Chronic Renal Insufficiency Catherine M Clase Division of Nephrology McMaster University
Objectives Review the epidemiology of CRI Describe progression of CRI Evidence-based strategies to minimize progression Be aware of the interaction between CRI and CVD Describe reasons for referral to nephrologists Discuss rationale/evidence
Size of the problem - ESRD New to ESRD Canada 1996: 3332 patients Growing at about 10% annually In CRI in nephrology clinics Rate of loss GFR ~ 6 mL/min/y Initiation of dialysis ~ 8 mL/min
Size of the problem - CRI 10% of men and 2% of women have Cr>133 µmol/L 11 million in US Jones et al. Am J Kidney Dis 1998;32:992 ~1 million in Canada
Referral is mandatory Diagnostic uncertainty Treatment of specific diseases Rapidly rising creatinine (20% increase over days to months)
Optimization of management Prevention of progression Optimization of transition to ESRD Management of metabolic complications of CRI Management of comorbidity cardiac diabetic other
Optimization of management Prevention of progression Optimization of transition to ESRD Management of metabolic complications of CRI Management of comorbidity cardiac diabetic other
Rates of progression in referred populations are variable
Multivariate risks for progression HTN Proteinuria
Hypertension Achieved BP control Intensive blood pressure control MDRD 1994 MAP 92 mmHg vs. 107 mmHg; 98 mmHg vs. 113 mmHg renal outcomes: no difference HOT study 1998 DBP <80 mmHg vs. 85 mmHg vs. 90 mmHg CV outcomes: no difference
Optimal blood pressure control: diabetics and nondiabetics
Hypertension in patients with diabetes UKPDS /85 mmHg vs. 180/105 mmHg significant differences death stroke microvascular disease HOT study (subgroup) 1998 DBP <80 mmHg vs. 85 mmHg vs. 90 mmHg significant differences CV events CV death
Tight control of blood pressure in patients with diabetes
Hypertension Volume control sodium restriction diuretics Drug class HANE 1997 hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol, nitrendipine, enalapril similar efficacy & tolerability Isolated systolic hypertension Proteinuria
ACE inhibition Diabetic nephropathy Collaborative Study Group 1993 Any chronic renal failure REIN study 1997, 1998 meta-analysis Giatras 1997 proteinuria increased effectiveness Normotensive normoalbuminaemic type II DM Ravid 1998
ARB in DMN New Engl J Med 2001;345:851 & 861 & 870
ACE inhibition & ARBs Adverse effects precipitation of ARF monitoring usually reversible hyperkalaemia dietary intervention diuretics K binding resins
Dietary protein restriction MDRD vs g/kg/day; 0.58 vs g/kg/day (+KA) selected, well-nourished patients intensive dietary counselling nutritional parameters weight, arm circumference, % body fat albumin no difference in rate of loss GFR
Nutrition Spontaneous reduction in protein intake, independent of dietary advice, with advancing CRI Cross-sectional studies Ikizler et al. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995;6:1386 Pollock et al. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997;8:777
Nutrition Malnutrition independent predictor of death in ESRD Bloembergen et al. Kidney Int 1996;50:557 Struijk et al. Perit Dial Int 1994;14:121 Churchill et al. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996;7:198 Blake et al. J Am Soc Nephrol 1993;3:1501 Maiorca et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995;10:2295 Jassal et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996;11:1052
Optimization of management Prevention of progression Optimization of transition to ESRD Management of metabolic complications of CRI Management of comorbidity cardiac diabetic other
How early are patients referred before ESRD? 39% of HD patients and 27% of PD patients are referred <4 months prior to ESRD USRDS Wave 2. Am J Kidney Dis 1997;30:S67
How early are patients referred? Canada, Consecutive patients new to ESRD Multicentre, N=238 35% first saw a nephrologist within 3 months of starting dialysis Curtis et al. Submitted
Referral time Effects on mortality morbidity access: Collins 1997 modality: Bloembergen 1997 quality of life: Jones 1998
Survival and referral time
How early should patients be referred to observe these benefits?
Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines Creatinine clearance Cockcroft-Gault formula Refer when GFR <30 mL/min Refer when Cr <300 µmol/L Whichever is worse Mendelssohn CMAJ 1999;161:4
Referral to nephrologists in Ontario Mailed survey, N=728, 41% response rate Mendelssohn et al. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:2473
Modality selection Late referrals less likely to select PD: Bloembergen 1997 Multidisciplinary education time to requirement of dialysis: Binik 1993 Choice HRQoL on PD: Szabo 1997
Access AVF > PTFE > catheter 25% access at 30 days prior to initiation: USRDS 1997 Woods 1997, Collins 1997 access-related morbidity cost mortality Assessment Preservation of veins Creation of fistula at GFR mL/min
Timing of initiation of dialysis Early dialysis Tattersall 1995 CanUSA 1998 Bonomini Results morbidity mortality rehabilitation
Symptoms at initiation in the elderly: Porush & Faubert 1991
Optimization of management Prevention of progression Optimization of transition to ESRD Management of metabolic complications of CRI Management of comorbidity cardiac diabetic other
Anaemia Progressive relative erythropoietin deficiency and uraemic resistance to erthropoietin Cardiac In ESRD LV dilatation, CHF, death: Foley 1996 hospitalization, LoS, death: Collins 1997 In CRF LVH: Levin 1996 Quality of life SF-36 (ESRD): Merkus 1997 SIP (CRF): Klang 1996
Treatment of anaemia Erythropoietin cost regulations monitoring Iron p.o. (timing) or i.v. Benefits quality of life energy, physical functioning no change in GFR, may BP Target Hgb
Calcium homeostasis Phosphate retention early not necessarily accompanied by phosphate 1, 25 D 3 deficiency Hypocalcaemia Hyperparathyroidism
Management of calcium homeostasis Dietary intervention Phosphate binders Calcium carbonate 1-alphacalcidol decreases PTH no effect on GFR monitoring
Metabolic acidosis Malnutrition Metabolic bone disease Treatment Sodium bicarbonate
Malnutrition Progressive spontaneous decline in protein intake MDRD 1994, Ikizler 1995, Pollock 1996 Malnutrition at initiation: CanUSA 1996 morbidity mortality Improves with starting dialysis: CanUSA 1996
Malnutrition Management dietary intervention g/kg/day protein adequate calories control of acidosis initiation of dialysis
Cockcroft-Gault (mL/min)MDRD equation 7 (mL/min/1.73m 2 )Couchoud (mL/min/1.73m 2 ) <20<30<40<20<30<40<30 Any metabolic abnormality * Sensitivity % CI Haemoglobin <110 g/L Sensitivity % CI Albumin <35 g/L Sensitivity % CI Bicarbonate <23 mmol/L Sensitivity % CI Calcium <2.15 mmol/L Sensitivity % CI Phosphorus >2.1 mmol/L Sensitivity100 95% CI Phosphorus >1.6 mmol/L Sensitivity % CI PTH >22.8 pmol/L Sensitivity % CI
Cockcroft-Gault (mL/min)MDRD equation 7 (mL/min/1.73m 2 )Couchoud (mL/min/1.73m 2 ) <20<30<40<20<30<40<30 Any metabolic abnormality * Specificity % CI Haemoglobin <110 g/LSpecificity % CI Albumin <35 g/LSpecificity % CI Bicarbonate <23 mmol/L Specificity % CI Calcium <2.15 mmol/LSpecificity % CI Phosphorus >2.1 mmol/L Specificity % CI Phosphorus >1.6 mmol/L Specificity % CI PTH >22.8 pmol/LSpecificity % CI
Nutrition in unreferred populations National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III database 5248 participants over 60y Composite definition of malnutrition Adjusted OR for malnutrition GFR mL/min 1.2 (0.7 – 2.0) GFR <30 mL/min 3.6 (2.0 – 6.6) Garg et al, submitted
Optimization of management Prevention of progression Optimization of transition to ESRD Management of metabolic complications of CRI Management of comorbidity cardiac diabetic other
Cardiac comorbidity is common Consecutive prevalent patients with CRI in nephrology clinics, mean GFR 75 mL/min Previous CVD 38.5% CVD associated with severity of CRI 80% hypertension 43% hyperlipidemia 38% had diabetes mellitus 27% were smokers
Renal insufficiency is an independent CV risk factor Garg et al. Submitted.
Cardiac comorbidity Hypertension control Lipid-lowering agents ACE inhibition Beta-blockers ASA Anticoagulation Smoking cessation
Diabetic comorbidity Glycaemic control DCCT 1993 (type I) UKDPS 1998 (type II) Hypertension HOT 1998 (subgroup) UKPDS 1998 ACE inhibitors retinopathy (Euclid 1998)
Formalized care of patients with chronic renal failure
Referral is mandatory Diagnostic uncertainty Treatment of specific diseases Rapidly rising creatinine (20% increase over days to months)
Optimization of management Prevention of progression Optimization of transition to ESRD Management of metabolic complications of CRI Management of comorbidity cardiac diabetic other
Role of non-nephrologist Diagnosis Establish chronicity/progression rate Manage HTN Use ACE, ARB Manage comorbidity Monitor progression Consider referral
When to Refer: Role of Nephrologist Diagnostic uncertainty Rapid progression GFR < 30mL/min Management of complications Preparation for dialysis
Objectives Review the epidemiology of CRI Describe progression of CRI Evidence-based strategies to minimize progression Be aware of the interaction between CRI and CVD Describe reasons for referral to nephrologists Discuss rationale/evidence