DTL Option for MEIC Ion Injection Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang Jlab 3/30/2015 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
11/27/2007ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop Mike Neubauer 1 RF Power and Cooling Requirements Overview from “Main Linac Power and Cooling Information”
Advertisements

Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro (Italy) DTL design status A. Pisent.
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
Experience with Bunch Shape Monitors at SNS A. Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge, USA.
Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
Part2: Cavities and Structures Modes in resonant cavity From a cavity to an accelerator Examples of structures JUAS 2015 Linacs-JB.Lallement - JUAS
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
ESS DTL beam commissioning
Beam Dynamics Layout of the FAIR Proton Injector Gianluigi Clemente, Lars Groening GSI, Darmstadt, Germany Urlich Ratzinger, R.Tiede, H.Podlech University.
Field and Phase Error Studies in Normal Conducting Structures LLRF and Beam Dynamics in Hadron Linacs – EuCARD2 Workshop Ciprian Plostinar
Proton Linac, Workshop, December 3 rd - 4 th, 2007 The FAIR Proton Linac Outline Requirements to Proton Linac Source, RFQ, DTL, RF Beam Dynamics.
LINAC4 STATUS Alessandra M. Lombardi for the LINAC4 team 1.Motivation and goals 2.Status of Linac4 2 years after official start of the project ( )
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
Cooler Injector Synchrotron (CIS) at IUCF V.S. Morozov MEIC Collaboration Meeting March 30-31, 2015.
Proton Driver at Fermilab Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab IDS-NF 7 th Plenary Meeting Oct 17-19,2011.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
Anders Sunesson RF Group ESS Accelerator Division
J. Alessi RF Structures EBIS Project Technical Review 1/27/05 RF Structures J. Alessi Some general thoughts on what our approach will be.
RF system issues due to pulsed beam in ILC DR October 20, Belomestnykh, RF for pulsed beam ILC DR, IWLC2010 S. Belomestnykh Cornell University.
January 5, 2004S. A. Pande - CAT-KEK School on SNS MeV Injector Linac for Indian Spallation Neutron Source S. A. PANDE.
Alexander Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Development of the Room Temperature CH-DTL in the frame of the HIPPI-CARE Project Gianluigi Clemente,
Proton Driver Main Linac Parameter Optimization G. W. Foster Proton Driver General Meeting Jan 19, 2005.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE) Sergei Nagaitsev Dec 19, 2011.
ICFA-HB 2004 Commissioning Experience for the SNS Linac A. Aleksandrov, S. Assadi, I. Campisi, P. Chu, S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, G. Dodson, J. Galambos,
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
Review 09/2010 page RF System for Electron Collider Ring Haipeng Wang for the team of R. Rimmer and F. Marhauser, SRF Institute and Y. Zhang, G. Krafft.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
R. Tiede, Institute for Applied Physics (IAP), Goethe-University Frankfurt 1 42nd ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop on High-Intensity, High-Brightness.
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
Comparison of Fermilab Proton Driver to Suggested Energy Amplifier Linac Bob Webber April 13, 2007.
ESS Linac Modifications for ESSnuSB Dave McGinnis Chief Engineer / Accelerator Division August 27, 2014.
Warm and Cold Ion Linac: Comparison and Optimization March 30, 2015.
Linac Design: Single-Spoke Cavities.
A. FaccoEURISOL DS Task 7GANIL, 30 Nov 2005 EURISOL DS 2° Meeting Task 7 - Primary Accelerator GANIL, November 30, 2005 Summary of the Task 7 status New.
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Summary Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab, USA.
Present and possible future schemes for hadron therapy linacs Alberto Degiovanni for the ADAM team HG2017 Workshop , Valencia.
Development of high-power IOTs as an efficient alternative to klystrons Morten Jensen Energy for Sustainable Science 24 October 2013, CERN.
Linac4 Beam Characteristics
Progress in the Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
A. Plastun¹, B. Mustapha, Z. Conway and P. Ostroumov
Part2: Cavities and Structures
Notkestrasse 85, Hamburg, Germany
Superbeams with SPL at CERN
Klystron Power Supplies for ILC
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
A Superconducting Proton/Electron Linac
Collective Effects and Beam Measurements in Particle Accelerators
Part2: Cavities and Structures
Physics Design on Injector I
The SPL-based Proton Driver at CERN
Status of the JLEIC Injector Linac Design
DTL for MEIC Ion Injection
JLEIC ion fullsize booster (2256m) space charge limit (Δν=0
MEIC New Baseline: Part 9
Ion bunch formation options for 400GeV JLEIC
JLEIC 200 GeV Ion Injector Chain and Bunch Formation
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang
Some Thoughts on the JLEIC Ion Injector
RF system for MEIC Ion Linac: SRF and Warm Options
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Choice of harmonic number with the consideration of ion beam formation
JLEIC electron ring with damping wigglers
Presentation transcript:

DTL Option for MEIC Ion Injection Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang Jlab 3/30/2015 1

Hardron Linac: Typical Layout 2 SourceSRF elliptical cavities Alveraz/IH/ CH/CC DTL SRF spoke or QWR/HWR RFQ ~0.1MeV0.5-5MeV5-200MeV80-300MeV >300MeV IH-DTL CH-DTL SRF CH-DTL Elliptical (medium β) SRF Spoke Alveraz DTL SRF HWR

DTL Efficiency 3 G. Clemente, CARE-Note HIPPI IH-DTLs are proven up to 8-10MeV/u FAIR 70MeV proton linac CH-DTL is under commissioning, a heavy ion version of CH-DTL for up to 22MeV/u U 38+ has been proposed Other DTLs like CC-DTL work at higher energy. DTL (Drift Tube Linac) is a multi-gap accelerator structure with very high R/Q/L at low β. Efficiency drops as β goes higher, especially for IH/CH structures Phase of different gaps are synced by the particle’s drift time. The structures have fixed (or very narrow) β profile. Will get same E k /u for different particles; have to lower V gap for lighter particles to match the β profile, but also result in higher current capability. Typical SRF QWR has Z eff in the order of Ω, 3~4 order of magnitude better

RF cavities: warm vs SRF 4 Ohm takes SRFCarnot favors warm Warm: Need multi-MW level RF power – major cost driver SRF: Need to pump out both dynamic and static heat load at % efficiency Warm RF can take the advantage of pulsed operation: increases efficiency with higher in-pulse beam loading, no Ohmic loss when pulse is off, reduces RF source cost and wall plug power

Technology choice 5 High βLow β SRF single/double gap Warm multi-gap Low beam currentHigh current CW operationLow duty cycle pulsed Different particles w/ same E k /q Different particles w/ same E k /u SRF multi-gap cavity is also an option for 0.1<β<0.5 CW operation. Warm DTL allows focusing magnets inside or very close to the tanks, which is crucial for β<0.1 heavy ion acceleration. Z eff /L for warm single/double gap structure is a little bit low, and the available RF sources with very low duty cycle in the frequency range of GHz cost too much per W avg.

RF cavities: warm vs SRF, example 1, β~0.2 6 Warm CH-DTL (Use Z eff of Tank 5 of FAIR p-linac, 325MHz, β= ) SRF QWR (115MHz, 2 cavities) L=1.52m, V eff =4MV (scaled from 6MV)L in cryomodule~1.6m, V eff =4MV Z eff cos 2 Φ=82MΩR/Q=509Ω*2, Q~10 9, Φ=20°, Z eff cos 2 Φ=9×10 11 Ω/cav P cu,peak =195kWP Nb =9W, P static =4W, P cryo =4kW I b =50mA with 0.3ms pulse width, 5Hz, 0.15% beam duty cycle, RF pulse width 0.5ms I b =2.5mA with 6ms pulse width, 5Hz, 3% beam duty cycle, ~5% RF duty cycle P RF FWD,peak ~ 440kW (assume 10% reflection with beam loading) P RF FWD = 15kW (30% reflection due to microphonics etc.) P RF FWD, avg = 1.1kW Wall plug power ~3kW RFWall plug power: ~2kW cryo, 2kW RF with DC modulation (>30kW if use tubes w/o DC modulation)

RF cavities: warm vs SRF, example 2, β~0.4 7 CC-DTL (Module 4 of CERN linac 4 CC- DTL, 352MHz, β= , 80MeV/u) SRF HWR (230MHz, 3 cavities) L=2.6m, V eff =8MVL in cryomodule~2.4m, V eff scale to 8MV Z eff cos 2 Φ=100MΩR/Q=250Ω*2, Q~10 9, Φ=20°, Z eff cos 2 Φ=4.4×10 11 Ω/cav P cu,peak =640kWP Nb =48W, P static =6W, P cryo =20kW RF pulse width 1ms 25Hz, I b =50mA with 0.8ms pulse width, 2% beam duty cycle CW RF, CW beam 1mA P RF FWD,peak ~ 1150kW (assume 10% reflection with beam loading) P RF FWD, cw = 12kW (30% reflection due to microphonics etc.) P RF FWD, avg = 29kW Wall plug power ~70kWWall plug power ~50kW

E k /u: 30-50MeV for Pb 64+#, MeV for H - Ion source pulse width: up to 0.5ms Ion source current: up to 150mA for non-polarized H -, 4mA for polarized H -, as low as 0.1mA for Li 3+ Rep-rate: 5 Hz nominal, depends on the ramping/cooling cycle in the booster ring Only need to inject once in every 3-8hr, ~10µC of charged particles per injection. Each injection should take <=0.5hr. With ~1mA pulsed current, the total linac beam duration will be ms, depending on the beam loss factor, so the overall duty factor is Duty factor during injection should be ~0.1% or less. Most of the parameters appear to prefer warm DTL, unless a side program is considered, or the required energy changes significantly. Need to carefully examine the cost and performance of both technologies, with the consideration of the newest development in ion source and booster ring MEIC Booster Ring Injection Requirements 8 # Pb charge state depends on stripping energy, which will be chosen to minimize total accelerating voltage, depending on the final particle energy. Here assumes a stripping energy of ~10MeV/u

A conceptual design of the DTL for H - and heavy ions 9 Ion sources RFQ MEBT IH CH3 CH1 CH2 SectionRFQIHCH1CH2CH3 (future upgrade) Lowest Q/A particle to accelerate Pb 30+ Pb 64+ H-H- H-H- Exit E k (MeV/u) Exit β Max V eff (MV) RF source (available for now) 108/162/176MHz tetrode, <=400kW peak/tank, 325 or 352MHz Klystron, 2.8MW peak/tank, <5kW average, may upgrade to magnetron Number of tanks Stripper Total peak RF power (~0.1% duty factor): <20MW for 40MeV Pb/60MeV H -, ~25MW for 100MeV H -. RF system wall-plug power during injection will be ~100kW, depending on duty factor. Average wall plug power will be in the order of 10s of kW, dominated by idle power of the tubes and other equipment. Estimated direct cost for HPRF sources and modulators: ~$10M Capable for >20mA peak current, ms pulse width, 5Hz

Option 2: two DTL linacs sharing RF sources 10 Ion sources RFQ MEBT IH 6 tank CHDTL Total peak RF power (~0.1% duty factor): ~20MW for 50MeV Pb/120MeV H -. Linac 2 can be built later as a future upgrade. H - source RFQ MEBT 4 tank CH CCDTL Linac 1, 50MeV/u Pb 64+ and H - (and all other ions with q/a>1/3) Linac 2, ~120MeV H - 6 klystrons, 325MHz, 2.8MW IH?

Compared to the truncated baseline SRF linac 11 Ion sources RFQ MEBT IH HWR QWR1 QWR2 SectionRFQIHQWR1QWR2HWR Lowest Q/A particle to accelerate Pb 30+ Pb 64+ Exit Pb E k (MeV/u) Exit H E k (MeV/u) Max V eff (MV) RF source115MHz tetrode, <=400kW peak/tank, 115MHz, ~8kW/cav230MHz, ~10kW/cav Number of cavities/tanks Stripper RF power: ~2MW pulsed + ~400kW high duty cycle or CW for 30MeV Pb/95MeV H - 4K Heat load: ~275W (~100W static and ~175W dynamic), needs ~100kW wall plug power to cool, average wall plug power for cryo is ~35kW Capable for 2mA peak current, ms pulse width, 5Hz

The requirements of MEIC injection, especially the pulsed beam time structure, made warm DTL a very attractive option. Some limitations exist for DTL structures, like fixed β profile, and degraded efficiency at higher energy, but won’t eliminate DTL’s advantage. Further design and cost estimate for warm linac (and SRF linac) options is needed for final decision. Summary 12