Research Issues on Treating Substance-Abusing Offenders Michael L. Prendergast, Ph.D. William M. Burdon, Ph.D. UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
Advertisements

Ex-Offenders and Housing
What is the term that defines the men and women we supervise? Parolee Probationer Offender Supervised Releasee Restored Citizen Returning Citizen Client.
Treatment of Substance Involved Offenders in Criminal Justice Settings – Challenges & Outcomes Igor Koutsenok, MD, MS Assistant Professor of Psychiatry,
Issues Faced by Juveniles Leaving Custody: Breaking Down the Barriers University of Oregon April 6, 2007 Pat Arthur, National Center for Youth Law.
Abstract People who enter substance abuse treatment under various degrees of legal pressure do at least as well at the end of treatment or at follow-up.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Strategies for Drug-Abusing.
Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: What Works with Offenders? Rita Dries July 2006.
Nora D. Volkow, M.D. Director National Institute on Drug Abuse Nora D. Volkow, M.D. Director National Institute on Drug Abuse RESEARCH and TREATMENT Provide.
Sex Offender Treatment US Probation Central California Presented by Helene Creager, LCSW Supervisor & Mental Health Coordinator US Probation Central District.
A MERICAN P SYCHOLOGICAL A SSOCIATION 11. Forensic Issues II.
VA Programs for Justice-Involved Veterans
The Honorable John R. Roach, Jr. 296 th Judicial District Court Alyse Ferguson, Esq. Attorney Director, MHMC Program.
ENROLLING JUSTICE INVOLVED POPULATIONS: POLICY IMPLICATIONS LINDSAY NELSON KENTUCKY PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION.
PROJECT FUNDING PROVIDED BY R e-entering O ffenders A chieving R ecovery ROAR offers reintegration and recovery services to male adult offenders transitioning.
DOC REENTRY SERVICES TEAM Reentry Services Director Gary Johnson Reentry Program Manager Tim Lanz Community Reentry Coordinator Farris Bell Facilities.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Common Practices in Treatment for Drug Using Offenders : Results from the National Criminal Justice Treatment Practices Survey Faye S. Taxman, Ph.D.
Family Support Program for Ex-Offenders (“FSP”) Presentation l Introduction and Rationale l Presentation by Clients l Program Description and Lessons Learned.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
In the Community. Community Corrections Continues after incarceration And it deals with split sentences.
Evaluating Prison-Based Therapeutic Community Substance Abuse Programs: The California Initiative William M. Burdon, Ph.D. David Farabee, Ph.D. Michael.
UCLA Drug Abuse Research CenterForever Free Evaluation Forever Free Substance Abuse Treatment Program Outcomes Study Michael Prendergast, Ph.D., Principal.
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
Participant Choice – Access to Recovery as a Voucher Service Delivery Model Presented to National Summit on Prisoner Re-Entry Sponsored by the White House.
Evidence-based Practices (EBP) in Corrections
Evidence-Based Sentencing. Learning Objectives Describe the three principles of evidence- based practice and the key elements of evidence-based sentencing;
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Joe Vesowate Assistant Commissioner.
Special Prison Populations
By Jacqueline Gallegos ……to  Chaired by Judge Wells  Invited Executive Level Management  Working toward Local Implementation ◦ Local government.
Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.
North Carolina TASC Clinical Series Training Module One: Understanding TASC.
Probation and Parole in the United States Your presenter:
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections.
Housing: A Significant Reentry Barrier Nicole E. Sullivan NC Department of Correction Office of Research and Planning.
Pretrial, Probation and Parole
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
Evaluations of CDCR Substance Abuse Programs: Lessons Learned Michael L. Prendergast, Ph.D. Criminal Justice Research Group UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse.
The Ohio Parole Board’s implementation of Select Strategies Presented by: Cynthia Mausser Chair.
Adult Drug Courts: The Effect of Structural Differences on Program Retention Rates Natasha Williams, Ph.D., J.D., MPH Post Doctoral Fellow, Morgan State.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
Treatment is the Key: Addressing Drug Abuse in Criminal Justice Settings Redonna K. Chandler, Ph.D. Branch Chief Services Research Branch Division of Epidemiology,
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Community-Based Corrections for Juveniles
Are Incentives Effective in Improving Participation and Outcomes in Treatment for Substance-Abusing Offenders? Michael L. Prendergast, Ph.D. Elizabeth.
Transition from Prison to Community Initiative Abt Associates and National Institute of Corrections Transition from Prison to Community Initiative MPRI.
1 Therapeutic Community Treatment in Correctional Settings The Call for An Integrated System George De Leon, Ph.D. Center for Therapeutic Community Research.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 10 – Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INTRO TO CORRECTIONS. WHAT IS CORRECTIONS? Corrections is that portion of the criminal justice system charged with carrying out the sentences.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Psychosocial Changes Among Special Populations in a Prison-based Therapeutic Community David Farabee, Michael Prendergast, & Jerome Cartier University.
1 Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime The TASC Model Elizabeth A. Peyton Presentation at the 7 th National Conference on Drugs and Crime Orlando, Florida,
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Amity In-Prison Therapeutic Community: Five-Year Outcomes Association of Criminal Justice Research (CA) Sacramento,
Introduction Results Treatment Needs and Treatment Completion as Predictors of Return-to-Prison Following Community Treatment for Substance-Abusing Female.
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Richard Rawson, Ph.D. Rachel Gonzales, Ph.D. Funded by: California Alcohol and Drug Programs CalOMS Training for.
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
SEXUAL TRAUMA RECOVERY IS NEEDED TO HELP WOMEN SUCCESSFULLY REINTEGRATE AFTER INCARCERATION Proposal for mental health intervention by Portal Houston in.
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse ProgramsForever Free Evaluation Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Programs for Women Laurie Bright, National Institute.
Substance Abuse Treatment for Adult Offenders: The Prevalence and Access Rates Across Prisons, Jails, and Community Correctional Agencies Faye S. Taxman,
Department of Corrections Joint Judiciary Hearing July 25, 2013.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Promising Practices in Criminal Justice Reform
Using the National Criminal Justice Treatment Practices (NCJTP) Survey
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Coming Soon! Manual on promising practices for the Role of the Corrections Officer in RSAP Programs.
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Presentation transcript:

Research Issues on Treating Substance-Abusing Offenders Michael L. Prendergast, Ph.D. William M. Burdon, Ph.D. UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Drug Abuse Research Center UCLA Extension, May 16, 2001

Purpose Provide a context for the remaining lectures covering the different aspects of treatment within the criminal justice system. Present and discuss the relevant research issues.

Parole and Community-Based Treatment Following Incarceration Goal: To provide a “seamless continuum of care” for clients leaving prison-based treatment and desiring to continue their treatment in the community. Taxman (1998)

Outcomes Research The Importance of Aftercare

KEY-CREST Outcomes Source: Martin et al., 1999 p<.05

Amity Return to Custody at 3 Years p<.000 RJD Source: Wexler et al., 1999

Texas Reincarceration at 3 Years p<.01 Texas Treatment Groups Source: Knight et al., 1999

Texas Reincarceration at 3 Years Texas High Severity Completers vs. Dropouts, p <.01 Completers vs. Comparisons, p <.01 Source: Knight et al., 1999

Texas Reincarceration at 3 Years Texas Low Severity Completers vs. Dropouts, p <.05 Source: Knight et al., 1999

Forever Free Parole Outcomes Source: Prendergast et al. (1996) p <.05

Conclusions from Outcome Studies Prison-based treatment alone does not guarantee long-term successful outcomes. Those who complete prison-based treatment and aftercare do better than those who receive no treatment or dropout of treatment. Treatment intensity should be matched to severity of crime- and drug-related problems (i.e., higher intensity treatment for high severity, lower intensity treatment for low severity).

Providing a continuum of care from the prison to the community

Continuity of Care Models Institutional Outreach Community Reach-In Third-party Coordination (CSAT, 1998; Field, 1998)

Institutional Outreach Prison-Based Treatment Provider CBTP CBTP = Community-Based Treatment Provider CBTP

Community Reach-In Prison-Based Treatment Provider CBTP CBTP = Community-Based Treatment Provider CBTP Prison-Based Treatment Provider CBTP

Third-Party Coordination Prison-Based Treatment Provider CBTP CBTP = Community-Based Treatment Provider CBTP Third-Party Coordinator CBTP Prison-Based Treatment Provider Prison-Based Treatment Provider Prison-Based Treatment Provider

Models of Aftercare in California Parolee Services Network (PSN) Substance Abuse Services Coordinating Agency (SASCA) Female Offender Treatment and Employment Program (FOTEP)

Parolee Services Network CVNBASNPPNP3 Region I Parole Offices Region II Parole Offices Region III Parole Offices Region IV Parole Offices Prison 1Prison 2Prison 3Prison 4Prison 5Prison n Community-Based Providers Outreach

SASCA 1 SASCA 2 SASCA 3 SASCA 4 TC2TCnTC3TC4TC5TC1 Reg 1 ProvidersReg 2 ProvidersReg 3 ProvidersReg 4 Providers SASCA System Coordination Field Parole TC Parole

Advantages of SASCA System Only one contracting agency for each community provider to deal with. Only one services coordination agency for Parole to deal with. Flexibility of allocation -- the dollars go where services are needed. Expandability -- all new SAPs must use the SASCAs

FOTEP 1 FOTEP 2 FOTEP 3 FOTEP n TC2TCnTC3TC4TC5TC1 FOTEP System Reach-In Field Parole FOTEP Parole TC Parole

Cross-Cutting Issues for Treating Substance Abusing Offenders “ System” Issues “Treatment” Issues

Primary Stakeholders Department of Corrections Parole & Probation Drug Courts Direct influence & control over decision-making process. Define the structure of the system and how it operates. Directly affected by the decisions that they make. System-based Providers Community-based Providers State/County ADPs Criminal Justice SystemTreatment System

Criminal Justice System Treatment System Society-focused Punishment & Incarceration Drug use is a crime Person-focused Treatment Drug use is a disease System Issue: Common Goals

Criminal Justice System Treatment System Subordinate System Superordinate System

Criminal Justice System Treatment System Society-focused Person-focused Punishment & Incarceration Treatment Drug use is a crime Drug use is a disease Reduced Criminal Behavior System Issue: Common Goals

System Issue: Collaboration and Communication Culture of Disclosure Criminal Justice System Treatment System Open sharing of system-, program-, and client-level information in a manner that promotes understanding and trust among people and organizations from different parts of the system. Ensures that the client receives effective, appropriate, and sufficient treatment.

System Issue: Resources Recruit, train, and retain qualified treatment staff. Adequate physical plant needs. $

Treatment Issue: Screening, Assessment, and Referral Goal: Maximize the match between individual needs and treatment received. The process should: Distinguish between substance use, abuse, and dependence. Assess motivation and readiness for treatment. Include a broad needs assessment. Include variables that permit the tracking of progress in treatment. Conduct at entrance into CJ system (to match needs and treatment) and at pre-release (to plan for aftercare).

Treatment Issue: Credit for Treatment Received Pertains specifically to aftercare (community-based treatment following release from custody or correctional supervision). Requires: Appropriate pre-release needs assessment and treatment planning that involves the community-based provider. Flexible curriculums on the part of community-based providers. Ensures: Client retention in treatment. Successful outcomes (i.e., decreased relapse to drug use and criminal behavior).

Treatment Issue: Special Populations Sex Offenders Empirical support for a relationship between sexual deviancy and alcohol abuse. Substance abuse is a primary trigger of sex offending behavior. Barriers include stigmatism, denial, untrained and inexperienced treatment staff, institutional policies against disclosure,co-occurring disorders. Mentally Ill (MI) High prevalence of substance abuse among MI. MI are significantly more likely to be incarcerated for a drug-related or property offense. Within 12 months following release, MI parolees are twice as likely to recidivate as non-MI parolees. Others: HIV/AIDS Physically Disabled Geriatric

Treatment Issue: Incentives Drug Courts Most drug courts emphasize sanctions for non-compliance. Few use reinforcement of positive,desired behavior. Where rewards are used, they usually are only “mirror images” of the sanctions imposed for non-compliance. Sanctions tend to be specific, well-defined, and administered immediately in response to a transgression. Rewards are intermittent, less specific, not immediately experienced, and based on a subjective evaluation of the client’s progress in treatment. Prison-based Treatment Mandated treatment results in resentment and resistance among inmates in the prison-based program. Disincentives in the treatment process and a focus on punishment for non-compliance and inappropriate behavior only serves to compound the resentment and resistance.

The End

Integrated System of Care Mediates between conflicting goals and operating procedures of stakeholders (Silverman, 1985). Combines fragmented strategies and philosophies into a system that provides effective and comprehensive treatment in a “seamless continuum of care” (Wellisch, Prendergast, & Anglin, 1995; Taxman, 1998).

Integrated System of Care Clearly defined, visible, and accessible (Glaser, 1990). Organized around a set of common goals, follows a set of common procedures, and provides for a system of evaluation, information sharing, and feedback (Downes & Shaening, 1993).