Beam-Beam effects in MeRHIC and eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory Jan 10, 2009 EIC Meeting at Stony Brook.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam Dynamics in MeRHIC Yue Hao On behalf of MeRHIC/eRHIC working group.
Advertisements

ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Ion instability at SuperKEKB H. Fukuma (KEK) and L. F. Wang (SLAC) ECLOUD07, 12th Apr. 2007, Daegu, Korea 1. Introduction 2. Ion trapping 3. Fast ion instability.
Bunch compressor design for eRHIC Yichao Jing and Vladimir Litvinenko FLS2012, Newport News, VA 3/8/2012.
Helmholtz International Center for Oliver Boine-Frankenheim GSI mbH and TU Darmstadt/TEMF FAIR accelerator theory (FAIR-AT) division Helmholtz International.
CESR-c Status CESR Layout - Pretzel, Wigglers, solenoid compensation Performance to date Design parameters Our understanding of shortfall Plans for remediation.
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii Apr
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
Beam-beam studies for eRHIC Y. Hao, V.N.Litvinenko, C.Montag, E.Pozdeyev, V.Ptitsyn.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
MeRHIC Design V.Ptitsyn on behalf of MeRHIC Design team: M. Bai, J. Beebe-Wang, I. Ben-Zvi, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Burrill, R. Calaga, X. Chang, A. Fedotov,
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Issues.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
MEIC Electron Cooling Simulation He Zhang 03/18/2014, EIC 14 Newport News, VA.
Beam-beam Observations in RHIC Y. Luo, W. Fischer Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA ICFA Mini-workshop on Beam-Beam Effects in Hadron Colliders, March.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
Scaling VFFAG eRHIC Design Progress Report June 24, 2013Stephen Brooks, eRHIC FFAG meeting1.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Synchrotron radiation at eRHIC Yichao Jing, Oleg Chubar, Vladimir N. Litvinenko.
MEIC Staged Cooling Scheme and Simulation Studies He Zhang MEIC Collaboration Meeting, 10/06/2015.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Beam observation and Introduction to Collective Beam Instabilities Observation of collective beam instability Collective modes Wake fields and coupling.
1 Three views on Landau damping A. Burov AD Talk, July 27, 2010.
Scaling VFFAG eRHIC Design Progress Report 4 July 15, 2013Stephen Brooks, eRHIC FFAG meeting1.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Beam Dynamics in MeRHIC Mike Blaskiewicz On behalf of MeRHIC/eRHIC working group.
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
ERHIC Conceptual Design V.Ptitsyn, J.Beebe-Wang, I.Ben-Zvi, A.Fedotov, W.Fischer, Y.Hao, V.N. Litvinenko, C.Montag, E.Pozdeyev, T.Roser, D.Trbojevic.
Effect of nonlinearity on Head-Tail instability 3/18/04.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
Polarization in ELIC Yaroslav Derbenev Center for Advanced Study of Accelerators Jefferson Laboratory EIC Collaboiration Meeting, January 10-12, 2010 Stony.
CERN F. Ruggiero Univ. “La Sapienza”, Rome, 20–24 March 2006 Measurements, ideas, curiosities beam diagnostics and fundamental limitations to the performance.
Crossing transition at RHIC V.Ptitsyn, N.Abreu, M. Brennan, M.Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, C. Montag, R. Lee, S.Tepikian.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
Six-dimensional weak-strong simulations of head-on compensation in RHIC Y. Luo, W. Fischer Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA ICFA Mini-workshop on Beam-Beam.
Beam-beam Simulation at eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory July 29, 2010 EIC Meeting at The Catholic University.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
T. Atkinson*, A. Matveenko, A. Bondarenko, Y. Petenev Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie The Femto-Science Factory: A Multi-turn ERL.
JLEIC and Electron Cooling: An Introduction Yuhong Zhang JLEIC Discussion Forum, August 3, 2016.
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Beam beam simulations with disruption (work in progress...)
A Head-Tail Simulation Code for Electron Cloud
Beam-Beam Interaction in Linac-Ring Colliders
Beam-Beam Effects in the CEPC
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
Frank Zimmermann, Factories’03
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
Beam-beam Studies, Tool Development and Tests
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Presentation transcript:

Beam-Beam effects in MeRHIC and eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory Jan 10, 2009 EIC Meeting at Stony Brook

Outline Beam-beam effect on the Electron beam – Beam distribution disruption – Mismatch with the design lattice – Pinch effect Beam-beam effect on the Proton/Ion beam – Kink Instability – Possible feedback scheme as countermeasures

Disruption Effect (MeRHIC No cooling) Np2e11 Ne0.31e11 Energy p/e (GeV) 250/4 Bunch number111 Emit. p/e [nm-rad] 9.4/9.4 β* p/e [m]0.5/0.5 Proton bunch length [m] 0.2 ξp / De1.5e-3/3.1 Lumi.[cm-2s-1]1.1e32

Disruption Effect (MeRHIC with CEC) Np2e11 Ne0.31e11 Energy p/e (GeV) 250/4 Bunch number111 Emit. p/e [nm-rad] 0.94/0.94 β* p/e [m]0.5/0.5 Proton bunch length [m] 0.2 ξp / De1.5e-2/31 Lumi.[cm-2s-1]1.4e33 In working progress

Power (Beam) loss requirements on aperture, MeRHIC w/o cooling

Mismatch compensation If aperture is an issue, the mismatch between the beam distribution and design optics can be compensated, since it is mainly an linear effect. Possible schemes: fast quadrupole, electron lens

Disruption for eRHIC Optimization β*= 1m Emittance: 1nm-rad β*= 0.2m Emittance: 5nm-rad

Kink Instability One turn map for two particle with kick between two particles leads to the matrix over one synchrotron oscillation is: The stability condition is just to keep the Eigen value of T as imaginary number, which requires The proton beam sees the opposing electron beam as wake field. The wake field can be calculated by simulation. It depends on the position of both leading and trailing particles. Define:

Kink Instability is curable Example: MeRHIC Not Cooled case Chromaticity=1 is needed Pre Cooled case Chromaticity=4 is needed Assuming the rms energy spread is 5e-4 For the parameters beyond threshold, use Landau damping to suppress the beam emittance growth. For eRHIC, larger chromaticity is needed (5-7 unit).

Feedback stabilization is possible RHIC ERL IP BPM Feedback kicker Kink instability can be stabilized by landau damping by introduce certain amount of chromaticity. However, large chromaticity is unpleasant in real machine operation. Under this motivation, a feedback scheme is being carried out to stabilize the instability by measuring the electron bunch info after beam-beam interaction. The info from the previous electron bunch is amplified by certain factor A and feed through the next opposing electron bunch for the same specific proton bunch. The factor A is determined by proton transverse tune, the position of BPM and kicker. It can also related to the noise level and how frequently the feedback is added.

A preliminary state-of-art illustration Use eRHIC parameters, to replace required 5-7 chromaticity, feedback loop is introduced. We measure the transverse offset of the electron bunch after beam-beam collision, multiply a factor ‘Amp’ and apply this offset to next electron bunch with respect to same proton bunch.

Summary We need to fight with electron disruption and mismatch effects to minimize the beam loss after the interaction. – For both eRHIC and MeRHIC, the effects are studied and no showstoppers are found The kink instability can be suppressed by chromaticity. – A possible feedback scheme can also bring the system stable without unpleasant large chromaticity. The electron beam noise issue has been discussed in M. Blaskiewicz’s talk.

Disruption with different beam-beam strength Use the MeRHIC with CEC parameters. Vary the proton beam intensity from 0 to 2e11 The disruption after collision is shown.

Disruption with different beam-beam strength

Beam-Beam effect is caused by interaction between the two beams at the interaction region. At interaction region, a particle in one beam is experiencing the electromagnetic force generated by both opposing beam and the beam itself. The former force is called beam-beam force, while the latter is called space charge force. Beam-Beam Effects Possible Countermeasures: (ring-ring, ERL-ring)  Proper working point (Hold the tune spread due to nonlinear force)  Electron lens (apply another force which has same form but opposite sign) Low-beta* electron optics Fight with collective effects in ion beam Electron beam is pinched by ion beam

Accelerator Keywords Transverse Tune One Turn Map Matrix Emittance Longitudinal Motion(Synchrotron Motion) The synchrotron motion is much slower tan transverse motion. The tune for synchrotron motion in eRHIC design is The motion is nonlinear if oscillation amplitude is large. Transverse Motion (x,x’,y,y’) Luminosity for two Gaussian beams:

Beam-Beam Field Bassetti-Erskine formular For round beam case, the field have simple form Near axis, the field is linear. (+/-4 sigma cut-off) For a transverse Gaussian distribution,

Beam-Beam In ERL Based eRHIC Proton Beam Fresh Electron Beam Continually rotate in RHIC To energy recovery path Electron Effects: Disruption - Nonlinear b-b force Mismatch - Mainly Linear effect Proton Effects: Kink Instability Pinch Effect Noise

Electron Disruption Effect in eRHIC(β * = 1m) Electron beam travels from positive longitudinal position to negative. The nonlinear beam-beam force will cause the electron beam geometric emittance growth.

Electron Disruption Effect in eRHIC(β * = 0.2m) Mismatch effect is much smaller, from the discrepancy of geometric emittance and effective emittance. Pinch effects also smaller! (Minimum electron size ~20 microns, compared with ~8 microns)

PositionEnergy Aperture Beer-Can Aperture Gaussian Lowest Energy at arc750 MeV2.9 mm4mm The exit of main linac100 MeV7.8 mm10mm Entrance of Beam dump 5 MeV (Dump All) 35 mm53mm The beam loss at different position (Not-Cool case) (Use beta=5m everywhere, easily scale later) For both initial Beer-Can and Gaussian (4-σ cutoff) Distribution

Kink Instability of Proton Beam Use 2-Particle model to illustrate kink instability, The two particles have same synchrotron amplitude but opposite phase. Let T be the synchrotron period. pe p p p e p pe p pe pe p p p e p pe p pe After T/2, the head and tail exchange there positions p p e Unstable Stable p p e

Threshold (Two-particle model) One turn map for two particle: Kick from the leading particle to trailing one. The total matrix for one synchrotron oscillation gives: Threshold:

Electron Pinch Effect Electron pinch effect is very harmful for proton/ion beam. It enhance the proton/ion beam-beam parameter up to factor of 60!! Can be cured by lower the electron beta*.

Conclusions MeRHIC will deliver cm -2 s -1 level luminosity, eRHIC reaches at least 10 times higher. MeRHIC white paper and cost estimation are being prepared. Staging plan leads us to the exciting full energy eRHIC with smooth transitions, 90% of equipment in MeRHIC will be reused in eRHIC. New accelerator physics and technology are being discovered and learned during design the machine. The difficulties are being overcome!