Managing Agriculture KnowledgeThrough Localized CommunityExpert System Managing Agriculture Knowledge Through Localized Community Expert System A Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ICT Services Suppliers Briefing Thursday, 17 September 2009.
Advertisements

Strengthening statistical capacity in support of progress towards the Internationally Agreed Development Goals in countries of South Asia United Nations.
International Telecommunication Union An Insight into BDT Programme 3 Marco Obiso ICT Applications and Cybersecurity Division Telecommunication Development.
State of Florida Performance Management. Performance Management The process of motivating employees through setting goals, measuring progress, giving.
Labour Market Indicators Library NetWork KILM-STAT EASMAT- EMAC-EMAO-ETM Costa Rica.
TECHNOLOGY NEEDS ASSESMENTS: AN UPDATE Hilary McMahon, UNDP.
Software Process Models
More CMM Part Two : Details.
Role of RAS in the Agricultural Innovation System Rasheed Sulaiman V
Performance-Based Funding in Higher Education Presentation by Arthur M. Hauptman Financing Reforms for Tertiary Education in the Knowledge Economy Seoul,
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Lecture 2b: Software Project Management CSCI102 - Introduction to Information Technology B ITCS905 - Fundamentals of Information Technology.
Business Area Analysis Focus: Domain View (selected business area) Goals: –Isolate functions and procedures that allow the area to meet its goals –Define.
CHAPTER 9: LEARNING OUTCOMES
© 2005 Prentice Hall, Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems, 7th Edition, Turban, Aronson, and Liang 6-1 Chapter 6 Decision Support System Development.
VENDORS, CONSULTANTS AND USERS
4. Quality Management System (QMS)
1 Building and Maintaining Information Systems. 2 Opening Case: Yahoo! Store Allows small businesses to create their own online store – No programming.
Global Action Plan and its implementation in other regions Meeting for Discussion of the draft Plan for the Implementation of the Global Strategy to Improve.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Ten years of Evaluability at the IDB Yuri Soares, Alejandro Pardo, Veronica Gonzalez and Sixto Aquino Paris, 16 November, 2010.
1 Process Engineering A Systems Approach to Process Improvement Jeffrey L. Dutton Jacobs Sverdrup Advanced Systems Group Engineering Performance Improvement.
- 1 - Roadmap to Re-aligning the Customer Master with Oracle's TCA Northern California OAUG March 7, 2005.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Luxor, Egypt, April 2013 Expert Systems Role as a tool of Knowledge Management in Water Resource Management Dr. Ibrahim Ahmed Expert System Project.
Approaches to quality assurance TIPA’s perspectives Fatmir Demneri.
Oracle9i Performance Tuning Chapter 1 Performance Tuning Overview.
Getting Started Conservation Coaches Network New Coach Training.
Peer review of digital resources for the arts and humanities David Bates and Jane Winters.
Lecture 7: Requirements Engineering
Decision Support System Development By Dr.S.Sridhar,Ph.D., RACI(Paris),RZFM(Germany),RMR(USA),RIEEEProc. web-site :
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 2c – Process Evaluation.
SYSTEM TESTING AND DEPLOYMENT CHAPTER 8. Chapter 8: System Testing and Deployment 2 KNOWLEDGE CAPTURE (Creation) KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER KNOWLEDGE SHARING.
Participatory Planning Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Review of CoP-MfDR Pilot Phase Review of CoP-MfDR Pilot Phase Third International Roundtable on Managing for Development Results Hanoi, Vietnam February.
1 Tracer Study: University Graduates and Labor Market Project Manager Prof. Dr. Eng. Radu Mircea Damian University Graduates and Labor Market Romanian.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
Presenters: Pauline Mingram & KG Ouye July 25, 2011 California State Library Public Access Technology Benchmarks Webinar.
Problem Solving – 4 Stages
ACCOUNTABILITY AND MONITORING IN HEALTH INITIATIVE PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAM Capacity Building Consultation 5 – 7 June, 2012 Istanbul, Turkey.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
1 UNEP/IETC EST Initiative Proposed Cooperation Framework 4 December 2003 Otsu, Japan.
Revisions Proposed to the CIS Plan by the Global Office Misha V. Belkindas Budapest, July 3-4, 2013.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
The implementation programme for the 2008 SNA and supporting statistics UNECE special session on National Accounts for economies in transition Geneva,
Wrap Up GNC Partner Meeting 17 th – 18 th March 2015 Geneva, Switzerland.
United Nations Oslo City Group on Energy Statistics OG7, Helsinki, Finland October 2012 ESCM Chapter 8: Data Quality and Meta Data 1.
Week 1 -Introduction IT2005 System Analysis & Design.
© 2005 Prentice Hall, Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems, 7th Edition, Turban, Aronson, and Liang 6-1 Chapter 6 Decision Support System Development.
Integration of ecological and indigenous knowledge into farm-level management tools in the Kalahari, Botswana Mark Reed and Andy Dougill Leeds Environment.
Comprehensive M&E Systems: Identifying Resources to Support M&E Plans for National TB Programs Lisa V. Adams, MD E&E Regional Workshop Kiev, Ukraine May.
Local HWTS Monitoring Eva Manzano, CAWST Technical Advisor Laos Vientiane, Lao PDR November 11, 2014.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
IFLA: International Advocacy Programme. Address the information gap of library workers at community, national and regional levels Build capacity among.
.  Evaluators are not only faced with methodological challenges but also ethical challenges on a daily basis.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
© 2005 Prentice Hall, Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems, 7th Edition, Turban, Aronson, and Liang 6-1 Chapter 6 Decision Support System Development.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Project planning The systems life cycle.
OVERVIEW Project and Workshop.
Architecture Components
Self Directed learning
VENDORS, CONSULTANTS AND USERS
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Module 5 The Climate Expert and your role as a consultant
GNC Global Partners Meeting Washington 30/03/16
Introduction and Objectives Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, December 2012
Presentation transcript:

Managing Agriculture KnowledgeThrough Localized CommunityExpert System Managing Agriculture Knowledge Through Localized Community Expert System A Research Project

Availability of user-friendly technology Building & maintaining expert systems is a process with two axes: Knowledge Acquisition and Knowledge Engineering Many components come into play creating a web of factors that could affect the efficiency of expert systems. The need not to just build an expert system but to document how to go about building a valid and efficient expert system. Researching A Process…. Evaluating A Product

 What are the components of a workable model for building efficient Knowledge Bases for solving problems in specific knowledge domains through the use of Expert Systems?  To what extent do the model components affect each other?  What is the expertise needed for managing and sustaining each of the model components?  What are the criteria of the knowledge domains that could be best encoded through Expert Systems?  What are the selection criteria of the knowledge experts who can effectively encode their expertise as Expert Systems?  To what extent is the knowledge engineering methodology adopted in the project effective in capturing and encoding expertise as rules in knowledge bases?  What are the advantages and disadvantages of the available Expert System technologies? On what basis the decision was taken for the expert system technology used in this project?  What are the competencies and skills required for the efficient use of Expert Systems?  How could the challenge of upgrading and sustaining Expert Systems be dealt with? Research Questions

Adopting and adapting expert system tool Identifying a workable model for building efficient expert systems. Researching conditions of system components and the relationships among them. Consolidating lessons learned and best practices. Producing field-tested prototypes to use in advocacy and capacity building Pilot Project

6 Capacity Building and Validation Workshops 50+ participants 37 Expert Systems developed 4 Focus group meetings with knowledge experts 1 Focus group meeting with CLAES Tool Questionnaire Training Questionnaire Peer Review Questionnaire Expert System Rating Scale Researching A Process……

The developed tool is user friendly The implementation of the expert systems has led to add some features to the developed tool (e.g. links to images, and textual document for symptoms and causes, systems directory, list of experts) Some rules are added to handle “no diagnosis”. User’s rating and comments The Expert System Tool

Workable Framework forBuildingEfficient Expert Systems Workable Framework for Building Efficient Expert Systems

Identification of Knowledge Experts Advocating Business Model Showing Prototypes Setting Requirements Training on Knowledge Engineering Establishing Follow-up Mechanism Developing/Reviewing & Updating Expert System Validation & Verification (internal/External ) Community Rating As Sequential as A, B, C……..

ADVOCACY -Advocacy Message -Advocacy Channels -Showing not Telling / Experiential not Theoretical BUILDING CAPACITY - Clear requirements -Training Approach -Follow-up Mechanism CONSTRUCTION - Building & Testing As Sequential as A, B, C……..

Advocacy Identification of Knowledge Experts Advocating Business Model Showing Prototypes

Advocacy Identification of Knowledge Experts Familiarity with problems /language in the field Access to in- depth specialized, valid, up-to- date and complete knowledge Logical Thinking Knowledge Acquisition / analysis Design Knowledge bases

Advocacy Advocating Business Model Clear Return on Investment Fierce Competition Users’ needs & satisfaction Quality of Input Different advocacy channels

Advocacy Showing Prototypes Showing not Telling Model Adaptation/ Variation Best Practice Prototype Expert System Advocates/ Other Advocacy Channels

Building Capacity Setting Requirements Training on Knowledge Engineering Establishing Follow-up Mechanism

Building Capacity Setting Requirements Avail Relevant Knowledge (texts/photos) Classifying /Sorting Knowledge Decide on Scope

Building Capacity Training on Knowledge Engineering Knowledge Engineering Knowledge bases Modeling Completing/ reviewing the expert system Start Feeding Knowledge bases to the tool Immediate Feedback ‘How-to validate and verify

Building Capacity Establishing Follow-up Mechanism Criteria/Index as frame of reference Announced Follow- up/technical support plans Motivation/ Incentives

Construction Developing/Reviewing & Updating Expert Systems Validation & Verification Community Rating

Construction Developing/Reviewing & Updating Expert Systems Clarity of questions Classification of answers Order/number of Questions Use/quality of photos System Review System Update Responding to the interest of the growers

Construction Validation & Verification Real-time Test cases Two cases/ rule (+/-) Adaptation in light of test cases Users’ feedback

Construction Community Rating Competition & Business Model Users’ rating & Comments Monitoring traffic Role modeling

Hyperlink of list of Expert Systemslist of Expert Systems Evaluating products……

Follow-up efforts (facebook groups, messaging, individual contacts) CLAES validation and verification reports Knowledge experts evaluation (rating and comments) Evaluating Products

Building experts system is a trainable process Identified critical factors that affect system efficiency and validity Factors taken into account in planning Advocacy, Capacity Building and Construction Phases of the process Concluding Remarks

Project Outputs: User-friendly expert system tool 37 expert systems at various degrees of completion Training Package ICT Skills KIT Process reports Process/Working Model document On-going feedback collection mechanism Concluding Remarks

Expert System Review CLAES technical support (end of Sept.) Peer reviewing continue Community Rating (Tool & Expert System) ICT Trust Fund customers-support Next Steps