1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

Ozgur Ates Hampton University HUGS 2009-JLAB TREK Experiment “Tracking and Baseline Design”
Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
TRACK DICTIONARY (UPDATE) RESOLUTION, EFFICIENCY AND L – R AMBIGUITY SOLUTION Claudio Chiri MEG meeting, 21 Jan 2004.
Calibration for different trigger sources (DT,CSC,RPC) S.Bolognesi for the Torino group (with a big help from M. Dalla Valle) DT Cosmic Analysis meeting.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
CMS Physics Meeting, Dec. 6, Analysis Note on the Validation of the ORCA Simulation of the Endcap Muon CSC Front-end Electronics S. Durkin -- Ohio.
Reconstruction of neutrino interactions in PEANUT in general scanning (unbiased) mode Giovanni De Lellis on behalf of Andrea Russo Naples University.
TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos. Introduction SCT Week – March 03 Jose E. Garcia TB & Simulation results Simulation results Inner detector.
DT calibration status A. Vilela Pereira for the DT calibration team (Università degli Studi di Torino & INFN Torino) Muon Barrel Workshop – July
Commissioning data are taken with individual chambers TP data autotriggered Cosmic rays data  ( different configuration) Different cosmic track angle.
A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.
Pion test beam from KEK: momentum studies Data provided by Toho group: 2512 beam tracks D. Duchesneau April 27 th 2011 Track  x Track  y Base track positions.
Approved Plots from CMS First Beam Runs 2-October-2008.
Tracking within hadronic showers in the SDHCAL Imad Laktineh.
U.GaspariniCMS week, 11/06/021 MB3 internal alignment study using cosmic muons - 14 MB3 chambers assembled in Legnaro have been extensively tested using.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
Performance of Track and Vertex Reconstruction and B-Tagging Studies with CMS in pp Collisions at sqrt(s)=7 TeV Boris Mangano University of California,
Barrel RPC Chamber consists of 2 double-gaps, each equipped with a common plane of 96 strips read-out by 6 front-end boards. The two double- gaps have.
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
Andrey Korytov, University of Florida IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Honolulu, 31 October Performance of CMS Cathode Strip Chambers Andrey Korytov.
HLT DT Calibration (on Data Challenge Dedicated Stream) G. Cerminara N. Amapane M. Giunta CMS Muon Meeting.
CMS WEEK – MARCH06 REVIEW OF MB4 COMMISSIONING DATA Giorgia Mila
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
Positional and Angular Resolution of the CALICE Pre-Prototype ECAL Hakan Yilmaz.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Tracking & Ecal Positional/Angular Resolution Hakan Yilmaz.
A. Meneguzzo Padova University & INFN Validation and Performance of the CMS Barrel Muon Drift Chambers with Cosmic Rays A. Meneguzzo Padova University.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
3D Event reconstruction in ArgoNeuT Maddalena Antonello and Ornella Palamara 11 gennaio 20161M.Antonello - INFN, LNGS.
Muon Barrel Geometry Studies Luca Scodellaro Muon Barrel Workshop July 6 th, 2010.
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
Preliminary results on DT T0s in beam collisions J. Santaolalla, J. Alcaraz (+ help/suggestions from C. Battilana, C. Fouz)
1 Light Yield results from the KEK tracker test using G4MICE M. Ellis Tracker Phone Meeting 25 th January 2006.
Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon.
Study of Belle Silicon Vertex Detector Intrinsic Resolution Saša Fratina, Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia for Belle SVD group.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
Study of 1D Hit Error Assignment Marco Terranova, Filippo Pisano, N. Amapane, G. Cerminara.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
Impact Parameter Resolution Measurements from 900 GeV LHC DATA Boris Mangano & Ryan Kelley (UCSD)
Irradiated 3D sensor testbeam results Alex Krzywda On behalf of CMS 3D collaboration Purdue University March 15, 2012.
Study of Charged Hadrons in Au-Au Collisions at with the PHENIX Time Expansion Chamber Dmitri Kotchetkov for the PHENIX Collaboration Department of Physics,
Plots of RPC performance G. Cattani, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” & INFN Roma 2 on behalf of ATLAS Muon Collaboration.
Tracking software of the BESIII drift chamber Linghui WU For the BESIII MDC software group.
Pattern recognition with the triplet method Fabrizio Cei INFN & University of Pisa MEG Meeting, Hakata October /10/20131 Fabrizio Cei.
E. W. Grashorn, for the MINOS Collaboration Observation of Shadowing in the Underground Muon Flux in MINOS This poster was supported directly by the U.S.
Operation, performance and upgrade of the CMS Resistive Plate Chamber system at LHC Marcello Abbrescia Physics Department - University of Bari & INFN,
Comparison of algorithms for hit reconstruction in the DTs: Test of calibration procedures for t trig and drift velocity on Test Beam data Test of calibration.
Approved Plots from CRAFT
M. Kuhn, P. Hopchev, M. Ferro-Luzzi
Searches for double partons
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
FURTHER STUDIES ON COMMISSIONING DATA
Calibration Status of the art – the first tTrig calculated from data
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
Track Finding.
DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Forward-Backward Asymmetry Study in
Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays
The CMS muon system performance
p0 detection and reconstruction with the
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
RPC approved plots.
Presentation transcript:

1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.: more detailed information on the plots can be found on the draft PAS linked in the Twiki page: https: //twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/DTLocalRecoCRAFTPaper full info and complete analysis on muon CMS-NOTE also linked in the page, submitted to muon editorial board on 11/6/09 ]

2 Plots list : → Highlight most relevant results from DT Local Reco CRAFT analysis: 1) Resolution of rec.hits, after the muon arrival time determination (i.e. the best obtainable performance nearest to LHC condition…) 1.a single chamber distribution 1.b summary from all DT chambers 2) Reconstructed hit efficiency 3) Result from dedicated  -rays study 4) DT track segment distributions: hit multiplicity & track direction 5) Track segments efficiencies in all DT chambers 6) Bending vs p T (between consecutive chambers & using the full “lever-arm” MB4→MB1) & multiple scattering effect

3 1.a Hit residuals in single chamber Reconstructed hit residuals in a MB1 DT station of Wheel-2, with respect to the predicted position from the segment extrapolation, after the determination of the arrival time of the cosmic muon in the chamber. The MB1 stations of this wheel have in their sensitive volume the larger value of the residual magnetic field, which may worsen the chamber resolution. The red curves show the result of a double Gaussian fit to the distributions. The bulk of the distribution has a fitted dispersion  1 ≈220  m in the data (≈190  m in the MC simulation). The expected resolution from test-beam measurement is 200  m. The scatter plot on the right shows the residuals as a function of the local position in the DT cells.

4 Distribution of the fitted values of the reconstructed hit resolution in 246 DT chambers, after the determination of the cosmic muon arrival time in the chamber. The blue entries are from chambers in the vertical sectors of the Muon Barrel system, for which the incident angle of the muon track with respect to the normal direction to the chamber is on average very large. 1.b Hit residuals : summary from all DT chambers

5 Efficiency to have a reconstructed hit in a DT cell crossed by a cosmic muon as a function of the predicted muon local position in the cell for the four different Muon Barrel stations. The position of the anode wire is at x=0; the I-beams separating contigous cells are positioned at x= ± 2.1 cm. 2. Hit efficiency

6 Distribution of the difference between the distance to the cell anode wire of the first hit recorded in a cell and the distance of the extrapolated track position. The left-side tail in the plot is due to  -rays passing nearer to the wire than the crossing muon. The right-side tails originates from  -rays farer than the muon, when the muon hit goes undetected. The x- coordinate has been expanded to values larger than the cell size, to show the effect of  ray hits occurring in the cell neighbouring to the one in which there is the extrapolated prediction. Hits from  -ray affects the association efficiency of the muon hits to the track segments built in a chamber. The simulation agrees with the data at ~ 0.5 % level. 3. Effect of  -rays

7 Right: distribution of the reconstructed local angle with respect to the direction normal to the chamber, for reconstructed cosmic muon crossing the top sectors of the Muon Barrel system. Dots: data; full line histograms: simulation. The data-MC discrepancy in the left plots is due to a slight difference in the hit association efficiency, which sum-up independently for each of the 12 (8 for MB4 stations) layers. (see PAS note for more details) 4. Segments: hit multiplicity & track direction Left: multiplicity of associated hits to reconstructed segments in the four Muon Barrel stations of the top sector (sector 4) of CMS

8 Segment reconstruction efficiency in the r-  plane in the DT Muon Barrel chambers. Black: MB1, red: MB2, green: MB3, blue: MB4. Chambers from vertical sectors are not shown in the plots, due to lack of statistics of good quality tracks usable by the efficiency computation algorithm. Segment reconstruction efficiency in the r-  plane 5. Track segments efficiency

9 Bending angle differences between consecutive stations: MB1-MB2 (left) and MB2-MB3 (right), for muons of p T = (10±2) GeV/c (red histograms) and p T = (30±5) GeV/c (blue histograms). A gaussian fit to the p T = 30 GeV/c distribution is shown both for positive (points) and negative (full line) muons. The agreement of the fitted average values shows the accuracy of the alignment of the stations. The dispersion of the distribution is in agreement with expectations from multiple scattering.  6. Bending between consecutive stations

10 Bending angle differences between MB1 and MB4 stations. The selected p T interval for the p T = 200 GeV/c distribution is [150, 250] GeV/c. As seen from the distributions, the Standalone muon system is capable to correctly identify the muon charge of a 200 GeV muon in 80% of the cases, without any assumption on the primary vertex. Fitted dispersion of the distribution of the bending angle differences between consecutive stations as a function of the muon momentum. Full points:  +; open points:  -. The dashed and dashed-dotted lines show the expectations from the multiple scattering between MB1-MB2 and MB2-MB3 (or MB3-MB4 as well) respectively.

11 Back up

12 MC Reconstructed hit residuals in four DT stations with respect to the predicted position from the segment extrapolation, after the determination of the arrival time of the cosmic muon in the chamber. Left column: data; middle column: simulation. The scatter plots on the right show the residuals as a function of the local position in the DT cells.

13 NOT for approval