will affect coastal waters products and not offshore waters. coastal waters products and not offshore waters. Differences Differences bb in denominator decrease bb in denominator decrease Chl in coastal waters Non linear with Q=3, Increases Chl. Little change with Q=4,6 bb in denominator increases bb in denominator increases bb in coastal waters bb in coastal waters Non linear with Q=3, Decrease bb Larger decrease with Q=4,6 Changes in bb product Are significant with Q changes. Changes in “a total” product Are similar with non-linear Q changes. bb in denominator decrease bb in denominator decrease chl in coastal waters chl in coastal waters Variation in the bb/b relationship illustrates the changing Q parameter. Currently using ~2%. Volume Scattering Functions (VSF) show high variability in different water types. This is responsible for high insitu scatter. Currently Linear Relationship Used Current Semi Analytical algorithms Backscattering Absorption Rrs = b b ~ b bw + b b p a t ~ a w + a  + a d + a g waterphytoplanktondetritus colored dissolved organic matter Backscattering Absorption ? ? bbt bbt at at Remote Sensing Reflectance Insitu - Comparisons Differences Changing from Q=3-6 Decreases bb Changes in Q – Little Affect on Chlorophyll For Contact: Robert Arnone Head Ocean Optics Section Naval Research Laboratory Stennis Space Center, MS (228)