Doc.: IEEE 802.15-14-0049-00-0sru Submission Jan 2014 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 1 Consideration on standardization process Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE Submission May 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE sru Submission Sep 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 1 Evaluation methodology and simulation scenarios.
Doc.: IEEE s Submission January 2015 Mineo Takai, Space-Time EngineeringSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE wng0 Submission January, 2015 Shoichi Kitazawa, ATRSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE xxxxx Submission doc. : IEEE doc. : IEEE pac Nov 2012 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working.
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission Nov 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 1 Simulation Methodology for SRU Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE s Submission March 2015 Mitsuru Iwaoka, Yokogawa Electric Co.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE s Submission January 2015 Mitsuru Iwaoka, Yokogawa Electric Co.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE Submission Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Drafting of IEEE e.
July 2004 Jay Bain, Fearn Consulting doc.: IEEE /0379r0 Submission Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /241r0 Submission May 2004 Reed Fisher Oki Electric IndustrySlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
September 2003 doc.: IEEE Submission Slide 1 Jason Ellis, Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2004 Larry Taylor (Staccato)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission doc. : IEEE March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE s Submission March 2015 Shoichi Kitazawa, ATRSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission September, 2013 Shoichi Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission May 2013 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission July 2010 Roberto Aiello, John BuffingtonSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Submission November 2015 Slide 1Li Qiang, Huawei Technologies Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission 9 May 2014 M Ariyoshi (ATR)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission March 2013 Stefan Aust (NCOS)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE b Submission July 2004 Liang Li, WXZJ Inc Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: Submission May 2006 Myung LeeSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Slide 1 SEPT doc.: c Submission Clint Powell, Kuor-Hsin Chang - Freescale, Inc. Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /241r4 Submission November 2004 Reed Fisher Oki Electric IndustrySlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE xxxxx Submission doc. : IEEE Slide 1 Junbeom Hur and Sungrae Cho, Chung-Ang University Project: IEEE P
Doc.: IEEE g TG4g Presentation Jan 2010 C.S. Sum1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)‏
Doc.: IEEE /0111r1 Submission May 2006 LEE, CUNYSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /099r0 Submission March 2000 Khaled Amer, AmerNetSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: [Add name of submission]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> May 2015
July 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [SG3c Project Timeline] Date Submitted: [13.
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2013 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposal of radio resource management architecture]
March 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Toumaz response to TG6 Call for Applications]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
September 2013 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [SG SRU Closing report for September 2013]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> December 2015
March 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG4s Closing Report for March 2015] Date.
January 2003 doc.: IEEE /056r0 May 2004
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> November 2015
<month year> doc.: IEEE / January 2005
October 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [SG3c Project Timeline] Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March 2017 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Timeline of TG4s] Date Submitted: [16 March.
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 June 2009
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> May 2015
<month year>20 Jan 2006
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2016
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
May 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Timeline of TG4s] Date Submitted: [19 May 2016]
平成31年5月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 September 2007
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
November 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: SRU IG Closing Report for Dallas November.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> July 2015
<month year> doc.: IEEE <030158r0> <March 2003>
January 2000 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Study Group Summary and Motion for .15WG.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
平成31年7月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 November 2007
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> September 2015
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
September 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Timeline of TG4s] Date Submitted: [17.
July 2003 doc.: IEEE <03/242> July 2003
Jan 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TeraHertz Closing Report Date Submitted: January.
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Jan 2014 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 1 Consideration on standardization process Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Takashi YamamotoSumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd , Shimaya, Konohana-ku, Osaka, Japan Yoshizo Kenichi Hirotsugu Yoji

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Jan 2014 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 2 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Consideration on standardization process] Date Submitted: [January 21, 2014] Source: [Takashi Yamamoto] Company [Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd] Address [1-1-3, Shimaya, Konohana-ku, Osaka, Japan] Voice:[ ], FAX: [ ], Re: [Call for contributions by IEEE SG-SRU] Abstract:[This presentation provides our view on the SG and TG standardization process.] Purpose:[To support the drafting of PAR & 5C.] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Abstract Jan 2014 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 3 An evaluation methodology for SRU should be substantially discussed in order to assess gains relative to legacy IEEE systems. This presentation provides our view on the SG and TG standardization process that could help RRMM spec development.

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Step 1: Clarify the RRMM requirements Jan 2014 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 4 Collect the requirements of the RRMM use cases and narrow down the target of SRU. –Applications Example: position estimation, periodic monitoring, etc. –Traffic models of sensors and actuators packet size, interval, event probability –Deployment methods numbers of gateways and devices additional deployment is possible or not initial channel settings –etc.

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Example of classifiers Jan 2014 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 5 #CategoryComment (example) 1NameFactory 2ActorsMeters (position, gas, pressure, etc.) 3LocationOutdoor 4Deployment methodsAdditional deployment is possible. 5STA/AP communication… 6Data rate 7BER/PER requirement 8Mobility 9 Traffic type wake up period (duty cycle) 10Battery life requirement 11STA/AP capacity 12STA/AP elevation Details of the classifiers are for further discussion.

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Step 2: Establish evaluation methodology Jan 2014 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 6 Define metrics to evaluate communication quality in the view point of application users. –Prioritize the evaluation items (throughput, delay, power consumption, etc.) for each application. –The problem is how to describe user experience such as connectivity, discovery, reachability, and mobility technically.

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Step 3: Evaluate new RRMM technologies Jan 2014 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 7 Analyze the issues of the legacy IEEE RRMM technologies and collect the solutions. –Simulation is one of potential evaluation methods. –IEEE MAC/PHY may be abstracted boldly to use the existing network simulation software. Summarize how to approach the issues in the SRU standardization activity.

doc.: IEEE sru Submission MarMayJulSepNovJanMarMayJulSep Schedule Jan 2014 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 8 The evaluation activity need enough discussion time, but we can’t repeat Step1~3 several times. Therefore, we propose that we schedule this work clearly and advance it systematically. –Guidelines for Step1~3 proposals will be roughly determined in order to collect contributions widely. Step 2: Evaluation Methodology Step 1: Requirements Step 3: Proposal of new technologies

doc.: IEEE sru Submission Summary Jan 2014 Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric IndustriesSlide 9 We proposed the standardization process of SRU. –Step 1: Clarify the RRMM requirements –Step 2: Establish evaluation methodology –Step 3: Evaluate new RRMM technologies Our intention is not to limit the discussion, but to activate the discussion by clarifying the issues at each step.