Custom mechanical sensor support (left and below) allows up to six sensors to be stacked at precise positions relative to each other in beam The e+e- international.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TPAC: A 0.18 Micron MAPS for Digital Electromagnetic Calorimetry at the ILC J.A. Ballin b, R.E. Coath c *, J.P. Crooks c, P.D. Dauncey b, A.-M. Magnan.
Advertisements

A MAPS-based readout of an electromagnetic calorimeter for the ILC Nigel Watson (Birmingham Univ.) Motivation Physics simulations Sensor simulations Testing.
23 Jul 2008Paul Dauncey1 TPAC 1.1 vs TPAC2.0 vs TPAC2.1 Paul Dauncey.
SPIDER Silicon Pixel Detector R&D  Birmingham University (N. Watson, J. Wilson, R. Staley), Bristol University (J. Goldstein, D. Cussans, R. Head, S.
Henri Videau LLR Ecole polytechnique - IN2P3/CNRSCalor Calorimetry optimised for jets Henri Videau Jean- Claude Brient Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet.
Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London.
Jaap Velthuis, University of Bristol SPiDeR SPiDeR (Silicon Pixel Detector Research) at EUDET Telescope Sensor overview with lab results –TPAC –FORTIS.
31 May 2007LCWS R&D Review - Overview1 WWS Calorimetry R&D Review: Overview of CALICE Paul Dauncey, Imperial College London On behalf of the CALICE Collaboration.
Testbeam Requirements for LC Calorimetry S. R. Magill for the Calorimetry Working Group Physics/Detector Goals for LC Calorimetry E-flow implications for.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
10 Nov 2004Paul Dauncey1 MAPS for an ILC Si-W ECAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
1 The MAPS ECAL ECFA-2008; Warsaw, 11 th June 2008 John Wilson (University of Birmingham) On behalf of the CALICE MAPS group: J.P.Crooks, M.M.Stanitzki,
17 May 2007LCWS analysis1 LCWS physics analysis work Paul Dauncey.
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation Report Venkatesh Kaushik 1 Simulation Study of Digital Hadron Calorimeter Using GEM Venkatesh Kaushik* University of Texas.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Particle Physics Department A Novel CMOS Monolithic Active Pixel Sensor with Analog Signal Processing and 100% Fill factor.
Michele Faucci Giannelli TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009 SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter Testbeam results.
Study of a Compensating Calorimeter for a e + e - Linear Collider at Very High Energy 30 Aprile 2007 Vito Di Benedetto.
SPiDeR  First beam test results of the FORTIS sensor FORTIS 4T MAPS Deep PWell Testbeam results CHERWELL Summary J.J. Velthuis.
First Results from Cherwell, a CMOS sensor for Particle Physics By James Mylroie-Smith
Summary of Calorimetry/Muon Sessions Burak Bilki University of Iowa Argonne National Laboratory.
SPiDeR  SPIDER DECAL SPIDER Digital calorimetry TPAC –Deep Pwell DECAL Future beam tests Wishlist J.J. Velthuis for the.
15 Dec 2010 CERN Sept 2010 beam test: Sensor response study Chris Walmsley and Sam Leveridge (presented by Paul Dauncey) 1Paul Dauncey.
7 Apr 2010Paul Dauncey1 Tech Board: DECAL beam test at DESY, March 2010 Paul Dauncey.
Lepton Collider Increased interest in high energy e + e - collider (Japan, CERN, China) STFC funded us for £75k/year travel money in 2015 and 2016 to re-
First tests of CHERWELL, a Monolithic Active Pixel Sensor. A CMOS Image Sensor (CIS) using 180 nm technology James Mylroie-Smith Queen Mary, University.
18 Sep 2008Paul Dauncey1 The UK MAPS/DECAL Project Paul Dauncey for the CALICE-UK MAPS group.
16 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 DECAL beam test at CERN Paul Dauncey for the CALICE-UK/SPiDeR groups: Birmingham, Bristol, Imperial, Oxford, RAL.
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Pion Showers in Highly Granular Calorimeters Jaroslav Cvach on behalf of the CALICE Collaboration Institute of Physics of the ASCR, Na Slovance 2, CZ -
24 Mar 2009Paul Dauncey1 CALICE-UK: The Final Curtain Paul Dauncey, Imperial College London.
Positional and Angular Resolution of the CALICE Pre-Prototype ECAL Hakan Yilmaz.
5 February 2003Paul Dauncey - Calice Status1 CALICE Status Paul Dauncey Imperial College London For the CALICE-UK groups: Birmingham, Cambridge, Imperial,
Advanced Pixel Architectures for Scientific Image Sensors Rebecca Coath, Jamie Crooks, Adam Godbeer, Matthew Wilson, Renato Turchetta CMOS Sensor Design.
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 2 Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 3 Paul Dauncey, Imperial College London.
26 Jan 2010Paul Dauncey1 TPAC papers Paul Dauncey.
Min-DHCAL: Measurements with Pions Benjamin Freund and José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting Max-Planck-Institute, Munich.
Update on the project - selected topics - Valeria Bartsch, Martin Postranecky, Matthew Warren, Matthew Wing University College London CALICE a calorimeter.
CMOS MAPS with pixel level sparsification and time stamping capabilities for applications at the ILC Gianluca Traversi 1,2
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Particle Physics Department G. Villani CALICE MAPS Siena October th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and.
A MAPS-based readout for a Tera-Pixel electromagnetic calorimeter at the ILC Marcel Stanitzki STFC-Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Y. Mikami, O. Miller,
11 October 2002Paul Dauncey - CDR Introduction1 CDR Introduction and Overview Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
Performance of Scintillator-Strip Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the ILC experiment Satoru Uozumi (Kobe University) for the CALICE collaboration Mar 12.
Monolithic and Vertically Integrated Pixel Detectors, CERN, 25 th November 2008 CMOS Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors R. Turchetta CMOS Sensor Design Group.
5 May 2006Paul Dauncey1 The ILC, CALICE and the ECAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
18 Sep 2008Paul Dauncey 1 DECAL: Motivation Hence, number of charged particles is an intrinsically better measure than the energy deposited Clearest with.
DHCAL Jan Blaha R&D is in framework of the CALICE collaboration CLIC08 Workshop CERN, 14 – 17 October 2008.
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
1 Update on the project - selected topics - Valeria Bartsch, Martin Postranecky, Matthew Warren, Matthew Wing University College London.
Elena Rocco Nikhef, The Netherlands On behalf of the ALICE Utrecht-Nikhef group Jamboree – Utrecht December 2012.
9 Sep 2008Paul Dauncey1 MAPS/DECAL Status Paul Dauncey for the CALICE-UK MAPS group.
Advanced Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors with full CMOS capability for tracking, vertexing and calorimetry Marcel Stanitzki STFC-Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
SPiDeR  Status of SPIDER Status/Funding Sensor overview with first results –TPAC –FORTIS –CHERWELL Beam test 09 Future.
Final CALICE OsC meeting: Status and summary of project
for the SPiDeR collaboration (slides from M. Stanitski, Pixel2010)
CEPC 数字强子量能器读出电子学预研进展
Update on DECAL studies for future experiments
SiD Calorimeter R&D Collaboration
On behalf of CEPC calorimeter working group
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
DECAL beam test at CERN Paul Dauncey for the CALICE-UK/SPiDeR groups:
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Presentation transcript:

Custom mechanical sensor support (left and below) allows up to six sensors to be stacked at precise positions relative to each other in beam The e+e- international linear collider (ILC) Planned CM energy in the range 500 GeV to 1 TeV Complements the physics programme of the LHC Electromagnetically interacting particle gives shower in dense material (see right) Usually, sampling calorimeter measures energy deposited in sensitive layers (analogue readout) Concept of digital calorimetry is to measure number of particles in sensitive layers instead TPAC 1.2 Sensor ΔE jet ~ 0.60√E jet ΔE jet ~ 0.30√E jet Beam Test Results Four signal diodes per pixel for efficient charge collection Shaping preamplifier, comparator and individual trim circuit in every pixel (see left) Timing and readout architecture compatible with ILC beam structure CERN and DESY Beam Tests Motivation Paul DAUNCEY, Imperial College London, representing the SPiDeR collaboration Digital Electromagnetic Calorimetry TPAC 1.2 fabricated in 0.18  m INMAPS CMOS 50  m pixel pitch on a 1cm 2 sensor (see left) 168×168 pixel array, 28k pixels total Total of four variants of sensors made, including with and without INMAPS enhancements Standard CMOS process INMAPS deep P-well enhancement INMAPS deep P-well and high-resistivity epitaxial layer, with standard (12  m) and thicker (18  m) layer depth e + e –  ZH, Z   at  s=500 GeV COIL HCAL ECAL Fabricated in “INMAPS” process; enhanced features beyond standard CMOS Deep P-well to prevent signal absorption in circuit N-wells (see right); allows use of full CMOS (NMOS and PMOS) in pixel High-resistivity epitaxial layer for faster signal collection Project tracks to individual sensors Check for sensor hits as a function of position relative to pixel centre to find probability of hit (see right) Determine MIP efficiency by fitting distribution of hit probability to a flat top function, convoluted with a Gaussian to allow for track resolution WW and ZZ separation for different jet energy resolutions shown left (from CALICE collaboration) Sets requirement around  E /E = 30%/  E Most ILC physics processes characterised by multi-jet final states The reconstruction of the invariant mass of two or more jets is critical (see right; from CALICE collaboration) Jet energy resolution major driver for detector design “Particle flow” widely accepted as good technique to achieve required performance Performance of CMOS sensors for a digital electromagnetic calorimeter University of Birmingham USB DAQ master board Sensor mechanical support CAEN power supply USB DAQ readout board Digital: a = 0.9, b = 12.8% Analogue: a =1.1, b = 16.0% Sensitive Layers TPAC sensor TPAC 1.2 sensors tested in beam at CERN (Aug 2009) and DESY (March 2010) All four sensor variants tested in beam 120GeV pion beams at CERN 1-5GeV electron beams at DESY Custom-designed DAQ system (see left) ILC-like timing and readout USB-based interface to Linux PCs Counting particles eliminates resolution contribution from Landau fluctuations Closer to intrinsic stochastic shower variations Fine pixel granularity reduces probability of multiple particles per pixel (see left); allows digital pixel readout High granularity should also improve particle flow Simulation indicates significant resolution improvement in principle (see right) Exact value sensitive to core shower density; not measured at high granularity Resolution needs to be demonstrated in practice Very significant improvement in efficiency found using INMAPS enhanced features compared to standard CMOS process, allowing use of in-pixel PMOS components MIP efficiency per pixel for both CERN and DESY data measured for all four sensor variants (see below) Due to use of in-pixel PMOS transistors, standard CMOS sensors have low efficiency Deep P-well cuts off N-well signal absorption and raises efficiency by factor ~5 Adding high-resistivity epitaxial layer makes further improvement with resulting efficiency close to 100% The TPAC (Tera-Pixel Active Calorimeter) sensor V1.2 is a study sensor to investigate aspects of digital electromagnetic calorimetry MIP leaves average signal of ~1200 electrons in a 12  m epitaxial layer Measure MIP efficiency as a function of digital readout threshold using tracks formed in sensors of other layers Analogue Digital Standard CMOS With INMAPS deep P-well Sensors stacked in beam line DAQ PC SPiDeR Preliminary