1 How to build an ontology Barry Smith

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Five Steps to Interoperability (in the domain of scientific ontology) Barry Smith.
Advertisements

Upper Ontology Summit Tuesday March 14 The BFO perspective Barry Smith Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo National Center.
KR-2002 Panel/Debate Are Upper-Level Ontologies worth the effort? Chris Welty, IBM Research.
1 Towards a Reference Terminology for Talking about Ontologies and Related Artifacts Barry Smith with thanks to Werner.
Knowledge Representation
So What Does it All Mean? Geospatial Semantics and Ontologies Dr Kristin Stock.
Ontology From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In philosophy, ontology (from the Greek oν, genitive oντος: of being (part. of εiναι: to be) and –λογία:
Ontology Notes are from:
New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences R T U New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences R T U.
1 Transportation Librarians Roundtable Transportation Research Thesaurus: WSDOT Use Cases February 14, 2008 Andy Everett Metadata Repository Administrator.
1 Introduction to Ontology: Terminology Barry Smith with thanks to Werner Ceusters, Waclaw Kusnierczyk, Daniel Schober.
1 Introduction to (Geo)Ontology Barry Smith
1 Beyond Concepts Barry Smith
Reconciliation between BFO and DOLCE leads to YATO ー On quality description ー Riichiro Mizoguchi ISIR, Osaka University.
Referent Tracking: Towards Semantic Interoperability and Knowledge Sharing Barry Smith Ontology Research Group Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and.
AN INTRODUCTION TO BIOMEDICAL ONTOLOGY Barry Smith University at Buffalo 1.
VT. From Basic Formal Ontology to Medicine Barry Smith and Anand Kumar.
Pathways and Networks for Realists Barry Smith 1.
1 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina Issues for Discussion and Work Jan 2007  Choose meeting time.
Formal Ontology and Information Systems Nicola Guarino (FOIS’98) Presenter: Yihong Ding CS652 Spring 2004.
1 A General Introduction to Biomedical Ontology Barry Smith
1 The OBO Relation Ontology Genome Biology 2005, 6:R46 based on the fundamental distinction between instances and universals takes instances and time into.
1/24 An ontology-based methodology for the migration of biomedical terminologies to the EHR Barry Smith and Werner Ceusters.
1 Part II. The Ontology of Biomedical Reality Some Terminological Proposals.
HL7 RIM Exegesis and Critique Regenstrief Institute, November 8, 2005 Barry Smith Director National Center for Ontological Research.
Foundations This chapter lays down the fundamental ideas and choices on which our approach is based. First, it identifies the needs of architects in the.
Theresa Tsosie-Robledo MS RN-BC February 15, 2012
SNOMED CT Denise Downs Knowledge Management & Education Lead Data Standards, Technology Office Department of Health Informatics Directorate.
Knowledge representation
Of 39 lecture 2: ontology - basics. of 39 ontology a branch of metaphysics relating to the nature and relations of being a particular theory about the.
Chapter 6: ER – Entity Relationship Diagram
Introduction to Ontology Barry Smith August 11, 2012.
Why we need the OBO Core Michael Ashburner, Suzanna Lewis and Barry Smith.
Nancy Lawler U.S. Department of Defense ISO/IEC Part 2: Classification Schemes Metadata Registries — Part 2: Classification Schemes The revision.
Core 6 (University at Buffalo) Dissemination of Ontology Best Practices Barry Smith (PI) Fabian Neuhaus (Post-Doc) Werner.
Dimitrios Skoutas Alkis Simitsis
1 The Ontology of CLASSIFICATION Barry Smith ONTOLOGIST.cOm.
Taken from Schulze-Kremer Steffen Ontologies - What, why and how? Cartic Ramakrishnan LSDIS lab University of Georgia.
Semantic web course – Computer Engineering Department – Sharif Univ. of Technology – Fall Knowledge Representation Semantic Web - Fall 2005 Computer.
EEL 5937 Ontologies EEL 5937 Multi Agent Systems Lecture 5, Jan 23 th, 2003 Lotzi Bölöni.
Christoph F. Eick University of Houston Organization 1. What are Ontologies? 2. What are they good for? 3. Ontologies and.
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
AT&T Government Solutions, Inc. Patrick Emery Lewis Hart or
User Profiling using Semantic Web Group members: Ashwin Somaiah Asha Stephen Charlie Sudharshan Reddy.
Of 33 lecture 1: introduction. of 33 the semantic web vision today’s web (1) web content – for human consumption (no structural information) people search.
Issues in Ontology-based Information integration By Zhan Cui, Dean Jones and Paul O’Brien.
Some Thoughts to Consider 8 How difficult is it to get a group of people, or a group of companies, or a group of nations to agree on a particular ontology?
EEL 5937 Ontologies EEL 5937 Multi Agent Systems Lotzi Bölöni.
Species and Classification in Biology Barry Smith
1 An Introduction to Ontology for Scientists Barry Smith University at Buffalo
1 The OBO Relation Ontology: Preliminaries Barry Smith
Upper Ontology Summit The BFO perspective Barry Smith Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo National Center for Ontological Research National.
New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences R T U New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences R T U.
Ontologies COMP6028 Semantic Web Technologies Dr Nicholas Gibbins
New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences R T U Discovery Seminar /UE 141 MMM – Spring 2008 Solving Crimes using Referent.
1 Standards and Ontology Barry Smith
Knowledge Representation Part I Ontology Jan Pettersen Nytun Knowledge Representation Part I, JPN, UiA1.
COP Introduction to Database Structures
UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEMS (UMLS)
COMP6215 Semantic Web Technologies
Common MBSE Modeling Questions and How Ontology Helps
Knowledge Representation Part II Description Logic & Introduction to Protégé Jan Pettersen Nytun.
CCNT Lab of Zhejiang University
ece 627 intelligent web: ontology and beyond
Towards the Information Artifact Ontology 2
Ontology From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Active Data Management in Space 20m DG
LECTURE 34: Database Introduction
Transportation Research Thesaurus:
PubMed.
Presentation transcript:

1 How to build an ontology Barry Smith

2 Two types of ontology natural-science ontologies capture terminology-level knowledge used by best current science vs. administrative ontologies (e.g. billing ontologies, bloodbank ontologies, lab workflow ontologies)

3 Scientific ontologies have special features Every term in a scientific ontology must be such that the developers of the ontology believe it to refer to some entity on the basis of the best current evidence

4 For scientific ontologies reusability is crucial compatibility with neighboring scientific ontologies is crucial  it should not be too easy to add new terms to an ontology we want to introduce these features in clinical medicine...

5 For scientific ontologies the issue of how the ontology will be used is not a factor relevant for determining which entities will be acknowledged by the ontology If this decision is made on specific practical needs, this will thwart reusability of the data the ontology is used to annotate

6 Administrative ontologies Entities may be brought into existence by the ontology itself. (Convention...) Highly task-dependent – reusability and compatibility not (always) important Developers may invent dummy entities (‘surgical procedure not performed because of patient request’) e.g. for forensic reasons (reality and knowledge are confused)

7 Hypothesis Many of the shortfalls of existing administrative ontologies can be overcome by adopting the scientific approach A good theory is, in the long run, also practically useful Administrative ontologies ~ data models

An Ontological Square Ontologies in support of science Administrative ontologies

9 An Ontological Square Upper-level integrating ontologies Domain ontologies

10 An Ontological Square Upper-level integrating ontologies Domain ontologies Ontologies in support of science Administrative ontologies

11 An Ontological Square Upper-level integrating ontologies Domain ontologies Ontologies in support of science BFO (Basic Formal Ontology) DOLCE SNOMED SwissProt FMA Administrative ontologies (for e- commerce, etc.) FOAF top level: person, topic, document, primary topic... Amazon.com ontology Library of Congress Catalog

12 Problem of ensuring sensible cooperation in a massively interdisciplinary community concept type instance model representation data

13 RetailPrice hasA Denomination InstanceOf Dollar (p. 101) SI-Unit instanceof System-of-Units (p. 40) from Handbook of Ontology (Semantic Web approach)

14 from: Ontological Engineering (Semantic Web approach) location =def. a spatial point identified by a name (p. 12) arrivalPlace =def. a journey ends at a location (p. 13) facet =def. ternary relation that holds between a frame, a slot, and the facet (p. 51)

15 What must an ontology contain terms (represent types in reality) preferred labels synonyms unique IDs alphanumeric identifiers for each term namespace ID (e.g. GO) nodes edges definitions axioms

16 Entity =def anything which exists, including things and processes, functions and qualities, beliefs and actions, documents and software (Levels 1, 2 and 3)

17 what are the kinds of entity?

18 First basic distinction universal vs. instance (science text vs. diary) (human being vs. Tom Cruise)

19 For science, and thus for scientific ontologies, it is generalizations that are important = universals, types, kinds, species

20 A515287DC3300 Dust Collector Fan B521683Gilmer Belt C521682Motor Drive Belt Catalog vs. inventory

21 Catalog vs. inventory

Catalog of Universals/Types

23 Ontology Universals Instances

24 Ontology = A Representation of Universals

25 Ontology = A representation of universals Each node of an ontology consists of: preferred term (aka term) term identifier (TUI, aka CUI) synonyms definition, glosses, comments

26 An ontology is a representation of universals We learn about universals in reality from looking at the results of scientific experiments in the form of scientific theories experiments relate to what is particular science describes what is general

siamese mammal cat organism substance universals animal frog instances

28 Domain =def a portion of reality that forms the subject- matter of a single science or technology or mode of study or administrative practice...; proteomics HIV epidemiology

29 Representation =def an image, idea, map, picture, name or description... of some entity or entities.

30 Ontologies are representational artifacts comparable to science texts and subject to the same sorts of constraints (including need for update)

31 Representational units =def terms, icons, alphanumeric identifiers... which refer, or are intended to refer, to entities and which are minimal (atoms)

32 Composite representation =def representation (1) built out of representational units which (2) form a structure that mirrors, or is intended to mirror, the entities in some domain

33 Analogue representations no representational units, no ‘atoms’

34 Periodic Table The Periodic Table

35 Ontologies are here

36 or here

37 ontologies represent general structures in reality (leg)

38 Ontologies do not represent concepts in people’s heads

39 They represent universals in reality

40 “leg” is not the name of a concept concepts do not stand in the part_of connectedness causes treats... relations used by biomedical ontologies

A515287DC3300 Dust Collector Fan B521683Gilmer Belt C521682Motor Drive Belt instances universals

42 Inventory vs. Catalog: Two kinds of representational artifact Databases represent instances Ontologies represent universals

43 How do we know which general terms designate universals? Roughly: terms used by scientists to designate entities about which we have a plurality of different kinds of testable proposition (cell, electron...)

44 Language has the power to create general terms which go beyond the domain of universals studied by science (sometimes language goes on holiday: cancelled haircut)

45 Problem: fiat demarcations male over 30 years of age with family history of diabetes abnormal curvature of spine participant in trial #2030

46 Problem: roles fist patient FDA-approved drug

47 Administrative ontologies often need to go beyond universals Fall on stairs or ladders in water transport injuring occupant of small boat, unpowered Railway accident involving collision with rolling stock and injuring pedal cyclist Nontraffic accident involving motor-driven snow vehicle injuring pedestrian

48 Class =def a maximal collection of particulars determined by a general term (‘cell’. ‘electron’ but also: ‘ ‘restaurant in Palo Alto’, ‘Italian’) the class A = the collection of all particulars x for which ‘x is A’ is true