Measurement, Evaluation, Analysis & Benchmarking Towards a CUCCIO Program Michael Ridley Chief Information Officer (CIO) and Chief Librarian University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEING AN ETHICAL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADER SHIRLEY JOHNSON & KEISHA D. SMITH BASED ON THE WORKSHOP FROM AEA 2012 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE.
Advertisements

Toward a Vision for a National System of Natural and Environmental Resource Indicators.
The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence
The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence
The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence A framework for continuous improvement.
PRD Group Maturity Matrix 31/07/08. Maturity Matrix Guidance Notes Aims of the Matrix The Maturity Matrix is a tool aimed to support groups during their.
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
The HR Paradigm Shift Discover Stakeholder Value for the Human Resources Function.
SHELLY POTTS, PH.D. UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF EVALUATION AND EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY Quality Assurance Mechanisms.
Oakland EMA Patricia LaBrie Calloway, R.N., P.H.N.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
© 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights Reserved. Evolutionary Strategies for the Development of a SOA-Enabled USMC Enterprise Mohamed Hussein, Ph.D.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Measuring the Perceived Value of your IT Service Marin Stanek Director of Communications & Support A brief overview of TechQual+ Project
Online Statistics for Australian, New Zealand & Asian Academic Libraries Cathie Jilovsky.
SEM Planning Model.
Teaching Quality Indicators Project Aims of today’s session: To consider the scope of ‘Institutional Climate and Systems’ To consider indicators as defined.
Enterprise Architecture. 2 Agenda What is Enterprise Architecture (EA)? Roles in EA? Why is EA Important? Tangible Benefits from EA? What Do We Need to.
Return On Investment Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation Framework.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
Origins SERVQUAL IS SERVQUAL LibQual+. Theoretical Model Define services from the end user point of view Understand that end user expectations are shifting.
Office of Enabling Technologies Erik Hofer, Director 11/1/2011.
Annual Monitoring and Review & Mutual Review Quality Assurance Services.
project management office(PMO)
1 Information Technology Service Quality – How does yours measure up? Jane McGuire Strategic Planner Office of the CIO UNM.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
A Balanced Scorecard is a Process Not Numbers MID ATLANTIC EDUCAUSE 2005 Saint Michael’s College Bill Anderson – Chief Information Officer Billie Miles.
Managing a Training Program Why train? Who will attend the training? What are the learning objectives? Strategies? Coverage? How will the training program.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Re-organizing Information Technology University at Buffalo.
The Assessment Environment in North American Research Libraries Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia 7th Northumbria.
Focus on Learning: Student Outcomes Assessment and the Learning College.
Acumanage Draft presentation Effective Leadership & Project Management Courses 1 L. Zegers – Training courses (in English, French or Spanish) Course 1:
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
GenCap Technical Workshop 2011 Evaluation Report Recommendations Geneva, 20 February 2012.
BENCHMARKING For Best Practices. What is Benchmarking A method for identifying and importing best practices in order to improve performance A method for.
Moving Beyond Compliance: Four Ways States Can Support Districts and Local Data Use 2012 MIS Conference Dan Domagala, Colorado Department of Education.
Policy and IT Security Awareness Amy Ginther Policy Develoment Coordinator University of Maryland Information Technology Security Workshop April 2, 2004.
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
6 Key Priorities A “scorecard” for each of the 5 above priorities with end of 2009 deliverables – with a space beside each for a check mark (i.e. complete)
Assessment: Research in Context Allison Sivak University of Alberta Libraries June 13, 2008.
Samantha Schreiner University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign BA 559 – Professor Michael Shaw December 15 th, 2008 A Survey of IT Governance Through COBIT,
Marv Adams Chief Information Officer November 29, 2001.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
What is a Service Level Agreement? Service level agreements are part of a quality approach to help teams identify and agree what ‘good quality’ looks like.
1 Library management ‘A clear policy must be formulated defining objectives, priorities and services in relation to the local community needs. The public.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
IT Governance and Management Structure
FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR EDUCAUSE RESEARCH
Defining a World-Class Finance Organization
Library Assessment Tools & Technology
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Achieving the Dream Mark A. Smith.
FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR EDUCAUSE RESEARCH
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Third-Party Vendors for Data Analytics: Friend or Foe
Building Partnerships:  How the Office of Assessment and Accreditation Can Help You and Your Program Be Successful.
Following Up on Internal Audit Reports Workshop on IIA Standard 2500
CUCCIO IT Leadership Development Program
SAIs FIGHTING CORRUPTION – INTOSAINT STRATEGY
Assistant Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
CAF Quarterly Meeting Measuring the Value of an EA Practice
Using the LibQUAL+ Survey to Inform Strategic Planning
February 21-22, 2018.
Butler County JVS: Performance Driven
Presentation transcript:

Measurement, Evaluation, Analysis & Benchmarking Towards a CUCCIO Program Michael Ridley Chief Information Officer (CIO) and Chief Librarian University of Guelph

Agenda  Review current initiatives in evaluation & analysis  Solicit feedback, interest & directions  Next steps for CUCCIO

Strategic Objectives  Core descriptive data with longitudinal analysis & institutional comparisons  Benchmark against “best practice”  Accountability Reporting  Data driven decision making  Institutional/CUCCIO KPIs  Others?

Review of Current Initiatives  EDUCAUSE Core Data  CAUDIT: Core Data + Local Data + Benchmarking  TechQual+: client satisfaction

EDUCAUSE Core Data  Established program & analysis tools  Historical data  Stable questionnaire  Good US participation  Limited Canadian participation 2005: : 15

EDUCAUSE Core Data: Issues  Data integrity definitions (data consistency) Measured, estimated, guessed  Extendibility  Applicability to Canadian setting  Workload re responding: onerous?

CAUDIT Core Data Extensions  Additional elements  EDUCAUSE policy re data  Double collection & management  Increased relevancy

Apples & Oranges  IT is non-uniform across institutions Central/Distributed Cost allocation models Multi campuses/sites  Normalization possibilities? Ratios Limited comparator data

CAUDIT Benchmarking  Limited data elements (weighted) FTE Students FTE Faculty & Staff Research Income  Existing tools & techniques  Enabled identification of comparators or institutional benchmarks  Renewed program: need for focus

CAUDIT & CUCCIO  Political & social similarities  Alignment re higher education  Willingness to collaborate  Small organization undergoing change

TechQual+  Qualitative analysis of client/user expectation & satisfaction  ServQual+ & LibQual+  Leadership: Texas A&M; Pepperdine  Participation: Toronto, Guelph, UNB

TechQual+  30 individual types of technology services grouped in 6 clusters.  For each service: minimum expectation level desired service level perceived service level  “Zone of Tolerance”

TechQual+  Access & Connectivity  Support & User Experience  Computing & Classroom Technology  Information Systems  Publishing Tools  Governance & Planning

TechQual+  Canadian version?  East-West comparison more important than North-South?  Still a work in progress  Worthy of investment?

What is Important to CUCCIO?  What do we want to know?  Identify the data to be collected Descriptive & transactional data Inventory data User satisfaction Best or current practices Benchmarks KPIs

Proposals  EDUCAUSE Core Data 2007 CUCCIO members participate Agree on data definitions Create a CUCCIO HE IT Scorecard  Create a CUCCIO E&A SIG Examine CAUDIT experience Monitor TechQual+  E&A Workshop at CANHEIT 2008

E&A Workshop at CANHEIT  Professional development opportunity for management staff  Key principles and practices of effective E&A  CAUDIT & EDUCASE participation  Consolidate CUCCIO E&A Program

Measurement, Evaluation, Analysis & Benchmarking Towards a CUCCIO Program DISCUSSION