Day Two, Session One Competitive Effects Andreas Bardong Head of Section Merger Policy, Bundeskartellamt, Germany.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Week 2: Market Power, Market Definition & (Horizontal) Mergers Francis O'Toole Department of Economics Trinity College Dublin 11 th October.
Advertisements

E FTC/DOJ Workshop on the Horizontal Merger Guidelines Firms that Participate Through a Supply Response: Uncommitted Entry Mark Whitener Antitrust Counsel.
Oligopoly. u u few firms u u either homogeneous or differentiated products u u interdependence of firms - policies of one firm affect the other firms.
ICN Merger Working Group Work Product Merger Review Workshop March 10-11, 2009 Taipei.
Competition Policy and Consumer Protection Dr. Patrick Krauskopf Swiss Competition Commission (COMCO) National Training Workshop on Competition Policy.
C HARLES R IVER A SSOCIATES Strengthening the Micro Foundations for Coordinated Interaction in Merger Analysis Andrew R. Dick Vice President.
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class VI, 17th Nov 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
Fantasy/Just Energy Overview of hypothetical case study.
English Welsh & Scottish Railway Holdings Ltd (“EWS”)/ Marcroft Holdings Ltd Adam Land Director of Remedies and Business Analysis Usual disclaimer: Personal.
Session 8: Remedies in Competition Policy Mergers and Unilateral Conduct Fifth Annual African Consumer Protection Dialogue Conference Livingstone, Zambia.
1 Potential “Non-Unilateral” Effects From a Merger David Scheffman* and Owen Graduate School of Management Vanderbilt University February 2004 * This presentation.
Basic Oligopoly Models
RBB | Economics Economic Analysis and the new EC Merger Notice Derek Ridyard RBB Economics 30 March 2004.
The Department of Justice Versus Alcoa (2000) Lance Light Tim Parrington Lance Light Tim Parrington.
Oligopolies A2 Economics.
Public Policy in Private Markets Merger Policy. Announcements Check iclicker grades. If you are using iclicker and do not see grades, let me know ASAP.
The Economics of Information Exchanges Matthias Pflanz, CRA International GCLC Lunch Talk, Brussels, 6 October 2008.
Mergers & Acquisitions-GOs.  Anticompetitive effects of mergers  Effect on businesses of anticompetitive mergers  Implications of Global Mergers.
Perfect Competition, Monopoly, Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition in Seller Markers Allan Fels, Professor of Government The Australia and New Zealand.
Mergers and acquisition
An Economic Approach for Collective Dominance Ekrem Kalkan Ş.Demet Kaya Korkut (Turkish Competition Authority)
Chapter 7 Market Structures Hello! Market Structure ► Market structure refers to the ways that competition occurs, based on the number of firms, the.
Master the Antitrust Basics Brown Bag Series
Nestle-Perrier Merger case study
VIETNAM TRAINING WORKSHOP ON M&A EVALUATION SKILLS FOR COMPETITION AUTHORITY OFFICIALS Ha Long Bay, Vietnam, 13 & 14 August 2005.
Introductory course on Competition and Regulation Pál Belényesi University of Verona October 2006.
Economics Chapter 9 Competition and Monopolies. Perfect Competition: Section 1 Market Structure- the amount of competition they face. Market Structure-
Non-leniency Tools for Detecting and Investigating Cartels: Overview and Chilean Experience Felipe Irarrazabal National Economic Prosecutor SYDNEY, BOS2.
State-created monopolies Break-out session ICN 6 th Annual Conference 30th May 2007, Moscow.
MERGERS Clayton 7 as amended by the Celler-Kefauver Act:
From « Guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 of the EC Treaty to horizontal cooperation Agreements » The purpose of these guidelines is to provide.
How to assess vertical mergers cast your vote! Miguel de la Mano* Member of the Chief Economist Team DG COMP, European Commission *The views expressed.
Merger Antitrust Law Fundamentals Dale Collins Shearman & Sterling LLP April 18, 2013.
Perfect Competition. A market structure in which a large number of firms all produce the same product A market structure in which a large number of firms.
Horizontal Merger
Regulation of Mergers & Acquisitions Presentation by Magdeline Gabaraane GICC 14 th March
1 The economics of non-horizontal merger guidelines Nikos Vettas Professor, Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece and Member, European Advisory.
An ‘Efficient’ or ‘Failing’ Defence? Matt Tavantzis Economist, Mergers All views are personal and not necessarily those of the OFT.
Market Structures Regulation and Deregulation. How firms increase Market Power  Controlling prices - leading firms can form a cartel, merge, or practice:
Assessing the efficacy of structural merger remedies: choosing between theories of harm? Steve Davies and Matt Olczak, ACLE EC Competition.
Economics RBB TOULOUSE, NOVEMBER 2007ANDREA LOFARO Svitzer/Adsteam: Assessing unilateral effects when monopolists merge Association of Competition Economics.
© 2009 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Essentials of Economics Hubbard/O’Brien, 2e. Fernando & Yvonn Quijano Prepared by: Chapter 9 Monopoly and Antitrust.
1 Economic Analysis in Competition Law – A Lawyer’s Perspective A. Douglas Melamed March 23, 2009.
Non-Horizontal Merger Analysis Mark Whitener Senior Counsel, Competition Law & Policy General Electric Company Presented to the Competition Commission.
JKU Dissertation Colloquium Economics [3DVWLKS; ] Linz, 23 th January 2012 Markus LINDNER.
Principles of Merger Analysis The Antitrust Masters Course V September 30, 2010 Andrea Agathoklis, Department of Justice Norman A. Armstrong, Jr., Federal.
Cooperative Strategy Hitt, Ireland, and Hoskisson
Use and limits of market definition 11 November 2015 St. Martin’s conference, Brno Alexis Walckiers Belgian Competition Authority and ECARES-Université.
February 10 th, 2009 Ticketmaster Live Nation. The Players  Ticketmaster Largest primary ticketing provider in the U.S. (80%) Largest primary ticketing.
Monopolistic Competition & Oligopoly. Characteristics of Monopolistic Competition A relatively large number of sellers (Small Market Share, No Collusion,
Merger Working Group Workshop March 10-11, 2009 – Taipei, Taiwan Introduction to Merger Investigation and Investigative Planning International Competition.
BIICL: The Seventh Annual Trans-Atlantic Antitrust Dialogue Empirical Evaluation of Coordinated Effects Dr Peter Davis 1 May 2007.
Topic 4: Competition and Market Structure. I.Perfect Competition A.Conditions for Pure Competition *Def: Pure Competition 1.Many buyers and sellers participate.
Prof. Ana Corrales ECO 2023 Notes Ch. 25: Monopolistic Competition & Oligopoly Most firms have distinguishable rather than standardized products Competition.
Best Practices for Competition Law Enforcement: March 18, 2016 Russell W. Damtoft Associate Director Office of International Affairs United States Federal.
Integrating Digital Media and Branding Clive Whysall CAM Examiner December 2013 & March 2014 Assessment.
Reference Guide on the Ex-Post Evaluation of CAs’ Enforcement Decisions Ania Thiemann Head of Global Relations Competition Division, OECD ICN AEWG workshop.
2009 ICN MERGER WORKSHOP Plenary Session “Entry and Other Competitive Effects”
ARE BUSINESSES EFFICIENT? 11a – Oligopoly
Horizontal Mergers: theory and practice
Government Regulations & Competition
Analyzing Telecom Mergers*
Adriaan Dierx European Commission* 15th Annual ACE Conference 2017
Loyalty Rebates: Exclusive Dealing, Predatory Pricing, or Both?
Market Structures: Different Types of Competition
Merger Control : Basics of Substantive Assessment Horizontal and Non-Horizontal Mergers Definition of Relevant Market.
Collusion and f0reclosure (predatory pricing)
Topic 4: Competition and Market Structure
Competition and Monopolies
Horizontal Mergers: theory and practice
Presentation transcript:

Day Two, Session One Competitive Effects Andreas Bardong Head of Section Merger Policy, Bundeskartellamt, Germany

ICN Merger Workshop Taipei March Outline Day Two Session One Brief Overview on competitive effects analysis, guidance from:  ICN Recommended Practices for Merger Analysis  ICN Merger Guidelines Workbook Role Play:  Interviews of competition official with competitor  Interview with customer Your turn:  Analysis of Information provided in interviews in Break out session

ICN Merger Workshop Taipei March Competitive Harm Will the merger lead to competitive harm? Competitive Harm Price increase Negative effect on innovation Limitation of output Negative effect on quality and variety

ICN Merger Workshop Taipei March Counterfactual Situation pre- merger Situation without the merger (Counterfactual) Likely situation post-merger How does the merger change the situation on the market?

ICN Merger Workshop Taipei March Competitive Effects Mainstream theories of competitive harm? Competitive Effects Unilateral Effects Coordinated Effects

ICN Merger Workshop Taipei March Types of Mergers Negative competitive effects can occur as a result of different types of mergers Horizontal Merger vertical mergers Typical case: Also possible: Conglomerate mergers

ICN Merger Workshop Taipei March Competitive Effects (II) Unilateral Effects  Non-coordinated action by market participants  In particular: Merging firms are able to excercise market power, e.g. raise price, limit output or quality  Merger eliminates competition between merging parties Coordinated Effects  Coordination of behaviour between companies in a market (not necessarily collusion).  Merging parties and some competitors coordinate on price, output, or customer/market allocation.  Merger increases the liklihood of coordination or strengthens existing coordination.

ICN Merger Workshop Taipei March Coordinated Effects Costly to cheat (other must be able to detect and punish cheating) Competitive constraints from outside must be weak (other competitors, buyer-power, entry) Ability to identify terms of coordination Is coordination stable? Does merger change situation?

ICN Merger Workshop Taipei March Coordinated Effects (II)  Relevant factors include: Market transparency Maverick firms spare capacity of non- Participating competitors, barriers to entrys Multimarket contacts and symmetry Buyer power Structural links between companies Product homogeneity