Mercury DPSSL Driver: Smoothing, Zooming and Chamber Interface Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Ray Beach, John Perkins, Wayne Meier, Chris Ebbers,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development Paths for IFE Mike Campbell General Atomics FPA 25 th Anniversary Meeting December 13,2004.
Advertisements

Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation,
M. S. Tillack, J. E. Pulsifer, K. L. Sequoia Grazing-Incidence Metal Mirrors for Laser-IFE Third IAEA Technical Meeting on “Physics and Technology of Inertial.
Laser Inertial Fusion Energy Presentation to Fusion Power Associates, Washington DC, December 2010 Mike Dunne LLNL in partnership with LANL, GA, LLE, U.
Systems Analysis for Modular versus Multi-beam HIF Drivers * Wayne Meier – LLNL Grant Logan – LBNL 15th International Symposium on Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update - Spot Size Model Changes* ARIES Meeting April 22-23, 2002 * This work.
Background on GIMM studies in HAPL Challenges for a final optic optical requirements environmental threats system integration Design choices Logic pursued.
Threats to the GIMM and Use of XAPPER for Testing Jeff Latkowski Ryan Abbott February 15, 2006.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update* ARIES e-Meeting October 17, 2001 * This work was performed under the auspices.
An Update Point Design for Heavy Ion Fusion Wayne Meier LLNL ARIES Meeting Jan. 8-9, 2003 UC San Diego Work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
Stewart Shen October 27, LCLS-XTOD Gas Attenuator LCLS FAC Meeting October 27, 2005 Stewart Shen, Keith Kishiyama and Marty Roeben.
Findings and Recommendations from Wetted-Wall IFE Designs Jeff Latkowski Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory March 9, 2001 Work performed under the.
LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Feasibility study on Scalable Self-Phase Locking of two beam combination using stimulated Brillouin scattering.
Shielding of the Final Focusing System in the HIF Point Design* by Jeff Latkowski and Wayne Meier ARIES Projct Meeting January 8-9, 2003 *Work performed.
1 ARIES IFE - Some Concluding Comments on Thick Liquid Walls Wayne Meier, Ryan Abbott, Jeff Latkowski, Ralph Moir, Susana Reyes ARIES Project Meeting September.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Per Peterson UC Berkeley Updated Heavy Ion Driver Parameters for Snowmass Point Design ARIES Meeting July.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Driver Model Update* ARIES IFE Meeting LLNL March 8-9, 2001 * This work was performed under the.
Sasha GilevichFacilities Advisory Committee April Injector Drive Laser Update Facilities Advisory Committee Meeting April.
1 Radiation Environment at Final Optics of HAPL Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI HAPL GIMM Conference Call.
October 19, 2003 Fusion Power Associates Status of Fast Ignition-High Energy Density Physics Joe Kilkenny Director Inertial Fusion Technology General Atomics.
1 Introduction A plan to develop electrical power with Laser Fusion in 35 years less than John Sethian (NRL) Steve Obenschain (NRL), Camille Bibeau (LLNL),
Phase II Considerations: Diode Pumped Solid State Laser (DPSSL) Driver for Inertial Fusion Energy Steve Payne, Camille Bibeau, Ray Beach, and Andy Bayramian.
The High Average Power Laser Program in DOE/DP Coordinated, focussed, multi-lab effort to develop the science and technology for Laser Fusion Energy Coordinated,
December 17, 2014 StarDriver: An Update (a) EIMEX, 107 Siebe Drive, Fairfield, CA 94534, (925) (b) Sandia Natl Lab, (c) WFK Lasers, (d) Logos,
Mercury Laser Driver Reliability Considerations HAPL Integration Group Earl Ault June 20, 2005 UCRL-POST
October 16-18, 2012Working Group on Space-based Lidar Winds 1 AEOLUS STATUS Part 1: Design Overview.
Long Term Exposure of Candidate First Wall Materials on XAPPER February – May 2004 Presented by: Jeff Latkowski XAPPER Team: Ryan Abbott, Robert Schmitt,
Ion Mitigation for Laser IFE Optics Ryan Abbott, Jeff Latkowski, Rob Schmitt HAPL Program Workshop Los Angeles, California, June 2, 2004 This work was.
This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by the University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under.
October 30th, 2007High Average Power Laser Program Workshop 1 Long lifetime optical coatings for 248 nm: development and testing Presented by: Tom Lehecka.
Beam alignment and incorporation into optical design
How does laser cost scaling affect the power plant optimization? HAPL Program Meeting PPPL Dec 12-13, 2006 Wayne Meier LLNL Work performed under the auspices.
Modeling efforts on the Mercury Laser system Mercury Andy Bayramian, Camille Bibeau, Ray Beach Prop ’92 work: Ron White French Collaboration with MIRO:Olivier.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
Fusion Magic? “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Radical, transformative technologies typically appear ‘impossible’
UCRL-PRES Magnet Design Considerations & Efficiency Advantages of Magnetic Diversion Concept W. Meier & N. Martovetsky LLNL HAPL Program Meeting.
The High Average Power Laser (HAPL) Program We are developing Fusion Energy with lasers, based primarily on direct drive targets and dry wall chambers.
John Sethian Naval Research Laboratory June 20, 2000 A Vision for Direct Drive Laser IFE: NS A vision for Laser Direct Drive Fusion Energy.
J. Pasternak First Ideas on the Design of the Beam Transport and the Final Focus for the NF Target J. Pasternak, Imperial College London / RAL STFC ,
Pulse Shaping & Energy Capabilities of Angularly-Multiplexed KrF Lasers 17 th HAPL Meeting Naval Research Laboratory October 30-31, 2007 R. H. Lehmberg.
1 Neutronics Assessment of Self-Cooled Li Blanket Concept Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.
1 Neutronics Parameters for the Reference HAPL Chamber Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.
“Sizing” of solid state laser driver requirements for inertial fusion energy 1) Efficiency > %, including cooling Key issue is recycled power: f.
This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by the University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under.
John Sethian Naval Research Laboratory Steve Payne Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory June 20, 2000 Laser Drivers for Inertial Fusion Energy NS Laser.
February 5-6, 2004 HAPL meeting, G.Tech. 1 Chamber Tasks Coordination Presented by A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from J. Blanchard and the HAPL.
1 Calibration Screen Development Claire Cramer Brian Stalder Gautham Narayan Christopher Stubbs Department of Physics Harvard University Claire Cramer.
Status of Modeling of Damage Effects on Final Optics Mirror Performance T.K. Mau, M.S. Tillack Center for Energy Research Fusion Energy Division University.
10/9/2007 Global Design Effort 1 Optical Matching Device Jeff Gronberg / LLNL October 9, 2007 Positron source KOM - Daresbury This work performed under.
Electron Beam Deposition Into the KrF Laser Gas
Bill White Commissioning October 9, 2006 Drive-Laser Commissioning Status and Plans Requirements Where do we stand today?
Laser Notcher Status Dave Johnson PIP Meeting June 26,2012.
Status and Plans for Systems Modeling for Laser IFE HAPL Progress Meeting November 2001 Pleasanton, CA Wayne Meier, Charles Orth, Don Blackfield.
Slide 1 The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory Why heavy ions? Target requires: 3.5 – 6 MJ in ~ 10 ns  500 TW Range ~ 0.02 – 0.20 g/cm.
Optics for VUV and soft x-ray FEL Oscillators Michelle Shinn & Steve Benson Future Light Sources Jefferson Lab March 5, 2012 Work supported by the U.S.
UV Laser-Induced Damage to Grazing Incidence Metal Mirrors M. S. Tillack, J. E. Pulsifer, K. Sequoia Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department and.
1 Radiation Environment at Final Optics of HAPL Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI HAPL Meeting ORNL March.
V. Bagnoud PHELIX, Plasma Physics department GSI Darmstadt
Update on Systems Modeling and Analyses
Target Gain Curves for Systems Modeling*
Welcome to the sixth HAPL meeting
Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update*
Laser Source for the g-g Collider Presented to: Snowmass 2001
Jeff Latkowski and Wayne Meier
Final Focus System: gg Interaction Region
Optics John Arthur, SLAC & William W. Craig, LLNL April 24, 2002
LCLS Injector Laser System Paul R. Bolton, SLAC April 24, 2002
Injector Drive Laser Technical Status
Presentation transcript:

Mercury DPSSL Driver: Smoothing, Zooming and Chamber Interface Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Ray Beach, John Perkins, Wayne Meier, Chris Ebbers, Jeff Latkowski, Ken Manes, Richard Town, Camille Bibeau Presented at High Average Power Laser Program Workshop Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, New Jersey October 27 and 28, 2004 This work was performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by the University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. W Eng-48.

RJB/VG We are investigating options, issues, and trades for DPSSL driver and direct-drive targets Motivation: We are working towards an updated laser design as basis for systems model and future integrated power plant study We are considering trades (e.g., target performance and driver efficiency for 1 , 2 , 3  and 4  options We are developing design concepts for beam delivery: - final optics, phase plate, turning/focusing mirrors - beam segmentation, number of beams that meet target requirements: - energy, pulse shape, illumination uniformity, - beam smoothing and zooming Next step will be to update laser architecture, and cost scaling

RJB/VG Mercury is a demonstration of a 1  laser engine that could drive 2 , 3  or 4  beam lines 1  laser engine 2  conversion module 3  or 4  conversion module Mercury LLNL Mercury is a sub aperture demonstration (100 J 1  ) of a DPSSL beam line architecture that scales in pulse energy to the multi-kJ level

RJB/VG Envisioned IFE laser driver design builds on NIF architecture NIF consists of 192 beams that will generate 1.8 MJ 3  Beam line integration architecture is defined by “bays,” “clusters”, “bundles”, and “quads”

RJB/VG IFE baseline DPSSL aperture size is a compromise between high efficiency laser and high pulse energy aperture Optimized aperture is 13 cm x 20 cm yielding an output energy of ~3.1 kJ 1  96 chamber ports for laser entry ~4.5 MJ 1  total 4  pulse energy or ~47 kJ per chamber port 4.5 MJ 1  is built up with 1,536 total beam lines (or 8 x NIF) IFE DPSSL will have 16 individual beams per port (4 x NIF) – the 16 beams (“IFE port bundle”) are the building blocks of a DPSSL driver optimized efficiency higher aperture energy B max 10 x 15 cm 2, 1.7 kJ 13 x 20 cm 2, 3.1 kJ 20 x 30 cm 2, 4.2 kJ 30 x 45 cm 2, 8.3 kJ

RJB/VG We are investigating the construction of a drive pulse using “IFE port bundles” consistent with target and chamber requirements Target considerations: Beam smoothing through speckle averaging is required to eliminate laser imprint Dynamic zooming of laser spot is required for efficient utilization of laser energy Chamber considerations: Minimization of solid angle dedicated to laser ports is desired to minimize neutron leakage and achieve adequate tritium breeding Proposed 2  drive pulse

RJB/VG Standoff for 0.48 cm dia. target implosionTime resolved maximum l mode l mode spectrum averaged over 1 nsec target response time – maximum l mode is 267 at t=0 Smoothing requirements impose a limit on product of target illumination solid angle and laser bandwidth “… low spatial frequency speckle relevant to direct drive is fundamentally determined by the product of the optical bandwidth and the illumination solid angle,” – Josh Rothenberg k imprint. d standoff > 2 or l mode >2r critical /d standoff – condition for coronal thermal smoothing of laser imprint where d standoff is distance between ablation front and critical radius

RJB/VG Fraction of solid angle needed for a 300 GHz 2  pulse to achieve 0.5%  rms on target between l=0 and the maximum l-mode that impacts target stability Target integration time, , is 1 nsec d targ ~ 4.8 mm = nm  2  = 300 GHz  tot = 0.5% P F R M The earliest portion of the pulse, the picket, requires the largest solid angle to achieve smoothing (~1% of 4  )

RJB/VG Because the target is most susceptible to laser imprint and subsequent instabilities early in the pulse, the picket requires the largest area in each port bundle for smoothing Each of the 16 aperture sources ~2.6 kJ 2  Picket aperture is 72 cm x 72 cm  /4  = 0.99% All other apertures are 10.3 cm x 10.3 cm  /4  = 0.3% Total solid angle dedicated to ports is 1.3%: Single aperture at 20 m from target P FRRMMMMM M M M M M M M 10.3 cm beam aperture is consistent with 20 m standoff of final optic, 5 TDL beam, and ~4.8 mm target size Spot size at target with 5 TDL beam:

RJB/VG Pulse construction from port bundle using only rectangular in time pulses Picket pulse overlaid with pulse constructed from 16 independently zoomed and overlapped beams (1 Picket,1 Foot, 2 Ramp, and 12 Main) All 12 beams in Main are 4.3 nsec or longer in duration with optical-optical conversion efficiency ~ 0.28 (diode pump light to 1  ) Harmonic generation issues are mitigated with rectangular in time pulses Picket Pulse 16 Beam Pulse

RJB/VG Beam line point design assumes a 13 cm x 20 cm Yb:S- FAP crystal aperture and B-integral limited extraction ComponentDuration Diode light to 1  efficiency Picket0.67 nsec0.11 Foot6.7 nsec0.29 Ramp3.4 nsec0.26 Main3.4 nsec0.26 Due to B-integral limited extraction, shorter duration components are necessarily generated at lower efficiency Pulse-averaged optical-optical efficiency (1  ) = 0.25 Each beam is assumed to have 150 GHz of 1 

RJB/VG Harmonic conversion efficiency 1  irradiance is 3.3 GW/cm 2 2  irradiance is 1.7 GW/cm 2 3  irradiance is 1.1 GW/cm 2 4  irradiance is 0.8 GW/cm 2 Process 1  Bandwidth Efficiency diode  final Efficiency 1   2  150 GHz   3  100 GHz   4  75 GHz

RJB/VG Independent zooming enables 88% of total pulse energy delivered to chamber to intercept target within critical radius Total Pulse Energy = 4.02 MJ With zooming as shown, 3.55 MJ falls within time resolved critical radius - 88% of pulse energy Without zooming, only 2.52 MJ falls within time resolved critical radius - 63% of pulse energy Energy delivered to chamber Energy delivered within target critical radius

RJB/VG Final optics scheme for port bundle – louvered GIM design Al Reflectivity S-pol P-pol Small GIMs for 10.3 cm x 10.3 cm beams need to be 135 cm in length (  inc =85.6 o ) to limit absorbed fluence to 10 mJ/cm 2 - for S-polarized green light Single GIM for the large area picket portion of the pulse (72 cm x 72 cm) would require a 9.45 m long optic Two mirrors as small as 1.02 m long can be used to replace the single large picket GIM (as shown above) Mirrors for 72 cm x 72 cm picket pulse GIMs for 15 pulse components that are after the picket

RJB/VG Summary Based on a “NIF-like” architecture, we are proposing “chamber bundles” as the basic building block of an IFE DPSSL driver Chamber bundles permit both zooming and smoothing to meet target and chamber requirements Concept is applicable to 1  laser engine with 2 , 3  or 4  harmonic conversion option We have developed a final optics concept that uses meter size GIMs The next step will be to update laser architecture, and cost scaling models