Elisabetta Maiorano IASF/INAF, Sezione di Bologna & Dip. Astronomia, Università di Bologna GRB 030328 : the burst before the Burst.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GRB : a canonical fake short burst L. Caito, M.G. Bernardini, C.L. Bianco, M.G. Dainotti, R. Guida, R. Ruffini. 3 rd Stueckelberg Workshop July 8–18,
Advertisements

Ryo Yamazaki (Osaka University, Japan) With K. Ioka, F. Takahara, and N. Shibazaki.
Bruce Gendre Osservatorio di Roma / ASI Science Data Center Recent activities from the TAROT/Zadko network.
Properties of high redshift galaxies from 24 μm images Paola Santini Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma Scuola nazionale.
GRB afterglows as background sources for WHIM absorption studies A. Corsi, L. Colasanti, A. De Rosa, L. Piro IASF/INAF - Rome WHIM and Mission Opportunities.
Gamma-ray Bursts in Starburst Galaxies Introduction: At least some long duration GRBs are caused by exploding stars, which could be reflected by colours.
September 6— Starburst 2004 at the Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge Constraints on Lyman continuum flux escaping from galaxies at z~3 using VLT.
Spectral Energy Correlations in BATSE long GRB Guido Barbiellini and Francesco Longo University and INFN, Trieste In collaboration with A.Celotti and Z.Bosnjak.
DETERMINING THE DUST EXTINCTION OF GAMMA-RAY BURST HOST GALAXIES: A DIRECT METHOD BASED ON OPTICAL AND X-RAY PHOTOMETRY Li Yuan 黎原 Purple Mountain Observatory.
The line-of-sight towards GRB at z = 2.66: Probing matter at stellar, galactic and intergalactic scales Palli Jakobsson Astronomical Observatory.
NASA's Chandra Sees Brightest Supernova Ever N. Smith et al. 2007, astro-ph/ v2.
Ehud Nakar California Institute of Technology Gamma-Ray Bursts and GLAST GLAST at UCLA May 22.
P. Price (U. of Hawaii) and many others Discovery and identification of the very high redshift afterglow of GRB J. B. Haislip, et al. astro-ph ,
Swift Nanjing GRB Conference Prompt Emission Properties of X-ray Flashes and Gamma-ray Bursts T. Sakamoto (CRESST/UMBC/GSFC)
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Existing Transient Surveys: High Energy I: Gamma-Ray Bursts Geoff Bower.
Jet Models of X-Ray Flashes D. Q. Lamb (U. Chicago) Triggering Relativistic Jets Cozumel, Mexico 27 March –1 April 2005.
Natalia Tyurina Behalf of the MASTER-team MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY Sternberg Astronomical Institute MASTER prompt and follow-up.
The monitoring of GRB afterglows and the study of their host galaxies with the SAO RAS 6-m telescope from 1997 V. Sokolov et al. The review of main results.
Type and redshift distributions 65 candidates have been observed between June 2003 and May Redshift is measured by using emission and/or absorption.
Two birds with one stone: Simultaneous optical polarization monitoring of SN2007uy and XRF080109/SN2008D. Javier Gorosabel Consejo Superior de Investigaciones.
AGILE detection of variable gamma-ray activity from the BL Lac S during 2007 September - October observations F. D’Ammando 1,2, A. Chen 3, A.
Swift Annapolis GRB Conference Prompt Emission Properties of Swift GRBs T. Sakamoto (CRESST/UMBC/GSFC) On behalf of Swift/BAT team.
Swift Kyoto GRB Conference BAT2 GRB Catalog Prompt Emission Properties of Swift GRBs T. Sakamoto (CRESST/UMBC/GSFC) on behalf of Swift/BAT.
Recent Observations of GRB-Supernovae Bethany Elisa Cobb The George Washington University IAU Symposium 279 March 13, 2012.
Rise and Fall of the X-ray flash : an off-axis jet? C.Guidorzi 1,2,3 on behalf of a large collaboration of the Swift, Liverpool and Faulkes Telescopes,
Recent Results and the Future of Radio Afterglow Observations Alexander van der Horst Astronomical Institute Anton Pannekoek University of Amsterdam.
Properties of X- Ray Rich Gamma- Ray Bursts and X -Ray Flashes Valeria D’Alessio & Luigi Piro INAF: section of Rome, Italy XXXXth Moriond conference, Very.
Gamma-Ray Bursts observed with INTEGRAL and XMM- Newton Sinead McGlynn School of Physics University College Dublin.
Is the Amati relation due to selection effects? Lara Nava In collaboration with G. Ghirlanda, G.Ghisellini, C. Firmani Egypt, March 30-April 4, 2009 NeutronStars.
COLLABORATORS: Dale Frail, Derek Fox, Shri Kulkarni, Fiona Harrisson, Edo Berger, Douglas Bock, Brad Cenko and Mansi Kasliwal.
The observations of GRB optical afterglow with 6-meter telescope: recent results and future plans T.A. Fatkhullin and SAO RAS follow-up team Nizhnij Arkhyz,
Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension (ESA Cosmic Vision ) or the Compton Scattering polarimetery challenges Ezio Caroli,
Gamma Ray Bursts Poonam Chandra National Centre for Radio Astrophysics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research.
1 Short GRBs - and other recent developments in GRBs Tsvi Piran ( HU, Jerusalem) Dafne Guetta (Rome Obs.)
Tight correlations in ‘canonical’ lightcurves of Gamma Ray Bursts M.G. Dainotti 1, R. Willingale 2, V.F. Cardone 3, S. Capozziello 4, M. Ostrowski 1 Dainotti.
The Early Time Properties of GRBs : Canonical Afterglow and the Importance of Prolonged Central Engine Activity Andrea Melandri Collaborators : C.G.Mundell,
A numerical study of the afterglow emission from GRB double-sided jets Collaborators Y. F. Huang, S. W. Kong Xin Wang Department of Astronomy, Nanjing.
Gamma-Ray Bursts observed by XMM-Newton Paul O’Brien X-ray and Observational Astronomy Group, University of Leicester Collaborators:- James Reeves, Darach.
Dark Gamma-Ray Bursts and their Host Galaxies Volnova Alina (IKI RAS), Pozanenko Alexei (IKI RAS)
Gamma-Ray Bursts Energy problem and beaming * Mergers versus collapsars GRB host galaxies and locations within galaxy Supernova connection Fireball model.
The Accretion History of SMBHs in Massive Galaxies Kate Brand STScI Collaborators: M. Brown, A. Dey, B. Jannuzi, and the XBootes and Bootes MIPS teams.
Gamma-Ray Bursts: Open Questions and Looking Forward Ehud Nakar Tel-Aviv University 2009 Fermi Symposium Nov. 3, 2009.
The nature of the longest gamma-ray bursts Andrew Levan University of Warwick.
Host Galaxy of Dark Gamma-Ray Burst GRB Host Galaxy of Dark Gamma-Ray Burst GRB A. Volnova (SAI MSU), A. Pozanenko (ISR RAS), V. Rumyantsev.
BeppoSAX Observations of GRBs: 10 yrs after Filippo Frontera Physics Department, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy and INAF/IASF, Bologna, Italy Aspen.
A Cosmology Independent Calibration of Gamma-Ray Burst Luminosity Relations and the Hubble Diagram Shuang-Nan Zhang Collaborators: Nan Liang, Wei-Ke Xiao,
Lorenzo Amati INAF, Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica, Bologna INAF, Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica, Bologna.
The GRB Luminosity Function in the light of Swift 2-year data by Ruben Salvaterra Università di Milano-Bicocca.
(Review) K. Ioka (Osaka U.) 1.Short review of GRBs 2.HE  from GRB 3.HE  from Afterglow 4.Summary.
A relation to estimate the redshift from the X-ray afterglow light curve Bruce Gendre (IASF-Roma/INAF) & Michel Boër (OHP/CNRS)
Alessandra Corsi (1,2) Dafne Guetta (3) & Luigi Piro (2) (1)Università di Roma Sapienza (2)INAF/IASF-Roma (3)INAF/OAR-Roma Fermi Symposium 2009, Washington.
L. Amati, E. Maiorano, E. Palazzi, R. Landi, F. Frontera, N. Masetti, L. Nicastro, M. Orlandini INAF-IASF Bologna (Italy) Unveiling GRB hard X-ray afterglow.
Stochastic wake field particle acceleration in Gamma-Ray Bursts Barbiellini G., Longo F. (1), Omodei N. (2), Giulietti D., Tommassini P. (3), Celotti A.
Radio afterglows of Gamma Ray Bursts Poonam Chandra National Centre for Radio Astrophysics - Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Collaborator: Dale.
A complete sample of long bright Swift GRBs: correlation studies Paolo D’Avanzo INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera S. Campana (OAB) S. Covino (OAB)
Gamma Ray Bursts IV : Observational Techniques and some results Andrea Melandri INAF – Astronomical Observatory of Brera.
The Mysterious Burst After the Short Burst Jay Norris Brief History, Overview, Central Questions Spectral lag distributions (long & short GRBs) Pulse width.
Dust Extinction in GRBs Patricia Schady UCL-MSSL M.J.Page (MSSL-UCL), S.R Oates (MSSL-UCL), M. Still (MSSL-UCL), M.De Pasquale (MSSL-UCL), T. Dwelly (Southampton.
Ariel Majcher Gamma-ray bursts and GRB080319B XXIVth IEEE-SPIE Joint Symposium on Photonics, Web Engineering, Electronics for Astronomy and High Energy.
Understanding the near infrared spectrum of quasars
“Dark” GRB in a Dusty Massive Galaxy at z ~ 2
Discovery of the near-IR Afterglow of GRB
Lecture 6: Gamma-Ray Bursts Light extinction: Infrared background.
GRB-Supernova observations: State of the art
Dark Gamma-Ray Bursts and their Host Galaxies
XMM-Newton Observation of the composite SNR G0. 9+0
EPIC observations of two GRB afterglows
GRB and GRB Two long high-energy GRBs detected by Fermi
Center for Computational Physics
Swift observations of X-Ray naked GRBs
Presentation transcript:

Elisabetta Maiorano IASF/INAF, Sezione di Bologna & Dip. Astronomia, Università di Bologna GRB : the burst before the Burst

Collaborators Evert Rol Nicola Masetti Eliana Palazzi Elena Pian Paul Vreeswijk Javier Gorosabel Antonio de Ugarte Postigo On behalf of the GRACE collaboration

HEADLINES GRB030328: overview Prompt event Optical photometry Optical spectroscopy Optical polarimetry Broadband spectrum Discussion Conclusions

GRB Trigger: March UT 2003 (by HETE-2) Coordinates (J2000): RA = 12 h 10 m 51 s.00 DEC = -09° 21’ 05’’.00 error circle = 52’’ Optical Transient: obs ~ 1 hr after the GRB, R ~ 18 (Peterson & Price 2003) X-ray Transient: obs ~ 15 hr after the GRB (exp=94 ks), Chandra (Butler et al. 2003) Redshift: z = 1.52 (Martini et al. 2003; Rol et al. 2003) Host galaxy: obs ~ 1 yr after the GRB, R ~ 24.4 (Gorosabel et al. 2005)

Prompt event Prompt event light curve Duration ( keV): ~ 100 s (T 90 ) Total Fluence ( keV): 3 x ergs cm -2 Peak Flux ( keV): 7.3 x ergs cm -2 s -1 (Villasenor et al. 2003; Butler et al. 2005) (7-40 keV) (7-80 keV) ( keV) Hete-2

Observations BVRI Photometry ESO) Spectroscopy ESO) Polarimetry ESO) X-ray Observations CXO) Host galaxy Observations CAHA)

WFI R-band image The Optical Transient is clearly detected Mid exp time = UT (0.79 d after the trigger) R = ± 0.04 N E Field size: 2x2 arcmin ESO)

BVRI light curves I/10 R Bx100 Vx10 (Maiorano et al. in preparation)

VLT+FORS1 Spectrum Spectrum acquired 0.59 days after the GRB and corrected for the Galactic extinction E(B-V) = Significant lines explained assuming two systems at redshifts z = ± (GRB redshift) and z = 1.295

Polarimetry P = (2.4 ± 0.6) % θ = (170 ± 7) degrees 5 different cycles of polarization measurements were obtained, the percentage of linear polarization P and the polarization angle θ do not vary across the 5 cycles. We thus summed the images on each angle to increase the S/N. t start = 0.13 d t end = 0.34 d V = ± 0.10 ESO)

Host galaxy analysis (Gorosabel et al.) The restframe Spectral Energy Distribution of the host galaxy.The best- fit is obtained using a Starburst galaxy (green template).The red dashed line shows the fit obtained using a powerlaw with index β = 1.25 ± Co-added C1+C2+C3+C4 image of the host galaxy obtained with 2.2m + Calar Alto Telescope

Host galaxy analysis (Gorosabel et al.) The restframe Spectral Energy Distribution of the host galaxy from the UV band (left panel) to the Optical and Infrared bands (right panel). The best fit is obtained using a Starburst galaxy of age 15 Myr (green template). The red dashed line in the left panel indicates the fit obtained using a powerlaw with index β = 1.25 ± 0.54.

X-ray afterglow analysis (Butler et al.) keV spectrum is well fitted using an absorbed powerlaw with photon index Γ = 2.0 ± 0.2 N H = N H (Gal) = cm -2 No X-ray emission lines The X-ray afterglow decreases in brightness following a powerlaw with index α x = 1.5 ± 0.1 CXO)

R-band light curve analysis a b c α = 1.07±0.05 α = 1.5±0.1 α 1 = 0.8±0.1 α 2 = 1.6±0.2 t b = 0.7±0.1 days a b c

Broadband spectrum (t sed = 0.78 d) β opt = 0.5 ± 0.1 β x = 1.0 ± 0.2 ν c = 1.7 x Hz β x-opt = 0.84 ± 0.01

Closure Relations (1) (β x =β opt ) α x = α opt Break No break β x = β opt α = 3(p1)/4 = 1.2 ism α = (1-3p)/4 = 1.7 wind α 1 = 3(p-1)/4 = 1.2 α 2 = p = 2.6 α 1 = 3(p-1)/4+1/2 = 1.7 α 2 = 3(p-1)/4+1 = 2.2 β=p/2 β=(p-1)/2 ν c > ν x p=2.6 sphere jet ν c < ν o p=1.6 α = (p+6)/4 = 1.9 α < 1 sphere jet ism wind α 1 = 0.8 α 2 = 1.6

Closure Relations (2) (β x ≠β opt ) β x = 1 α = 3(p-1)/4 = 0.75 α = (3p-1)/4 = 1.25 α 1 = 3(p-1)/4 = 0.75 α 2 = 3(p-1)/4+3/4 = 1.5 α 1 = 3(p-1)/4+1/2 = 1.25 α 2 = 3(p-1)/4+1 = 1.75 β x =p/2 sphere jet ν o < ν c < ν x p = 2 β opt = 0.5α x = 1.5 ν c = 1.7 x Hz β opt = (p-1)/2 = 0.5ν o < ν c < ν x E iso ~1.8x10 53 erg Θ jet =4°.3 E γ = 5x10 50 erg ism wind ism wind

Summary Optical and X-ray afterglow well detected Redshift: z = Polarization: P ~ 2.4% Host galaxy: Starburst Preferred regimes in fireball scenario: (1) isotropic expansion within a wind-shaped medium, p ~ 2.6 (2) jet collimated expansion within a homogeneous medium, p ~ 2 …more data (if any) are welcome