The WINSS School Improvement Planning Tool: An Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Agenda For Today! Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) School Improvement Snapshot School Improvement.
Michigan Department of Education School Improvement Plan SIP February 2011.
Migrant Education Comprehensive Needs Assessment
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
PORTFOLIO.
The WINSS School Improvement Planning Tool: An Overview.
Campus Improvement Plans
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Copyright © 2013 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. TELL KENTUCKY Survey Data Analysis School-Based Decision Making Council Training Kentucky Teaching.
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Your High-Level Overview of the Components Provided by ESP Solutions Group Disaster Prevention and Recovery.
Supporting Positive Behaviour in Alberta Schools Dwaine M Souveny Central Alberta Regional Consortium D.M. Souveny Action Planning.
NH Department of Education NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan April 15, 2011 Referencing requirements for Schools in Need.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Wisconsin Statewide Title I Network CESA #1 and the Wisconsin DPI
WINSS Perceptions Surveys An Overview. A Collaboration Between Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction North Central Regional.
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
This product was developed by Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project through University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
J.B. Speed School of Engineering University of Louisville KEEPS Energy Management Toolkit Step 3: Set Performance Goals Toolkit 3A: Set Energy Performance.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
ASTPHND ASTPHND Innovative Applications and Training Strategies.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
Washington State Department of Social & Health Services – Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery - PRI One Department Vision Mission Core set of Values.
COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT (CNA) Schoolwide Programs.
D62 Response to Intervention
Copyright © 2013 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2015 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. TELL KENTUCKY Survey Data Analysis.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
CONDUCTING A PUBLIC OUTREACH CAMPAIGN IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Conducting a Public Outreach Campaign.
Michigan School Improvement Conversation Starter Kit II.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Title I Schoolwide Mid- Year Review Melissa Moe and Kris Rangel January 24, 2013.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Cheryl Simonson, CESA 6 Jacob Hollnagel, DPI. Guiding Successful Implementation of Educator Effectiveness Understand successful educator effectiveness.
Data Driven Professional Learning Communities Hertford County Schools.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
Focused Review of Improvement Indicators A Self-Assessment Process SPP Stakeholder Meeting December 16, 2009.
DSAC Leadership Meeting 1/24/12 Massachusetts Tiered System of Support (MTSS)
Literacy Partner 2007 – 2008 The literacy partner supports student learning by collaborating with teachers and administrators to model best practices and.
Identifying Assessments
Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Introduction to the TIP and Setting Up Your Teams and Plans
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
A simple tool for a complex job INDISTAR. Learning Outcomes As a result of this training, participants will be able to… Navigate the Wisconsin Indistar.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Thinking about Change Cedu 527 – Mequon Cohort Spring 2010.
Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Introduction to the Predictor Rubric Transition Improvement.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
A Template for Stakeholder Dialogue. Purpose To move its students to greater success with college and career readiness and in other state priorities the.
Nevada Department of Education Office of Educational Opportunity Nevada Comprehensive Curriculum Audit Tool for Schools NCCAT-S August
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference Washington, DC Sept , 2013 Planful Changes: Using Self-Assessments to Improve Child and Family Outcome.
Achieving Goals in Conjoint Behavioral Consultation: The Nuts and Bolts Shannon E. Dowd Ariadne V. Schemm Brandy L. Clarke.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Transition Resources for Youth
Towson University Store
Presentation transcript:

The WINSS School Improvement Planning Tool: An Overview

Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction North Central Regional Educational Laboratory North Central Regional Educational Laboratory North Central Regional Technology Education Consortium North Central Regional Technology Education Consortium A Collaboration Between

The School Improvement Planning Tool Framework The Characteristics of Successful Schools The Characteristics of Successful Schools The CESA Data Retreat Model The CESA Data Retreat Model

Benefits of The School Improvement Planning Tool Allows continuous planning. Allows continuous planning. Research-based planning process. Research-based planning process. Plan meets federal requirements for schools identified for improvement. Plan meets federal requirements for schools identified for improvement. Comprehensive online data. Comprehensive online data. Enhances Data Retreats. Enhances Data Retreats. Flexible, easily edited and shared. Flexible, easily edited and shared.

Ways to Use the School Improvement Planning Tool As a guide for integrating data review and decision making throughout the school year. As a guide for integrating data review and decision making throughout the school year. As a focus for school improvement teams. As a focus for school improvement teams.

Other Uses To record consensus decisions when conducting school improvement planning. To record consensus decisions when conducting school improvement planning. To monitor the progress and impact of school improvement efforts. To monitor the progress and impact of school improvement efforts. To share school improvement planning decisions with parents and community members. To share school improvement planning decisions with parents and community members.

The team must consider more than test data. The team must consider more than test data. Writing a school improvement plan is only the beginning. Writing a school improvement plan is only the beginning.

Special Features Allows Wisconsin schools or districts to create customized plan. Allows Wisconsin schools or districts to create customized plan. Plans are password protected and cannot be viewed or edited without entering the password. Plans are password protected and cannot be viewed or edited without entering the password.

Getting Started.....

Step 1: Review Data and Identify Concerns Review both WINSS and local data. Review both WINSS and local data. “Evidence of Success” data: “Evidence of Success” data: Describes student achievement and behavior.Describes student achievement and behavior. Data in other characteristics: Data in other characteristics: Provides a picture of potential influences on student performance.Provides a picture of potential influences on student performance.

Data Sources WINSS Data Analysis Section WINSS Data Analysis Section WINSS Characteristics of Successful Schools Surveys WINSS Characteristics of Successful Schools Surveys WINSS School Climate Surveys WINSS School Climate Surveys enGauge enGauge

Step 2: Refine Concerns After all data has been reviewed and the team has listed concerns, Step 2 allows the user to combine, delete, or edit concerns to a final list. After all data has been reviewed and the team has listed concerns, Step 2 allows the user to combine, delete, or edit concerns to a final list. These concerns can be further edited at a later date if needed. These concerns can be further edited at a later date if needed.

Step 3: Prioritize Concerns Only concerns about “Evidence of Success” data are shown in this step. Only concerns about “Evidence of Success” data are shown in this step. The others are stored and become available in Step 4: Developing Hypotheses. The others are stored and become available in Step 4: Developing Hypotheses. In this step, the team designates a FEW concerns as priority for development of improvement goals. In this step, the team designates a FEW concerns as priority for development of improvement goals.

Step 4: Develop Hypotheses For each priority concern: Agree on an explanation or hypothesis for why the problem is occurring. For each priority concern: Agree on an explanation or hypothesis for why the problem is occurring. Each accepted hypothesis must be supported by data. Each accepted hypothesis must be supported by data. Accepted hypotheses should focus on factors within the school’s control. Accepted hypotheses should focus on factors within the school’s control. Hypotheses lead to improvement strategies. Hypotheses lead to improvement strategies.

Help! Most steps have a help box with suggested ideas for completing the step. Most steps have a help box with suggested ideas for completing the step. They contain activities, worksheets, and other helpful resources. They contain activities, worksheets, and other helpful resources.

Step 5: Set Goals Users must establish an improvement goal for each priority concern. Users must establish an improvement goal for each priority concern. Goals must meet specific criteria. Goals must meet specific criteria.

Step 6: Identify Strategies For each goal: Decide what improvement strategies will be implemented. For each goal: Decide what improvement strategies will be implemented. To generate ideas for strategies: Review the agreed upon hypotheses. To generate ideas for strategies: Review the agreed upon hypotheses. Strategies must be research based. Strategies must be research based.

Step 7: Evaluation Criteria Users define the criteria that will determine if goals and strategies have been successful. Users define the criteria that will determine if goals and strategies have been successful. Strategies often require multiple evaluation criteria. Strategies often require multiple evaluation criteria.

Additional Features…. Reflection Questions Plan Manager Download Feature

Key Web Addresses DPI Home Page: DPI Home Page: WINSS Home Page: WINSS Home Page: School Improvement Planning Tool: School Improvement Planning Tool:

For More Information Contact: Mary Kleusch, Consultant Department of Public Instruction