District Assessment Report 2005-2006 School Year.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bureau of Indian Education
Advertisements

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
District Testing Report: Analyzing The Data Danielle M. Shanley Director of Curriculum and Instruction October 17, 2011 New Milford School District.
Mark J. Raivetz Superintendent Elizabeth Mennig Supervisor Teaching and Learning 21 October 2010 Assessment in the Haddon Township Public Schools 2010.
1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. 2.
Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2013 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.
Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2012 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 TEST SCORE PRESENTATION.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District December 16, 2010.
District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District October 18, 2012.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
Report on District Assessments for the School Year.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Goal 1: To successfully educate all students Objective 3 Identify subgroups and content areas which contributed Identify subgroups and content areas which.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Manasquan High School Testing Report
Using Assessments to Plan for Learning MEAP and MME Data Collection.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
NHCS READY Report October READY Annual Report Contents Growth Proficiency: Detail for Grades 3- 8 and High School Progress: Annual Measurable Objectives.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Report to Board of Education April 12, 2010 Trenton Public Schools.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
091 Equity Initiative Status Indicators_March Lodi Unified School District Equity Initiative Status Indicators Prepared by the Assessment, Research,
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC Results: Year One Belleville Public schools January 25, 2016.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.
Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Advanced Placement AP can change your life!. Why Participate? ► Rigorous coursework is the best way to be prepared for college and to improve SAT scores.
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
New Jersey Department of Education December 2012
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
Michigan School Report Card Update
Student Assessment Data and NJ School Performance Report
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
PARCC RESULTS: PRESENTATION FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT OCTOBER 2, 2018
Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008
Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008
Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential
Presentation transcript:

District Assessment Report School Year

Testing Calendar October: HSPA Retest March: NJASK 3, 4, 5, 6, 7; GEPA, HSPA May: AP

Alphabet Soup of Testing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Proficiency Levels Student Subgroups Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) AYP Increments Status Reports District Factor Group (DFG)

Proficiency Levels Partially Proficient (scale score ) Proficient (scale score ) Advanced Proficient (scale score )

Student Subgroups Total Students Native American/Alaskan Native Asian/Pacific Islander African American Hispanic White Limited English Proficiency Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Other

Adequate Yearly Progress To make AYP, each school and district must meet 40 indicators: 95% Participation for 10 student subgroups in Language Arts Literacy (LAL) and Mathematics Meet or Exceed Proficiency: The 10 student subgroups must meet the State's measurable AYP goals regarding the percentage of students scoring proficient or better.

Increments for Demonstrating AYP Content Area Grade LAL Math

What is the District Factor Group? Districts are grouped by socio-economic factors. Our DFG is GH (76 other GH districts statewide). Other Bergen County GH districts include Emerson, Fair Lawn, Hillsdale, Leonia, Midland Park, Northvale, Paramus, Rutherford, Teaneck, and Waldwick.

Advanced Placement Westwood Regional High School offers 12 AP courses. Scores of 3, 4, or 5 on AP tests are comparable to an A or B in college. Such scores will generally result in some advantage at the college a student attends.

What does that advantage look like? 1. Receive college credit for a particular AP course. 2. Be granted an exemption by the college or university from entry-level courses. 3. Gain tuition savings – up to a year of credit may be given to students with qualifying grades. 4. Have greater flexibility in scheduling and more opportunity to take electives. 5. Gain eligibility for honors and other special programs open to students who have received AP recognition.

Advanced Placement Trends May# of test takers # of testsNumber of tests scored at 4 or 5 Number of tests scored at 3 Percent of tests equivalent to a college A or B % % % % %

2006 Advanced Placement Scholars AP Scholars with DistinctionAP Scholars with HonorAP Scholars Rimida Panzer Anil Fermin Alina EasterbrookGabrielle Canaie Douglas Giombarrese Walter Joseph Kirsten Kuizema Jessica Nelson Kenneth Barney Elina Kremen AP Scholar with Distinction—average grade of 3.5 on all AP exams taken and grades of 3.0 or higher on five or more exams. AP Scholar with Honor—average grade of 3.25 on all AP exams taken and grades of 3.0 or higher on four or more of these exams. AP Scholar—grades of 3 or higher on three or more of the exams.

What Do We Do With The Information? District One-Year & Multi-Year Action Plans Principals’ PIPs Building-Level Objectives Teachers’ PIPs Professional Development for Staff Practice SAT/ACT

Questions?