REPORT National Senior Certificate Examination Results Towards a Sector Plan for Basic Education Presentation by Nkosinathi Sishi –Chief Director: National.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools
Advertisements

1 Progress on expanding access to education for children with disabilities Presentation to Parliamentary Select Committee October 2009.
Measuring Gender and Education Quality - The Need for Social Outcomes Huma Zia, Sahar Saeed and Saba Saeed Comparative and International Education Society.
AME Education Sector Profile
Programme to Support Pro-Poor Policy Development A partnership between the Presidency, Republic of South Africa and the European Union Repetition, dropping.
1 Key Outcome One: Quality Basic Education Presentation to Ad Hoc Committee 03 February 2010 Cape Town.
Programme to Support Pro-Poor Policy Development A partnership between the Presidency, Republic of South Africa and the European Union Making Sense of.
1 Student Success Program Ministry of Education November 2004.
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE PRESENTATION
Update on Education for All (EFA) Goals
“Outside looking in” The evaluation of the NSC in South Africa by UK NARIC Anne Oberholzer.
May Rihani Senior Vice President and Director
LAYING SOLID FOUNDATIONS FOR LEARNING Early Childhood Development
ELSABE VAN HEERDEN 1 REGISTRATION VARIOUS TOPICS.
Timor-Leste AME EDUCATION SECTOR PROFILE. Education Structure Timor-Leste Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, World Bank EdStats Education System.
Raising Academic Standards for all School Development Planning Initiative.
Budget Hearings: Education Committee By Macharia Kamau Representative, UNICEF South Africa 6 March 2007.
National Adult Literacy Agency, Ireland May 8th 2006
Update on Progress in Preparations for ANA 2013 Meeting of the National Consultative Forum 20 August 2013.
The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, Overview for Parents and the difference they.
ECOSOC GLOBAL PREPARATORY MEETING OF THE ANNUAL MINISTERIAL REVIEW(AMR) 28 APRIL 2011.
STATUS OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, ACCOMPANYING CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIC RESPONSE Presentation to PC on Basic Education 9 November
14-24 Learning, Employment and Skills Strategy Learning, Employment and Skills Strategy 11 October 2012 Patrick Leeson Corporate Director.
Presentation Outline a)Introduction b)Test Development c)Learner registration d)Printing, packing and distribution e)Test administration f)Marking g)ANA.
Presentation to Education Portfolio Committee, 29 May 2001 White Paper Early Childhood Development.
The Education Response to HIV and AIDS- Progress Presentation to Education Portfolio Committee 19th August 2003 Kgobati Magome, Ministry of Education.
LINDA BIERSTEKER Scaling up a preprimary year (Grade R) in South Africa Africa ECCD Initiative Workshop Cape Town July 2010
Measuring and Promoting Progression Glyn Parry, Young People’s Education and Skills Linda Rose, Department for Education.
Attendance and Students’ School Experiences Selina McCoy, Merike Darmody, Emer Smyth, Allison Dunne NEWB Conference 26 February 2008.
REPORT National Senior Certificate Examination Results 2009 Presentation by Nkosinathi Sishi –Chief Director: National Examinations and Assessment to the.
1 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND ASGI-SA Presentation to PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE.
THE SOUTH AFRICAN HIGHER EDUCATION LANDSCAPE
1 2009/10 DIVISION OF REVENUE BILL Presentation to Select Committee on Finance 24 February 2009.
Submission to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee and Select Committee on Women, Children and People with Disabilities on the implementation of the UN.
LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SERVICES (LIS) PRESENTATION- PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE Presentation to Portfolio Committee 20 AUGUST 2013 Mr HM Mweli 1.
Transition of NCV students from TVET colleges to the Labour Market Presentation to Bridge Post School Access Focus Group 22 October 2015.
Assessment at KS4 Bury C of E High School Engaging Parents Information.
Release of the 2010 Standardisation Decisions Presentation to Portfolio Committee on Basic Education 15 March 2011.
“Access and opportunity” - Schooling in Khayelitsha, an introduction Jonathan Clark, Schools Development Unit/ Schools Improvement Initiative, UCT.
Realities versus data noise: Comparing ANA across years, and to Grade 12 results and levels of poverty Martin Gustafsson Department of Basic Education.
Helmingham Community Primary School Assessment Information Evening 10 February 2016.
Report of the Public Hearing on the Right to Basic Education, October 2005.
Technical Report National Senior Certificate RESULTS 2008 Presented by nkosi sishi –chief director: national examinations, assessment and measurement 12.
DINALEDI SCHOOL PROJECT 1 PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 14 SEPTEMBER 2011.
Asia Education Summit on Flexible Learning Strategies Children February 2016 Bangkok Thailand The Lao Equivalency Programme (EP) for Lower Secondary.
Factors which affect throughput rate of ACE (ML) students: Sarah Bansilal, Faculty of Education.
GENERAL EDUCATION CERTIFICATE(GEC) ABET Examination Cycle & Related Processes ABET IN THE WORKPLACE INDABA Presented by Mr. D. Govender.
Basic Education 17 October Republic of South Africa The Presidency Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Progress made on Basic Education.
WACE 19 th World Conference in Kyoto, JAPAN Opportunities and Challenges in Republic of South Africa Workplace-based Learning for Empowering youth & Socio-Economic.
A Training Course for the Analysis and Reporting of Data from Education Management Information Systems (EMIS)
DG: Department of Basic Education Mr HM Mweli Venue: Cape Town 17 March 2016 JOINT PC BASIC EDUCATION AND HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING O VERVIEW OF THE.
Progress against indicators October 2013 Martin Gustafsson.
Standards report Standards Report CT Board 18 th March 2016.
NSLA AND BASIC EDUCATION SECTOR LEKGOTLA
Deputy director-general: curriculum branch
TIMSS 2015 Grade 9 and Grade 5 Performance PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON BASIC EDUCATION 21 FEBRUARY 2017.
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE MEETING 23 August 2016
National Senior Certificate
Early Childhood Development Delivery – one year later
Budget and Operational Plans 2006/7
2006 Examinations Results Lessons for the improvement strategy
ANALYSIS OF EXAMINATION RESULTS AND THE LEARNER ATTAINMENT STRATEGY
SETTING AND MAINTAINING STANDARDS in the NSC
Budget and Operational Plans 2006/7
Principals' Upfront Dialogue Series, 01 March 2017
Role of Education Key for human development
Accessing skills development opportunities
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON BASIC EDUCATION
The NWDoE&SD roundtable discussion
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BASIC EDUCATION FOR 2010/11
Presentation transcript:

REPORT National Senior Certificate Examination Results Towards a Sector Plan for Basic Education Presentation by Nkosinathi Sishi –Chief Director: National Examinations and Assessment, to the National Council of Provinces (NCOP), Select Committee on Education and Recreation, Parliament, Republic of South Africa Towards a Sector Plan for Basic Education

% 632.3%1.3% 750.7%27.9%1.9%0.1% 810.7%46.1%22.1%2.1%0.3% 92.6%16.1%41.7%21.5%2.2% 101.1%5.2%21.2%39.1%16.5%1.5% 110.2%1.9%7.2%19.0%36.5%13.0%1.0% 120.3%0.9%3.4%10.3%25.1%42.1%10.2%0.9% 130.1%0.4%1.3%4.6%11.7%23.6%39.5%14.0%1.8%0.3% 140.3%0.1%0.6%2.6%4.0%9.8%23.5%35.8%14.8%1.8% %0.5%0.8%3.1%6.1%14.5%24.4%32.4%14.1%2.1%0.2% %2.5%5.9%12.9%24.6%34.2%13.8%1.8% %2.8%6.9%12.3%21.6%32.1%17.2% %1.0%2.4%7.5%11.5%20.6%32.3% %1.8%3.5%7.7%10.7% %1.8%6.1%10.8%15.4% %0.6% 1.7%5.1%9.7% %0.6%3.4%6.0% %0.4%4.1% %0.1%0.9%1.6% % 0.6% %0.3% 2 yrs + 5% of Grade 1 learners are 2 or more years above age-grade norms 26% of Grade 9’s 2 or more years above age-grade norms 38% of Grade 12’s 2 or more years above GRADE Age of learners

Standardisation of Results Thursday, February 04, subjects were presented to Umalusi for standardisation Subjects were accepted as raw scores 3. 6 subjects were adjusted downwards subjects were adjusted upwards 5. In all cases presented no adjustments exceeded the 10% allowed either upwards or downwards 6. In the case of Mathematics: In took Mathematics passed and of these passed at 50% desired for entry into most science and engineering HE fields. There was an outcry that P1 and p2 were too easy. Umalusi indicated that discrimination at the upper levels should be greater. In 2009 national examiners moved in that direction while strategically within the subject assessment guidelines laid down by the Department of Basic Education. 7. In wrote Mathematics, passed, passed on 40% and above and passed on 50 % and above.

Magnitude and Size National Examination System: Thursday, February 04, Schools: 1. Enrolments: Increased-biggest in history 2. National: (includes repeater candidates) 3. EC-15.6 % increase 4. GP-4.3% increase 5. LP-10.7 % increase 6. WC-6.3% increase Colleges 1. National: NC (V) Engineering General Studies ABET National:

Magnitude and Size Thursday, February 04, Examination Centres: NSC 2. Marking Centres: Markers: Chief markers: National examiners: External moderators: Question papers: 197 (130 National Question papers and 67 foreign languages) 8. QP adapted for Braille: QP adapted for deaf learners 10. All QP, excluding English and African languages, prepared in English and Afrikaans 11. Subjects Entries: Moderation of SBA: A minimum of 10% portfolios moderated per subject per school

Thursday, February 04,

7

ProvinceTotal wroteTotal AchievedTotal wroteTotal Achieved EC FS GP KZN LP MP NW NC WC National Numbers Wrote/Passed Per Province

Thursday, February 04,

10

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Some Gains Thursday, February 04, more candidates wrote the 2009 NSC examination Candidates offered a second opportunity. 3. The quality of performances is starting to show - 40% pass and above. 4. Increased numbers qualifying for HE bachelor entries More candidates allowed admission to Bachelor studies % of candidates passing in 2009 obtained HE Bachelor qualification More candidates allowed admission to diploma studies. 8. Gap between Female & Male is closing ( – Female: Male) 9. Bachelor passes higher than historical trends e.g female and male qualified for bachelor studies ) 10. Two rural provinces with greater share of poverty showing an upward trend in performance (EC & KZN)

External Quality Assurance Thursday, February 04, Umalusi approved the release of the 2009 NSC results for 8 provinces, excluding Mpumalanga 2.Mpumalanga results released on 6 January After further investigation into alleged leakage of national question papers prior to the start of the examinations

SUBJECT RESULTS Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Thursday, February 04,

Supplementary Examinations  EC  FS  GP  KZN  LP  MP  NW  NC  WC  Mathematics  Physical Science  M Lit  National: Subject Enrolments Thursday, February 04,

What are the causes of the problems? 1. High level of consensus that we face huge challenges in basic education that require urgent remediation 2. Need accurate diagnosis of problems and causes of failure if we are to design effective solutions 3. Failing in primary objective: most schools do not have conditions required for effective attainment of learning outcomes

What are the causes of the problems? (continued) 1. Key factors contributing to system failure: Socio-cultural environment within and outside schools; enabling policy context coupled with capable bureaucracy to support schools effectively; school management and governance; teacher capability and commitment; parental involvement; adequacy of fixed infrastructure; and adequacy of teaching and learning inputs

Access (Physical, epistemological, and socio-cultural) BASIC ACCESS Attendance: enrolment and attendance at school Enrolment and progression at appropriate age Consistent attendance (conversely: absenteeism) Contractual access: school adherence to regulations which enable access for children ENABLING ACCESS Access to physical and human resources Freedom from exposure to a range of harmful behaviour (bullying, sexual abuse etc)

Attendance by age: an overview Age Cohort% OUT of school Estimated number of children not in school 7 to 15 years 1.2% to 18 years 9.8% to 13 years 1% to 18 years 6.8% to 18 years 3.4% to 15: General Household Survey:98% Community Survey: 95.4% 16 to 18: General Household Survey: 82% Community Survey: 77.1% 7 to 15: General Household Survey:98% Community Survey: 95.4% 16 to 18: General Household Survey: 82% Community Survey: 77.1%

Attendance: an overview  Near universal access to school for children aged 7 to 15  High take up of Basic Education Phase  Fairly high enrolment of 16 to 18 age group but….  10% out of school: not leaving to pursue “positive” / productive opportunities  Take up of the FET Phase lower than Basic Education Phase. Age BandGross Enrolment Rate Basic Education Phase (Grades 1 to 9)110.5% FET Phase (Grades 10 to 12)94.9% (Gr. 12=82.7%) Age BandNet Enrolment Rate Basic Education Phase (Grades 1 to 9)95.3% FET Phase (Grades 10 to 12)60.0%

Profile of out-of-school children aged 7 – 15  Very high participation of this age group in education  Lower for children living on farms (5.2% out)  Disabled children more vulnerable  If out of school:  Localised, household or child specific  Context: household poverty  Marginalised children in marginalised households (Fleisch et al) Only 9.8% of out-of-school children had a sibling out of school Negative relationship between composite index of Socio-Economic Status and being in or out of school.

Out-of-school youth aged 16 to 18  Vulnerability context  Disability  Relationship to the household head  Race (….socio-political history designated by race)  Location / settlement type  Poverty and socio-economic status indicators  Reasons youth leave school?  Specific socio-economic histories  Household poverty and cost of education  Teenage pregnancy  Disengagement from / lack of interest in schooling Bunking school, “We were late and they locked us out!” (Thembelihle)

Attendance by race (ages 16 to 18) 29% of coloured boys (aged 16 to 18) out of school, versus 18% of coloured girls FOCUSED study needed on causes of high drop out for coloured youth

Attendance: LOCATION and race (ages 16 to 18)  Coloured and black children on farms more vulnerable  Coloured youth particularly vulnerable: 48% of coloured youth aged 16 to 18 on farms out of school Sub-place Type Percentage of 16 to 18 year olds OUT of school Farm30.60% (51 901) Informal14.00% (31 623) Formal9.10% ( ) Communal7.20% (95 591) Access to low-wage labour? Farms schools not providing tuition up to Grade 12? Historical labour market access? Experiences re providing access to secondary schools in farming areas? Access to low-wage labour? Farms schools not providing tuition up to Grade 12? Historical labour market access? Experiences re providing access to secondary schools in farming areas?

Household poverty provides an overarching context for school drop out  Multi-dimensional impact of poverty on access  Relationship between socio-economic status and being in / out of school  Responses from caregivers and out-of-school youth  Poverty and cost of education most common reason for drop out (50% of cases)  BUT process is complex….

Focus on poverty in the broader sense School fees About other access costs (uniforms etc) About daily burden of poverty About relative poverty and social exclusion: –Educators / school –Peers 1 / 3 of learners who struggled to pay fees had report cards withheld POLICY needs to be underpinned by a multi- dimensional understanding of poverty, including relative poverty of child FOCUS on access costs FOCUS on reducing incentives for schools to economically and socially exclude poorer learners POLICY needs to be underpinned by a multi- dimensional understanding of poverty, including relative poverty of child FOCUS on access costs FOCUS on reducing incentives for schools to economically and socially exclude poorer learners

Youth disengaged from their education In addition…. in-school factors related to school attachment: Lack of stimulation at school? Academic and non-academic Breakdown of relationship between educator and learner Poor learning outcomes (TIMMS etc) and high repetition rates children alienated from education and disincentivised to remain until Matric? Quality and retention inextricably interlinked RESPONSE? providing academic and non- academic stimulation, feeling a sense of inclusion in school (esp. for older children?), empowered educators and principals…. Alternatives for youth struggling academically? RESPONSE? providing academic and non- academic stimulation, feeling a sense of inclusion in school (esp. for older children?), empowered educators and principals…. Alternatives for youth struggling academically?

Repetition 35% of children in school at the time of the survey had repeated 9% of youth in the FET phase had repeated 3 times or more School PhaseNever repeatedRepeated once Repeated twice Repeated 3 times or more TOTAL REPEATED Foundation Phase (Grades 1 to 3) 78.6% % % % % Intermediate Phase (Grades 4 to 6) 68.5% % % % % Senior Phase (Grades 7 to 9) 60.2% % % % % FET Phase (Grades 10 to 12) 48.5% % % % %

Profile of repeaters Repetition higher in traditional areas Boys more than girls (across race, province and settlement) Black children 6 times more likely to repeat than white children –Race: veil through which to view… –Differential / unequal access to quality education –Different / inequality i.t.o living conditions and socio-economic status –Home language –Other…. 84% of white children go to Quintile 5 or private schools 11% of black children go to Quintile 5 or private schools 84% of white children go to Quintile 5 or private schools 11% of black children go to Quintile 5 or private schools

Repetition and home language  Children who include English as a home language are at a distinct advantage Home languageNever repeatedRepeated onceRepeated more than once English88.4% ( )9.2% (74 059)2.4% (19 562) Afrikaans75.3% ( )18.1% ( )6.5% (88 953) IsiNdebele61.4% ( )19.2% (56 771)19.3% (57 242) IsiXhosa63.2% ( )24.6% ( )12.3% ( ) IsiZulu66.0% ( )22.4% ( )11.6% ( ) Sepedi59.1% ( )22.5% ( )18.5% ( ) Sesotho63.2% ( )25.2% ( )11.6% ( ) Setswana66.2% ( )23.2% ( )10.7% ( ) Siswati60.0% ( )23.2% (68 303)16.8% (49 407) Tshivenda52.5% ( )22.9% (56 110)24.6% (58 057) For black children who include English as a home language: 80% have never repeated MIDDLE CLASS CHILDREN AT AN ADVANTAGE

Access to infrastructure and resources in school

Access to human resources in school While on aggregate educator: learner ratios are approx 1:32 in SA (DoE data), large differences in class sizes… 82% of learners aged 16 to 18 in Quintile 5 schools said teachers always taught classes when they were supposed to, contrasted with 49% in Quintile 1 schools (youth survey) "Grade 1 has 94 learners, and there is only one teacher for all those learners.“ (Phagameng educator, Limpopo)

Youth perceptions of the biggest problems facing youth at school

Time taken to get to school for those who walk to school and are 10 yrs or younger Time taken to travel to school FarmsFormalInformalTraditional Up to 10 mins23.8%54.3%27.5%30.2% 11 to 30 mins20.7%40.1%63.0%47.4% 31 to 1 hour45.3%4.8%8.5%19.5% More than an hour10.2%.8%1.0%3% TOTAL100%

80 Learner Retention in the South African Education System (May 2008) 1. Drop out rate below grade 9 is statistically insignificant 2. Drop out rate increases sharply in Grades (Report disputes SAHRC and Mail and Guardian version) 3. No evidence of anomalies between Grades 1 and 2 (High repetition of Grade 1 cited) 4. Retention is improving, so are the levels of education attainment 5. Younger age groups have a better chance of progressing to secondary school than older age groups 6. South Africa compares favorably to other developing countries on progression rates, enrolment rates and levels of educational attainment 7. Survival rate estimates indicates improving trends in general education: This means younger age groups have a better chance of ultimately completing compulsory education than older age groups

Learner Retention in the South African Education System - May 2008 GET GroupBirth RatesAge in 2007% ultimately completing Grade Too soon to tell

Leaner Retention in the South African Education System (May 2008) FET GroupBirth datesAge in 2007LevelPercentage with Grade 9 reaching level Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Too early to tell

Key outputs and targets for outcome: “Quality Basic Education”

Focussing on outcomes

Activities that will improve the quality of schooling  Teachers (continued)

Activities that will improve the quality of schooling

KEY INTERVENTIONS AND ACTIVITIES DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE THE OUTPUTS AND TARGETS IDENTIFIED

Ensure credible outcomes-focussed planning and accountability system 1. Necessary condition for effective turnaround 2. Critical to establish comprehensive and contextually- relevant accountability system 3. Standardised and credible learner performance assessments in Grades 3, 6 & 9. Ensure parents and other stakeholders use this for school improvement and accountability

A basic education sector plan/ACTION PLAN 1. Key innovation for 2010: Basic Education Sector Plan. 2. Will contain clear outputs, targets and activities 3. Will form basis for sector accountability as well as all levels of system down to school level 4. Will serve to purposefully marshal stakeholder involvement in practical implementation

Ensure minimum threshold of school functionality 1. Single most important factor if one excludes socio- economic factors from equation 2. Establish – in collaboration with provincial education departments – national education management development academy 3. Establish adequate capability in districts to effectively support schools – marshal private sector and NGO support

Ensure all teacher have required capability, commitment and practice 1. Some teachers have problems with content knowledge 2. And some in respect of commitment and practice 3. This despite significant investment in teacher development 4. Strategy 2 dimensions: 1. Labour peace and stability 2. Dedicated teacher development Institute

Ensure effective implementation of the curriculum review led to important revisions: Streamline learning areas, teacher administrative burden, development and supply of textbooks and other learning and teaching support materials 2. Focus on numeracy and literacy in early grades plus maths, science and languages in senior grades

Ensure effective implementation of the curriculum (continued) 1. Supply workbooks and other resources that compensate for challenges in teacher capability and school/system functionality 2. Improved capability at district level to support curriculum implementation 3. e-Learning strategy

Ensure bureaucracies have capability to support school improvement and accountability 1. Serious weaknesses in this area, especially in provincial and district structures that serve areas catering for high concentrations of poor learners 2. All education departments need to reconfigure themselves to be more capable of direct support, ensuring accountability and undertaking required interventions 3. This is a key priority for the basic education sector going forward

Improve learner retention 1. Important issue that has attracted much interest 2. Gross enrolment is about 88% but only 50% of youths reach Grade 12 and about a third of youths obtain a NSC 3. We compare favourably to other countries (Brazil, Botswana, Thailand) but clearly situation not ideal 4. Two-fold strategy: 1. Quality and pass rate throughout schooling system 2. More post-school alternative pathways

Achieve universal and quality Grade R and ECD 1. Aim of universal Grade R in 2014 stands. 2. Serious concerns around the quality of Gr R in many schools – poorly paid and under-qualified teachers in some schools, excessive number of learners per class in others. One intervention currently under way is increase in number of teachers with at least level 4 (Gr 12) training. Further quality improvement strategies will have to be developed 3. Increase coverage of children in subsidised ECD sites and improve practitioner training

Ensure adequate resourcing of schools 1. Had huge investment, but too many learners continue to experience conditions that are unacceptable. Two main reasons for this: 1. Below adequate funding and resource inputs 2. Poor capacity to convert financial resources to required inputs, effective utilisation and maintenance thereof 2. Research shows No Fee policy working well 3. Will develop a comprehensive infrastructure development action plan during 2010 to deal with pressing shortcomings

Conclusion  Contents of presentation has drawn from discussion in HD Cluster, Council of Education Ministers, HEDCOM, IPEAC, 2010 Cabinet Lekgotla and with stakeholders