1 OSEP Verification Visits Fiscal Component FFY 2008-2009 Office of Special Education Programs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

IDEA Final Report Process
A Multi-Year Improvement System and Schedule
Audit Requirements  A-133 Gov't, Education and Non-Profit  Thresholds $500K or more expended during the FY - Single Audit required  Audit Report - due.
P ART C M AINTENANCE OF E FFORT Charles Kniseley Slide presentation by Anthony White 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 1.
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
Maintenance of Effort IV-B Funding LEA Level Special Education Services Kansas Department of Education Special Education Services.
OSEP QUARTERLY CALL WITH PARENT CENTERS PART B FINAL REGULATIONS RELATED TO PARENTAL CONSENT FOR THE USE OF PUBLIC BENEFITS OR INSURANCE Office of Special.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
Special Education Monitoring – IDEA Grant
IDEA Proportionate Share and Equitable Services: Serving Parentally Placed Private School Students with Disabilities OSE/ISD Directors Leadership Meeting.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education
UNDERSTANDING SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING How to account for IDEIA funds.
1 Ohio Department of Transportation Michael Miller, Auditor Division of Finance & Forecasting Division of Finance & Forecasting Office of Audits Rural.
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Excess Cost Presenter Patricia Holcomb-Gray Office of Special Education Programs NJ Department of Education June 3, 2015.
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
FY 14 Special Education Funding Issues Illinois ASBO Annual Conference May 16, 2013 Illinois State Board of Education Funding and Disbursement Services.
Special Education Funding Education Service Center, Region 20 Sherry Marsh 1.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
1 South Dakota Department of Education – Grants Management Rob Huffman – Administrator Mark Gageby – Special Education Fiscal Kim Fischer – Fiscal Monitoring.
Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) edgar.html.
A State Department Perspective.  Headed by an elected State Superintendent ◦ No state board of education  425 School Districts  12 Cooperative Educational.
Special Education Proportionate Set-Aside Requirements October 2014.
Erica Cummings Grant Coordinator 1.  The New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) is responsible for:  Monitoring.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement Texas Education Agency (TEA)
IDEA, Part B Fiscal and Results Driven Accountability TIFFANY R. WINTERS, ESQ. JENNIFER MAUSKAPF, ESQ. BRUSTEIN.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.
1 NJ SHARES ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN Jackie Berger 2004 NFFN June 7, 2004.
IDEA EC Grant Application & Fiscal Accountability New Charter Leaders Institute June 16-17, 2015 Valencia W. Davis, Consultant IDEA, Part B Programs NCDPI.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS). 34 CFR § : An LEA may not use more than 15 percent of the amount the LEA receives under Part B of.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA) Office of Non-Public Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Office of Special.
Best Practices: Financial Resource Management February 2011.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Participation of the State Advisory Panel and State Interagency.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA) Office of Non-Public Education Office of Innovation and Improvement U.S. Department.
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SPED Finance-Grants and Data LEA Academy SPED Finance 1.
INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT (IDEA) Parentally Placed Children with Disabilities in Private Schools.
SPR&I: Changes, New Measures/Targets, and Lessons Learned from Focused Monitoring Visits David Guardino, SPR&I Coordinator Fall 2009 COSA Conference.
Budgeting. Objectives Participants will learn: Resources for budgeting Distribution of state special ed funds Projecting state and federal funds Code.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
How to Prepare for a Federal Monitoring Visit (SASA/OSEP) Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2012.
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective Leigh M. Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
IDEA EQUITABLE SERVICES: SERVING PARENTALLY PLACED PRIVATE SCHOOL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein &
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
Local Education Agency (LEA) Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Requirements under IDEA.
Understanding Finance and Program Issues Fall Forum November 4, 2013 Office of Special Education Michigan Department of Education John Andrejack and Sheryl.
Utilizing Federal IDEA Special Education Funds Permissively to Serve At-Risk Students in General Education The Fiscal Mechanics of RTI and PBS.
COORDINATED EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES CEIS 1.
Grant Applications Shanna Graham-Garrett
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.
Division of Adult Education and Literacy U.S. Department of Education Washington, DC.
Kay Townsend, Fiscal Consultant Title I, IIA, VI, & X Oklahoma State Department of Education (405)
IDEA Grants Application: Maintenance of Effort. 2 What is Maintenance of Effort? IDEA regulation (34 CFR § ) which directs districts, for each grant.
Challenges and TA Solutions for Allocating Part B Subgrants to LEAs
IDEA EC Grant Application & Fiscal Accountability
NCJA’s National Forum on Financial Management Training
Introduction to LEA MOE Tool
LEA Maintenance of Effort and Excess Cost Calculation
Fiscal Monitoring in eGrants Management System (eGMS) July 26, 2018
Oregon Department of Education
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Managing Federal grants
AUDITS----SINGLE AUDIT CONCEPT, COMPLIANCE
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
SPECIAL EDUCATION FINANCE UPDATES
Presentation transcript:

1 OSEP Verification Visits Fiscal Component FFY Office of Special Education Programs

2 Introducing The Critical Elements Analysis Guide (CrEAG) CrEAG is a tool for organizing and analyzing data to identify what will be addressed during a verification visit. Part B CrEAG document Part C CrEAG document

3 Introducing CrEAG CrEAG replaces old information collection forms, including the OSEP Fiscal Desk Audit form. CrEAG is used to organize data and information collected prior to, and during, the verification visit.

4 Introducing CrEAG Pre-visit sharing of CrEAG with States Pre-visit conversations with States about questions in CrEAG

5 Introducing CrEAG A State is not required to complete the CrEAG and submit it to OSEP. A State is permitted to complete all or part of CrEAG and submit it to OSEP.

6 Components of CrEAG Critical Elements for each focus area Related Questions for Critical Elements – Cells for responses and notes for each Related Question – Cells for flagging issues Related Requirements for each Critical Element

7 Components of CrEAG CrEAG includes sections to record the review and analysis of-- Customer Service Information (e.g., parent contacts) Information from interviews Documents (e.g., SPP/APR)

8 How OSEP Uses CrEAG To organize relevant data and documents for review prior to a verification visit To summarize information from various sources (e.g., parent contacts, APR issues, data reports, audit reports, etc.)

9 How OSEP Uses CrEAG To determine who is interviewed on-site To identify what will be addressed on- site To develop the foundation of OSEP’s verification letter

10 Critical Elements in CrEAG Revised Critical Elements Revised Related Questions for the Critical Elements

11 Fiscal Critical Elements There are Fiscal Critical Elements for Part B and Part C Fiscal Critical Elements for Part B apply to Section 611 and Section 619 grants

12 Fiscal Critical Elements There are differences between Section 611 and Section 619 requirements The SEA is responsible for proper disbursement and use of Section 619 funds

13 First Fiscal Critical Element for Part B and Part C FS-1 Does the State have procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure the timely obligation and liquidation of IDEA funds?

14 Related Questions Under of FS-1 FS-1 includes questions about— Timely obligation of funds (within the 27 month obligation period) Timely liquidation of funds (no later than 90 days after the obligation period)

15 Second Fiscal Critical Element for Part B FS-2 Does the State have procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure appropriate distribution of IDEA funds within the State?

16 Related Questions Under of FS-2— Part B FS-2 includes questions about-- Expending funds consistent with Part B requirements Calculating subgrants Use of administrative

17 Related Questions Under of FS-2— Part B (continued) Funds to charter schools State funding mechanisms and LRE Funds for children parentally-placed in private schools Funds for the LEA Risk

18 Second Fiscal Critical Element for Part C FS-2 Does the State have procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure appropriate use of IDEA funds at the State level?

19 Related Questions Under of FS-2 -- Part C (continued) How does the lead agency ensure that Part C is the payor of last resort – that other public or private sources pay for commitments for which they are legally responsible?

20 Related Questions Under of FS-2 -- Part C (continued) How does the State ensure that Part C funds are not commingled with State funds?

21 Related Questions Under of FS-2-- Part C (continued) How does the lead agency ensure that the total amount of State and local funds expended for early intervention services in one year is maintained or increased in each subsequent year?

22 Related Questions Under of FS-2-- Part C (continued) How does the lead agency ensure that Federal funds are used only for allowable purposes (consistent with 20 U.S.C and 1438)?

23 Related Questions Under of FS-2-- Part C (continued) Does the lead agency have a system of payments? If yes, is it approved by OSEP?

24 Related Questions Under of FS-2 -- Part C (continued) Describe the system of payments, including use of co-insurance, co- payments, sliding fees, defining inability to pay, etc. What is the Status of the State’s indirect cost rate?

25 Related Questions Under of FS-2 -- Part C (continued) What are the barriers that impede the State’s ability to ensure fiscal compliance with the Part C requirements? What is the State doing to address these barriers?

26 Third Fiscal Critical Element Part C does not have a third Critical Element.

27 Third Fiscal Critical Element for Part B FS-3 Does the State have procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure appropriate use of IDEA funds? (Note: Section 611 and Section 619 have different requirements.)

28 Related Questions Under of FS-3 FS-3 includes questions about-- – Communication between finance and program officials – Accounting procedures – Supplement/not supplant – Maintenance of effort / excess cost

29 Related Questions Under of FS-3 (continued) – Continuous Early Intervening Services (CEIS) – Control over property, equipment, etc. in schools serving parentally- placed students – Conducting Single Audits

30 QUESTIONS Discuss questions with your State Contact.