The trigger for the New Electromagnetic Calorimeter NewCal Feasibility studies Charles F. Perdrisat February 17,2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Review from this Lesson
Advertisements

Today’s Objectives: Students will be able to:
4.3 Matrix Approach to Solving Linear Systems 1 Linear systems were solved using substitution and elimination in the two previous section. This section.
Use of G EANT 4 in CMS AIHENP’99 Crete, April 1999 Véronique Lefébure CERN EP/CMC.
SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones. SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones Overview of GEn, GMn setup Overview of GEp setup The.
SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones 1 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAA A.
1 ACES Workshop, March 2011 Mark Raymond, Imperial College. Two-in-one module PT logic already have a prototype readout chip for short strips in hand CBC.
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
ME 3861 CAD Review A solid modeling example January 24, 2001.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
The Design of MINER  A Howard Budd University of Rochester August, 2004.
1 Calice Analysis Meeting 13/02/07David Ward Just a collection of thoughts to guide us in planning electron analysis In order to end up with a coherent.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
AP Physics C Montwood High School R. Casao
Linear Systems of Equations
1 Shower maximum detector (SMD) is a wire proportional counter – strip readout detector using gas amplification. SMD is used to provide a spatial resolution.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: Introduction SNR Gain Patterns Beam Steering Shading Resources: Wiki:
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
Acute angle An angle with a measure less than 90 degrees.
David Emschermann CBM Collaboration Meeting - GSI – 12/04/2010 TRD geometry in CBMroot and conclusions for detector module design David Emschermann Institut.
Restricted Track Assignment with Applications 報告人:林添進.
Guidelines for Whole Class Math Talk 1)Wait time: Wait to think about what is being said after someone speaks (try five seconds) 2)Explain: “this is my.
Development of an ASIC for reading out CCDS at the vertex detector of the International Linear Collider Presenter: Peter Murray ASIC Design Group Science.
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
Marco Delmastro 23/02/2006 Status of LAr EM performance andmeasurements fro CTB1 Status of LAr EM performance and measurements for CTB Overview Data -
1. Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Solving Systems of Linear Equations in Three Variables 4 1.Determine.
The ZEUS Hadron-Electron-Separator Performance and Experience Peter Göttlicher (DESY) for the ZEUS-HES-group Contributions to HES Germany, Israel, Japan,
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
Fine Pixel CCD for ILC Vertex Detector ‘08 7/31 Y. Takubo (Tohoku U.) for ILC-FPCCD vertex group ILC vertex detector Fine Pixel CCD (FPCCD) Test-sample.
BigCal Reconstruction and Elastic Event Selection for GEp-III Andrew Puckett, MIT on behalf of the GEp-III Collaboration.
GlueX Two Magnet Tagger G. Yang University of Glasgow Part 1, 3 D Tosca analysis. Part 2, Preliminary Drawings. Part 3, Proposed Assembly Procedures (i)
UK Activities on pixels. Adrian Bevan 1, Jamie Crooks 2, Andrew Lintern 2, Andy Nichols 2, Marcel Stanitzki 2, Renato Turchetta 2, Fergus Wilson 2. 1 Queen.
Vina Punjabi Norfolk State University Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 10-11, 2010 GEp-V Experiment to Measure G Ep /G Mp.
Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.
Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.
Torque on a Current Loop
Muon/Special Detector Studies Update St. Malo Muon ID - Single muons, single pion rejection. TESLA TDR (M. Piccolo) 2. Muon ID events:  ID efficiency,
STS simulations: Layout, digitizers, performance Radoslaw Karabowicz GSI.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Assumptions: Cockcroft-Walton photomultiplier bases are the same for all ECAL sections Digital to analog converters are installed on the distribution boards.
Nantes — 2008, July Analysis of results from EmCal beam test at CERN PS (and SPS) energies P. La Rocca & F. Riggi University & INFN Catania University.
ANGULAR CORRELATION OF NEUTRONS EMITTED FROM DECAY OF GIANT DIPOLE RESONANCE IN ULTRA-PERIPHERAL COLLISIONS AT RHIC In an ultra peripheral collision the.
Forward Tagger Simulations Implementation in GEMC Moller Shield Tracking Studies R. De Vita INFN –Genova Forward Tagger Meeting, CLAS12 Workshop, June.
JLab, October 31, 2008 WACS in 12 GeV era 1 GPDs Wide-Angle Compton Scattering pi-0 photo-production in 12 GeV era B. Wojtsekhowski Outline WACS and other.
1 Plannar Active Absorber Calorimeter Adam Para, Niki Saoulidou, Hans Wenzel, Shin-Shan Yu Fermialb Tianchi Zhao University of Washington ACFA Meeting.
P. Checchia LCWS02 Jeju1 Lccal * : an R&D project for the Electromagnetic barrel Calorimeter Design principles Prototype description Status of.
S. Dasu, University of Wisconsin February Calorimeter Trigger for Super LHC Electrons, Photons,  -jets, Jets, Missing E T Current Algorithms.
Accidental Coincidences Learning Objectives Understand the difference between real and accidental coincidences in an experiment using  2 scintillators.
1 Projectile Spectator Detector: Status and Plans A.Ivashkin (INR, Moscow) PSD performance in Be run. Problems and drawbacks. Future steps.
Digital Image Processing CCS331 Camera Model and Imaging Geometry 1.
21 November 2003Jacques Lefrancois1 HOSTING ELECTRONICS AND CONNECTIVITY Role of calorimeter system: Level 0 trigger +  reconstruction +e/  id. Level.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design Jim Kellie Glasgow University.
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
Chapter 12. Chapter Summary Boolean Functions Representing Boolean Functions Logic Gates Minimization of Circuits (not currently included in overheads)
y x Vincenzo Monaco, University of Torino HERA-LHC workshop 18/1/2005
Some input to the discussion for the design requirements of the GridPixel Tracker and L1thack trigger. Here are some thoughts about possible detector layout.
Large Booster and Collider Ring
SANE Cherenkov - Bigcal Efficiency Update
Testbeam comparisons arXiv:
The MIDDLE Layer Lesson 4.
Yuhui Li How to edit the title slide
HyCal Energy Calibration using dedicated Compton runs
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Wei Luo Lanzhou University 2011 Hall C User Meeting January 14, 2011
Hall “12 GeV” May 27, 2003 NAPP 2003: J.J. LeRose.
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Presentation transcript:

The trigger for the New Electromagnetic Calorimeter NewCal Feasibility studies Charles F. Perdrisat February 17,2012

Assumptions: HERA-B midsection shashlik detectors available, 2128 channels in clusters of 2x2, with 4 FEU-84-3 PMs in each cluster. 2) The cross section size of one midsection detector is 5.59x5.59 cm 2. 3) The proposal NewCal front was ~110x312 cm 2 ; which can be achieved with 20x56 =1280 blocks, neglecting the unknown gap between elements. Largest we can do is 24x72=1728 blocks, 134x402 cm 2. Electronics? 4) First configuration compatible with existing adding circuits. Second and preferred solution: requires use of analog FI/FO’s for second levels. 5) The location of the ”largest” cluster will be correlated with the hadron calorimeter hit position; this part not addressed here: trigger only.

Solid angle matching for 65 msr proton-detector

Conceptual design: The trigger is formed in 3 steps, as in BigCal: first adding signals in the vertical direction (first level), with 2 blocs overlap between each vertical section of 8 (not done in BigCal). Second, adding first level outputs in the horizontal direction (second level), with 2 blocs overlap between each section of 4 (vertical in BigCal). Third, discriminating second level outputs, and reducing logic outputs to 11 channels (or more if required for ep correlation) with FI/FOs, to discriminators, each with different trigger levels, “ored” to reduce to one trigger signals (third level). First level requires 288 input octets, or 144 adders units. Second level input analog FI-FO. The third level requires 33 analog 4-fold FI-FOs, 11 DISCRIs set at a different trigger level (more on that later), and 3 4-fold logic FI-FOs, to form one trigger.

Twenty four columns. Showing only the first 26 rows for readability

Second level adders. Whether compatible with ep trigger correlation is unclear to me right now. Requires 11x12=132 4-fold analog FI/FOs. The segment of circle approximates constant Q 2 : 12 GeV 2.

Showing how many times the output of a given detector block is required to obtain the overlap patterns discussed so far. Yellow for 1 Grey for 2 Pink for 4

Problems that need to be addressed next 1)Present scheme requires two parallel PM outputs from 432 of the 1728 PMs. 1)It also requires 4 outputs from the first level adder octets; these currently have 3 outputs. We have 112 first level adder modules, and 21 second level modules, total 266 octets plus spares? compare to the need of 264 first level adder modules. 3) About HERA-B middle section shashliks: need to know first: do we get it, YES or NO. Then manpower, cost of transport, no PMs? polarity of HV and more…. I need to establish contact with locals at DESY asap.

Design considerations : Assuming again HERA-B mid-section shashliks, the lead weight of 1 element consisting of four 5.59x5.59 cm bars, is ~18 kg, 40 lbs elements in the calorimeter is 8,200 kg, 18,000 lbs. OK with crane, but must add overall container(s). Design challenge (?). Propose building 3 identical units, each 24x24 bars. Details ito follow.

Combined top view (upper part), and side view looking down the beam pipe (Lower part). NewCal assumed to be monolithic vertical 4 m. Circles are constant Q 2, illustrating the missmatch of this geometry. However, note that acceptance for 9.3 GeV 2 is minimal, but acceptance for 14 GeV 2 is maximum.

Illustrating how to “wrap” the 3 modules around circle of constant Q2. This is rotation in the plane of a circle perpendicular to the beam. Doable, but difficult. Does solve partially problem of energy spread and trigger level accuracy.

Here vertical view in lower part is in plane containing the middle trajectory. To reduce problem of shower spread over many blocks, divide NewCal into 3 identical sections, and orient them around circle centered at target center, and thru detector center. Center of each section at -16, 0 and +16 degrees. Doable. To do both rotations is in my view probably not doable.

Your comments (and advice) are welcomed.

use solid angle 65 msr of p in SBS Ebeam q2 pmom Escat th(e) t(p) th(p) pt pl dp3_dp