Gravitation in 3D Spacetime John R. Laubenstein IWPD Research Center Naperville, Illinois 630-428-9842 www.iwpd.org 2009 APS April Meeting Denver, Colorado.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Theories of gravity in 5D brane-world scenarios
Advertisements

The Quantum Mechanics of Simple Systems
Modelling - Module 1 Lecture 1 Modelling - Module 1 Lecture 1 David Godfrey.
STRING THEORY: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS John H. Schwarz October 2008.
Developing a Theory of Gravity Does the Sun go around the Earth or Earth around Sun? Why does this happen? Plato } Artistotle } Philosophy Ptolemy }& Models.
Lattice Spinor Gravity Lattice Spinor Gravity. Quantum gravity Quantum field theory Quantum field theory Functional integral formulation Functional integral.
PRESENTATION TOPIC  DARK MATTER &DARK ENERGY.  We know about only normal matter which is only 5% of the composition of universe and the rest is  DARK.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2007 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29 Lecture Notes 8.
Final Parametric Solution. A Quick Overview of Relativity Special Relativity: –The manifestation of requiring the speed of light to be invariant in all.
Macroscopic Behaviours of Palatini Modified Gravity Theories [gr-qc] and [gr-qc] Baojiu Li, David F. Mota & Douglas J. Shaw Portsmouth,
Chapter 12 Gravitation. Theories of Gravity Newton’s Einstein’s.
Gravity as Geometry. Forces in Nature Gravitational Force Electromagnetic Force Strong Force Weak Force.
The Pursuit of Unification: Fulfilling Einstein’s Dream N. Seiberg Institute for Advanced Study 2004.
Fall 2008Lecture 1-1Physics 231 Electric Charges, Forces, and Fields.
Vectors 1D kinematics 2D kinematics Newton’s laws of motion
Chapter 5 More Applications of Newton’s Laws. Forces of Friction When an object is in motion on a surface or through a viscous medium, there will be a.
Chapter 2 Motion in One Dimension. Kinematics Describes motion while ignoring the agents that caused the motion For now, will consider motion in one dimension.
Mathematical Concepts: Polynomials, Trigonometry and Vectors AP Physics C 20 Aug 2009.
Central Force Motion Chapter 8
Chapter 26 Relativity. General Physics Relativity II Sections 5–7.
Zero-energy space cancels the need for dark energy Tuomo Suntola, Finlandwww.sci.fi/~suntola/ Mathematics, Physics and Philosophy.
Gravitation In galaxy M31, one very similar to our own, there is almost certainly a super massive black hole at the center. This very massive object supplies.
Chapter 25 Electric Potential Electrical Potential and Potential Difference When a test charge is placed in an electric field, it experiences a.
Chapter 13 Black Holes. What do you think? Are black holes just holes in space? What is at the surface of a black hole? What power or force enables black.
Intro to Cosmology! OR What is our Universe?. The Latest High Resolution Image of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Low Energy RegionHigh Energy.
A black hole is a region of space with such a strong gravitational field that not even light can escape.
Black Holes Escape velocity Event horizon Black hole parameters Falling into a black hole.
Edmund Bertschinger MIT Department of Physics and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research web.mit.edu/edbert/Alexandria General Relativity.
Correspondence of The Principle of Maximum Entropy With other Laws of Physics Maximum Proper Time Least Action Least Time Minimum Energy How may the Maximum.
Electrical Charges and Coulomb’s Law
Chapter 22 Gauss’s Law Chapter 22 opener. Gauss’s law is an elegant relation between electric charge and electric field. It is more general than Coulomb’s.
More Applications of Newton’s Laws
General Relativity Physics Honours 2005 Dr Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29
Fundamental Principles of General Relativity  general principle: laws of physics must be the same for all observers (accelerated or not)  general covariance:
Unifying the Geometry of General Relativity with the Virtual Particle Nature of Quantum Electrodynamics John R. Laubenstein IWPD Research Center Naperville,
Motion & Force: DYNAMICS
General Relativity Physics Honours 2008 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 560, A29 Lecture Notes 10.
Anthropology Series In the Beginning How did the Universe begin? Don’t know!
Summary for Chapters 2  4 Kinematics: Average velocity (Instantaneous) velocity  Average acceleration = (Instantaneous) acceleration = Constant acceleration:
General Relativity Physics Honours 2008 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 560, A29 Lecture Notes 9.
Astro-2: History of the Universe Lecture 10; May
Ch. 4, Motion & Force: DYNAMICS
The Meaning of Einstein’s Equation*
General Relativity and Cosmology The End of Absolute Space Cosmological Principle Black Holes CBMR and Big Bang.
Redefining Planck Mass: Unlocking the Fundamental Quantum of the Universe John R. Laubenstein Senior Scientist IWPD Research Center
Unit 13 Relativity.
Chapter 25 – Electric Potential
First Steps Towards a Theory of Quantum Gravity Mark Baumann Dec 6, 2006.
Absolute Planck Values: Moving Beyond the Arbitrary Assignment of Unity John R. Laubenstein IWPD Research Center 2008 APS March Meeting New Orleans, Louisiana.
Conductor, insulator and ground. Force between two point charges:
Concept 2: Motions and Forces Analyze relationships between forces and motion. 1. Determine the rate of change of a quantity 2. Analyze the relationships.
Life on Earth Without the Theories of Relativity How would our lives be different on Earth if we did not have any knowledge of the theory of relativity?
Lecture 27: The Shape of Space Astronomy Spring 2014.
Gravity 3/31/2009 Version. Consent for Participation in Research Construct Centered Design Approach to Developing Undergraduate Curriculum in Nanoscience.
The Beginning of Time Review: evidence for dark matter evidence for dark matter comes from  motions of stars and gas in galaxies  motions of galaxies.
Course Goals: The mission of Spring Hill College states, “…we strive to awaken mind and spirit to the pursuit of truth and an ever-deepening appreciation.
Chapter I Vectors and Scalars AAIT Engineering Mechanics Statics Department of Tewodros N. Civil Engineering.
ETSU Astrophysics 3415: “The Concordance Model in Cosmology: Should We Believe It?…” Martin Hendry Nov 2005 AIM:To review the current status of cosmological.
Florian Girelli 2. General construction of DSR 3. Exploring the physics of DSR 1. DSR: phenomenology of QG.
Macroscopic Quantum Geometry Craig Hogan University of Chicago and Fermilab.
Chapter 4 Forces in One Dimension. Classical Mechanics Describes the relationship between the motion of objects in our everyday world and the forces acting.
Fundamental Forces of Nature
Electric Potential Between Charged Plates
Space-time Invariance and Quantum Gravity
Devil physics The baddest class on campus AP Physics
Black Holes Escape velocity Event horizon Black hole parameters
Fundamental Forces of Nature
Review Chapter 1-8 in Jackson
Principle of Equivalence: Einstein 1907
Expressing n dimensions as n-1
Presentation transcript:

Gravitation in 3D Spacetime John R. Laubenstein IWPD Research Center Naperville, Illinois APS April Meeting Denver, Colorado May 5, 2009

 Our team has been working together for over 10 years, with our center becoming incorporated in 2005  Among our various activities, we explore relationships between:  Observational data  Physical constants  Physical laws

 IWPD Scale Metrics (ISM) DOES NOT:  Claim to identify some past error or oversight that sets the world right  Suggest that past achievements should be discarded for some new vision of reality

 IWPD Scale Metrics DOES:  Suggest an alternative description of space-time  Show that ISM is equivalent to 4-Vector space-time (at least in terms of velocity)  Modify gravitation so that it can be described using ISM  Show that ISM makes predictions and establishes relationships that are consistent with observation

 ISM quantitatively links Scale Metrics and 4-Vector space-time through a mathematical relationship  Scale Metrics and 4-Vectors are shown to be equivalent (at least for specific conditions)  Scale Metrics adds to the body of knowledge

 Approach. We will conceptually develop ISM using a two-dimensional flat manifold  Why? Because in our world we understand both 3D and 2D Euclidean geometry  Verification. You can serve as the judge and jury over the decisions made by the “Flatlanders”  Result. If successful, a model of 3D Spacetime will be established that is equivalent to 4-Vector Spacetime

 When pondering a description for space-time this individual decides to plot time as an abstract orthogonal dimension to the two dimensions of space known in the Flatlander world  This requires three pieces of information to identify an event  (x,y) coordinates for position and a (z) coordinate for time

 A series of events are depicted as a Worldline

 A point tangent to the Worldline defines the 3-Velocity, which is normalized to a value of 1

 The observed (2D) velocity is depicted by the blue vector that lies in the plane of the observable dimensions

 The orientation of the 3-Velocity vector can be determined from its angle ( ) relative to the 2D observable plane of the Flatlander world

 If a Worldline is due to gravitation, the challenge becomes to accurately describe the curvature of space and spacetime to accurately depict the curve of the Worldline  The simplest case (a uniform spherical non rotating mass with no charge) requires the Schwarzschild solution

 When pondering a description for space-time this individual decided to plot time as an abstract orthogonal dimension to the two known dimensions of space in the Flatlander world  This individual decides to account for time within the 2 observed dimensions by plotting time – not as a point – but as a segment representing the passage of time

 This approach also requires three pieces of information to identify an event  (x,y) coordinates for position  A line segment plotted on the x-y plane to designate time  Three pieces of information are required to identify an event  (x,y) coordinates for position and a (z) coordinate for time

 For an object at rest, its Worldline is orthogonal to the x-y plane  For an object at rest, the (x,y) ordered pair defines a “point” at the center of the time segment

 A series of events are depicted as a Worldline  As viewed from above, the three points may be seen “plotted” on the 2D plane

 A series of events are depicted as a Worldline

 A series of events are depicted as points embedded in time segments

 A series of events are depicted as a Worldline  A series of events are depicted by ever-increasing time lines

 The orientation of the point relative to the timeline is denoted as (X) and is equivalent to the value  The orientation of the 3-Velocity vector can be determined from its angle ( ) relative to the 2D observable plane of the Flatlander world

 The position of the timeline segment can change relative to the (x,y) position coordinates (X) = 0.5

 The position of the timeline segment can change relative to the (x,y) position coordinates (X) = 0.75

 The position of the timeline segment can change relative to the (x,y) position coordinates (X) = 1.0

 The position of the timeline segment can change relative to the (x,y) position coordinates (X) = 0.75

 The position the timeline segment can change relative to the (x,y) coordinate (X) = 0.5

 Both ( ) and (X) represent orientations  They are related by the following expression:

 ANSWER:  X has allowable values ranging from 0.5 to 1 (X) = 0.5 (X) = 1.0

 dimensions in the Flatlander world can be expressed in 2 dimensions with no information lost  4-Vector Space-Time may be expressed within the 3 spatial dimensions we experience  So What? Who Cares? Where is the advantage of this?

 When using ISM, time is not defined as orthogonal to the spatial dimensions  A time segment with a defined point is equivalent to the 4-Vector Worldline  The orientation of the point (X) is related to the velocity of an object just as the slope of the Worldline is related to velocity  Just as gravity influences the 4-Vector Worldline, gravity must also be shown to influence the value of X in ISM  Who c

 The mass of the electron is normalized to the electron charge:  From this, a fundamental quantum mass is defined as:  The quantum values for mass, length and time are different manifestations of the same fundamental entity, dubbed the “energime”  From this, an argument may be made that matter decays to free space  3D Spacetime replaces the “points” of a 4D cooridate system with “segments” or “rings”  Matter decays to free space 

 How do you determine the directionality of the time segment?

 Apply a factor of pi.

 Time (Space from the decay of matter) emerges from everywhere within the Initial Singularity

 Time progresses as a quantized entity defining quantized space

The collective effort results in the creation of an overall flat Background Energime Field (BEF)

Flat Background Energime Field (BEF)

Perturbation due to local effects of a gravitating mass resulting in a Local Energime Field (LEF)

Gravitation is an interaction between a local gravitating mass and the total mass-energy of the universe

As time progresses, the initial singularity increases in size as the scaling metric changes.

Fundamental Unit Time Fundamental Unit Length

 Velocity is typically determined by the orthogonal relationship between 4-Velocity and the observed 3-Velocity

 If you attempt to subtract the 3-Velocity from the 4-Velocity linearly, you will not get the correct answer

 If you attempt to subtract the 3-Velocity from the 4-Velocity linearly, you will not get the correct answer a b

 However, if you apply a scaling factor, you can achieve a linear relationship between 4- Velocity and 3-Velocity

 However, if you apply a scaling factor, you can achieve a linear relationship between 4- Velocity and 3-Velocity a b

 ANSWER: The ISM Scaling Metric (M), relative to the Fundamental Unit Length (L), defines the magnitude of the Scaling Factor required to make a = b. Fundamental Unit Time (T) Fundamental Unit Length (L) Scaling Factor = M/L ISM Scaling Metric (M)

Fundamental Unit Time (T) Fundamental Unit Length (L) Scaling Factor = M/L ISM Scaling Metric (M)

 If a Worldline is due to gravitation, the challenge becomes to accurately describe the curvature of space and space-time to accurately depict the curve of the Worldline  The simplest case (a uniform spherical non rotating mass with no charge) requires the Schwarzschild solution  In the case of ISM, an object under the influence of gravitation must have a specific value of X  The value of X and therefore the geometry of ISM space-time is defined by:

 Fundamental quantum mass:  Electron mass:  Proton mass:

 Age of the Universe:  Redshift:  Mass Density:

 Gravitation Constant (G):  Planck’s Constant (h):  Coulomb’s Constant (k):  Electron (mass and charge) :  Fundamental Quantum (mass, length, time) : 1

     

 All of the information in 4-Vector space-time can be captured in 3 spatial dimensions by incorporating:  a quantized time segment (ring)  with an orientation value (X)  The relationship between time and (X) defines velocity  ISM coordinates are consistent with a new formalism for gravitation  ISM is supported by observational data

A quantum theory of gravityPhysical explanation of the fine structure constant A university that is 14.2 billion years oldA new interpretation of objectivity and local causality An accelerating rate of expansionAbsolute definition of mass, distance and time Inflationary epoch falling naturally out of expansionA link between gravitation and electrostatic force A clear definition of the initial singularityA link between gravitation and strong nuclear force A physical definition of spaceDefined relationship between energy and momentum A physical definition of Cold Dark MatterExplanation of the effects of Special Relativity A physical explanation of Dark Energy4-Vectors expressed in a 3D ISM coordinate system