TECHNOLOGY PLANNING WRITING SESSION #3 January 2011 Cyndie Mutka McCarley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Advertisements

Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.
Morris Community High School Systematic Approach to Implementing RtI (Response to Intervention)
Technology Integration Plan (TIP) Overview Meeting Welcome TIP Teams.
Developed by ESC Region 12 in partnership with TEA. 9/16/04 Texas Teacher STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness
Illinois State Board of Education Technology Integration Plan An Illinois e-Plan Presented by: Jamey Baiter Principal Education Consultant An Illinois.
Individual Education Plan Overview Presented By: Pamela Cameron Winter 2013.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Session 3 Assessement of, for, & as Learning. Phases of Assessment Diagnostic Formative Summative Assessment.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 9 Competitive.
Georgia School Standards District Strategic Plan School Strategic Plan (SSP) Heavy focus on CRCT, ITBS, Perceptual Surveys Teacher Evaluation Instrument.
Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Planning Part II: Goal Setting
Technology Use Plan Mary Anderson 7/29/08 EDTECH 571 click to go to each slide.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Principal Performance Evaluation System
The District Technology Plan The District Technology Plan Melanie & David Dillard Melanie & David Dillard
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Competitive Grants PBS TeacherLine.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Tom Barnes, Technology Coordinator Southwest Plains Regional Service Center
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Reviewed by Kim Davis EDLD 5362 Final Project May 15, 2011.
BOLD’S WORLD’S BEST WORK FORCE, MISSION TO SUCCESS.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
By Raquel Cantu Lamar University, EDLD 5362, ET8021.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
TECHNOLOGY PLANNING WRITING SESSION #1 November 2010 Cyndie Mutka McCarley.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
Katie McDermott. National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers The Maryland Technology Consortium has developed Maryland Teacher Technology Standards,
Welcome to Technology Planning FY 2013 Learning Technology Center 1 Central Mary A. Warren, Director.
Important to Remember! Name of tool used to collect data. Date the tool was administered.
TECHNOLOGY PLANNING FOR Mary Mehsikomer Division of School Improvement November 2006.
Draft TIP for E-rate. What is E-rate? The E-rate provides discounts to assist schools and libraries in the United States to obtain affordable telecommunications.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
District Technology Plan (DTP) Overview Meeting Area III Learning Technology Center John Closen.
Technology Integration Plan (TIP) Overview Meeting Area III Learning Technology Center John Closen.
Exploring Evidence.
TECHNOLOGY USE PLAN INFORMATIONAL LETTER: 7 POLICY CODE: IJND Technology Planning Guidelines July 26, 2002.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
MacArthur Elementary School Curriculum Night September 17, 2015 September 21, 2015.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
TECHNOLOGY PLANNING WRITING SESSION #2 December 2010 Cyndie Mutka McCarley.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
New Administrators’ Technology Guide Becca, Dana, José, Kim.
Overview and Update.  LBUSD is currently facing a unique set of challenges and opportunities. It is imperative that we look intensely and thoroughly.
Using the framework to ground decisions in the quality of teacher practice.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Presented by Diana Mitchell Beaumont ISD Central Medical Magnet High School.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Technology Planning Session I October 15, 2009 Facilitator: Patti Furlano October 15, 2009 Facilitator: Patti Furlano.
Using the Snyder Student Rubric Presentation Link:
Developing School Improvement Plans #101
Colorado Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

TECHNOLOGY PLANNING WRITING SESSION #3 January 2011 Cyndie Mutka McCarley

AGENDA Working Day –  Section II: Action Plan  Recap Parts A & B  Part C: Professional Development  Part D: Parent/Community  Part E. Technology Deployment  Part F: Monitoring Process

TIP TIMELINE  Area 3 LTC Voluntary Pre-Review -- January- February, 2011  Suggest submitting by Feb. 24  Submit TIP Plans to ISBE – February28, 2011  ISBE Approval by June 30, 2011

AREA 3 TECH PLAN WIKI 

SAMPLE 2  All students will move from 85% in reading and 79% in math to 92.5% in 2012, 92.5% in 2013 and 100% in 2014, or make Safe Harbor, as measured by ISATs and PSAEs with the support of technology.  The Students with Disabilities subgroup will move from 62.3% in reading and 49.5% in math to 92.5% in 2012, 92.5% in 2013 and 100% in 2014, or make Safe Harbor, as measured by ISATs and PSAEs with the support of technology.

ACTION PLAN - GOAL  Transfer the goal from Section I, Part E.  The goal will be the foundation for strategies and activities for 4 key areas:  Curriculum and Instruction  Professional Development  Parent/Community Involvement  Technology Deployment  Timeline – 3 years ( )  Budget – Be sure to include E-rate where applicable

STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES DEFINED  Strategies - general, broad statements that set a course of action and have a technology focus  Maximum 3 strategies per phase  Activities - support strategies and include specific step-by-step actions, start and end date, and budget.

ACTION PLAN: CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION Section 2: Part B –  Use conclusions from District Report Card Data, Attributes and Challenges Data, and Local Assessment Data to develop strategies.  Strategy(ies) and activities for each phase (3 years) that address the integration of technology into curriculum and instruction.  Strategy(ies) and activities for each phase (3 years) that address an increase in student accessibility.

ACTION PLAN: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Section 2 Part C  Use conclusions from Educator Qualifications and Professional Growth Data.  Strategy(ies) and activities for each phase (3 years) that address professional development focused on the integration of technology into the curriculum and instruction. Sample district pg 56

ACTION PLAN: PARENTAL/COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Section 2 Part D  Use conclusions from Parent Community Involvement Data  Strategy(ies) and activities for each phase (3 years) that address the promotion of parental and community involvement.  Strategy(ies) and activities for each phase (3 years) that address an increase in communications with parents, including a description of how parents will be informed of the technology use. Sample district pg 57

ACTION PLAN: TECHNOLOGY DEPLOYMENT Section 2 Part E:  Use conclusions from Technology Deployment data and District Inventory.  Strategy(ies) and activities for each phase (3 years) that address the acquisition, utilization, and/or reliable access of technology and telecommunication.  NOTE: Make sure activities includes services requested in the E-rate application! Sample district pg 58

ACTION PLAN: MONITORING PROCESS  Monitoring Description This should include a description of how district personnel will monitor the effectiveness of strategies and activities toward the achievement of the goals. The description should address:

MONITORING DESCRIPTION  Integrating technology into curriculum and instruction  Increasing the ability of teachers to teach  Enabling students to reach challenging state academic standards  Establishing an on-going, measurable process for monitoring the effectiveness of strategies and activities toward the achievement of the goal(s)

ACTION PLAN: MONITORING PROCESS Monitoring Description – Sample District administration and instructional technology committee will continue reviewing, analyzing, and planning for the effective use of technology in our classrooms. The district will strive to make adjustments to this plan as necessary to compensate for those and any other factors that might affect the efficiency of the use of technology and telecommunications equipment and services for instruction and learning.

ACTION PLAN: MONITORING PROCESS  Monitoring Tools – Instrument for gathering data – Surveys, Sign-In Sheets, etc.  Progress Indicators – what’s your measure for improvement—how will you know? (Increase in…)  Evaluation Frequency – how often?  Person(s) Responsible – title of person (can use name if you want)

BEFORE SUBMISSION  Finish Action Plan section of the TIP; and  Finalize online plan.  Send to Cyndie for pre-review if you want feedback BEFORE peer review. Must be sent by Feb.  Submit plan for peer review around Feb. 24.

QUESTIONS?  Cyndie McCarley