ERCOT CWG/MCWG April 24, 2013 DAM Credit Parameters.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3 CHAPTER Demand and Supply.
Advertisements

© 2010 Pearson Addison-Wesley. Markets and Prices A market is any arrangement that enables buyers and sellers to get information and do business with.
INSULATING PRICE RESPONSIVE LOAD FROM RUC CAPACITY SHORT CHARGE Mark W. Smith J. Kay Trostle August 2008 DSWG.
3 DEMAND AND SUPPLY © 2012 Pearson Education What makes the prices of oil and gasoline double in just one year? Will the price of gasoline keep on rising?
NPRR 206 DAM Credit Requirements Reduction: E Values and Percentiles Luminant Proposal.
©CourseCollege.com 1 24 In depth: Stock splits, stock dividends and Treasury stock Learning Objectives 1.Explain stock splits 2.Account for stock dividends.
Automation and Improvements to Default Uplift Methodology (summary/white paper of a draft NPRR)
DSWG Update to WMS May 17, DSWG Goals Update.
Understanding Interest Rates
Seasonal Adjustment Factor Mark Ruane Credit Work Group ERCOT Public July 23, 2014.
3 Demand and Supply Notes and teaching tips: 4, 6, 41, and 46.
Rolling Up a Put Option as Prices Increase. Overview  Agricultural producers commonly use put options to protect themselves against price declines that.
Global foreign exchange market turnover. Foreign Exchange Transactions A foreign exchange market transaction is composed of: spot, outright forward and.
FAST Procurement and Pricing May 28, 2015 TAC Meeting 1.
ECON 101: Introduction to Economics - I Lecture 3 – Demand and Supply.
MCWG Update to WMS Loretta Martin LCRA, Chair Josephine Wan AE, Vice Chair 03/05/
ERCOT RMR Deployment and Cost Proposals By: Matt Mereness and Ino Gonzalez.
3 DEMAND AND SUPPLY.
1 CRR Credit Policy Task Force Update TPTF July 21, 2008.
Utah Cost of Service and Rate Design Task Force
Market Trials - Friday call Credit and Treasury Weekly Update September 3, 2010.
Day Ahead Market Working Group March 31, Agenda Review minutes - March 24 Coral Proposal - Working Group Discussion Loads/LDCs and DAM.
September 2012 Proposed CRR Auction Credit Changes: Summary of Draft NPRR.
WMS Subgroup – CRR Credit 3.Review of CRR margining methodology for PTP Obligations in Nodal Protocols 4.Potential credit margin alternatives Cheryl Yager.
Training NPRR 206 and “e” Factors August 10, 2010 NPRR 206 and "e" Factors.
ERCOT Credit Loss Model Mark Ruane Credit Work Group / Market Credit Work Group ERCOT Public April 22, 2015.
E x p e r i e n c e C o m m i t m e n t SM ERCOT Nodal – Fuel Cost Analysis Verifiable Cost Working Group October 6, 2008.
© 2010 Pearson Education Canada. Markets and Prices A market is any arrangement that enables buyers and sellers to get information and do business with.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
3 DEMAND AND SUPPLY © 2014 Pearson Addison-Wesley After studying this chapter, you will be able to:  Describe a competitive market and think about a.
1 CRR Credit Policy Task Force Update WMS April 16, 2008.
Nodal Settlement Delta Calculations and Statements – 7/11/06 Workshop  Objective: Describe design concepts of nodal settlement delta calculations and.
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department October 11, 2006.
MCWG Update to WMS 08/14/2013. MCWG Update to WMS General Update -July 31 st Joint MCWG/CWG Meeting Review NPRRs All operational except – NPRR 552 – Additional.
1 Cutover Market Call November 29, :00 AM.
Resource Adequacy Task Force (RATF) Update to WMS June 12, 2013.
Transmission Congestion Rights – Credit Perspective April 17, 2014.
FURTHER INFORMATION ON MISO FTR AUCTIONS For SPP RSC Discussion October 6, 2010.
1 DAM Credit parameters review The “Procedures for Setting Nodal Day Ahead Market (DAM) Credit Requirements Parameters” is a document that is required.
Nodal Credit DAM Non-Business Day Treatment of Available Credit Limit (ACL)
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
This slide deck contains animations. Please open this deck in slide show mode (“View” menu, then click on “Slide Show”). To move through the animations,
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM Southern California Edison Company’s Proposal to Participate in Convergence Bidding August 23, 2010.
Load Resources Negative RRS Bidding in the Nodal Market Credit Working Group January 30, 2008.
Carrie Tucker Supervisor, Day-Ahead Market DAM data supporting MCWG/CWG credit parameters discussion February 29, 2012.
January 7, 2011 Review Nodal Exposure / Collateral as of end of December, 2010 Cheryl Yager.
Nodal Short Pay and Uplift Process CWG Meeting May 28, 2008.
Market Credit Working Group Update to WMS Wed. Oct 20, 2010.
Mitigation of Credit Tail Risk Exposure Donald Meek Credit Working Group January 20, 2015.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education Canada. What makes the prices of oil and gasoline double in just one year? Will the price of gasoline keep on rising?
Market Credit Working Group Update to WMS Wed. Nov 18, 2009.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 03, :30 PM.
Total Potential Exposure (TPE) Overview Credit Work Group May 28, 2008 Cheryl Yager.
1 Exposure Stress Testing CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public June 12, 2014.
Credit Parameter Change Technical Advisory Committee of ERCOT July 30, 2014.
2% Shift Factor dispatchable rule discussion and alternatives for the 2% rule Kris Dixit 1.
DAM Collateral Requirements Carrie Bivens Manager, Day-Ahead Market Dec 16,
1 Credit Parameters Review TAC July 2, Protocol Section , “Credit Requirement for DAM Bids and Offers” specifies: Credit Requirement for.
DAM and Nodal Collateral Requirements Concerns and Solutions December 7, 2009.
WMS – Nodal Credit Integration Start Up May 19,
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
NPRR639 Discussion CWG/MCWG August 20, Current MCE Calculation MCE ignores net purchases of bilateral energy. See red portion of MCE formula below.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Money Transfer Due to Real-Time Irresolvable Constraint Resmi Surendran ERCOT.
Reliability Must Run Resources for Summer Slide 2 RMR for Summer 2011 RMR Contracts for Mothballed Units ERCOT has signed RMR Agreements with two.
Day Ahead Market QSE’s Credit Requirements Concerns and Solutions August 14, 2008.
CRR Deration and NPRR821 WMS 09/06/2017.
General Overview Of Resource Costs
NPRR829 Incorporate Real-Time Telemetered Net Generation for Non-Modeled Generation into the Real-Time Liability Estimate ERCOT PRS Meeting May 11, 2017.
Mod_38_18 Limitation of Capacity Market Difference Payments to Loss Adjusted Metered Quantity. 12th December 2018.
Presentation transcript:

ERCOT CWG/MCWG April 24, 2013 DAM Credit Parameters

DAM Credit Parameters DAM credit parameters were determined during the nodal design in We now have actual data and behaviors to help us determine the appropriateness of current parameters - Energy Bids - Likely assumed to be submitted by load only so a higher percentile was determined to be appropriate to protect the market against high $ purchases by REPs (Dth = 85 th p) - Today, Generators make use of Energy Bids to buy back hedges, and along with TPOs, usually enter the DAM fairly flat - Without buying back their OTC hedges, Generators would be exposed to the DA/RT basis spread as hedges settle against RT (see slide 7) - Three Part Offers - Submitted by Generators to sell MW – lack of clarity as to why the Zth percentile is lower than the Dth (Zth =50 th p) - Results in less credit offset to Generators for selling the same MW that they are buying with their Energy Bids - Results in very high collateral requirements in a high price environment which Generators must factor into capital structure at a cost to the market - E1 factor - Lack of clarity for use of 95 th p when no other percentiles are this high - Serves as a multiplier against the Bid price 1

Day-Ahead Market (DAM) – Price Percentiles The Day Ahead Market Credit Requirement is driven by 2 components: - DAM Energy Bids - Generators participate in this market to buy back existing hedges (at Hubs) - Three Part Supply Offer -Sell Plant MW's The DAM Credit Requirement for DAM Energy Bids and Three Part Supply offers are driven by: - Percentile calculation of the previous 30 Day Ahead Settlement Point Prices (DASPP) - DAM Energy Bids - Percentile Calculation (Dth) is 85 th - Three Part Offer - Percentile Calculation (Yth) is 45th & (Zth) 50 th - The Percentile is a point within a distribution of prices which represents the percentage of prices falling below such value. For example, the 90 th percentile is the value where 90% of the prices fall below such value Counterparties must post collateral based on the 85 th percentile of the previous 30 days of prices of DAM Energy Bids but only receives credit for the 45 th or 50 th percentile for Supply Offers (sell MW’s) Due to the percentile discrepancy, Generators who buy back their hedges in the DAM must post enormous collateral in the event of 5 days of extreme prices within a 30 day period. The Collateral required remains until the 16 th day of extreme prices or until there is less than 5 days of extreme prices within a 30 day period - The large collateral requirement due to the percentile discrepancy occurs for counterparties in spite of the fact that their DAM participation is flat 2

Example – Collateral Required During Normal Prices 3

Example – Collateral Required During Extreme Prices 4

Percentile Example – 4 Days Until Collateral Jumps The below table is an example of the number of days within the previous 30 days before the discrepancy of percentiles impacts collateral during extreme price events 5

“e” Factor Calculation “e” Factors are applied to the Day Ahead Market Credit Requirement when a bid price is higher than the Dth percentile - The amount of the difference in bid price and Dth percentile is multiplied by the “e” Factor The e1 Factor is calculated as follows: - e1 = 95 th percentile of Ratio1 over the last 30 days - Ratio1 = Min[1, Max[0,(Qcleared bids * PDAM – Qcleared TPO * PDAM – Qcleared EOO * PDAM)/(Qcleared bids * PDAM)] - Essentially the above calculation is a percentage of the excess of cleared bids (P*Q) over cleared TPO and EOO divided by total cleared bids (P*Q) - However, counterparties do not get a benefit for days where cleared TPO and EOO exceed cleared bids - The section of the calculation where it seeks the Max of 0 or the parenthetical quotient results in counterparties receiving zero credit for days where they enter the market long Counterparties who enter the DAM long on 28 of the previous 30 days will experience a significant rise in their “e” Factor with just 2 days of entering the market short. Similar to the price percentile discrepancy Generators who buy back hedges in the DAM receive no credit for TPO sales For every difference in price between Bid and Dth Percentile of $1,000 and a 10% e1 Factor, counterparties post an additional $100 per MW hour 6

Day Ahead/Real Time Settled GEN into Day Ahead Market ERCOT GEN sends DA MW to ERCOT GEN receives $50 for MW sold to ERCOT GEN Sells DA MW to C/P GEN sells MW to counterparty GEN receives $35 from counterparty for Sale Counterparty A GEN Buys RT MW for C/P Sale GEN receives MW to cover C/P Sale GEN pays ERCOT $75 RT for C/P MW ERCOT GEN Buys MW Energy Only GEN Receives $75 RT for C/P MW GEN pays ERCOT $50 DA to buy back C/P Hdg ERCOT DA Clears $50 RT Clears $75 Under above scenario, GEN still open to DA/RT spread The Energy Only purchase of the hedge MW flattens the DA/RT position 7 DAM TPO PRE DAM Hedge DAM Bid *Bilateral trx use RT prices