Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, NERL Overview and Evaluation of AQMEII Phase 2 Coupled Simulations over.
Advertisements

Comparison of the CAM and RRTMG Radiation Schemes in WRF and coupled WRF-CMAQ models Aijun Xiu, Zac Adelman, Frank Binkowski, Adel Hanna, Limei Ran Center.
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory Overview of the Two-way Coupled WRF-CMAQ.
Limei Ran 1,2, Robert Gilliam 3, Jonathan Pleim 3, Adel Hanna 1, William Benjey 3 1 Center for Environmental Modeling for Policy Development, Institute.
Development of Alternative Methods For Estimating Dry Deposition Velocity In CMAQ.
Dynamical Downscaling of CCSM Using WRF Yang Gao 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yun-Fat Lam 1, John Drake 1, Kate Evans 2 1 University of Tennessee, USA 2 Oak Ridge.
Clouds and Climate: Forced Changes to Clouds SOEE3410 Ken Carslaw Lecture 4 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds.
Environmental Modeling Center ______________________________________________ Climate Change and Air Quality Workshop MCNC On the intercontinental transport.
Air Quality-Climate Interactions Aijun Xiu Carolina Environmental Program.
The impact of the thermal power industries from the Beijing- Tianjin-Hebei regions on Beijing haze studied by the two-way coupled WRF-CMAQ model (Preliminary.
Limei Ran 1,2, Robert Gilliam 3, Frank Binkowski 2, Aijun Xiu 2, Larry Band 2, Jonathan Pleim 3 1 Ph.D. Candidate, Curriculum for the Environment and Ecology,
Clouds and Climate: Forced Changes to Clouds SOEE3410 Ken Carslaw Lecture 4 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds.
Effects of size resolved aerosol microphysics on photochemistry and heterogeneous chemistry Gan Luo and Fangqun Yu ASRC, SUNY-Albany
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
Improving Cloud Simulation in Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Through Assimilation of GOES Satellite Observations Andrew White Advisor: Dr. Arastoo.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Jerold Herwehe 1, Kiran Alapaty 1, Chris Nolte 1, Russ Bullock 1, Tanya Otte 1, Megan Mallard 1, Jimy Dudhia 2, and Jack Kain 3 1 Atmospheric Modeling.
A Modeling Investigation of the Climate Effects of Air Pollutants Aijun Xiu 1, Rohit Mathur 2, Adel Hanna 1, Uma Shankar 1, Frank Binkowski 1, Carlie Coats.
Modelling the Canadian Arctic and Northern Air Quality using GEM-MACH Wanmin Gong and Stephen Beagley Science and Technology Branch Environment Canada.
Russ Bullock 11 th Annual CMAS Conference October 17, 2012 Development of Methodology to Downscale Global Climate Fields to 12km Resolution.
Comparison of three photochemical mechanisms (CB4, CB05, SAPRC99) for the Eta-CMAQ air quality forecast model for O 3 during the 2004 ICARTT study Shaocai.
Meteorological Service of Canada Environment Canada Cloud Cover Changes and Their Impacts on Solar Energy Production in North America PERD Climate Change.
Jonathan Pleim 1, Robert Gilliam 1, and Aijun Xiu 2 1 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, NOAA, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with the.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Preliminary Study: Direct and Emission-Induced Effects of Global Climate Change on Regional Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter K. Manomaiphiboon 1 *, A.
Air quality real-time forecast of PM 2.5 in Hangzhou metropolitan city with the WRF-CMAQ and WRF/Chem systems: model development and evaluation Shaocai.
Aerosols in WRF-CHEM Eric Stofferahn George Mason University _07:00:00 (UTC)
Seasonal Modeling (NOAA) Jian-Wen Bao Sara Michelson Jim Wilczak Curtis Fleming Emily Piencziak.
Representation of Sea Salt Aerosol in CAM coupled with a Sectional Aerosol Microphysical Model CARMA Tianyi Fan, Owen Brian Toon LASP/ATOC, University.
A detailed evaluation of the WRF-CMAQ forecast model performance for O 3, and PM 2.5 during the 2006 TexAQS/GoMACCS study Shaocai Yu $, Rohit Mathur +,
IACETH Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Sciences Indirect aerosol effects in EC earth Trude Storelvmo and Ulrike Lohmann, ETH-Zurich.
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory WRF-CMAQ 2-way coupled system: Part I David Wong,
Morrison/Gettelman/GhanAMWG January 2007 Two-moment Stratiform Cloud Microphysics & Cloud-aerosol Interactions in CAM H. Morrison, A. Gettelman (NCAR),
K.S Carslaw, L. A. Lee, C. L. Reddington, K. J. Pringle, A. Rap, P. M. Forster, G.W. Mann, D. V. Spracklen, M. T. Woodhouse, L. A. Regayre and J. R. Pierce.
U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer Studying.
THE MODELS-3 COMMUNITY MULTI- SCALE AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) MODEL: 2002 RELEASE – NEW FEATURES Jonathan Pleim, Francis Binkowski, Robin Dennis, Brian Eder,
Cloud-mediated radiative forcing of climate due to aerosols simulated by newly developed two-way coupled WRF-CMAQ during 2006 TexAQS/GoMACCS over the Gulf.
Climatic implications of changes in O 3 Loretta J. Mickley, Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University David Rind Goddard Institute for Space Studies How well.
Assessment of aerosol direct effects on surface radiation in the northern hemisphere using two-way WRF-CMAQ model Jia Xing, Jonathan Pleim, Rohit Mathur,
Investigation of Microphysical Parameterizations of Snow and Ice in Arctic Clouds During M-PACE through Model- Observation Comparisons Amy Solomon 12 In.
1 RUC Land Surface Model implementation in WRF Tanya Smirnova, WRFLSM Workshop, 18 June 2003.
Update on the 2-moment stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in CAM Hugh Morrison and Andrew Gettelman National Center for Atmospheric Research CCSM Atmospheric.
Simulation of the indirect radiative forcing of climate due to aerosols by the two-way coupled WRF-CMAQ model over the continental United States: Preliminary.
Aerosol Indirect Effects in CAM and MIRAGE Steve Ghan Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Jean-Francois Lamarque, Peter Hess, and Francis Vitt, NCAR.
Application of Ice Microphysics to CAM Xiaohong Liu, S. J. Ghan (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory) M. Wang, J. E. Penner (University of Michigan)
Update on progress with the implementation of a new two-moment microphysics scheme: Model description and single-column tests Hugh Morrison, Andrew Gettelman,
Development and Initial Applications
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy Jonathan Pleim, Shawn Roselle,
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Examining the impact of aerosol direct.
A study of process contributions to PM 2.5 formation during the 2004 ICARTT period using the Eta-CMAQ forecast model over the eastern U.S. Shaocai Yu $,
12 th annual CMAS conference Impact of Biomass Burning Aerosols on Regional Climate over Southeast US Peng Liu, Yongtao Hu, Armistead G. Russell, Athanasios.
Aerosol simulation with coupled meteorology-radiation- chemistry model WRF/Chem over Europe.
Aerosol 1 st indirect forcing in the coupled CAM-IMPACT model: effects from primary-emitted particulate sulfate and boundary layer nucleation Minghuai.
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, NERL AQMEII Phase 2: Overview and WRF/CMAQ Application over North America.
Aerosol Indirect Effects in CAM A. Gettelman (NCAR), F. Vitt (NCAR), P. Hess (Cornell) H. Morrison (NCAR), P. R. Field (Met Office), S.J. Ghan (PNNL)
Modal Aerosol Treatment in CAM: Evaluation and Indirect Effect X. Liu, S. J. Ghan, R. Easter (PNNL) J.-F. Lamarque, P. Hess, N. Mahowald, F. Vitt, H. Morrison,
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory WRF-CMAQ 2-way Coupled System: Part II Jonathan.
Wang Jiandong 1, Wang Shuxiao 1, Zhao Bin 1, Wang Long 1, David Wong 2, Jonathan Pleim 2, Hao Jiming 1 1. Tsinghua University, Beijing, China 2. U.S. EPA,
Preliminary Evaluation of the June 2002 Version of CMAQ Brian Eder Shaocai Yu Robin Dennis Jonathan Pleim Ken Schere Atmospheric Modeling Division* National.
H. Morrison, A. Gettelman (NCAR) , S. Ghan (PNL)
A model of sea salt aerosol for Cape Grim Preliminary investigations
Simulation of primary and secondary (biogenic and anthropogenic) organic aerosols over the United States by US EPA Models-3/CMAQ: Evaluation and regional.
Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division,
Sensitivity of WRF microphysics to aerosol concentration
A. Gettelman, X. Liu, H. Morrison, S. Ghan
The Value of Nudging in the Meteorology Model for Retrospective CMAQ Simulations Tanya L. Otte NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, RTP, NC (In partnership with.
Climatic implications of changes in O3
Presentation transcript:

Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, Grid-scale indirect radiative forcing of climate due to aerosols over the northern hemisphere simulated by the integrated WRF-CMAQ model: Preliminary results Shaocai Yu*, Kiran Alapaty, Jonathan Pleim, Rohit Mathur, David Wong, and Jia Xing Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, National Exposure Research Lab, U.S. EPA, RTP, NC 27711 *now ORAU at Atmospheric Modeling Branch, Army Research Lab, WSMR, NM 88002 Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited

Largest uncertainty (IPCC, 2007): indirect aerosol forcing

Model Description (Configuration) Calculation of indirect aerosol forcing in WRF-CMAQ (Yu et al., 2013) Aerosols: number, size, chemical composition Coupled WRF-CMAQ aerosol simulation Sulfate, BC, OC, dust CAM ice nucleation scheme (Liu et al. 2007) Aerosol activation scheme (Abdul-Razzak and Ghan, 2000, 2002) Updraft velocity, ice water content (WRF), temperature Updraft velocity, liquid water content (WRF) Cloud microphysics (Morrison): cloud vapor and water, rain, ice, snow, graupel CCN, Cloud droplet number Ice number Conc., IN Radiative transfer model: RRTMg: re(2-60) mm Cloud effective radius (re), COD Ice effective radius (rie), IOD Met fields (WRF) The 1st and 2nd IAF Glaciation IAF

Model domain 108 km domain over the northern hemisphere Simulation period: August of 2006

Results (SWCF) (preliminary results) Monthly Daily August 1, 2006 CERES Obs WRF (only) with subgrid cloud-radiation effect (Alapaty et al. 2012) WRF (only) WRF-CMAQ

Results (SWCF) (preliminary results) Monthly Daily August 2, 2006 CERES Obs WRF (only) with subgrid cloud-radiation effect (Alapaty et al. 2012) WRF (only) WRF-CMAQ

Results (SWCF) (preliminary results) CERES Obs Monthly Mean for August, 2006 WRF-CMAQ significantly improves relative to WRF WRF (only) with subgrid cloud-radiation effect (Alapaty et al. 2012) WRF (only) WRF-CMAQ (Aug 1-3 mean)

Results (Shortwave cloud forcing) Comparison of Monthly means SWCF (August) over the continental U.S. (Yu et al., 2013) Land 12-km simulations with both indirect and direct aerosol forcing (WRF-CMAQ) are the best with very good correlation coefficients 12-km runs still underestimate SWCF over land Land Ocean Obs (CERES) Corr NMB (%) CAM WRF-CMAQ 0.96 -18.18 0.90 1.21 WRF (only) 0.50 -5.01 -0.55 53.86 RRTMG -27.44 0.93 -18.91 0.72 -30.45 -0.48 14.90 Ocean

Results Possible use of NH simulation results for Army Research Lab’s (ARL) globally relocatable limited-area convective-scale WRF FDDA nowcasting project ARL is developing Weather Running Estimate-Nowcast (WRE-N) (Dumais et al., 2013) Based on WRF-ARW model Observation nudging-based 4-D data assimilation (FDDA) methodology WRF-CMAQ NH simulations can provide ARL NH WRE-N nowcasting for specific locations and regions: Initial conditions and boundary conditions Aerosol fields

Contacts: Brian K. Eder email: eder@hpcc.epa.gov www.arl.noaa.gov/ www.epa.gov/asmdnerl

Coupler Two-way coupled WRF-CMAQ modeling System (Interaction and feedback) Meteorological Model WRF modeling System: x=12 km, 4km 34 layers Land-Surface: PX LSM PBL: ACM2 Cloud Physics: Morrison Cumulus: Kain-Fritsch, not for 4km Shortwave: RRTMg, or CAM Longwave: RRTMg, Chemical Transport Model CMAQ Modeling System: Photochemistry: CB05 59 organic and inorganic species, 156 chemical reactions Aerosol module: AE6 3 lognormal modes, organic and inorganic Emission: SMOKE In-line emission for biogenic species AQPREP Prepares virtual CMAQ compatible input met. files Coupler CMAQ-mixactivate: cloud drop, ice number conc. Direct forcing: Aerosol size, composition, conc.