Interaction LBSC 734 Module 4 Doug Oard. Agenda Where interaction fits Query formulation Selection part 1: Snippets Selection part 2: Result sets  Examination.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recuperação de Informação B Cap. 10: User Interfaces and Visualization 10.1,10.2,10.3 November 17, 1999.
Advertisements

Support.ebsco.com Student Research Center with Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre Tutorial.
Transforming Information Into Knowledge Group Intelligence By Angelos Papaioannidis Knowledge is worthless – unless it moves, is shared and acted upon!
Interaction LBSC 796/INFM 718R Douglas W. Oard Week 4, February 23, 2011.
Arrayed Maps An excellent way to review at the end of a unit. This activity results in a bulletin board displaying an array of phenomena maps developed.
Information Retrieval: Human-Computer Interfaces and Information Access Process.
Ranked Retrieval INST 734 Module 3 Doug Oard. Agenda  Ranked retrieval Similarity-based ranking Probability-based ranking.
Learning about software Interfaces.  In this lab, you will examine  Excel Spreadsheet Interface  Access Database Interface  You will also learn about.
UNESCO ICTLIP Module 4. Lesson 3 Database Design, and Information Storage and Retrieval Lesson 3. Information storage and retrieval using WinISIS.
Information Retrieval in Practice
Design Activities in Usability Engineering laura leventhal and julie barnes.
Designing the User Interface Theories, Principles, and Guidelines Course 4, CMC, 23/09/03.
VISUAL INTERFACE DATABASE WITH FISHEYE TECHNOLOGY Peter Sommer Ju-Ling Shih, Laura Zadoff Columbia Center for New Media Teaching and Learning Visual Interface.
Human-Computer Interaction and Prototype Demos Session 8 INFM 718N Web-Enabled Databases.
INFM 700: Session 7 Unstructured Information (Part II) Jimmy Lin The iSchool University of Maryland Monday, March 10, 2008 This work is licensed under.
Information Retrieval Interaction CMSC 838S Douglas W. Oard April 27, 2006.
HCI Part 2 and Testing Session 9 INFM 718N Web-Enabled Databases.
Information Retrieval: Human-Computer Interfaces and Information Access Process.
Today’s class Group Presentation More about principles, guidelines, style guides and standards In-class exercises More about usability Norman’s model of.
LBSC 796/INFM 718R: Week 9 User Interaction Jimmy Lin College of Information Studies University of Maryland Monday, April 3, 2006.
WMES3103: INFORMATION RETRIEVAL WEEK 10 : USER INTERFACES AND VISUALIZATION.
Guided Conversational Agents and Knowledge Trees for Natural Language Interfaces to Relational Databases Mr. Majdi Owda, Dr. Zuhair Bandar, Dr. Keeley.
Interaction LBSC 796/INFM 718R Douglas W. Oard Week 4, October 1, 2007.
1 Final Discussion Class User Interfaces. 2 Discussion Classes Format: Question Ask a member of the class to answer Provide opportunity for others to.
ISP 433/633 Week 12 User Interface in IR. Why care about User Interface in IR Human Search using IR depends on –Search in IR and search in human memory.
1 User Interface Design CIS 375 Bruce R. Maxim UM-Dearborn.
Interaction LBSC 734 Module 4 Doug Oard. Agenda Where interaction fits  Query formulation Selection part 1: Snippets Selection part 2: Result sets Examination.
Access Point One: Purpose and Modeling
Search Engines and Information Retrieval Chapter 1.
Ch 6 - Menu-Based and Form Fill-In Interactions Yonglei Tao School of Computing & Info Systems GVSU.
1 Human-Computer Interaction  Design process  Task and User Characteristics  Guidelines  Evaluation.
Interaction Design Session 12 LBSC 790 / INFM 718B Building the Human-Computer Interface.
Evaluation INST 734 Module 5 Doug Oard. Agenda Evaluation fundamentals  Test collections: evaluating sets Test collections: evaluating rankings Interleaving.
Information in the Digital Environment Information Seeking Models Dr. Dania Bilal IS 530 Spring 2006.
Evaluation INST 734 Module 5 Doug Oard. Agenda  Evaluation fundamentals Test collections: evaluating sets Test collections: evaluating rankings Interleaving.
User Interfaces & IR Readings Review - Googling Further - HomeFinder Live Demos!
IR Theory: Relevance Feedback. Relevance Feedback: Example  Initial Results Search Engine2.
The Structure of Information Retrieval Systems LBSC 708A/CMSC 838L Douglas W. Oard and Philip Resnik Session 1: September 4, 2001.
User Interfaces 4 BTECH: IT WIKI PAGE:
Structure of IR Systems INST 734 Module 1 Doug Oard.
Interaction LBSC 734 Module 4 Doug Oard. Agenda Where interaction fits Query formulation Selection part 1: Snippets  Selection part 2: Result sets Examination.
Chris Cook STEPS Head of Program, CQUniversity.  One of two academic writing units in STEPS  Designed for students intending to study health, science.
Claudia AchatschitzGEOGERAS '061 Preference Based Spatial Decision Support A dialogue based spatial query Claudia Achatschitz Institute for Geoinformation.
Catalogue of decisions CDM Executive Board EB September 2006.
Database Architecture Course Orientation & Context.
Digital Libraries1 David Rashty. Digital Libraries2 “A library is an arsenal of liberty” Anonymous.
Search Result Interface Hongning Wang Abstraction of search engine architecture User Ranker Indexer Doc Analyzer Index results Crawler Doc Representation.
Evidence from Content INST 734 Module 2 Doug Oard.
Software Engineering Principles Practical Advice and Steps for Managing Your Project.
User Interface Design Lecture #4 Part-A. 30 January, 2008Human Computer Interaction Spring 2008, Lecture #4A 2 Agenda Principles on User Interface Design.
Human-Computer Interaction Design process Task and User Characteristics Guidelines Evaluation ISE
Human Computer Interaction Introduction. Subject : Learning Outcomes At the end of this semester, the student should be able to: Identify the basic concept.
User Interfaces and Information Retrieval Dina Reitmeyer WIRED (i385d)
User Interfaces for Information Access Prof. Marti Hearst SIMS 202, Lecture 26.
November 8, 2005NSF Expedition Workshop Supporting E-Discovery with Search Technology Douglas W. Oard College of Information Studies and Institute for.
Search Strategies Session 7 INST 301 Introduction to Information Science.
The Future of OPAC Interfaces Jamshid Beheshti, Ph.D. Director Graduate School of Library & Information Studies McGill University.
Principles Determine users' skill levels Novice or first-time users - Knowledgeable intermittent users - create templates Expert frequent users-
Your Personal Workout Coach
World of work How do tasks bring the WoW into the classroom?
Ch 1 Second Half What is a Language?
RIS715 Human-Computer Interaction
9 Algorithms: Indexing Now where did I put that?.
Evaluation of IR Performance
Models, Metaphor, Paradigms
Pre-Writing Mind Map Templates
World of work How do tasks bring the WoW into the classroom?
Lab 2: Information Retrieval
Structure of IR Systems
Question Examples Is the interactive Google map useful?
Presentation transcript:

Interaction LBSC 734 Module 4 Doug Oard

Agenda Where interaction fits Query formulation Selection part 1: Snippets Selection part 2: Result sets  Examination

Fisheye Document Viewer

Mainly about both DBMS and reliability Mainly about DBMS, discusses reliability Mainly about, say, banking, with a subtopic discussion on DBMS/Reliability Mainly about high-tech layoffs TileBars Topic: reliability of DBMS (database systems) Query terms: DBMS, reliability DBMS reliability DBMS reliability DBMS reliability DBMS reliability

U Mass: Scrollbar-Tilebar

Some Good Advice Human-Computer Interaction User in control –Anticipatable outcomes –Explainable results –Browsable content –Informative feedback –Easy reversal Limit working memory load –Show query context Support for learning –Novice and expert alternatives –Scaffolding Interactive IR Support human reasoning –Show actual content –Depict uncertainty –Be fast Use familiar metaphors –Timelines, ranked lists, maps, … Some system initiative –Loosely guide the process –Expose structure of knowledge Co-design w/search strategies Credit: Ben Shneiderman

Four Simple Ideas Show the query in the selection interface –It provides context for the display Suggest options to the user –Query refinements, for example Explain what the system has done –Highlight query terms in the results, for example Complement what the system has done –Users add value by doing things the system can’t –Expose the information users need to judge utility