John Carwardine 13 th April, 2011 Report on the 9mA program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Advertisements

J. Branlard ALCPG11 – March 2011 – Eugene OR, USA Results from 9mA studies on achieving flat gradients with beam loading P K |Q L studies at FLASH.
SCRF Cavity R&D Goal and ILC Operational Gradient Akira Yamamoto: Prepared for discussions at Cavity Webex Meeting, July 20, , A. Yamamoto1SCRF.
April SCRF Meeting FNAL08 S.Fukuda 1 HLRF Summary and Work Assignment S. FUKUDA KEK.
ILC RF phase stability requirements and how can we demonstrate them Sergei Nagaitsev Oct 24, 2007.
Working Group 1: Microwave Acceleration Summary 10 July 2009.
1 9 mA study at FLASH on Sep., 2012 Shin MICHIZONO (KEK) LCWS12(Sep.24) Shin MICHIZONO Outline I.Achievement before Sep.2012 II.Study items for ILC III.
5 th CLIC X-band collaboration meetingWalter Wuensch16 May 2011 CLIC rf structure program.
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg FEL driver linac operation with very short electron bunches.
Akira Yamamoto Project Manager, SCRF To be presented, April 19, 2009 AAP Review – SCRF Introduction AAP-SCRF-Introduction.
SCRF Monthly WebEx Meeting June 30, 2010 Agenda 1.Report from PMs (5 min.) 2.General Report from Group Leaders(15 min.) 3.Special Discussions 1.TDP R&D.
Highlights from LINAC 12 in Tel Aviv, Israel Jürgen Pfingstner Alexander Gerbershagen.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
TTF-II Status & Prospectives Nick Walker DESY 5 th ITRP Meeting – CALTECH.
Proposed TDR baseline LLRF design J. Carwardine, 22 May 2012.
LLRF ILC GDE Meeting Feb.6,2007 Shin Michizono LLRF - Stability requirements and proposed llrf system - Typical rf perturbations - Achieved stability at.
Recent Experiments at PITZ ICFA Future Light Sources Sub-Panel Mini Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-RAY FELs August 18-22, 2003 at DESY-Zeuthen,
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
John Carwardine 5 th June 2012 Developing a program for 9mA studies shifts in Sept 2012.
Cavity Gradient for the R&D and ILC Operation Akira Yamamoto ILC-GDE SCRF Presented at the AD&I meeting held at DESY, Dec. 2-3, 2009 A, Yamamoto,
Marc Ross Nick Walker Akira Yamamoto ‘Overhead and Margin’ – an attempt to set standard terminology 10 Sept 2010 Overhead and Margin 1.
ML Planning for ILC08 First Pass + SCRF agenda Chris Adolphsen Hitoshi Hayano.
ML Planning for ILC08 First Pass Chris Adolphsen Hitoshi Hayano.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 1 High-Gradient Module Test Lutz Lilje.
ILC-BAW1 ML Accelerator Operational Gradient Introduction Akira Yamamoto, Marc Ross and Nick Walker GDE Project Managers Reported at BAW1, held at KEK,
SRF Requirements and Challenges for ERL-Based Light Sources Ali Nassiri Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory 2 nd Argonne – Fermilab Collaboration.
1 Simulation for power overhead and cavity field estimation Shin Michizono (KEK) Performance (rf power and max. cavity MV/m 24 cav. operation.
Preparation for Sept 9mA studies: Follow-up items from February J. Carwardine, 22 May 2012.
Horizontal Test Stands and CC2 Results Andy Hocker Testing an alternative ILC cavity design at USPAS (Q 0 =2.23E+02)
Nick Walker (DESY) John Carwardine (ANL) GDE ILC10 Beijing March 2010 Cryomodule String Test: TTF/FLASH 9mA Experiment.
John Carwardine 21 st October 2010 TTF/FLASH 9mA studies: Main studies objectives for January 2011.
AS TAG Leaders Meeting PM Report. Topics R&D Plan release 4 ADI WebEx meetings (cost and design) Central region integration face-to-face meetings.
ILC Accelerator Operational Gradient Akira Yamamoto: SCRF Webex Meeting, July 28, , A. Yamamoto1SCRF Cavity Meeting.
John Carwardine 29 October, mA meeting 1. Agenda 9mA workshop Data analysis DAQ refresher / online database 2.
Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Americas Region Team WBS x.2 Global Systems Program Overview for FY08/09.
John Carwardine 20 April 09 Preliminary planning for Aug/Sept studies.
Progress and Plans for R&D and the Conceptual Design of the ILC Main Linacs H. Hayano, KEK PAC2005 5/18/2005.
John Carwardine (Argonne) First Baseline Allocation Workshop at KEK September 2010 Experience from FLASH ‘9mA’ experiments Gradient and RF Power Overhead.
@ Fermilab ILC bunch-compressor and linac rf requirements Sergei Nagaitsev Fermilab Feb. 9, 2006.
LLRF at FLASH for 9mA Program, ILC08, Nov. 19, 2008 LLRF for the FLASH 9mA Program S. Simrock DESY, Hamburg, Germany.
BEAMLINE HOM ABSORBER O. Nezhevenko, S. Nagaitsev, N. Solyak, V. Yakovlev Fermi National Laboratory December 11, 2007 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop.
John Carwardine January 16, 2009 Some results and data from January studies.
PM Report AS ILC PAC (19-20 May) Agenda: –Akira, Rongli, Hitoshi H, Marc, Nick, Toshiaki, Mark P., Peter G. –Nick will report on Design –Marc.
CFS / Global – 09 June, 2010 PM Report: SB2009: –4 two-day workshops form the core of ‘TOP LEVEL CHANGE CONTROL’ –  as advised by AAP, PAC and etc –Written.
Overview of long pulse experiments at NML Nikolay Solyak PXIE Program Review January 16-17, PXIE Review, N.Solyak E.Harms, S. Nagaitsev, B. Chase,
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
ML-SCRF: Monthly WebEx Meeting April 4, Reports from PMs (20 min.) GDE activity and meeting plan Summary document of SCRF-Baseline Technical Review.
Matthias Liepe. Matthias Liepe – High loaded Q cavity operation at CU – TTC Topical Meeting on CW-SRF
A Proposal for FJPPL (TYL) Development of Frequency Tuners Optimization and Cryomodule Integration for 1.3 GHz SRF Cavities G. Devanz, F. Nunio, O. Napoly.
RF control and beam acceleration under XFEL conditions Studies of XFEL-type Beam Acceleration at FLASH Julien Branlard, Valeri Ayvazyan, Wojciech Cichalewski,
FLASH. Free-Electron Laser in Hamburg TTF/FLASH: Injector Performance Dark Current Video ‘flags’ Comments based on Desy visit, 5 th May, /19/2010Desy.
Overview Step by step procedure to validate the model (slide 1 and 2) Procedure for the Ql / beam loading study (slide 3 and 4)
John Carwardine TDR Writing: FLASH 9mA Experiment.
Longitudinal dynamic analysis for the 3-8 GeV pulsed LINAC G. Cancelo, B. Chase, Nikolay Solyak, Yury Eidelman, Sergei Nagaitsev, Julien Branlard.
PM Report CFS /Gbl ILC PAC (19-20 May) Agenda: –Akira, Rongli, Hitoshi H, Marc, Nick, Toshiaki, Mark P., Peter G. –Nick will report on Design.
dependence on QL can not longer be seen
Studies Leader Report: 9mA webex meeting, 15th March 2011
LLRF systems status update
Planning the Experiment
Outlook of future studies to reach maximum gradient and current
2. SCRF General Preparation for the AD&I Preparation for AAP Review
Longitudinal Diagnostics for start-up
CW Operation of XFEL Modules
LCLS Commissioning Parameters
Nick Walker (DESY) EU GDE Meeting Oxford
“Workshop on Linac Operation with Long Bunch Trains” Summary
Injector: What is needed to improve the beam quality?
Summary of the maximum SCRF voltage in XFEL
Presentation transcript:

John Carwardine 13 th April, 2011 Report on the 9mA program

Topics Parallel session on 9mA studies at ALCPG, four presentations: –Carwardine: Results of the 9mA studies in Feb 2011 –Grecki: Detuning compensation during the 9mA studies –Branlard: Results from 9mA studies on achieving flat gradients with beam –Chase: preparing for future 9mA studies Data Acquisition System access / analysis –Enhanced data browsing tool: beta version was released to a small group for testing –Working on setting up a mirror for the 9mA studies data at either Fermilab or Argonne to give more convenient access for data analysis Long Bunch-trains Workshop has been announced (at DESY, 6-8 th June) Only two additional 9mA studies periods are likely before the end of 2012 ( Spring and Autumn 2012) –Assessing progress towards the TDP R&D Goals for 9mA studies… 2

Long bunch-trains workshop: June 6-8 th at DESY The '9mA' programme remains a central theme of the workshop, but in keeping with the broader issues of the challenges of operations with long bunch-trains and the spirit of the first meeting, this workshop will also focus on specific issues relevant to FLASH VUV-FEL and future European XFEL operations Unlike the first workshop, this meeting will be entirely plenary with no parallel working groups The time will be divided into sessions dedicated to the following themes: 1.Results from 9mA studies on controlling cavity gradient slopes 2.Preparing for future 9mA studies 3.Feedback control of longitudinal phase space 4.Concurrent operation modes for FLASH and FLASH2 5.Machine protection for long bunch-train operation 6.Beam-based feedback and rf field-control 3

Tentative timetable for Long Bunch-trains workshop: (at DESY, June 6-8, 2011) MondayTuesdayWednesday 09:00 – 10:30 DAQ tools tutorials?Feedback control of longitudinal phase space Machine protection 11:00 – 12:30 DAQ tools tutorials?Feedback control of longitudinal phase space Concurrent modes for FLASH and FLASH2 14:00 – 15:30 Opening Session (13:30 – 15:30) Welcome (10min) Long bunch train operations at FLASH (40min) Photon science operations with long bunch trains (20min) Scope/Goals for WS (20min) 9mA studies analysis and results 9mA future studies 16:00 – 17:30 9mA studies analysis and results9mA future studiesClosing session Workshop Dinner Workshop site: Webex will be available

LBT Workshop Session Leaders Feedback control of longitudinal phase space – TBA Operations modes for FLASH2 – TBA Machine protection for long bunch-train operation –S. Schreiber + N. Walker Results and analysis from 9mA studies in February 2011 –M. Ross + M. Grecki Looking toward future 9mA studies –J. Carwardine + TBA 5

TDP Phase 9mA R&D program 6

TDP R&D Plan (Rel.5): Studies and development activities Modeling of the cavity / HLRF/ power distribution / LLRF control system, including –‘Lorentz Force detuning’ and microphonics –Development of LLRF controls –Integration of high-power linac machine protection systems –Studies of needed RF power and cavity gradient overhead –Studies of long-term RF stability –Studies and demonstrations of ILC bunch compressor RF stability 7

How well are we doing with the TDP R&D 9mA goals? Demonstrate principles of tailoring Pks/Qls to flatten cavity gradients with beam loading Module operation close to quench with ILC-like gradients & gradient spread and ILC-like beams Next logical steps 1.Flatten gradients on all 16 cavities with 6mA / 800us bunch-trains, including Better control of systematic errors Automated procedures for Pk/Ql optimization 2.Operation of all 16 cavities within a few percent of quench with 6mA / 800us bunch-trains Done, but not yet at maximum gradients and 9mA Preparatory studies at NML...?

A list of questions from Marc… How will we meet ‘S2’ goals in general, and specifically the TDP RD goals? In general we won’t be able to do it all – what are the problems and limits?: –Cavity detuning measurement –Cavity gradient – what do we miss with only limited high grad cavities? –Beam current – what do we miss by having ½ nominal 9 mA? –Coupler performance –LDF compensation performance –Q-loaded adjustment control –Integral / proportional feedback; gain –What should we plan to do at FLASH, next run? –Other test facilities? –Dark current interaction with linac operation. –Data analysis – what’s been done? What is needed? What is basic? (svd?) 9

What about gradient…? ACC67 modules at FLASH have operating gradient spread around +/-25% Max. gradient: ~38MV/m Highest average gradient used during Feb 2011 studies was ~23MV/m There is good justification for extrapolating to ILC operating gradients Carefully consider gradient context of the next 9mA studies We already have experience cavities at the upper end of the TDP gradient range (38MV/m) ACC6 ACC MV/m

It was a strategic decision not to push for 9mA for the Feb ‘11 studies Achieving flat gradients with up to 5mA was already expected to be quite difficult Operations rationale –Achieving stable long bunch-train operation at 3nC could have taken a large fraction of the 15 shifts available –Much could still be learnt with beam current less than 9mA –We operated in ‘FEL Mode’ with bunch charge up to ~1.7nC –It was a good decision to not push for 9mA for this studies period An open issue for future studies: when (or whether) to push to get 9mA before the end of 2012 (personal view: stick to ~6mA) –Will take into account TDP baseline current + FLASH operations

February 9mA studies were very positive: bodes well for future studies periods Flawless operation of the FLASH accelerator Good progress towards TDP R&D goals –Achieved flat gradients +/-few % at 1.5mA - 4.5mA –Gradient spreads up to 17-25MV/m –Lorentz-force detuning compensation with beam loading Significant operational experience, insight into practical issues: –Fine control of and repeatability of setting Loaded-Q –Absolute measurements: Loaded Q, Detuning TDP R&D goals for 9mA program are challenging, especially with such limited studies time – but significant additional progress can be made on (all) the key issues 12

13