1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Guiding Principle Five Mentoring needs to be tailored to the needs of the individual teacher and, at the same time, verifying their skills as teachers.
Advertisements

Examination Technique
RTTT Teacher Evaluator Training
Using NJ ELAS Forms The Nitty Gritty. To use NJ ELAS, teachers apply 2 assessment processes: Documentation –ongoing observations –during daily classroom.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 June 12, 2012 Welcome BT BOCES, SV, ME, Chenango Forks, Newark Valley, Windsor, Tioga and Vestal.
Day 2: Learning and Teaching Session 2: Recording Evidence NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
Balanced Assessment in the Classroom. Balanced Assessment Learning Objectives will answer the following essential questions: What is balanced assessment?
5D+ Teacher Evaluation Model Professional Learning Phase 1
Activity 3a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades 6–12: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
December 13, 2011 ICSD facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back! Can I have your attention please?
 List two engagement strategies you use regularly in your classroom.  For each one, tell when you use it and why.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1.
TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING October 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach
Effective Evaluation Feedback: Getting People to Commit to Changing Practice.
RAPPS – Rural Alaska Principal Preparation and Support Program Selecting and Training Evaluators May 28 – 30, 2014 Learning Groups 1, 2, and 3 Hilton Hotel.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Welcome!
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1.
The Basic Components of Inter-Rater Reliability
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Welcome Back!
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
Broome-Tioga BOCES Network Team… the ENTIRE team! (Pat Walsh, Barb Phillips, Jennifer Dove)
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back! Can I have your attention please?
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back! Can I have your attention please?
Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Day 3 Welcome Back!
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
What are the strengths and weaknesses associated with each of these ways of coping? 1.Keeping your feelings to yourself 2.Talking about it with someone.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
Score the Washington Educational Technology Assessments Educational Technology.
© TNTP 2014 March Principal Training. / 2 Do Now Reflect on your progress from the last session: How successful were you in supporting a teacher to identify.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Fourth session of the NEPBE II in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 25th, 2013 Assessment Instruments.
Bell Ringer What did you do to motivate students in the first few weeks of school?
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Grade 7 The Power of Point of View Vocabulary ELA Grade 7 The Power of Point of View, Lesson 2 Resource 2.1.
A brief introduction to
Common Core State Standards & North Carolina Essential Standards Support for School Executives 1.
Teacher Evaluation Danielson Framework Yukon Koyukuk School District New Teacher Training.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training February 27, 2012 Part 1 – Welcome Back!
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back!
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back!
Hosted by Julie Milder Unpacking the Classroom Environment and Culture and Professional Collaboration and Communication Dimensions of 5D+
 Pre-Observation Conference  Priority component: 1e (Designing Coherent Instruction)  Observation  Priority components: 3c, 3d (Engaging Students in.
Good Morning Please come in and pick a table. At least 2 people need to sit at each table. Take a piece of purple paper out of the basket. Trace your hand.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Welcome!
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Teachscape Reflect Poo Part of a Continuous Improvement Process art of a Continuous Improvement Process.
 Teacher completes Step #1: Lesson Plan in advance and sends to evaluator two days in advance of planning conference  Teacher and Evaluator meet to discuss.
Giving Clear, Specific Directions
Lead Evaluator Training
Cooperative Learning An Overview.
The Framework for Teaching
Lead Evaluator Training
Lead Evaluator Training
Ms. Burke’s Classroom Rules!.
Lead Evaluator Training Part 1
Sustaining school improvement through External Reviews
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Lead Evaluator Training
Can I have your attention please?
Clinical Educator and Teacher Candidate Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
DBQ assignment.
Lead Evaluator Training
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Training Chapter for the Advanced Field Experience Form (Pre-CPAST
Cooperating Teacher and Student Teacher Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
Presentation transcript:

1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1

 Identify current practices for defining teacher actions and student actions while observing  Explain the difference between current practice and evidence based observation  Describe requirements for schools to develop inter- rater agreement and inter-rater reliability with a chosen rubric  Identify and define criteria for one area of effective instruction around which evidence collection will be focused

Collection of factual information Free of bias or opinion Based on specific criteria Used to provide feedback for reflection and improvement of teacher practice

Allows for consistency Provides “concrete” feedback to the teacher Based on facts—easily supported

Free of Bias or Opinion: Free of prejudice or judgment in favor of or against someone or something--usually not based on fact Example: The students were seated in rows in the classroom. Non-Example: The teacher discourages collaboration in her classroom by arranging the students in rows.

Example: The teacher stated to the students, “Turn and face your partner. Share two facts you read in the article.” Non-Example: I love the way you had the students work with a partner to share facts from the article.

Ms. Smith discourages interactions between students by arranging the classroom desks in rows. “Using the blank map on your desk, label the continents” was written on the white board. There was no confusion in the classroom because Mr. Smith’s directions were presented clearly. Insufficient wait time was provided to the students. 9 out of 10 students in the class created a t-chart in their notebooks.

 Practice collecting evidence using set criteria  Compare and contrast evidence collected during shared observations  Review written observation documents and provide feedback to evaluators (Superintendent or designee)

Question: How do I begin to collect evidence? There is so much to look for! ANSWER:

What are examples of categories (elements/criteria) that makes a difference? Let’s check.... Are these in the rubrics?

Also known as...

 Evidence is observable (overt)  Evidence is of ALL students  Evidence is congruent to the objective When does checking for understanding occur??

 OK?  Any questions?  Using a “check” to be sure the student is paying attention Is a ticket out the door a check for understanding?

 Identify the presence or absence of “check for understanding” in your present evaluation tool  Practice collecting evidence of “check for understanding”  Check yourself – did your evidence contain bias or opinion?  Identify the presence or absence of “check for understanding” in one of the NYSED approved rubrics

Thank you! See you October 18—Same time ME Board Room!