Junk in a Box Final Presentation Frank Becky, Kyle Cummings, Jordan Haines, Villiam Klein, Matt Peoples, Ryan Scott and Aaron Young 4 December 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Team K^3 + C Final Team Presentation Khin Oo, Kim Gleffe, Carlie Bolin, Katelyn Harder AEM /16/11.
Advertisements

Team Space Jam Launch Readiness Review Paul Guerrie, Ben Azlein, Megan Scheele, Bridget Chase, Shane Meikle, Taylor King, & Jamie Usherwood November 2,
Matt Breihan, Jay Davis, Jack Gregory, Ashton Schrage, Sara Schuette, and Lydia Whitney October 14, 2008.
Team Ramrod Final Presentation Dan Armel, Michaela Cui, Andrew Grimaldi, Kyle Kemble, Silvia Peckham, Chris Sawyer & Kelsey Whitesell 6 th December 2007.
Space Debris Conceptual Design Review Cole Bostrom Corey Godwin Jonathan Kirchmaier Emily Logan Sean Murphy Seanna Renworth
Solar Cell Efficiency Flight Readiness Review Teddy Bounds Angela Dunn Joel Sasser.
Team Six-Pack Launch Readiness Review Calder Lane, Courtney Ballard, Ian Thom, Thomas Green, Matt Cirbo, Janelle Montoya 11/29/11 Fall 2011 Rev A
Team Lightning Rod Launch Readiness Review Fall 2010 Rev C 11/2/2010 Trevor Luke Chris Bennett Matt Holmes Sushia Rahimizadeh Alex Shelanski Matthew Dickinson.
Team 7, Final Presentation December 1, Mission Overview Send up petri dishes containing bacteria Analyze the effects of temperature, pressure, and.
Adam Archuleta Katie Cartee Logan Farley Patrick Klein Kamron Medina Catherine Villa TEAM INFINITY AND BEYOND LAUNCH READINESS REVIEW Fall 2011 Rev C
Team Poptarts Final Presentation Saad Alqahtani Kyle Skjerven Charles MacCraiger Connor Jacobsen Matt Busby Alexa Warly Corinne Desroches 11/29/11.
Brynn Larson Trey Karsten Terek Campbell Marcus Flores Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki 2015/6/10 Team Ochocinco.
Cosmic Ray Detection If they’re out there, we’ll find them. *Space photos from Gateway to Space class launch in 2005 by team Hooligans* Joanna Gordon Shane.
Metropolitan State University Isaac Hamilton Jordan Gallegos Christopher Olson McMillan Miskin Daniel Koch Thomas Mindenhall Cody Overcash March 27, 2009.
BalloonSat “Optimism Prime” Team “Thumbs Up” Conceptual Design Review Nick Lenk, Greg Nelson, Eddie Cyrus, Jake Varey, Chase Pritchett, Brian Inglis 9/23/08.
Team icarus Final Project Presentation AJ Knapp, Kyle Marek-Spartz, Lucas Chowen, Max Sjöberg, Mike Hill AEM 1905 – Nov. 24 th 2009.
Paul “Trey” Karsten Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki Brynn Larson Terek Campbell Marcus Flores 11/25/09 Final Revision.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Fall 2010 Rev A
Team R3D3 Final Presentation Devon Campbell Greg McQuie Kate Kennedy Henk Wolda Marisa Antuna Nicole Ela Tyler Smith 12/1/11.
Team S.H.I.E.L.D Launch Readiness Review Team Members Evan Coffey Aaron Holt Travis Pollok Matthew Ross Jared Turner Addison Woodward-Parrish 11/11/08.
Team Helios. Mission and Experiment Mission: Launch a balloonsat to determine the light filtering effect of the atmosphere and test the effectiveness.
Team Mate Launch Readiness Review Jason Schelz, Will Hakes, Emma Mossinger, Ethan Long, Brendon Barela, Amelia Weller 11/02/10.
Teamo Supremo Final Presentation Kristen Brenner Kim Fornall Ahna Isaak Nick Martinez Wes Roos Bart Tofany RevD
Chouinard, John Getz, Jennifer Hewitt, Lisa Kim, Elise Salmons, Patrick Silva-Ortiz, Carlos.
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn December 7, 2006.
Space Debris Critical Design Review Cole Bostrom Corey Godwin Jonathon Kirchmaier Emily Logan Sean Murphy Seanna Renworth October 14, 2008 Fall 2008 Rev.
Final Presentation Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani December 5, 2006.
GONS Final Presentation Steven Benedict Jake Danser Josh Hecht Brock Kowalchuk Erik Shuttlesworth Matthew Zemel December 4, 2007 Steven Benedict Jake Danser.
Oddballs Team 8 Final Presentation Jennifer McGraw Evan Townsend Jessica (JB) Brown Brian Roth Stephanie Jalovec Grant Fritz December 5, 2007.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Rev
Cydonia Final Review Presentation 6 December 2007 Greg Rancourt, Sarah Flinn, Dominic Boiko, Kevin Stuth, Derek Houtz, Max LaFon.
Critical Design Review Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani October 17, 2006.
Team DSRO Critical Design Review Taylor Boe Andrew Buckner Andrew Gilbert Emily Howard Grace Harsha Bobby Stillwell October 14, 2008.
Team Hubble Jr. Final Presentation Rachel Small, Holly Zaepfel, Ryan Del Gizzi, Kyle Norman, and Evan Levy December 5, 2006.
Launch Readiness Review 11 Nov Brady Phillips, Elliot Guber, Brandon Campbell, Dushyant Dhundra, Joel Mendez, Cameron Trussell.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date. User notes –You may reformat to fit your design but make sure you cover the following points –You may.
Critical Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards October 17, 2006 Project Frankenfine: A Near Space.
JAKE BINNEY JAMEY GRAHAM LOUISE MARTINEZ JACK OAKES MARCUS RAHIMPOUR ERIN TUCKER JAKE BINNEY JAMEY GRAHAM LOUISE MARTINEZ JACK OAKES MARCUS RAHIMPOUR ERIN.
Design Review Corinne Desroches Saad Alqahtani Charles MacCraiger Alexa Warly Connor Jacobson Kyle Skjerven Matt Busby.
Space Debris Launch Readiness Review Seanna Renworth, Emily Logan, Corey Godwin, Sean Murphy, Cole Bostrom, Jonathan Kirchmaier November 11 th, 2008.
Greg Rancourt, Sarah Flinn, Dominic Boiko, Kevin Stuth, Derek Houtz, Max LaFon.
Team Hang 7 Final Presentation Lucas Migliorini, Sierra Williams, Chase Goodman, Ethan Hollenbach, Becca Lidvall, Abby Caballero, Paul Smith, Nikhil Desai.
Ryan Olin, Austin Granger, R.J. Kakach, Seth Frick, Joey Senkyr AEM /24/09.
Mission Statement: Mission Statement: Team T.W.S.S. will design and construct a BalloonSat that will simultaneously image the stars in both the visible.
Sam Bukowski, Emily Daugherty, Chris Lewin, Troy Hayes, Natalie Schaefer, Matt Vaninger November, 2011.
Space Monkeys Launch Readiness Review Project Curious George November 11, 2008 Project Curious George November 11, 2008.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date. User notes –You may reformat to fit your design but make sure you cover the following points –You may.
Napoleon Connor Strait | Chris Gray | Chad Alvarez Akeem Huggins | Ashley Zimmerer Tucker Emmett | Ginny Christiansen |Caleb Lipscomb Conceptual Design.
Victor Taberski, Ryan Walker, Allen Marshall, Matt Kerwin, Andrew Winthrop, Steven Ramm October 14, 2008 UANIOOU – (Upper Atmosphere Near-Infrared Optical.
Quinn Kostelecky, Vincent Staverosky, Gloria Chen, Roshan Misra, Jacqueline Godina, Raymond Auyeung Fall 2011 Rev C
Cole Bostrom, Corey Godwin, Jonathon Kirchmaier, Emily Logan, Sean Murphy, Seanna Renworth Rev D.
S.H.I.E.L.D. CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Addison, Travis, Jared, Evan, Aaron, Matt 10/14/08.
Scott Luisi, Abe Fark, Trent Quick, Jack Szmanda, Tom Valkenberg AEM 1905, 11/20/2008.
Junk in a Box Critical Design Review
Balloon Payload Launch
Panoramic Rays Final Presentation
Mission Statement... The Space Wolverines will;
Brandi Casey Lee Wilson
Team S.H.I.E.L.D. Final Presentation
Skillz That Killz Team 3 Final Presentation
Team Go Go Gadgets Launch Readiness Review
Team Thumbs Up Final Presentation
S^3 Launch Readiness Review
Space Debris Critical Design Review
Launch Readiness Review
Team Super 8: Sat Morpheus Final Presentation
Team TWSS Launch Readiness Review
Team SCREAM Launch Readiness Review
Proposal Team 8: Grant Fritz, Jessica Brown, Stephanie Jalovec, Jennifer McGraw, Brian Roth, Evan Townsend.
Panoramic Rays Critical Design Review
Presentation transcript:

Junk in a Box Final Presentation Frank Becky, Kyle Cummings, Jordan Haines, Villiam Klein, Matt Peoples, Ryan Scott and Aaron Young 4 December 2007

Mission Overview  Objectives  Prove possibility of capturing images of stars on a CCD camera during the day  Stabilize the CCD camera during the flight  Measure g-forces experienced by BalloonSAT  Expected Discoveries  Discover the minimum altitude stars become visible to a CCD camera during the day  Discover if the stabilization platform stabilizes the CCD camera  Flight Summary  Failure of CCD camera after thirty-two minutes  HOBO stopped recording before balloon burst  Maintained internal temperature above zero °C for 50 min  Collected 3 hrs and 40 min of accelerometer data  Semi-stabilization of CCD camera

Request for Proposal Compliance  Our mission objectives remained the same  Attempted to see stars during the day  Attempted to stabilize the CCD camera  Attempted to collect g-force data  CCD camera stabilization system changed  Design of BalloonSAT changed  Number of accelerometers changed  Mass was 26 grams over budget  Stayed under cost budget

Differences between proposal and final design  Original proposal involved two different types of stabilization (rotational and tilt)  Due to mass issues, only tilt was addressed  Magnet and 360° viewing window  Size was reduced due to mass and heat  Original design failed heat test after 40 minutes

Mass and Cost Summary ItemCost Glue, tape and binding material$25.00 Structure$25.00 Batteries$30.00 CCD CameraFree AccelerometerFree Silicon PacksFree CCD Camera RecorderFree Total$80.00 ComponentWeight (grams) Foam Core Volt battery (3) volt Battery for CCD camera (6)43.20 CCD Camera96.00 CCD Camera Recorder HOBO15.20 CCD Camera stabilization platform21.00 Platform counter balance16.00 Washers, tube and paperclips35.00 Heater Circuit24.20 Accelerometer and Logomatic22.00 Plexiglass and support Silicon Packs (3) & Insulation85.00 Milar, tape and hot glue67.30 Total826.00

Accelerometer Flight Results  samples, 3.6 recorded hours of data  Graphs clearly show launch, ascent, burst, and landing  Maximum and Minimum G-forces AxisMinimum number of GsMaximum number of Gs x-axis y-axis z-axis

Accelerometer Data - Launch

Accelerometer Data - Balloon Burst

Accelerometer Data - Landing

Reasons for failure  Accelerometer and logomatic tested post flight, both worked  Second accelerometer failed because in got unplugged

Accelerometer Orientation inside the BalloonSat

Description of Accelerometer Outputs

Accelerometer Comparison Data  Stabilization system worked intermittently  Obtained 19.4 seconds of data from both accelerometers  Data most likely acquired from ground or post flight transit

Accelerometer Comparison Graph

HOBO data  We have 2.5 hours of data (it was programmed for that duration)  Weren’t prepared for long duration flight  Temp. reached -5°C inside, -55°C outside  We weren’t prepared for sudden cold temperature  But successfully got temperature back up to 10°C

HOBO Temp. Graph

Camera Results  CCD Camera failed  Too bright at takeoff to record pictures  The sudden temp. drop ruined the output voltage for our batteries, so camera failed

CCD photo at launch

CCD photo taken 32 min. into flight

CCD photo taken 1 hour into flight

Conclusions  Desired outcomes from mission objectives failed  Through analysis of the lack of data, we were able to determine why these failures occurred  This information will be useful when passed on to future classes and missions  This was a great learning experience for team Junk in a Box

Lessons learned  Set your HOBO to record data for longer than the estimated flight time  Make sure everything, from components to connections, are secure and incapable of moving  Test, test, and test!  Keep communication lines open between team members

Ready to fly again  How problems were fixed  Increased amount of internal foam core  Relocate heaters to protect CCD batteries  Gluing of accelerometer connections  Increased pre-programmed HOBO recording time  How the payload should be stored  In a dry place at room temperature  Handled with care and not thrashed around  How to activate the payload  (from left to right as the BalloonSAT is upright)  flip the first switch, then the third and finally the second

Message to next semester Don’t worry about the grades that you get in the beginning, but don’t throw them aside either. You WILL have to learn from what you did wrong and improve upon it for the next time. Although this class tends to have rather independent work, you still need to get approval. Thus, you will greatly benefit from elaborately detailing everything, especially when you need to convince the professor. There is also no limit to the amount of pre-flight testing that a team can do. In fact, the more testing you do the better it will be for your team, pre-flight and post-flight. What worked-  Meetings held at least once a week in which the team discussed our progress and plans for building and testing the BalloonSAT.  Having fun and entertaining ourselves throughout the process helped us to alleviate the stress and tension that built up from the demanding work. What didn’t work-  Communication. ing back and forth took too long. What we would have done differently-  Organizing team members into groups and having the groups meet more often instead of the whole team.  Making sure that more team members assisted others in tasks so that one person did not end up doing an entire project.