AcroJet--Final Akujuaobi, Timothy Dingyi Chen Huiliang Su Jing Ai Wen Zhang

Contents of Presentation Project Description What is GMPLS GELS Test Bed Juniper & Transmode Test Bed Marketing Analysis Future Work

Who we are? TSLab Project Team – AcroJet Team Coach – Markus Hidell Champion: Peter Sjödin Acreo AB Principal – Anders Gavler

Project Description Purpose: To establish a multilayer test bed with optical cross-connects, Ethernet switches and IP routers. Goals : To establish a unique test bed environment To analyze the potential targets for such a test bed Final GMPLS Test Bed GELS Test Bed Juniper & Transmod e

Forwarding table calculated with Such complex algorithms as Longest prefix matching IP Packet Switching Paradigm HeaderPayload Label Switching Paradigm L HeaderLabelPayload IP Packet VS Label Switching Paradigm Network Gateway Interface Eth0 Forwarding done based on Labels inserted into packets at ingress Router into MPLS cloud

LSR LER LSR LER MPLS CONCEPT LSP Path Label Path

IP Control Plane IP Router Optical Switch Optical Switch OXC Data Plane LSR OSPF-TE RSVP-TE Layer n LSP Layer n-1 LSP Layer n-2 LSP GMPLS CONTROL AND DATA PLANE CONCEPT

Advantages of GMPLS Unified Control Plane Automatic/Dynamic Provisioning of Bandwidth and Capacity Optical Virtual Private Networks Open Standards Support

GELS Test Bed Akujuaobi, Timothy Huiliang Su Wen Zhang

VE2 244 VE2 244 E2 E1 E3 E0 VPCE E0 E2 E1 VE3 245 VE3 245 E0 E3 E1 E0 VR1 251 VR1 251 E2 E1 E3 E0 VE1 243 VE1 243 E0 E1 VR2 252 VR2 252 E1 E0 VR3 253 VR3 253 VN11 VN22 VN33 VN12 VN23VN13 VN0 ETHERNET/SWITCHCORE TESTBED NAT

GMPLS Protocols / Software Dragon Software OSPF-TE Routing protocol modified with TE extensions RSVP-TE Signaling and Resource Reservation with TE extensions

Challenges Encountered Customized Dragon Software Bugs Minimal documentations Learning threshold for new concepts

Juniper & Transmode Test Bed Jing Ai Dingyi Chen

T&J Test Bed Juniper M-SeriesTransmode 3000

Juniper & Tansmode Test Bed Overview M10M5M7 KISTAKTH M5 VÄLLINGBY KTH-2KTH-1

KTH Node D ge-0/3/0 Te-id:28679 If-id:57255 ge-0/3/0 Te-id:28679 If-id: Te-id:0x1026c Rx-id:0x Te-id:0x1026c Rx-id:0x Tx-id:0x10266 Rx-id:0x Tx-id:0x10266 Rx-id:0x Tx-id:0x10265 Rx-id:0x Tx-id:0x10265 Rx-id:0x10201 te-ed-020 te-ed-010 PPP In-band Control CH GbE TE Links Label Switch Paths In-band PPP Links Fast Ethernet M5 Node E Ge-0/1/0: Te-id:30759 If-id: Tx-id:0x10266 Rx-id:0x Tx-id:0x10266 Rx-id:0x Tx-id:0x1026a Rx-id:0x Tx-id:0x1026a Rx-id:0x Tx-id:0x10265 Rx-id:0x Tx-id:0x10265 Rx-id:0x10201 Kista Node B te-ab-030 ge-1/3/0 Te-id:29703 If-id:57271 ge-1/3/0 Te-id:29703 If-id:57271 te-ab-130 M10 Node A Ge-0/2/0: Te-id:30791 If-id:56231 Ge-0/2/0: Te-id:30791 If-id:56231

Conclusion IP connectivity of the whole testbed GMPLS communication between Transmode nodes. GMPLS communication between Juniper nodes.

Problem and Solution A little lack of real-time documentations and technique support Two systems with incompatible implementation standards

Marketing Analysis of GMPLS

SWOT Analysis

Traditional Service Model of Network Operator

Service Model of Network Operator with GMPLS

Future Work

Integration Concept LSR Juni per Swit ch OXC

Switch Controler M10M5M7 KISTA Vällingby KTH KTH2 M5 KTH1 Final Network Diagram