Helicity-driven sigmoid evolution and its role in CME initiation David Alexander, Rice University SOHO/MDI Magnetograms showing the evolution of a long-lived.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The flare-CME relationship – determining factors (if any!) Sarah Matthews, Lucie Green, Hilary Magee, Louise Harra & Len Culhane MSSL, University College.
Advertisements

What can HMI teach us about flares & CMEs? Some Discussion-Starting Ideas by Brian Welsch, SSL UC-Berkeley WARNING: My ideas tend to be half-baked, hand-wavy,
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Trend of the magnetic helicity flux during the formation and the destabilization of flux ropes F. Zuccarello 1, S.L. Guglielmino 1, P. Romano 2 and F.P.
Study of Magnetic Helicity Injection in the Active Region NOAA Associated with the X-class Flare of 2011 February 15 Sung-Hong Park 1, K. Cho 1,
Hard X-ray Production in a Failed Filament Eruption David, Alexander, Rui Liu and Holly R., Gilbert 2006 ApJ 653, L719 Related Paper: Ji. H. et al., 2003.
The Relation between Filament Skew Angle and Magnetic Helicity of Active Regions Masaoki HAGINO, Y.J. MOON (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute)
7 March th SECCHI Consortium Meeting Observing prominence dynamics with STEREO David Alexander, Rui Liu, and Holly Gilbert Rice University
Modeling the Magnetic Field Evolution of the December Eruptive Flare Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Free Magnetic Energy and Flare Productivity of Active Regions Jing et al. ApJ, 2010, April 20 v713 issue, in press.
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
SHINE Campaign Event: 1-2 May 1998 Brian Welsch (& Yan Li) Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley Introduction: Data, Context, etc. Work: Completed & Ongoing.
The Halo CMEs’ Speeds and Energy of Their Related Active Regions Yang Liu¹, and CDAW Source Identification Team² ¹Stanford University ² Including: E. Cliver,
Jonathan A. Constable University of St Andrews Solar REU Presentation 2009 A flux rope model for CME initiation over solar cycle 23 Jonathan Constable.
HMI/AIA Science Team Meeting, HMI Science Goals Alexander Kosovichev & HMI Team.
MSU Team: R. C. Canfield, D. W. Longcope, P. C. H. Martens, S. Régnier Evolution on the photosphere: magnetic and velocity fields 3D coronal magnetic fields.
Discussion Group B: Progress on Initiation Mechanisms 1. Determine topology of initiating field –Initiate broad observational investigation on filament.
Incorporating Vector Magnetic Field Measurements into MHD models of the Solar Atmosphere W.P. Abbett Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley and B.T. Welsch,
Magnetic Helicity • Magnetic helicity measures
Solar-B XRT XRT-1 The Science and Capability of the Solar-B / X-Ray Telescope Solar-B XRT Presenter: Ed DeLuca Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
Progenitors to Geoeffective Coronal Mass Ejections: Filaments and Sigmoids David McKenzie, Robert Leamon Karen Wilson, Zhona Tang, Anthony Running Wolf.
Discussion Summary: Group B –Solar Active Regions And Their Production of Flares and Coronal Mass Ejections Discussion Leaders: George Fisher Hugh Hudson.
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
Coronal Mass Ejections: Models and Their Observational Basis (P.F. Chen Living Rev. Solar Phys.) 张英智 中国科学院空间科学与应用研究中心空间天气学国家重点实验室.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Solar Flare and CME Prediction From Characteristics of 1075 Solar Cycle 23 Active Regions Determined Using.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Flows in NOAA AR 8210: An overview of MURI progress to thru Feb.’04 Modelers prescribe fields and flows (B, v) to drive eruptions in MHD simulations MURI.
Dr. Alexei A. Pevtsov Helicity on the Sun. If you worry about publicity Do not speak of Current Helicity Jan Stenflo.
AR 10759/ May Event Overview
Flows and the Photospheric Magnetic Field Dynamics at Interior – Corona Interface Brian Welsch, George Fisher, Yan Li, & the UCB/SSL MURI & CISM Teams.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
The nature of impulsive solar energetic particle events N. V. Nitta a, H. S. Hudson b, M. L. Derosa a a Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory.
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.
Summary of UCB MURI workshop on vector magnetograms Have picked 2 observed events for targeted study and modeling: AR8210 (May 1, 1998), and AR8038 (May.
Solar Source and Magnetic Cloud Yang Liu – Stanford University
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Knots and Bolts of Solar Helicity Dr. Alexei A. Pevtsov “If You are after good publicity, You should not speak about current helicity” – Jan Stenflo.
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
Kinematics and coronal field strength of an untwisting jet in a polar coronal hole observed by SDO/AIA H. Chen, J. Zhang, & S. Ma ILWS , Beijing.
The Occurrence and Speed of CMEs Related to Magnetic Helicity Injection in Their Source Regions Sung-Hong Park Solar and Space Weather Research Group Korea.
Flares in and their associations with CMEs N.V. Nitta, J.P.Wuelser, M. J. Aschwanden, J. R. Lemen (LMSAL), D. M. Zarro (Adnet, Inc.)
Coronal Mass Ejection As a Result of Magnetic Helicity Accumulation
1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.
18-April-2006XRT Team1 Initial Science Observations Solar-B XRT Ed DeLuca for the XRT Team.
Helicity as a Constraint on the Solar Dynamo Alexei A. Pevtsov If you worry about publicity Do not speak of Current Helicity Jan Stenflo.
H.N. Wang Key Laboratory of Solar Activity National Astronomical Observatory Chinese Academy of Sciences SDO data for solar activity forecasts.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
Helicity Observations by Huairou Vector Magnetograph Mei Zhang National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences Plan of the Talk: 1.Huairou.
1 Introduction: Onset of solar flares and coronal mass ejections Yokoyama, T. Dept. Earth & Planetary Science, University of Tokyo Isobe, H. Univ. Tokyo.
Invited speakers (afternoon): David Alexander (Rice University) Chip Manchester (University of Michigan) Brad Hindman (JILA/University of Colorado)
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Detailed comparison of active regions AR9906 and AR0069 in the build-up to the SEP events of 21 Apr 2002 and 24 Aug 2002 D.
Solar seminor: 4 Oct (1)Eruption of a multiple-turn helical magnetic flux tube in a large flare : Evidence for external and i ternal reconnection.
SHINE 2006 David Alexander Rice University Exploring the dynamics of flux-emergence in magnetically-complex solar active regions David Alexander and Lirong.
Polar Magnetic Field Elena E. Benevolenskaya Stanford University SDO Team Meeting 2009.
Evolutionary Characteristics of Magnetic Helicity Injection in Active Regions Hyewon Jeong and Jongchul Chae Seoul National University, Korea 2. Data and.
Coronal and Interplanetary Magnetic Fields in October-November 2003 and November CMEs Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory,
1 Yongliang Song & Mei Zhang (National Astronomical Observatory of China) The effect of non-radial magnetic field on measuring helicity transfer rate.
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
Magnetic Helicity and Solar Eruptions Alexander Nindos Section of Astrogeophysics Physics Department University of Ioannina Ioannina GR Greece.
The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) has continuously measured the vector magnetic field, intensity, and.
Recent observations of rotating sunspots in TRACE white light images and their apparent association with soft X-ray sigmoids have led to the intriguing.
What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)
2. Method outline2. Method outline Equation of relative helicity (Berger 1985): - : the fourier transform of normal component of magnetic field on the.
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
Studies on Twisted Magnetic Flux Bundles
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs
-Short Talk- The soft X-ray characteristics of solar flares, both with and without associated CMEs Kay H.R.M., Harra L.K., Matthews S.A., Culhane J.L.,
Magnetic Helicity In Emerging Active Regions: A Statistical Study
Presentation transcript:

Helicity-driven sigmoid evolution and its role in CME initiation David Alexander, Rice University SOHO/MDI Magnetograms showing the evolution of a long-lived active region spanning 4 months: note the counter-clockwise rotation of the main spot group (from Tian et al., 2005) Evolution and eruption of a soft X-ray sigmoid associated with an instability arising from the continuous injection of helicity by the rotation of the underlying sunspot (from Alexander et al., 2005)

Helicity-driven sigmoid evolution and its role in CME initiation David Alexander, Rice University Publications 1. Magnetic twist and writhe of delta active regions, L.Tian, D. Alexander, Y. Liu & J.Yang, Solar Phys., 2005a, in press. 2. Formation of a twisted and kink-driven fluxtube for a long- lived active region: AR 9632, L. Tian, Y. Liu, J.Yang & D. Alexander, Solar Phys., 2005b, in review. 3. The role of sunspot rotation in driving sigmoid eruptions, D. Alexander, R. Nightingale, T. R. Metcalf, & D. S. Brown, 2005, in preparation. 4. TRACE Observations of Many Active Regions with X- flares and Rotating Sunspots in the Current Solar Cycle, R. Nightingale & T. R. Metcalf, 2005, in preparation. 5. Sunspot and sunspot group rotation of NOAA AR 9684, L. Tian, D. Alexander, Y. Liu & J. Yang, 2005c, in preparation. The proposed effort builds upon recent observations of rotating sunspots in TRACE white light images and their apparent association with soft X-ray sigmoids evolution and flare production. The role played by the rotating spots, and the associated injection of helicity, in the generation of flares and CMEs is not yet fully understood although there have been a number of intriguing studies by various groups. Despite the delays caused by the transition of the original grant to Rice University, following the PIs move there, and the setting up of a contract with Lockheed Martin co- investigator, Dr. Rich Nightingale, significant progress has been made in our study of rotating sunspots resulting in several presentations at scientific meetings and the production of a number of relevant papers (see below). As part of the setting up process the PI hired post-doc Dr. Lirong Tian at Rice University in June of The number of rotating sunspot events observed with TRACE has significantly increased and these are currently being prepared for a detailed velocity analysis. Preliminary studies of some of the largest events have shown a clear association between sunspot rotation and the production of X-class flares (Nightingale and Metcalf, 2005). This has been augmented by a SOHO/MDI study of 104 active regions exhibiting a magnetic  -configuration and utilizing the apparent rotation of the sunspot and the tilt angle to the equator to determine the relationship between twist and writhe helicity (Tian et al., 2005a). In a complementary study we explored the behavior of the magnetic field and associated coronal activity of a single long-lived (over 4 solar rotations) active region to show that the sense of helicity and the sense of sunspot rotation are consistent with an emergence of a twisted  -fluxtube which has been subjected to the kink instability in the sub-photosphere. This has been written up for Solar Physics and is currently under review (Tian et al., 2005b). One of the primary aims of the original proposal was examine the role of the coronal helicity injection implicit in the sunspot rotation as the ‘proximate cause’ for the sigmoid evolution. An initial study of two sunspot rotation cases and using a “stackplot” velocity analysis has indicated that the evolution of the sunspot rotation, i.e. the duration over which it injects helicity into the corona, can determine whether a coronal sigmoid reaches an instability limit and therefore erupts or not (Alexander et al., 2005). This study is to be augmented by detailed local correlation tracking techniques and vector magnetic field measurements to better determine the helicity injected into individual coronal structures.