Neutrinos and the sea Els de Wolf NIKHEF Ilias Meeting, Prague, February 8 th 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P. Sapienza, Laboratori Nazionali del Sud (INFN)NOW2004, sept A km 3 detector in the Mediterranean: status of NEMO Motivation for a km 3 detector.
Advertisements

Trigger issues for KM3NeT the large scale underwater neutrino telescope the project objectives design aspects from the KM3NeT TDR trigger issues outlook.
Using HOURS to evaluate KM3NeT designs A.Leisos, A. G. Tsirigotis, S.E.Tzamarias In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study VLVnT Athens, 15 October.
Jan 2009 U. Katz: Astroparticle Physics 1 What is KM3NeT – the Vision  Future cubic-kilometre sized neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea  Exceeds.
1 N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Current & Future Research.
AMANDA Lessons Antarctic Muon And Neutrino Detector Array.
ANTARES and KM3NeT John Carr Centre de Physique de Particules de Marseille IN2P3 / MICINN meeting Madrid, 12 Jan 2009.
10/7/2003C.Spiering, VLVNT Workshop1. 10/7/2003C.Spiering, VLVNT Workshop2  With the aim of constructing a detector of km3 scale in the Northern hemisphere,
Status of the ANTARES Neutrino-Telescope Alexander Kappes Physics Institute University Erlangen-Nuremberg for the ANTARES Collaboration WIN´05, 6.–11.
Neutrino Astronomy with KM3NeT  The KM3NeT physics case  What happened so far  The KM3NeT Conceptual Design Report  The Preparatory Phase: Towards.
A. BELIAS, NESTOR Institute, Pylos, Greece TeVPA 2009, July 13-17, SLAC1 KM3NeT, a deep sea neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea KM3NeT objectives.
ANTARES aims, status and prospects Susan Cartwright University of Sheffield.
The KM3NeT Project Design Study for a Deep Sea Facility in the Mediterranean for Neutrino Astronomy and Environmental Sciences Physics Perspectives of.
Neutrino Telescopy in the Mediterranean – ANTARES, KM3NeT and Acoustics  Physics with telescopes  ANTARES: Design and status  The KM3NeT Design Study:
Status of the KM3NeT Project  What happened so far  The KM3NeT Conceptual Design Report  The Preparatory Phase: Towards Implementation 3rd Workshop.
Energy Reconstruction Algorithms for the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope J.D. Zornoza 1, A. Romeyer 2, R. Bruijn 3 on Behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 1.
P. Sapienza, NOW 2010 The KM3NeT project  Introduction & Main objectives  The KM3NeT Technical Design Report  Telescope physics performance  New developments.
KM3NeT: The Future km 3 -Scale Telescope in the Mediterranean Sea  Scientific motivation  Current Projects: ANTARES, NEMO, NESTOR  The KM3NeT Design.
The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope Mieke Bouwhuis 27/03/2006.
Special Issues on Neutrino Telescopy Apostolos G. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University School of Science & Technology Particle and Astroparticle Physics.
Antares/KM3NeT M. de Jong. neutrinos  p Scientific motivation: – origin cosmic rays – birth & composition relativistic jets – mechanism of cosmic particle.
Neutrino Telescopy Today and Tomorrow – Towards km 3 -Scale Detectors  Introduction  Current Projects  Aiming at a km 3 Detector in the Mediterranean.
(Towards) a km 3 detector in the Mediterranean Sea Lee F. Thompson University of Sheffield, UK Neutrino 2004 Conference, Paris, June 18th 2004.
KM3NeT IDM/TeVPA conference 23  28 June 2014, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Maarten de Jong on behalf of the KM3NeT collaboration The next generation neutrino.
Paolo Piattelli - KM3NeTIAPS - Golden, 6-8 may 2008 KM3NeT: a deep-sea neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea Paolo Piattelli - INFN/LNS Catania (Italy)
KM3NeT The Birth of a Giant V. Popa, KM3NeT Collaboration Institute for Space Sciences, Magurele-Bucharest, Romania.
Hanoi, Aug. 6-12, 2006 Pascal Vernin 1 Antares Status report P.Vernin CEA Saclay, Dapnia On behalf of the Antares collaboration P.Vernin
KM3NeT: Towards a km 3 Mediterranean Neutrino Telescope  Some Physics Arguments  Aiming at a km 3 Detector in the Mediterranean Sea  The KM3NeT Design.
C.DistefanoCRIS 2008 – Salina, September The KM3Net Consortium Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Laboratori Nazionali del Sud Towards a km3-scale.
Apostolos Tsirigotis Simulation Studies of km3 Architectures KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting April 2007, Pylos, Greece The project is co-funded by the.
Status of KM3NeT (Detector Design Optimisations) Christopher Naumann, CEA Saclay – IRFU / SPP for the KM3NeT consortium 44 th Reconcontres de Moriond,
KM3NET 24 September 2004 Gerard van der Steenhoven (NIKHEF)
RICH th International Workshop for Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters September 15 th – 20 th 2007, Trieste – Italy September 15 th – 20 th 2007, Trieste.
Petten 29/10/99 ANTARES an underwater neutrino observatory Contents: – Introduction – Neutrino Astronomy and Physics the cosmic ray spectrum sources of.
CEA DSM Irfu The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope A status report Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 44 th Rencontres de Moriond February.
Piera Sapienza – VLVNT Workshop, 5-8 october 2003, Amsterdam Introduction and framework Simulation of atmospheric  (HEMAS and MUSIC) Response of a km.
V.Bertin CPPM / ANTARES Coll. - Moriond ANTARES : A deep-sea 0.1 km² neutrino telescope Vincent Bertin - CPPM-Marseille on behalf of the Antares.
Susan Cartwright IDM2000 ANTARES : vStatus u site evaluation u demonstrator u detector design vProspects u physics aims u neutralino detection status and.
XXIII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics 2008 Christchurch, New Zealand Contacts:
SINP MSU, July 7, 2012 I.Belolaptikov behalf BAIKAL collaboration.
Tools and Methods for Underwater, High Energy Neutrino Telescopy A.G.Tsirigotis, A. Leisos, S.E.Tzamarias Physics Laboratory, School of Science and Technology,
Tools and Methods for simulation and evaluation of Very Large Volume Cherenkov Neutrino detectors: Optimization and Evaluation of proposed KM3NeT designs.
Antares Neutrino Telescope Jean-Pierre Ernenwein Université de Haute Alsace (On behalf of the ANTARES collaboration) Rencontres de Moriond, 13/03/2005.
Why Neutrino ? High energy photons are absorbed beyond ~ 150Mpc   HE  LE  e - e + HE s are unique to probe HE processes in the vicinity of cosmic.
ANTARES  Physics motivation  Recent results  Outlook 4 senior physicists, ~5 PhD students, ~5 technicians M. de Jong RECFA 23 September 2005.
KM3NeT International Solvay Institutes 27  29 May 2015, Brussels, Belgium. Maarten de Jong Astro-particle and Oscillations Research with Cosmics in the.
The NEMO Project: Toward a km 3 Neutrino Telescope in the Mediterranean Sea M. Circella, INFN Bari NUPPAC-05, Nov The NEMO Project (NEutrino Mediterranean.
Neutrino Telescopy in the Mediterranean Sea – Towards the km 3 -Scale Detector KM3NeT  Introduction  Current Deep-Sea Projects  Aiming at a km 3 Detector.
March 02, Shahid Hussain for the ICECUBE collaboration University of Delaware, USA.
Alexander Kappes Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics for the ANTARES collaboration IAU GA, SpS 10, Rio de Janeiro, Aug Status of Neutrino.
Time over Threshold electronics for an underwater neutrino telescope G. Bourlis, A.G.Tsirigotis, S.E.Tzamarias Physics Laboratory, School of Science and.
Underwater Neutrino Detection in the Mediterranean Sea: From Presence to Future  Scientific Case: Some highlights  Current Projects: ANTARES, NEMO, NESTOR.
Astroparticle physics with large neutrino detectors  Existing detectors  Physics motivation  Antares project  KM3NeT proposal M. de Jong.
Status report on the Antares project Luciano Moscoso (DSM/DAPNIA, CEA/Saclay F Gif-sur-Yvette) (On behalf of the ANTARES collaboration)
Sebastian Kuch, Rezo Shanidze Preliminary Studies of the KM3NeT Physics Sensitivity KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting Pylos, Greece, April 2007.
KM 3 Neutrino Telescope European deep-sea research infrastructure DANS – symposium Maarten de Jong.
Comparison of different km3 designs using Antares tools Three kinds of detector geometry Incoming muons within TeV energy range Detector efficiency.
STATUS AND PHYSICS GOALS OF KM3NET Paolo Piattelli P. Piattelli, ICHEP14 Valencia INFN – LNS, Catania (Italy)
Antares status and plans  Reminder  Project status  Plans M. de Jong.
Status and Perspectives of the BAIKAL-GVD Project Zh.-A. Dzhilkibaev, INR (Moscow), for the Baikal Collaboration for the Baikal Collaboration September.
Neutrino telescopes: ANTARES and KM3NeT Maarten de Jong Programme: Group composition (current): 6+2 staff, 4 post-doc, 4 PhD. Vidi 1, Veni 1+1.
Status report Els de Wolf Annual Meeting 2011, Nikhef.
Alexander Kappes ECAP, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg for the KM3NeT Consortium 2009 EPS HEP, Krakow, 16. July 2009 The KM3NeT project: Towards a km 3 -scale.
KM3NeT Neutrino conference 2-7 June 2014, Boston, U.S.A. Maarten de Jong on behalf of the KM3NeT collaboration The next generation neutrino telescope in.
KM3NeT P.Kooijman Universities of Amsterdam & Utrecht for the consortium.
P.Kooijman, UVA-GRAPPA, UU, Nikhef
The Antares Neutrino Telescope
M.Bou-Cabo, J.A. Martínez.-Mora on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration
on behalf of the NEMO Collaboration
(Towards) a km3 detector in the Mediterranean Sea
Presentation transcript:

neutrinos and the sea Els de Wolf NIKHEF Ilias Meeting, Prague, February 8 th 2005

2 KM3NeT, what is it? Design study for a Deep Sea Facility in the Mediterranean for Neutrino Astronomy and Associated Sciences Design study for a Deep Sea Facility in the Mediterranean for Neutrino Astronomy and Associated Sciences Objective: develop cost-effective design of a 1 km 3 neutrino telescope (~ 200 M€) Objective: develop cost-effective design of a 1 km 3 neutrino telescope (~ 200 M€) Participants from existing collaborations: Participants from existing collaborations: + + +…

3 Participating countries

4 Outline Purpose of -telescopes Purpose of -telescopes -telescopes in the Mediterranean -telescopes in the Mediterranean The KM3NeT project The KM3NeT project –History –Why in Mediterranean Sea –Physics Motivation –Design Requirements –Design Considerations –Challenges Gamma-Ray Bursts Active Galactic Nuclei

5 Purpose of Neutrino Telescopes Astrophysics ( -astronomy): Astrophysics ( -astronomy): –Identify point sources –Composition of jets –Origin of cosmic acceleration –Diffuse fluxes Particle physics: Particle physics: –Dark Matter searches:  Neutralinos –Monopoles –Origin of UHE-cosmic rays (extra) galactic -sources Neutralino search:  → +…

6 Dumand Baikal Amanda Icecube Neutrino Telescopes Projects Mediterrennean km 3 Antares NEMO NESTOR

7 Detection Principle Neutrino reactions (key reaction is  N   X) Cross sections and mechanisms known from accelerators Cross sections and mechanisms known from accelerators Extrapolation to high energy (> 100 TeV) uncertain Extrapolation to high energy (> 100 TeV) uncertain

8 ANTARES Flexible strings 10” PMTs, looking downwards 2500 m depth 40 km offshore Toulon 70 m between strings 14.5 m between storeys One junction box

9 Measurements from an ANTARES Prototype String Measurements from an ANTARES Prototype String Rate measurements: strong fluctuation of bioluminescence background observed Rate measurements: strong fluctuation of bioluminescence background observed Also measured: current velocity and direction, line heading and shape, temperature, humidity,... Important input for preparation and optimisation of ANTARES operation 10min Rate (kHz) time (s) ANTARES deep sea data 10min

10 NESTOR Rigid tower structure (titanium) Dry mateable connectors 15” up- and downward looking PMTs 3800 m deep Near Pylos Tower 32 m diameter 30 m between floors 144 PMTs First floor (reduced size) deployed and operated in 2003

11 NESTOR: atmospheric muon flux Zenith Angle (degrees) (1/N)dN/dcos(θ) M.C. Prediction Data Points

12 ….and comparison with others Good agreement confirms precise understanding of detector response, calibration, simulation and efficiencies

13 NEMO project 3340 m deep 80 km off shore Catania 16 arms per tower 20 m arm length Arms 40 m apart 64 PMTs per tower Up- and down-looking PMTs Wet mateable connectors Hierarchy of junction boxes

14 NEMO objectives Extensive site exploration R&D for km3: architecture, mechanical structures, readout, electronics, … Test installation foreseen with all critical components Completion expected by 2006

15 History KM3NeT July 2002: HENAP report to PaNAGIC July 2002: HENAP report to PaNAGIC  “... a km3-scale detector in the Northern hemisphere should be built to complement the IceCube detector being constructed at the South Pole.” October 2003: VLV T workshop in Amsterdam October 2003: VLV T workshop in Amsterdam  ANTARES, NEMO, NESTOR  Also industrial presentations e.g. Hamamatsu, Photonis, ETL, Saclant, Nautilus, Seacon, Ocean Design, …  March 2004: KM3NeT EU FP6 Design Study submitted March 2004: KM3NeT EU FP6 Design Study submitted

16 Why in the Mediterranean Sea? Sky view complementary to ICECUBE Sky view complementary to ICECUBE Deep sites (up to ~5000m) close to shore: Deep sites (up to ~5000m) close to shore: –shielding against atmospheric muons –good infrastructure –easy to reach by boat –short cable to shore –repair of detector line feasible Long scattering length Long scattering length –good pointing accuracy Experience of NESTOR, ANTARES, NEMO Experience of NESTOR, ANTARES, NEMO

17 KM3NeT and IceCube Complementary sky views * : Complementary sky views * : (*) ANTARES location provides a sky coverage of 3.5 p sr and an instantaneous common view with AMANDA of 0.5 p sr, and about 1.5 p sr common view per day. The Galactic centre is visible 2/3 of the time. Region of sky seen in galactic coordinates assuming 100% efficiency for 2  down KM3NeT galactic centre Not seen Mkn 501 GX339-4 SS433 CRAB VELA IceCube Mkn 501 Mkn 421 CRABSS433 Not seen

18 Scientific motivation HESS supernova remnant RXJ

19 KM3NeT Design Requirements Effective volume: 1 km3, expandable Effective volume: 1 km3, expandable Angular resolution: close to intrinsic resolution ( 10 TeV) Angular resolution: close to intrinsic resolution ( 10 TeV) Maximal angular acceptance for all possible detectable neutrino signals including down-going neutrinos at VHE Maximal angular acceptance for all possible detectable neutrino signals including down-going neutrinos at VHE Lower energy threshold of a few 100 GeV for upward going neutrinos with the possibility to go lower for from known point sources Lower energy threshold of a few 100 GeV for upward going neutrinos with the possibility to go lower for from known point sources Energy reconstruction within a factor of 2 for muon events Energy reconstruction within a factor of 2 for muon events For all neutrino flavors For all neutrino flavors Field of view: close to 4  Field of view: close to 4  Source tracking → from satellites: Source tracking → from satellites: Duty cycle close to 100% Duty cycle close to 100% Operational lifetime ≥ 10 years Operational lifetime ≥ 10 years Cost effectiveness ~ 200 M€ per km 3 Cost effectiveness ~ 200 M€ per km 3 All parameters need optimisation

20 Associated Sciences KM3Net Infrastructure will cooperate with the European Sea Floor Observatory Network KM3Net Infrastructure will cooperate with the European Sea Floor Observatory Network Long term and continuous monitoring of ocean environment around Europe: – –Environment and Security – –Geohazards – –Global change – –Biodiversity

21 Design Considerations Detector architecture Detector architecture Photo detection Photo detection Calibration Calibration Mechanics Mechanics Readout and Data Transfer Readout and Data Transfer Deployment and Sea operations Deployment and Sea operations Power distribution Power distribution Cost (~ 200 M€) Cost (~ 200 M€) Highly interconnected

22 Detector Architecture homogeneous lattice 20 x 20 x 20 downward-looking 10 “ photomultiplier tubes 20 x 60 m = 1200 m Homogenous strings?Towers? D. Zaborov at VLV T

23 Detector Architecture homogeneous lattice 20 x 20 x 20 downward-looking 10 “ photomultiplier tubes 20 x 60 m = 1200 m Homogenous strings? D. Zaborov at VLV T

24 Detector Architecture Top view 50 x 20 m = 1000 m 250 m 50 floors 20 m step 25 towers, each consists of 7 strings PMTs are directed downwards Towers? D. Zaborov at VLV T

25 Detector Architecture D. Zaborov at VLV T 200 m 16 x 40 m = 640 m 40 m 20 m Top view 16 floors with 4 PMTs each 40 m floor step 64 NEMO - towers Towers?

26 Sea Operations Rigid towers or flexible strings? Rigid towers or flexible strings? Connection in air (no ROVs) or Connection in air (no ROVs) or wet mateable connectors? Deployment from platform Deployment from platform or boat?

27 Photo Detection Glass pressure vessel < 17” Glass pressure vessel < 17” Hamamatsu 15” used by NESTOR Hamamatsu 15” used by NESTOR Requirements for photo detection: Requirements for photo detection: –High QE –Large photocathode areas –Wide angular coverage –Good single photon resolution resolution –High dynamic range Example of a device discussed: Hamamatsu HY0010 HPD Excellent np.e. resolution

28 Photo Detection Options Large segmented photocathode area with arrays of small PMTs packed into pressure housings - low cost! Large segmented photocathode area with arrays of small PMTs packed into pressure housings - low cost! Determine the photon direction via, e.g. Determine the photon direction via, e.g. –Multi-anodic PMTs plus a matrix of Winston cones

29 Readout and Data Transfer The data rate from a KM3 detector will be high - estimated at Gb/s The data rate from a KM3 detector will be high - estimated at Gb/s Questions to be addressed: Questions to be addressed: –Optimal data transfer to shore (many fibres + few colours, few fibres + many colours, etc.) –How much processing to be done at the optical module –Analogue vs. digital OMs - implies differing approaches to design of front end electronics –Data filtering will play an important role –Distribution of (raw?) data to data analysis centres One possible data distribution concept One possible data distribution concept Application of current PP GRID technologies to some of these open questions? Application of current PP GRID technologies to some of these open questions?

30 KM3NeT Challenges Design: Design: –Simplify off-shore electronics (‘all-data-to-shore’) –Separate detection and calibration functionalities? Production model: Production model: –Start construction at end of design study (TDR) –Multiple production and lines or structures –Multiple production and assembly lines or structures –Pressure and shallow water tests at production sites –Transport and deployment ‘as is –Transport and deployment ‘as is’ Site selection: Site selection: –France, Italy or Greece

31 KM3NeT Production Model? Estimated size of the production: Estimated size of the production: – optical modules –400 detector units (“lines”) –40 calibration units Start of data taking: 2012 Start of data taking: 2012 –Start design study: 2006 –Start of production: / day 12 / month 1.5 / month Production time of 3 years 5 – 6 production sites are needed

32 Final choice will depend on Final choice will depend on –Depth –Accessibility –Distance from shore –Bioluminescence rate rate –Sedimentation –Sea current –Access to high speed networks on shore –…… –Socio-political/regional considerations Site Selection ?

33 Summary Compelling scientific argument for complementing IceCube with a km 3 scale detector in the Northern Hemisphere Compelling scientific argument for complementing IceCube with a km 3 scale detector in the Northern Hemisphere The Mediterranean projects NESTOR, ANTARES and NEMO provide knowledge and experience for deep sea telescopes The Mediterranean projects NESTOR, ANTARES and NEMO provide knowledge and experience for deep sea telescopes The FP6 KM3NeT Design Study has been accepted The FP6 KM3NeT Design Study has been accepted Foreseen start of the DS early 2006 Foreseen start of the DS early 2006 Objective of the DS: TDR end 2008 Objective of the DS: TDR end 2008