L3 Algorithms: status and plans for the near future All-D  Meeting: 1 st March 2002 Dan Claes and Terry Wyatt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mayukh Das 1Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop Activities with L3 and the Higgs By : Mayukh Das.
Advertisements

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
UK egamma meeting, Sept 22, 2005M. Wielers, RAL1 Status of Electron Triggers Rates/eff for different triggers Check on physics channels Crack region, comparison.
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
Level 1 Trigger system design specifications 1MHz Tevatron Collisions Level 2 Level 3 Tape 10kHz1kHz20-50Hz Time budget for Level3 i/o, event building,
Update on Tools FTK Meeting 06/06/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
D0 Level 3 filters Dan Claes Moacyr Souza U. of Nebraska Fermilab / Lafex - Rio de Janeiro Dzero Collaboration Meeting November 9th, 2001.
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
9/14/2001D0 Simulation Tasks Q.Li 1 Simulation Tasks Status Qizhong Li Fermilab Sept. 14, 2001 D0 Collaboration Meeting.
L3 Muon Trigger at D0 Status Report Thomas Hebbeker for Martin Wegner, RWTH Aachen, April 2002 The D0 muon system Functionality of the L3 muon trigger.
1 T1-T3 in L1 algorithm  Idea (F. Teubert) Use extra tracking information to measure the large Pt that triggers the event (L1, HLT). Based in the fact.
1 Tracking Reconstruction Norman A. Graf SLAC July 19, 2006.
C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version (8) 
Level 3 Muon Software Paul Balm Muon Vertical Review May 22, 2000.
David N. Brown Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Representing the BaBar Collaboration The BaBar Mini  BaBar  BaBar’s Data Formats  Design of the Mini 
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
March 13, 2002 Daniel Whiteson L3 tracking - muons! Daniel Whiteson LBL.
A Technical Validation Module for the offline Auger-Lecce, 17 September 2009  Design  The SValidStore Module  Example  Scripting  Status.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
Organisation of the Beatenberg Trigger Workshop Ricardo Gonçalo Higgs WG Meeting - 22 Jan.09.
L3 Filtering: - short- and medium term plans - how you can help out All-D  Meeting: 14 th March 2003 Terry Wyatt (FNAL-CD/Manchester) on behalf of the.
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
1 Silke Duensing DØ Analysis Status NIKHEF Annual Scientific Meeting Analysing first D0 data  Real Data with:  Jets  Missing Et  Electrons 
D0 Status: 01/14-01/28 u Integrated luminosity s delivered luminosity –week of 01/ pb-1 –week of 01/ pb-1 –luminosity to tape: 40% s major.
18 March 2002 All Experimenters’ Meeting Alan L. Stone Louisiana Tech University 1 DØ Status: 03/11 – 03/18 Week integrated luminosity –1.1 pb -1 delivered.
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
D0 Status: 04/01-04/08 u Week integrated luminosity –1.7pb -1 delivered –1.5pb -1 utilized (88%) –1.1pb -1 global runs u Data collection s global data.
1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.
W/Z Plan For Winter Conferences Tom Diehl Saclay 12/2001.
9/12/99R. Moore1 Level 2 Trigger Software Interface R. Moore, Michigan State University.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
L3 Algorithms: status and plans for the near future D  Trigger Workshop: 22 nd April 2002 Dan Claes and Terry Wyatt.
L3 Filtering: status and plans for the near future D  Collaboration Meeting: 25 th April 2002 Dan Claes and Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms.
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Trigger Items: Overview & Midterm Results Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 11/11/2010.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Issues with cluster calibration + selection cuts for TrigEgamma note Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 12/08/2010.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
Hardeep Bansil (University of Birmingham) on behalf of L1Calo collaboration ATLAS UK Meeting, Royal Holloway January 2011 Argonne Birmingham Cambridge.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.
L1Calo EM Efficiencies Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Joint Meeting, Stockholm 29/06/2011.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
Generic Trigger List for MC Production Terry Wyatt. L3 Algorithms Meeting 11 th Sept overview of planned list tools/Filters in L3 technical section.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Fixing Tau HLT (Part 1.5/2) ‏ M.Bachtis. 2 L1 Seeding Fix L1: Seeding with High Et Jet paths to increase efficiency with High Et Still using corrected.
Using direct photons for L1Calo monitoring + looking at data09 Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting February 18, 2010.
L1Calo EM Efficiency Maps Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Weekly Meeting 07/03/2011.
CALORIMETER CELL MONITORING TOOL Viacheslav Shary.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge LCD WG6 Meeting, February
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
TrigEgamma Note L1 Plots Status Update Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 30/09/2010.
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Efficiencies
Effect of t42 algorithm on jets
CALGO: Software Tasks cal software:
ALICE analysis preservation
Interactions of hadrons in the Si-W ECAL
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Update of Electron Identification Performance Based on BDTs
Performance of BDTs for Electron Identification
Presentation transcript:

L3 Algorithms: status and plans for the near future All-D  Meeting: 1 st March 2002 Dan Claes and Terry Wyatt.

Design: L1 L2 L3 tape 10kHz 1kHz 20-50Hz Curently: L1 L3 tape. 100Hz 20-50Hz Factor ~ 5 rejection needed Calorimeter-based filtering (jets, electrons, taus) only Next steps (p11.02 release): Improve electron rejection (transverse shower shape) Commission muons and tracking

Level 3 Jargon Tool: Does the real work –Unpacks raw data, finds tracks, clusters –Identifies physics objects (e, , , jet, , W, Z) Filter: Applies (simple) cuts on objects –e.g. pt(  ) > 10 GeV Filter Script: Defines a L3 trigger condition –Logical.AND. of one or more filters –If all filters in a script are.TRUE. trigger is satisfied and event is recorded ‘Mark and Pass’: –Selects unbiassed sample of input events to be recorded –‘Poor man’s’ efficiency calculation/monitoring

L3TJet Tool author: Volker Buescher ( Mainz ) Rejection of L1-accepts makes use of: high precision calorimeter readout available at L3 simple cone algorithm identify (and reject) low-E T events passing L1 trigger sharpen the turn-on curve running online stably since early Sept’01

DATA runs e.g., Fraction of events passing L3FJet(1,15) p T of leading offline JCCA jet (GeV) Main effect smearing turn-on is lack of primary vertex at L3 L3 NADA needed (Marumi Kado investigating) QCD group: currently adjusting each L3 jet p t cut to value at which the relevant L1 trigger reaches ~ 100% efficiency.

L3TEle Electron Tool authors: Volker Buescher ( Mainz ) Ulla Blumenschein ( Mainz ) Current filter: simple 0.4 cone applying cuts on E T emfrac (>0.9) providing a rejection of ~3 PrVtx L3TNullVertex()| CAL_CLUS4L3TCalCluster(calunp=CAL_UNP, vertex=PrVtx, conesize=0.4, MinSeedEt=.5)| ELE_LOOSE L3TEle(CAL=CAL_CLUS4,EMFR=0.9)|

p11 certification: data runs Fraction of events passing L3Fele(1,5) vs p T of leading offline EM object (GeV) after pre- and standard-selections

p11 certification: data runs

Improvements: 1) Reconstruct EM Object within smaller (0.25) cone ELE_LOOSE L3TEle(CAL=CAL_CLUS4, EMFR=0.9 ConeSize=0.25)| L3 Efficiency vs offline EM object pT after pre- and standard-selections Rejection:

Improvements: 2) Additional discrimination available through transverse shower shape cut (shape variables based on an energy-weighted  r) ,  : energy weighted cluster axis position

Z  ee sample data sample  r, floor 1  r, floor 3 ELE_LOOSE L3TEle(CAL=CAL_CLUS4,EMFR=0.9, ConeSize=0.25, Width_EM1=0.085, Width_EM2=0.085, Width_EM3=0.045)|

Events rejected by: p t cut e.m. fraction shower shape

Triggerlist Proposals (single electron triggers): Lower L3 threshold for inclusive unprescaled EM trigger Replace CEM(1,10)L3FEle(1,15,emfr) with CEM(1,10)L3EM(1,12,emfr,cone=0.25,shape) CEM(1,10)L3EM(1,15,emfr,cone=0.25) Replace CEM(2,5)L3EM(1,10,emfr) with CEM(2,5)L3EM(1,12,emfr,cone=0.25,shape) CEM(2,5)L3EM(1,15,emfr,cone=0.25) Replace CEM(1,5)L3EM(1,5,emfr) with CEM(1,5)L3EM(1,7,emfr,cone=0.25,shape) CEM(1,5)L3EM(1,10,emfr,cone=0.25) Rejection =10.3 Drop prescale?

L3FTauHadronic Level3 TauTool author: Yann Coadou (Upsala) non-optimized filter currently in triggerlist, gathering information for tuning under online conditions Running online since 17-Jan-2002 Bug fix to filter installed 09-February p certification included runs over Z  QCD MC data run (>100K events)

Z   + 0 minbias

QCD p T >20 GeV

Raw Data Run , 104k events

Short term goal to filter with L3TMuon cutting on muo_local p T with ‘tight / loose / a-stub’-like quality criteria Mainly needed for single muon triggers (which currently have a L1 prescale of ~25) L3TMuon responsibles: Martin Wegner (Aachen), Martijn Mulders (Fermilab) (and the L3Muon working group)

Test Samples p performance/certification Processed following samples –Single 5 GeV Muon MC,  < events –Single GeV MC,  < events –Golden J/psi samples 300 events –Special run mu1ptaxaa only events –Recent run events No crashes! Rejection factors >4 wrt L1 (loose muons) but p efficiency 50-60% for offline “tight” quality muons Attributed to bugs fixed in p11.02

Muon finding efficiency in p11.02 version Low efficiency for ‘tight’ in central region still under investigation

Most important outstanding issues: 1) Memory leak : approx. 1.5 kB/event (probably in the muon segment reconstruction code) (probably affecting both offline and L3)

Memory leak :

Most important outstanding issues: 2) L3TMuoUnpack (unpacking tool) Current version requires a configuration file. When a module is removed from readout, without a corresponding change to the cfg.dat file, crate data will be ignored creating a hole in L3Muon acceptance A dynamic unpacker independent of rapidly changing configuration files (a fix provided by Scott Snyder) yet to be implemented. However, we hope to run p11.02 muon code online: - initially a test run, in ‘mark and pass’ mode. - aim for active filtering asap!

Recent improvement (p11.02): replace global threshold with individual channel thresholds (as used now in offline reco) Tested on real data >89,000 events (Run FEB) Updating thresholds and cable maps: requires no code changes but care in archiving/version-tagging (general problem!) Daniel Whiteson is studying the improvement this offers global tracking. CFT Unpacking Principal author: Robert Illingworth ( IMPERIAL )

Level 3 Global Track Finding author: Daniel Whiteson ( BERKELEY ) a global (SMT plus CFT) track finder Find axial CFT tracks Match stereo clusters Extend into SMT

Improvement in tracking from new CFT unpacking new unpacking old unpacking Beam-spot corrected dca track phi

Improvement in tracking from new CFT unpacking new unpacking old unpacking Q/ptq/p t Number of smt hits Number of trackschisquared i.e., SMT matching is failing completely!

CFT Tracking Algorithm - L3TCFTTracker Principal author: Ray Beuselink ( IMPERIAL ) P11 tool certification: Robert Illingworth and Chris Barnes CFT unpacked and tracked > assorted MC events (delivered to IC farm by SAM) No crashes, no memory leaks 10,000 events with full (tsim_l3) triggerlist

Tracking will not be perfect for a long time. However, our aim is to try and get tracking turned on reasonably soon. For example, add another electron trigger? CEM(1,10)L3EM(1,12,emfr,cone=0.25,shape) CEM(1,10)L3EM(1,12,emfr,cone=0.25,matched_track) CEM(1,10)L3EM(1,15,emfr,cone=0.25) … and similarly for muons? Or run a standalone track trigger at L3 for single muon triggers? N.B. If you don’t like it, you can always exclude it by using the L3 trigger bits.

L3 Primary Vertex needed soon! author: Guilherme Lima (UERJ/Brazil) Has yet to be tested on REAL DATA Opportunity for new person to get involved! 1) Histogram technique using SMT hits 2) L3TVertexFinder Track-based vertexing tool author: Ray Beuselinck (Imperial) Recently upgraded to use either CFT or Global candidate tracks as input Per Jonsson (Imperial) testing N.B. Marseille group (Arnaud Duperrin, Mossadek Talby, Eric Kajfasz) will be actively involved in testing tracking, vertexing.

Level3 Requirements for certification of Code Fully tested on a Linux system. Works "out of the box" (No private mods to code or RCP files) No crashes/memory leaks on samples of order 100K events: real data and Monte Carlo. Timing studies Performance studies/plots DOCUMENTED Efficiency, rejection, physics distributions these tests may run the tool singly, but : Must run on data with triggerlist exercising all released tools The filter code must be tested, as well as associated tools. Must test persistency of physics_results: Write out events. Read back in to check physics distributions. Verification: run trigger simulator on real data and check that results agree with those obtained online. Shadow nodes (in the future) to test new code ‘online’

L3 Monitoring L3 filter statistics for each trigger available to shift crew via daq_monitor ‘physics_results’ for each tool written out on each accepted event debug_info l3fanalyze program: produces rootuple –Each tool must provide methods to fill rootuple –Used for offline checks of data quality –Plan to run online as ‘examine’ – use root to fill monitoring histograms from rootuple –Extra person needed to work on this! L3 monitoring needs to get a lot more routine!

Conclusions, outlook. Currently factor ~ 5 rejection needed at L3 Calorimeter-based filtering (jets, electrons, taus) only Next steps (p11.02 release): Improve electron rejection (transverse shower shape) Commission muons, tracking, primary vertex Get more systematic monitoring for L3 When L2 turns on we’ll still need factor ~ 5 rejection at L3, but will have to work harder to achieve it!

To find out more: L3 Algorithms web-pages: L3 Algorithms working group meetings take place every on-week, Wednesday 14:00-15:30 in the Farside Talk to Dan Claes or Terry Wyatt about the opportunities to get involved!