COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Class 8: September 18, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Michal Shur-Ofry, 2009 Dr. Michal Shur–Ofry Hebrew University of Jerusalem WIPO SME Seminar, May 2009 The Protection of Databases.
Advertisements

Class 4 Derivative and Compilation Works. Copyright Law – Class 4 © 2011 Anne S. Mason Review Background and policies of copyright law -- to encourage.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002: CLASS 5 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA JANUARY 28, 2002.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004 CLASS 3 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Professor Fischer Jan. 21, 2003.
Copyright Law – Ronald W. Staudt Class 5 September 12, 2013.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002: CLASS 4 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America January 23, 2002.
Copyright Law: Fall 2006 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS of October 11, 2006 OWNERSHIP: WORKS FOR HIRE, JOINT WORKS.
Class 9 Copyright, Winter, 2010 Authorship and Ownership Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School January 19, 2007 Copyright – Ownership, Duration.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004: CLASS 5 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA FEB 2, 2004.
Copyright Law Boston College Law School January 30, 2002 Works of Authorship (cont’d)
Intro to Copyright: Originality, Expression, and More
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School January 9, 2008 Copyright - Intro, Requirements.
Intro to Copyright: Originality, Expression, and More
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School January 18, 2008 Copyright – Ownership, Duration.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008: CLASS 7 THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Sept. 10, 2008.
Intro to Copyright: Originality, Expression, and More Intro to IP – Prof Merges
UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT OFFICE Copyright Registration for Musical Compositions.
Class 7 Copyright, Winter, 2010 Governmental Works Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Copyright Law Ronald W. Staudt Class 7 February 11, 2009.
A RCHITECTURAL W ORKS Prior to 1990, architectural plans were protected as graphic works, but finished buildings were not protected due to their inherent.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003: CLASS 5 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA JANUARY 22, 2003.
Copyright Basics - the Highlights An introduction to copyright law drawn from the copyright statute and from Copyright Basics by the Library of Congress,
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003: CLASS 6 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA JANUARY 27, 2003.
Copyright: Protecting Your Rights at Home and Abroad Michael S. Shapiro Attorney-Advisor United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Introduction to Intellectual Property: Fall 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS of OCT OWNERSHIP, DURATION.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2006 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 22 Infringement November 3, 2008.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Class 8: September 15, 2008.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA FEB 4, 2004.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004: CLASS 7 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA JANUARY
What is Copyright?. Copyright When you create an original piece of work such as a story, poem, drawing or other pieces of artwork, you own the copyright.
Copyright Law Ronald W. Staudt Class 7 Sept. 19, 2013.
INTRO TO IP LAW FALL 2009: CLASS 2 Professor Fischer Copyrightability: The Originality and Fixation Requirements AUGUST 25, 2009.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002: CLASS 7 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA FEBRUARY 4, 2002.
Copyrights. Copyright Definition 17 U.S.C. 102 C’ (a) Copyright protection subsists, in accordance with this title, in original works of authorship fixed.
COPYRIGHT : FAIR USE CONT’D Professor Fischer The Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law April 2, 2003.
Copyright Law: Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 11 February 12, 2003.
Copyright Law – Ronald W. Staudt Class 6 February 9, 2009.
Copyright II Class 4 Notes Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2004 Professor Wagner Copyright © R. Polk Wagner Last updated: 11/19/2015 1:12:27 AM.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Class 5 September
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Class 7: September 13, 2006.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008 THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Class 6: September Idea-Expression Dichotomy.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2008 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 23 November 5, 2008.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2001 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 19 (MARCH 26, 2002)
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer April 3, 2002.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003 Professor Fischer CLASS of April : PREEMPTION.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002 CLASS 6 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA JANUARY 30, 2002.
Copyright Fundamentals Copyrightability Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University.
INTRO TO IP LAW FALL 2009: CLASS 3 Professor Fischer Copyrightability: The Idea- Expression Dichotomy, Protection for Factual Works AUGUST 27, 2009.
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2008 CLASS 9 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA September 17, 2008.
INTRODUCTION TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW Copyrightable Subject Matter Monday October
COPYRIGHT LAW 2006 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 21 Infringement November 1, 2006.
Copyright Law: Fall 2008 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS of October 8, 2008 – Joint Works.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2006 CLASS 6 Jan Fairness Feist CB p. 121: “It may seem unfair that much of the fruit of the compiler’s labor may be used by others.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2002 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer Class 25 (APRIL 17, 2002)
COPYRIGHT LAW : FALL 2006 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA October 4, 2006.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer March 19, 2003.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2008 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA OCT
Class 7 Copyright, Spring, 2008 Authorship and Ownership Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2004 Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Prof. Fischer March 24, 2004.
International Intellectual Property Profs. Atik and Manheim Fall, 2006 Copyright Subject Matter.
International Intellectual Property Prof. Manheim Spring 2007 Originality in Copyright Copyright © 2007.
Seminar 4 Sweat of the Brow Doctrine. Principal Issue  Whether “originality” is satisfied by the labour and expense in the “industrious collection” of.
17 U.S.C. §103 (a) The subject matter of copyright as specified by section 102 includes compilations and derivative works, but protection for a work employing.
Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2003
Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2003
Intellectual Property:
Class 4 Copyright, Autumn, 2016 Facts and Compilations
Copyright Law: Feist & Databases
Presentation transcript:

COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 PROFESSOR FISCHER THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Class 8: September 18, 2006

WRAP-UP: COPYRIGHT – exceptions for FACTS/FUNCTIONALITY Baker and the blank forms doctrine Criticism of the bright-line rule in Bibbero as inconsistent with originality requirement set out in Feist (conflicting case law in 2d and 9 th Circuits on this) Merger doctrine (criticism of this being applied too broadly) Copyrightability of historical facts, historical theories

Wainwright Securities CB p. 133 Copyright protection of news events? Overprotection?

Protection for Factual Research? Does Feist sing the swan song for the “judicial ugly duckling” of Toksvig?

Invented Facts Can a phone number be copyrightable?

103(a) The subject matter of copyright as specified by s. 102 includes compilations and derivative works, but protection for a work employing preexisting material in which copyright subsists does not extend to any part of the work in which such material has been used unlawfully.

103(b) The copyright in a compilation or derivative work extends only to the matter contributed by the author of such work, as distinguished from the preexisting material employed in the work, and does not imply any exclusive right in the preexisting material. The copyright in such work is independent of, and does not affect or enlarge the scope, duration, ownership, or subsistence of, any copyright protection in the preexisting material.

DEFINITION OF COMPILATION AT S. 101 A compilation is a work formed by the collection and assembling of preexisting materials or of data that are selected, coordinated, or arranged in such a way that the resulting work as a whole constitutes an original work of authorship. The term “compilation:” includes collective works.

FEIST “Thin” Copyright Protection for compilations “Sweat of the brow doctrine”

Cases After Feist

What is a Compilation Why was the greeting card in Roth (CB p. 131) protectable as a compilation while the set of signs in Sem-Torq (CB p. 132) was not?

HYPO: FURNITURE DESIGNS Can an arrangement of furniture in a showroom be copyrightable? See Baldine v. Furniture Comfort Corp., 956 F. Supp. 580 (M.D.N.C. 1996)

Hypo 4 CB p. 135 Has Haberman infringed Cantor’s copyright? Are there any other persons who can legitimtely complain of copyright infringement?

CCC Information Services v. Maclean Hunter Copyrightability of the Automobile Red Book – Official Used Car Valuations Why didn’t the merger doctrine argument succeed?

PICKING NUMBERS – COPYRIGHTABLE? Compare Southco and ATC at CB p Are these consistent with Feist or CCC?

WIREdata p. 152 CB Why couldn’t AT succeed in stopping WIREdata from extracting noncopyrighted data based on its compilation copyright?

Fairness Feist CB p. 121: “It may seem unfair that much of the fruit of the compiler’s labor may be used by others without compensation” Do you agree?

Sui Generis Right Is there a need for a sui generis right protecting databases in the US?

BellSouth Advertising v. Donnelley CB p. 153 Describe the reasoning of the lone dissenting judge? Who is right, in your opinion, the majority or the ?

Another Hypo Jon compiles a list of all 50 states. Can she argue that her list is copyrightable? What if Jon compiles a list of the 12 states containing the best dressed models? Does it matter if Jon arranges the states in alphabetical order?

OTHER KINDS OF COMPILATIONS Can a greeting card be copyrightable as a compilation? See Roth v. United Card Co., 429 F.2d 1106 (9th Cir. 1970) Can a T-shirt be copyrightable as a compilation? See Matthews v. Freeman, 157 F.3d 25 (1st Cir. 1998) p. 139 CB Can a videogame be copyrightable as a compilation? Atari v. Oman, 979 F.2d 242 (D.C. Cir. 1992) p. 138 CB