Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summer Institute, May16,  Peer review process that evaluates educational programs and services for quality.  Transferability of credit hours.
Advertisements

September 8, /8/2014 Margarita Pillado -- Faculty Accreditation Coordinator -- Los Angeles Pierce College 1.
Fall 2013 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges D ISCUSSION WITH E XPERTS.
1 Preparing for Institutional Self Study Dr. Deborah G. Blue, Vice President Mr. Jack Pond, Vice President Fall 2005.
A Presentation for Peralta Community College District Governing Board By Thomas E. Henry, PCCD Fiscal Adviser November 10,
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Spring 2015.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
2013 A CCREDITATION S ELF S TUDY K ICKOFF M AY 2, 2011 Presented by Chairs: Aimee Myers, Faculty Chair Laurie Thiers, Classified Chair Brian Haley, Management.
1 Cosumnes River College’s Institutional Self Study Norv Wellsfry Fall 2007.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
SACS Reaffirmation Project Compliance Certification Team Orientation Compliance Certification Report Thursday, September 30, – 11:00AM 209 Main Building.
Accreditation and Self Study Process A presentation by: Joseph Saimon Accreditation Liaison Officer (ALO) (Director for Development and Community Relations)
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Fall 2014.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
The Accreditation Adventure Sink, Float, or Swim? Columbia College December 2009.
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
Los Angeles Southwest College LACCD Trustee Accreditation Subcommittee Self-Study Overview December 14, 2005.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015.
Los Angeles Mission College Institutional Self Study for Reaffirmation of Accreditation
Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Strategic Master Planning Revising the Strategic Master Plan
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
Accreditation Update to ICC Student Development & Services March 16, 2015 Gohar Momjian Associate Vice Chancellor of Institutional Development Accreditation.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
MT. SAN JACINTO COLLEGE Accreditation Self Study Report 2011 presented by Rebecca Teague, Accreditation Liaison Officer Steering & Standard Chair Committee.
Accreditation Update Self-Study Progress and Review MPC Flex Days Spring 2015.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
Board of Trustees Presentation Foothill & De Anza Colleges Accreditation 2011 April 5, 2010.
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
MSJC Accreditation Classified Professional Day – March 22,2017
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Accreditation Steering Committee Meeting March 18, 2016
Accreditation Update Board of Trustees Meeting January 12, 2016
Accreditation Preparation
Bonita Jaros, Ph.D., Accreditation Liaison Officer, SAC
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
WASC Self Study: A First Look
Assessment Committee The ISER What you need to know. 9/14/2018
Accreditation Institute, Garden Grove, CA
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Accreditation 101 Tim Brown, ACCJC Commissioner
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
For Excellence in Accreditation… “Moorpark it”
PORTERVILLE COLLEGE ACCREDITATION OVERVIEW Fall 2017
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Overview of accjc stanard IV
Reaccreditation and Illinois
Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College
Accreditation Standards
Agency on the Move ACCJC Update
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office

Accreditation Overview What is ACCJC? (Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges) - Part of WASC (Western Association of Schools and Colleges) -Accredits community colleges and other associate degree granting institutions in the Western region - One of seven regional accrediting commissions in the U.S. - ACCJC is authorized to operate by the Department of Education What is accreditation? - Voluntary participation in self regulation -Peer review process to ensure overall educational quality and Institutional effectiveness - Site visit every 6 years (moving to every 7 years)

Accreditation Overview Why do we need it? - Provides assurance to the public that the college meets set Standards and Federal Eligibility Requirements (ERs) - Provides assurance to employers and other higher education institutions that the degree is legitimate - Needed to receive federal financial aid “The primary purpose of an ACCJC-accredited institution is to foster student learning and student achievement. An effective institution ensures that its resources, programs, and services, whenever, wherever, and however delivered, support student learning and achievement. The effective institution ensures academic quality and continues improvement through ongoing assessment of learning and achievement and pursues institutional excellence and improvement through ongoing, integrated planning and evaluation.” - ACCJC

Self-Study Report What is the Self-Study Report? - An honest evaluation of our strengths and weaknesses - Continuous self-evaluation of our activities for continuous improvement - A reflective, analytical and forward thinking look into our processes and practices

Self-Study Report What should it include? - Information and evidence of meeting our mission AND the Standards - Areas for improvement (actionable improvement plans and Quality Focus Essay) - A commitment to continuous quality and improvement - Presentation of evidence of student achievement and learning (results, analysis of the results, use of the results at the course, program and institution levels) Example Self-Study Report: Napa Valley College:

Accreditation Standards Standard 1: Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness and Integrity A. Mission B. Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness C. Institutional Integrity Standard 2: Student Learning Programs and Support Services A. Instructional Programs B. Library and Learning Support Services C. Student Support Services Standard 3: Resources A. Human Resources B. Physical Resources C. Technology Resources D. Financial Resources Standard 4: Leadership and Governance A. Decision-Making Roles and Processes B. Chief Executive Office C. Governing Board D. Multi-College Districts

Responding to the Standards Use the language in the Standards as part of your answer Make sure that you answer every part of the Standard Repetition is not necessarily a bad thing Link to relevant evidence Write it like it is Report the facts Avoid unnecessary superlatives Limit describing future plans in the action plans or quality focus essay Only make claims that can be substantiated with evidence Use a one-voice narrator

Use of Data in the Report What types of data can we use? - Qualitative and/or quantitative data presented in tables, charts and graphs or in documentary form WITH ANALYSIS - Longitudinal when appropriate - Disaggregated by relevant subpopulations

Use of Data in the Report Examples of Program Review Data: - Policies on curriculum review and implementation - Evaluation of student learning outcomes - Review elements, cycles/timelines, connection and correlation of program review with institutional planning - Usage of program review data at all levels and across multiple cycles - Actions taken (improvements) on the basis of program review

Self-Study Report What is the site visit team looking for in regards to data? - That we routinely and systematically gather data - We analyze data and reflect upon the data and the analysis - We publish the data and analyses and share them widely with constituent groups - We use them to plan and implement program improvements - We use them to plan and implement institutional improvements - We use them to evaluate the effectiveness of our improvements

Other Examples of Evidence - State Scorecard - Program Review documents - SLO assessment results, analysis and changes made due to ongoing assessment - Policies and procedures - College website and usability of it - Human resources (positions) intended to help meet Standards - Committee minutes and agendas - Mid-term report for accreditation - Surveys (CCSSE, Accreditation) - Student learning and achievement data (Educational Master Plan, Equity Plan, 3SP Plan, etc.)

Draft Timeline January 2016February 2016March-April 2016May 2016June 2016 District provides functional map to colleges Assign standards to teams and provide training on the Standards Teams begin work on self-study; Campus provides feedback on District Accreditation Survey Accreditation survey sent to students and employees District provides accreditation survey results to colleges September November 2016 December 2016January 2017February 2017March 2017 Teams continue work on self-study. Accreditation Steering Committee determine areas for Quality Focus Essay (QFE) - Teams finalize self-study areas Self-study draft shared with governance groups - Steering Committee Drafts QFE QFE finalized and shared with governance groups Campus feedback and public comments on process, self-study report, and QFE collected April 2017May 2017June 2017July - September 2017October 2017 Campus feedback incorporated into final draft Documents due for editing Final draft of self-study due to Board of Trustees Self-study to printer; Copies sent to team; Accommodations for site visit; Compile hard copies of evidence for team room Site Visit

Draft Assignments College Planning Committee IPBTLibrarySSPBTFERPBT Technology Taskforce Standard 1.A., 1.B., 1.C. Standard 2.A.Standard 2.B.Standard 2.C. Standard 3.A., 3.B., 3.D. (Liabilities, Contractual Agreements) Standard 3.C. Campus BudgetAcademic SenateClassified Senate President and Senior Staff District Advisory Team Standard 3.D. (Planning and Fiscal Responsibility and Stability) Standard 4.A. Standard 4.B. Standard 4.C., 4.D.

Questions?