Gamma-Ray Bursts and unmagnetized relativistic collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar Caltech.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dimitrios Giannios Purdue Workshop, May 12th 2014 Sironi L. and Giannios D. 2014, ApJ in press, arXiv: Is the IGM heated by TeV blazars?
Advertisements

Many different acceleration mechanisms: Fermi 1, Fermi 2, shear,... (Fermi acceleration at shock: most standard, nice powerlaw, few free parameters) main.
ICECUBE & Limits on neutrino emission from gamma-ray bursts IceCube collaboration Journal Club talk Alex Fry.
Understanding the prompt emission of GRBs after Fermi Tsvi Piran Hebrew University, Jerusalem (E. Nakar, P. Kumar, R. Sari, Y. Fan, Y. Zou, F. Genet, D.
2009 July 8 Supernova Remants and Pulsar Wind Nebulae in the Chandra Era 1 Modeling the Dynamical and Radiative Evolution of a Pulsar Wind Nebula inside.
The Phase-Resolved Spectra of the Crab Pulsar Jianjun Jia Jan 3, 2006.
Neutrinos as probes of ultra-high energy astrophysical phenomena Jenni Adams, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
Low-luminosity GRBs and Relativistic shock breakouts Ehud Nakar Tel Aviv University Omer Bromberg Tsvi Piran Re’em Sari 2nd EUL Workshop on Gamma-Ray Bursts.
Low-luminosity GRBs and Relativistic shock breakouts Ehud Nakar Tel Aviv University Omer Bromberg Re’em Sari Tsvi Piran GRBs in the Era of Rapid Follow-up.
Mario A. Riquelme, Anatoly Spitkovsky Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University Generation of magnetic field upstream of shocks: the cosmic.
Relativistic Particle Acceleration in a Developing Turbulence Relativistic Particle Acceleration in a Developing Turbulence Shuichi M ATSUKIYO ESST Kyushu.
Electromagnetic instabilities and Fermi acceleration at ultra-relativistic shock waves Electromagnetic instabilities and Fermi acceleration at ultra-relativistic.
Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar Krakow Oct. 6, 2008.
GLAST Science LunchDec 1, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/21 Can emission at higher energies provide insight into the physics of shocks and how the GRB inner.
Shock Wave Related Plasma Processes
GRB Prompt Emission: Turbulence, Magnetic Field & Jitter Radiation Jirong Mao.
Astrophysical Jets Robert Laing (ESO). Galactic black-hole binary system Gamma-ray burst Young stellar object Jets are everywhere.
Ehud Nakar California Institute of Technology Gamma-Ray Bursts and GLAST GLAST at UCLA May 22.
Outflow Residual Collisions and Optical Flashes Zhuo Li (黎卓) Weizmann Inst, Israel moving to Peking Univ, Beijing Li & Waxman 2008, ApJL.
1/39 New Relativistic Particle-In-Cell Simulation Studies of Prompt and Early Afterglows from GRBs Ken Nishikawa National Space Science & Technology Center/CSPAR.
Spectral analysis of non-thermal filaments in Cas A Miguel Araya D. Lomiashvili, C. Chang, M. Lyutikov, W. Cui Department of Physics, Purdue University.
Collisionless shocks in Gamma Ray Bursts Current results and future perspectives. Århus, September 2005 Troels Haugbølle Dark Cosmology.
Probing Magnetic Field Structure in GRBs Through Dispersive Plasma Effects on the Afterglow Polarization Amir Sagiv, Eli Waxman & Abraham Loeb GRBs in.
The 511 keV Annihilation Emission From The Galactic Center Department of Physics National Tsing Hua University G.T. Chen 2007/1/2.
A Critical Role for Viscosity in the Radio Mode AGN Feedback Cycle Paul Nulsen Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 2014 July 9X-ray View of Galaxy.
Radiation from Poynting Jets and Collisionless Shocks Edison Liang, Koichi Noguchi Shinya Sugiyama, Rice University Acknowledgements: Scott Wilks, Bruce.
1/39 Ken Nishikawa National Space Science & Technology Center/UAH 38th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, July 2010, Bremen, Germany Collaborators: J.
Interaction among cosmic Rays, waves and large scale turbulence Interaction among cosmic Rays, waves and large scale turbulence Huirong Yan Kavli Institute.
GRB workshop 2008 Nanjing, June 26, 2008 Mikhail Medvedev (KU) Students (at KU): Sarah Reynolds, Sriharsha Pothapragada Simulations: Ken-Ichi Nishikawa.
Yutaka Fujita (Osaka U.) Fuijta, Takahara, Ohira, & Iwasaki, 2011, MNRAS, in press (arXiv: )
Gamma-Ray Burst Polarization Kenji TOMA (Kyoto U/NAOJ) Collaborators are: Bing Zhang (Nevada U), Taka Sakamoto (NASA), POET team Ryo Yamazaki, Kunihito.
Diffusive shock acceleration: an introduction
Relativistic Collisionless Shocks in the Unmagnetized Limit
Hot Electromagnetic Outflows and Prompt GRB Emission Chris Thompson CITA, University of Toronto Venice - June 2006.
Simulation of relativistic shocks and associated radiation from turbulent magnetic fields 2010 Fermi Symposium 9 – 12 May 2011 Rome Italy K.-I. Nishikawa.
Amir Levinson Tel Aviv University Levinson+Bromberg PRL 08 Bromberg et al. ApJ 11 Levinson ApJ 12 Katz et al. ApJ 10 Budnik et al. ApJ 10 Nakar+Sari ApJ.
1 Physics of GRB Prompt emission Asaf Pe’er University of Amsterdam September 2005.
PIC simulations of magnetic reconnection. Cerutti et al D PIC simulations of relativistic pair plasma reconnection (Zeltron code) Includes – Radiation.
The acceleration and radiation in the internal shock of the gamma-ray bursts ~ Smoothing Effect on the High-Energy Cutoff by Multiple Shocks ~ Junichi.
Gamma-Ray Bursts Energy problem and beaming * Mergers versus collapsars GRB host galaxies and locations within galaxy Supernova connection Fireball model.
Gamma-Ray Bursts: Open Questions and Looking Forward Ehud Nakar Tel-Aviv University 2009 Fermi Symposium Nov. 3, 2009.
The effect of neutrinos on the initial fireballs in GRB ’ s Talk based on astro-ph/ (HK and Ralph Wijers) Hylke Koers NIKHEF & University of Amsterdam.
Radiation spectra from relativistic electrons moving in turbulent magnetic fields Yuto Teraki & Fumio Takahara Theoretical Astrophysics Group Osaka Univ.,
Dongsu Ryu (CNU), Magnetism Team in Korea
The Generation of Magnetic Fields and X-ray Observations Yutaka Fujita National Astronomical Observatory, Japan → Osaka University, Japan.
Particle Acceleration by Relativistic Collisionless Shocks in Electron-Positron Plasmas Graduate school of science, Osaka University Kentaro Nagata.
Multiple Sheet Beam Instability of Current Sheets in Striped Relativistic Winds Inertial Parallel E in Neutron Star Magnetospheres: Return Cuurent Sheets.
Multiple Sheet Beam Instability of Current Sheets in Striped Relativistic Winds Jonathan Arons University of California, Berkeley 1.
Ehud Nakar California Institute of Technology Unmagentized relativistic collisionless shock Milos Milosavljevic (Caltech) Anatoly Spitkovsky (KIPAC) Venice.
Expected Gamma-Ray Emission of SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (d = 50 kpc) E.G.Berezhko 1, L.T. Ksenofontov 1, and H.J.Völk 2 1 Yu.G.Shafer Institute.
The non-thermal broadband spectral energy distribution of radio galaxies Gustavo E. Romero Instituto Argentino de Radio Astronomía (IAR-CCT La Plata CONICET)
1/39 Ken Nishikawa National Space Science & Technology Center/UAH Acceleration & Emission Processes at High Energies and their Application to AGN Observatoire.
The impact of magnetic turbulence spectrum on particle acceleration in SNR IC443 I.Telezhinsky 1,2, A.Wilhelm 1,2, R.Brose 1,3, M.Pohl 1,2, B.Humensky.
Rapid high-energy emission variability in relativistic pair plasma reconnection Benoît Cerutti University of Colorado, USA. 5 th International Symposium.
Rice 05/15/07 Simulations: Anatoly Spitkovsky (Princeton) Luis Silva and the Plasma Simulation Group (Portugal) Ken Nishikawa (U. Alabama, Huntsville)
Don Ellison, NCSU, Future HE-Observatory, SNR/CR Working Group Magnetic Field Amplification in Astrophysical Shocks 1)There is convincing evidence for.
Stochastic wake field particle acceleration in Gamma-Ray Bursts Barbiellini G., Longo F. (1), Omodei N. (2), Giulietti D., Tommassini P. (3), Celotti A.
Simulation of relativistic shocks and associated radiation from turbulent magnetic fields 2009 Fermi Symposium 2-5 November 2009 Hyatt Regency Washington,
Fermi Several Constraints by Fermi Zhuo Li ( 黎卓 ) Department of Astronomy, Peking University Kavli Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics 23 August, Xiamen.
A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.
Yizhong Fan (Niels Bohr International Academy, Denmark Purple Mountain Observatory, China)
1/39 Ken Nishikawa National Space Science & Technology Center/UAH DECIPHERING THE ANCIENT UNIVERSE WITH GAMMA- RAY BURSTS Kyoto, April 19 – 23, 2010 Collaborators:
Magnetized Shocks & Prompt GRB Emission
Diffusive shock acceleration: an introduction
The signature of a wind reverse shock in GRB’s Afterglows
Particle acceleration and the microphysics of gamma-ray burst shocks
Edison Liang, Koichi Noguchi Orestes Hastings, Rice University
Intense Coherent Emission in Relativistic Shocks
Gamma-Ray Bursts Ehud Nakar Caltech APCTP 2007 Feb. 22.
FilamenTATION INSTABILITIES IN RELATIVISTIC PLASMA
Presentation transcript:

Gamma-Ray Bursts and unmagnetized relativistic collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar Caltech

Outline - Gamma-Ray bursts – observational constraints on relativistic, unmagnetized collisionless shocks - Electro-static layer in relativistic, unmagnetized collisionless shocks in pair plasma Milosavljevic, Nakar & Spitkovsky, ApJ Constraints on particle acceleration in galaxy cluster merger shocks (M=2-3, mildly magnetized collisionless shocks) Nakar, Milosavljevic, & Nagai, in preparation

NASA web site Gamma-Ray Bursts Flash of  -rays of several seconds Fox et. al., 05 Weeks of decaying radio-X-ray emission – The afterglow

Compact engine Relativistic wind Internal Dissipation  -rays Afterglow External shock Schematic model

The afterglow – Emission from an ion-electron plasma shocked in a relativistic (or mildly relativistic) collisionless unmagnetaized shock. Relativistic: Lorentz factor from 100 to 1.1 Collisionless: Upstream density ~1 prticle/cm -3 l collision ~ cm ; system size R~ cm Unmagnetized: Emitting region width: R/  ~ cm Plasma skin depth: s ~ cm Upstream Larmor radius: R L,p ~10 12 cm (upstream B~  G)

Radiation model Synchrotron Electrons: N(  )   e -p for  e >  min A fraction  e of the internal energy Magnetic field - a fraction  B of the internal energy The model fits for five free parameters: E k, n, p,  e and  B Main microphysical assumptions Thin shock Accelerated electrons and generated magnetic field. Constant  e and  B (in time and space).

The typical parameters that fit the data  e ~ 0.1  B ~ (B does not decay in the downstrem) p = 2-3 E k,iso = erg (Comparable to E  iso  n ~ cm -3 (expected in ISM) At early time (~1hr after the burst) this simple theory often does not work. Theoretical insights on the microphysics is of great need!

GRB afterglow observations (external shocks) suggest: Relativistic unmagnetized collisionless shocks take place in Nature  What initiates such shocks?  What is their steady-state structure? Electrons are accelerated to a power-law at least up to TeV  How?  Does  e and p vary in time, space or initial conditions? Long lasting anisotropic magnetic field is generated  How is it generated?  How can it survive for so long?  What is the source of anisotropy?

Weibel instability (Weibel 59; Fried 59) 2D numerical simulations of relativistic electron-positron beams show filmentation (e.g., Lee & Lampe 73) Weibel instability is suggested as the mechanism responsible for astrophysical relativistic unmagnetized collisionless shocks (Medvedev & Loeb 99; Gruzinov & Waxman 99) Extensive numerical effort with 3D PIC simulations supports this idea (Silva et al; Nordlund et al.; Liang et al.; Jaroschek et al.; Nishikawa et al.; Spitkovsky et al;) What is the source of colissionality in an unmagnetized plasma? Moiseev & Sagdeev 63

3D simulations in pair (and low mass ratio) plasma: But, 3D simulations do not answer yet (partial list): What is the steady-state shock structure? What is the fate of the generated field far in the downstream? Are particles accelerated and how? What is the back reaction of accelerated particles on the shock? Does the same mechanism works in e-p plasma? Are electrons and protons coupled in the shock? Skin depth ( s ) current filaments are generated (The magnetic field coherence length is s ) At the shock  B ~10 -1 The magnetic field is within the shock plane Particles start thermalization and the magnetic field start decaying.

Electro-static layer in the steady-state structure of unmagnetized relativistic pair plasma collsionless shock (Milosavljevic, Nakar & Spitkovsky 06)

The steady-state shock structure Structure guideline: Filamentation arises where cold upstream plasma and hot counter-stream plasma interpenetrate e+e+ e+e+ e-e- e-e-     Cold upstream e+e+ e+e+ e-e- e-e-     e+e+ e-e-   e+e+ e+e+ e-e- ee   e+e+ e+e+ e-e-   ee   Shock layer  Hot downstream e-e-  e+e+ All the discussion is in the shock frame

Two stages in the shock structure: I)Laminar charge separation layer: A nearly maximal charge separation of the upstream takes place in the first generation of filaments producing a quasi-static 2D structure II) Turbulent compression layer Unstable and interacting filaments produce a 3D turbulent layer that isotropize and compress the plasma

What prevents the counterstream particles from escaping the shock layer into the upstream? Filamentation: e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e-e- e-e- e-e- e-e- e-e- J J J Counter-stream Upstream E E E  us >>  cs  E·J<0 The first generation of filaments may functions as a diode protecting the upstream from the downstream The charge separation layer

The first generation of filaments >R L A quasi-static 2D structure with E || may be constructed An electrostatic layer with |    ~  mc 2 ,  B ~1 e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e-e- e-e- e-e- e-e- e-e- J J J Hot Counter-stream Cold Upstream E E E x0x0 A small fraction (<n us /  2 ) of the counterstream escapes to the upstream

Additional properties of the charge- separation layer: Width: s <<  ~(  us /  cs ) 1/2 s <  s Initial deceleration and spreading of the momentum distribution function Almost no upstream compression B || <<B  A small fraction (<n us /  2 ) of the CS particles escapes the shock into the upstream At x=x 0 : Maximal charge separation:  /n~1 Maximal electromagnetic energy:  B ~1 R L,us ~  s I~ (  mc 3 /q) - the Alfven current

X0X0 JxJx Not a steady-state!!! Size: [200×32×32] s Numerical Precursor Simulation by Anatoly Spitkovsky

  us  x/ s n cs /n us y/ s X0X0  /qn>

Shock structure - Conclusions Two stages in the shock structure: I)Quasi-static 2D charge separation layer:  ~m e c 2   /n~1  B ~1 Some counterstream particles do escape to the upstream – candidates for particle acceleration II) Dynamic 3D compression layer Unstable interacting filaments Decaying  B B || ~B 

Main open questions Far in the upstream: What is the fate of the escaping counter stream particles? Are they accelerated? Do they affect the shock structure (e.g, Milosavljevic & Nakar 06) ? Far in the downstream: what fraction of the generated magnetic fields survive? What is the structure p-e - shocks?

Thanks!