Radiological Assessment April 4, 2011. AMS Summary Ops Summary – Aerial Measuring Systems have totaled more than 221 flight hours in support of aerial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiological Assessment March 29, AMS Summary Ops Summary – Aerial Measuring Systems totaled more than 130 hours of flying – Flight operations were.
Advertisements

Radiological Assessment March 25, AMS Summary 2 Ops Summary – Aerial Measurement Systems totaled more than 70 hours of flying – Flight operations.
Response to a nuclear plant incident in Wisconsin How a nuclear power plant incident could affect your county October 14, 2009.
DOE Response to Radiological Releases from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant Daniel Blumenthal, PhD, CHP Manager, Consequence Management Program.
Emergency response organization (ERO)
How Much Radiation Is That Giving Me, Doc? Suggestions for explaining risk from ionizing radiation: 1.There is, always has been, and always will be naturally-
1 NRC Meteorologists Role in Support of the Headquarters Operations Center During an International Event Kevin Quinlan Physical Scientist, NRO U.S. Nuclear.
Ambient Air Monitoring for the Revised Lead NAAQS Daniel Garver US EPA Region 4.
UTAH AMRP RADIATION SAFETY PLAN by Anthony A. Gallegos.
Perspectives on USNRC Study Request Nuclear & Radiation Studies Board April 26, 2010 Ralph Andersen, CHP Senior Director – Radiation Safety & Environmental.
Our Mission To provide safe and secure ground and air transportation of nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons components, and special nuclear materials and.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant May 6, 2011.
Radiologic Units. Intensity Radiation intensity is the amount of energy passing through a given area that is perpendicular to the direction of radiation.
Understanding Radioactivity The Basics. This Course  This course is intended to provide a very basic understanding of radiation, radioactivity, and interacting.
US NRC Protective Action Recommendation Study National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference April 10, 2008 Las Vegas, NV Randy Sullivan, CHP.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant May 13, 2011.
Cleaning up residential areas after a nuclear accident – Accident scenario Michael Ammann, STUK.
1 Radiological Effects Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident Jim Lynch NRC Region III August 24, 2011.
1 RASCAL 4.0 Radiological Assessment System for Consequence Analysis National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference March 30, 2010 George Athey,
Jed Harrison Office of Radiation & Indoor Air.  Review the Incident – What Happened  Describe the EPA Response  Review EPA’s RadNet Monitoring System.
EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency Mike Boyd, Senior Health Physicist EPA/Office of Radiation & Indoor Air Presented at 2011 OAS Annual.
Updated NCRP Population Exposure Information and Implications to RETS-REMP Issues Ken Sejkora Entergy Nuclear Northeast – Pilgrim Station Presented at.
Biological response and radiation safety practices
7-1 NFIRS 7 Haz-Mat Module. 7-2 Optional Haz-Mat Module The Marshal will accept this data This reporting does not take the place of mandated DEP or other.
A Radiation Primer radiation … radioactive material What are they? exposure … contamination Are they the same?
Phillip Ray Gibson NC Radon Program
[
Radiation Dosimetry of the Patient
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Commission, regulation, advisory, standards. Description This presentation provides general information about each of the.
Knowledge of radiation exposure in common radiological examinations amongst radiology department staff AL Chang, LH Cope, DH Keane, S Wood Presented by.
“The World We Create” NATS 101 Section 6 Don’t forget to turn in your homework! 02/02.
James A. FitzPatrick NPP Ingestion Pathway Exercise May and June 21-23, 2011 and LHD Radiological Plan Template Kevin Kraus Associate Radiological.
CT physics and instrumentation
ANALYTICAL X-RAY SAFETY User Training Centre for Environmental Health, Safety and Security Management.
Nuclear Disasters A Historical Look.
PA State Participation in Liberty RadEx Randolph Easton PA BRP.
Products to X-ray People for Security Presented to the : Technical Electronic Product Radiation Safety Standards Committee May 22, 2002.
Page 1 Vision Service Partnership U.S. Department of Energy’s Aerial Measuring System (AMS) Response Mission Provide a rapid and comprehensive worldwide.
1 WEEK 7 RADIATION BIOLOGY & PROTECTION Part 1 FINAL.
DOSIMETRIC UNITS AND BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION (W. R. LEO) DOSIMETRIC UNITS AND BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION (W. R. LEO) 12/06/2010Emrah Tiras,
1 Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project Site LTS&M Planning LTS&M Conference Grand Junction, CO November 16, 2010 Donald Metzler U.S.
1 Options to Revise Radiation Protection Regulations SECY Kimyata Morgan Butler, Ph.D. Health Physicist/Project Manager Office of Federal and State.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
FUKISHIMA Nuclear Reactors Radiological Assessment Air Measurement Surveillance AMS March 22,
Radiological Assessment March 22, AMS Summary 2 Ops Summary – Aerial Measurement Systems totaled more than 40 hours of flying Plot interpretation.
Part 1d: Exposure Assessment and Modeling Thomas Robins, MD, MPH.
The Curious Absence of New Nuclear Michael Hoeger Presented 02/06/2012.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 7, 2011.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 18, 2011.
Nuclear and radiological incidents – Introduction
Dot Plots and Histograms (Pg. 71) EQ: How do we create and interpret dot plots and histograms? Assessment: Students will write a summary of how to create.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Shielding Workshop R. Casey Activation Issues for NSLS-II March 28, 2007.
Wed/Thurs Dec 3-4 Objective: Calculate the radiation exposure of different people. Checkpoint: How much radiation (in mSv) is a cancer risk? How much radiation.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 20, 2011.
EMF GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
Radiological impacts from nuclear industrial facilities on the public and the environment : Their magnitude and the next 50 years forecast Sylvain Saint-Pierre.
South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions
Catastrophe Modeling Personal Lines Perspective
Training Courses for RPOs
Maryland's Air Quality: Nitrogen Reductions and the Healthy Air Act
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Radiation Safety Standards
Tan Yong Jia, Somesh, James
RADIATION TERMS AND UNITS
The “Green Run”.
Allen Chan U.S. Government Accountability Office October 2, 2018
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response
Members of the Public and Other Organizational Personnel Working in Proximity to RASP Controlled Areas.
Radiological Assessment March 22, 2011
16th Annual City Tech Poster Session
Phenotyping Facility X-ray Awareness Training
Presentation transcript:

Radiological Assessment April 4, 2011

AMS Summary Ops Summary – Aerial Measuring Systems have totaled more than 221 flight hours in support of aerial monitoring operations – NNSA’s Consequence Management Response Teams have collected thousands of ground measurements provided by DOE, DoD and the Japanese monitoring teams

Guide to Interpretation US radiological assessments are composed of aerial and ground measurements and indicate the amounts of radiological material that has settled on the ground. Each measurement corresponds to the radiation a person receives in one hour at that location. AMS data is presented as exposure rate 1 meter from the ground at the time the measurements occurred. All measurements in this plot are below 0.03 Rem per hour – a low but not insignificant level.

Assessment An assessment of measurements gathered through April 3 continues to show: – Radiation levels consistently below actionable levels for evacuation or relocation outside of 25 miles – Radiological material has not deposited in significant quantities since March 19 An assessment of measurements gathered at US military installations in the Tokyo area through April 3 shows: – Radiation levels far below actionable levels for evacuation or relocation – All aerial measurements at US facilities were less than 32 microrem/hr - a level that poses no known health risk – Monitoring of these locations will continue although no increases in deposited radiation are anticipated

Context The Nuclear Regulatory Commission estimates that the average American absorbs 620 mRem a year* (or mRem/hour) An average transatlantic flight produces an exposure of 2.5 mRem* A typical chest x-ray produces 10 mRem per image EPA guidelines call for public health actions if exposure exceed 1000 mRem over 4 days * Source: NRC: