Assessments for Children Birth to 3: Part 1 Minnesota Child Development Inventory Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind November 6, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EARLY CHILDHOOD Early Childhood Whats new? All early childhood evaluations will be completed at the local school. This includes Child.
Advertisements

Western States Early Intervention Outcomes Project Kathryn Kreimeyer, Ph. D. Shirin Antia, Ph. D. Tucson, Arizona Arlene Stredler Brown, CCC-SLP, CED Allison.
ESI-P Early Screening Inventory-Preschool
The BRIGANCE® Screens-II
Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind November 13, 2013
VB-MAPP Verbal Behavior Milestones Assessment and Placement Program
1. 2 Easy-to-Use Administrator Features 3 Customisable Screen Cutoff Scores.
ABC Child Find Screening
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
A Review of Assessments for Children with Significant Communication and Socialization Issues Presented by Shantal Jackson & Suzanne Coyne.
Sarah Funke.  The range from ASL to English is based on the influence of English on ASL  The upbringing of Deaf children and adults influence how.
Chapter Eleven Individuals with Hearing Impairments.
WELCOME TO THE WEBINAR We will be starting soon. Please be sure your audio is set up following the steps outlined below. Click on Tools Click on Audio.
DIP vs DAP Question: What do these stand for?.
Ages & Stages Questionnaires® is a registered trademark of Paul H
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Refresher: Child Outcome Summary Form Child Outcome Summary Form.
DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY IN MA EARLY INTERVENTION A General Overview to Scoring.
Equity Issues in Assessments for Individuals who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Ann Moxley, Ph.D. California School for the Deaf - Fremont.
Early Childhood System Screening Ongoing Assessment Instructional Activities Data Management.
Evaluating Deaf Individuals with Additional Disabilities Donna Morere, Ph.D. Gallaudet University.
Infant AND TODDLER SENSORY PROFILE
Kindergarten Readiness:
Nevada Dual Sensory Impairment Project University of Nevada, Reno MaryAnn Demchak, Ph.D. Project Director Deafblindness: An Introduction.
Measures of Intelligence and Adaptive Behavior
The INSITE Developmental Checklist
Supporting PreK Teachers During Act 3 Implementation.
Assessment for ASD Programming November 2012IDEA Partnership1.
1 Implementation of the New Part C Eligibility Criteria Effective 7/1/2010.
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
Assessment of Mental Retardation & Giftedness: Two End of the Normal Curve Lecture 12/1/04.
Georgia State University Series
A Steep Hill to Climb: Identifying the Literacy Crisis for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students Christine Yoshinaga- Itano, Ph.D. Professor University of.
Situation of Children with Hearing Impairments in Ethiopia.
NHS nd International Conference on Newborn Hearing Screening, Diagnosis, and Intervention Como, Italy May 31, 2002 Progress in Specific Language.
Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind November 20, 2013
Our textbook defines Section 504 as:  As a person with a disability as anyone who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or.
Premature and Low-birth Weight Children By Tina Figueroa and Doris Russell.
LEAP – USA (Using Science-based Approaches) Three Year Follow-up Outcomes for Children with Autism in LEAP's Randomized Trial Phillip S. Strain & Ted Bovey.
SPED 537 ECSE Methods Multiple Disabilities Ch 6 Deborah Chen, Ph.D. California State University, Northridge March 27-28, 2006.
Speech and Language Issues For Babies and Pre-school age children who have Down Syndrome Ups and Downs Southwest Conference 2007.
All Aboard! Child Outcomes Measurement Across Early Childhood Systems Dawn McGrath ICAN/ISTAR Director Ann Ruhmkorff Indiana GSEG Project Coordinator.
Ages & Stages Questionnaires® (ASQ-3) A Parent-Completed, Child-Monitoring System Ages & Stages Questionnaires® is a registered trademark of Paul H. Brookes.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Use of Signed Communication Among Parents of Cochlear- Implanted Children with Additional Disabilities.
Oklahoma Parents as Teachers (OPAT) Program Results 1.
Georgia CTAE Resource Network Instructional Resources office July 2009
Miller Function & Participation Scales (M-FUN)
A NEW SYSTEM OF SUPPORT FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS WITH DISABILITIES Recent Changes in the Provision of Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers with.
WHERE ARE THEY NOW: Children who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Identified by Newborn Hearing Screening in Hawai`i 2005 Early Hearing Detection and Intervention.
Minnesota FAED Project Survey Deaf Education Summit April 22, 2010.
 range in severity and may interfere with the progress and use of one or more of the following: Oral language (listening, speaking, understanding) Reading.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1  Two Major Types  Language disorders include formulating and comprehending spoken messages. ▪ Categories:
Special Education 547 Unit Five Special Topics Kevin Anderson Minnesota State University Moorhead 2006.
DEVELOPMENT IN INFANCY AND EARLY CHILDHOOD by Dr. Azher Shah Associate Professor Department of Paediatric Medicine.
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5: Introduction to Norm- Referenced.
Language Disorders of Young Children
The NC Infant Toddler Program: Together We Grow Policy information taken N.C. Infant-Toddler Program Manual.
A Medical Home for Children with Hearing Loss Julia L. Hecht, M.D., Deaf Access Program Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Approaches to Converting Assessment Data to OSEP Outcome Categories Jim J Lesko, Ed.D. Delaware Department of Education
PROFESSOR KERI MCCORVEY M. CCC-SLP PROFESSOR KERI MCCORVEY M. CCC-SLP Seminar Unit 3 Identification and Early Intervention.
Minnesota's Approach to Comprehensive Assessment Megan E. Cox, Ph.D. Principal Leadership Academy January 11, 2016 Minnesota’s Approach to Comprehensive.
E-LAP TRAINING. Who Can Administer? The Manual does not give guidelines as to who can and can’t administer the E-LAP.
Foundations of Environment Rating Scales Presented By: 1.
ASQ-3 HMG Home Visiting July Discussion points What is developmental screening What are the basic features of the ASQ-3 When should you adjust for.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
Language Outcomes, Growth, and Predictors of Success: A Multi-State (NECAP) Perspective WREIC June 16, 2017.
CHAPTER 8: Language and Bilingual Assessment
CHAPTER 7: Developmental Assessment
Linking Standards, IFSPs and Service Delivery
Assessment of Communication
Chris Russell Sam Morgan Hunter College SPED 746
Presentation transcript:

Assessments for Children Birth to 3: Part 1 Minnesota Child Development Inventory Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind November 6, 2013

Presenter Allison Sedey, Ph.D., CCC-SLP, CCC-A University of Colorado-Boulder Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind 

Today’s Topics Description of assessment Instructions for administration Opportunity for families with children who are d/hoh to participate in NECAP Interpretation and use of results

Age Range 12 months to 6 years Expressive language most sensitive from 15 months to 3½ years Language Comprehension most sensitive from 12 months to 3½ years

General Description Parent report Parents respond “yes” or “no” to a variety of statements about their child Example: “Has a vocabulary of 20 or more words” 9 areas of development assessed Summary score “general development”

Areas Assessed Social Self Help Gross Motor Fine Motor Expressive Language Language Comprehension

Areas Assessed (cont.) Letters Numbers Situation Comprehension (from 1974 version) General Development Composite score Selected items from all subscales

Published version Available from Pearson Education, Inc. Manual available on-line at: 59/files/cdi-manual.pdf

Adapted version for d/hoh Adapted at the University of Colorado- Boulder Based on original adaptations made at Gallaudet University Appropriate for children who use sign language (with or without spoken language)

Adapted version for d/hoh Clarification that sign or spoken language is acceptable ASL equivalents on grammar items Some auditory items adapted to include a visual counterpart **Adapted version available in English or Spanish

Scoring Age scores assigned on each subscale Plotted on a profile sheet relative to: Chronological Age Borderline delay (20% below CA) Significant delay (30% below CA)

NECAP National Early Childhood Assessment Project Assisting interested states in administering two developmental assessments  Minnesota Child Development Inventory  MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory

NECAP National Early Childhood Assessment Project For children who are deaf or hard of hearing Assessments scored by CU-Boulder Report of child’s results sent to interventionist and/or family Annual accountability report sent to participating state/agency

NECAP ** State- or agency-level administrators interested in participating in NECAP can contact:

Use of Results Identifies children functioning within vs. below average range Age scores are typically easily understood by parents Easy to monitor progress over time Self Help and Situation Comprehension provide estimate of non-verbal cognition

Use of Results (cont.) Profile sheet provides a visual display of areas of strength and limitations Are scores consistent across developmental domains or varied? Alerts interventionist to possible need for referral to other disciplines

Use of Results (cont.) In conjunction with manual listing items in developmental order: Identify specific items where child is delayed Delay or lack of opportunity? Does lack of a single skill dramatically impact score? (e.g., feeding) Identify “next steps” in a variety of skill areas