 Revision is an important part of the design process. In addition to conducting review and redesign cycles personally and with your client, you can also.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Presentation by Erin Trauth, Angela Tartaglia, Richard Ellman, Melissa Jones, and Andrea Dennin for the University of South Florida FYC Program.
Advertisements

Resistance to Inquiry The importance of conducting climate setting, stating student performance objectives, and achieving closure.
CHAPTER 8 WRITING NEGATIVE MESSAGES
An introductory tutorial
Effective Feedback Fiona Spencer.
Team Communication What does it take?. Overview  Why it is important & necessary  Creating Team Communication  Characteristics of Open Communication.
Supervisor Workplace Skills Series: Delegation
Participating in Performance Reviews Preparing for and Participating in (Relatively) Stress-free Review Meetings.
Participating in Performance Reviews
Student Job Centre 2012 Student Job Centre Sault College Career Essentials Mentors.
Assisting Peers to Provide W orthwhile Feedback UC Merced SATAL Program.
EVALUATING WRITING What, Why, and How? Workshopping explanation and guidelines Rubrics: for students and instructors Students Responding to Instructor.
Chapter 3:.
United States Fire Administration Chief Officer Training Curriculum Human Resource Development Module 6: Managing the Workforce.
Sales letter Ms. Debs f. dianco. WHAT IS A SALES LETTER? = It is a document designed to generate sales. = It persuades the reader to place an order; to.
Lesson 9: Peer Review Topics Role of the Peer Reviewer
Unit 2: Managing the development of self and others Life Science and Chemical Science Professionals Higher Apprenticeships Unit 2 Managing the development.
English GCSE Revision. Section A - Reading There are essentially 5 reading questions as Q1 has two parts. You are being tested on your reading, not your.
Presentations: The good, the bad and the ugly
©2007 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved. MODULE 12 Negative Messages.
Lecturer: Gareth Jones Class 7: Routine Business Messages.
Chapter Ten Bad-News Messages McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Usability testing IS 403: User Interface Design Shaun Kane.
Module 5 Week 11 Supplement 12. SPEAKING TRUTH EFFECTIVELY How to provide insightful and effective peer reviews.
Designing Apps for audience and purpose Evaluation of your App.
What is Peer Editing? A peer is someone your own age. Editing means making suggestions, comments, compliments, and changes to writing.  Peer editing.
Public Speaking and Feedback Leaders in Health Namibia.
INFLUENCES AND COMMUNICATION UNIT 8 & 9: STI PREVENTION & SEX ED.
Level of Government: Type here Issues being discussed: Type here Group Members: Type here Teacher suggestions for your powerpoint: 1.Use a 24 pt font (so.
Peer Critiques. For Today:  Class Lecture and Discussion: What is a Peer Critique?  Raider Writer assignment is to critique two other 1302 students’
Student Peer Review An introductory tutorial. The peer review process Conduct study Write manuscript Peer review Submit to journal Accept Revise Reject.
Techniques for Highly Effective Communication Professional Year Program - Unit 5: Workplace media and communication channels.
Chapter 3 Whole Composition Summary of Key Points Writing processes can include eight activities: planning, gathering, writing, evaluating, getting feedback,
The Demonstrative Speech. What is a demonstrative speech? A speech that tells/shows an audience how to do something It requires that you provide instruction.
Welcome! Academic Strategies Unit 5 Seminar Writing Effectively.
Successful Behavior Change through Motivational Interviewing Brevard Health Alliance.
Understanding TDQs and Writing a Response to Text.
Strategies Good Readers Use
Comprensive edit.  Rude distinguishes between "copyediting" and "comprehensive editing." –In just a sentence, what do you feel to be the principal difference.
AuthorAID Train-the-Trainers Workshop on Teaching Research Writing Nepal March 2011.
 Reading Quiz  Peer Critiques  Evaluating Peer Critiques.
LEGAL WRITING IN THE VIS MOOT, PART II Writing Persuasive Arguments: What to Look for in a Memo.
Bad News Messages Chapter 11
Unit II PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK.
Orientation to the 360 Evaluation Process for the Feedback Team.
Chapter 4 Becoming a Better Listener Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
Peer Review Workshop ENG 113: Composition I. What Is a Peer Review Workshop?  You will be paired with a classmate  Read each narrative  Provide detailed.
Jan. 6 th - AP Lit Bellwork: List 5 strategies you need to employ when peer reviewing and peer editing an essay? What is the difference between peer reviewing.
Timed Writing Notes 45 minute essay. Essay Guidelines- Structuring the Essay The essay should have three parts: – Introduction – Body – Conclusion.
Promoting young children’s readiness and ability to learn is a natural and vital priority to children’s lives however, it is also essential for children.
Abstract  An abstract is a concise summary of a larger project (a thesis, research report, performance, service project, etc.) that concisely describes.
Successful Peer Review Strategies. Getting Ready for Peer Review What you get out of peer review depends on what you put into it. Your job as a writer.
Chapter 21 Informal Reports
Peer Review Workshop ENG 113: Composition I.
From Revising to Editing: Working with Peer Groups
Introduction You have been selected to play a role in providing feedback to a participant Your feedback will provide powerful information in helping.
Legal Writing In the vis moot, Part II
Sault College Career Essentials Mentors
April 25th, 2017 CEGO 2: Brendan, Lida, Ivan and Lindsay
How to become a GREAT peer editor!
Website Documentation
Viable Proposals: Planning & Securing Buy-in
Business Communication
Providing Peer Feedback
Handout 5: Feedback and support
Critical Response: How to begin
1.7 Providing Peer Feedback
Agenda 10/19/15 Symbolic Color Critique Photoshop Skills to Learn:
Rater Orientation to the 360 Evaluation Process
July 24, 2009 Peer Critiques.
Presentation transcript:

 Revision is an important part of the design process. In addition to conducting review and redesign cycles personally and with your client, you can also benefit from peer review.  Additionally, peer review occurs in many professional environments and it will be good practice to start on this essential skill now.

 When giving peer review, be sure your points are both positive and negative. Give your critiques as suggestions, not commands.  When receiving peer review, do not be disenchanted or feel that you did a bad job based on one review.  Every review is different, and what one person does not approve of, the next person may find exemplary.

 When presenting your work for peer review, state the purpose, audience, and goals of your document and point out any concerns you have.  To conclude, summarize the reviewer’s suggestions and offer a plan for revision.

 Before making any comments, review the entire document and make sure you understand the designer’s intentions. Or, if being presented work by a designer, your first response should be to reiterate the designer’s purpose, audience, and goals.  After the designer’s purpose, audience, and goals are clear, ask questions of the designer, make comments, and offer suggestions.

 Point out both the strengths and the weaknesses of the document (design, layout, typography, and so on).  Offer suggestions, not commands. For instance, do not use “should,” as in “You should do this….” Instead, use “I” statements, such as “I see that…” or “I’m confused about....”

 Be respectful and considerate of your peer’s feelings. Do not say or write anything you wouldn’t want to receive yourself—there is no reason to be rude.

 Make sure your comments are clear and specific so your peer knows what you are referring to. It is important to give specific examples and point to design principles, image composition, layout guidelines, and so on to make your point. Such comments as “this is unclear” or “this is too vague,” are too general to be helpful. Rather make a comment like, “I’m confused by this image because there is no caption identifying what it is”).

 If you are writing your comments, reread them before passing them on to your peer. Make sure all your comments make sense and are easy to follow.

 Peer Review is an important step in the Review and Redesign process.