THE DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAM RESEARCH GROUP*

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ronald T. Ackermann, MD, MPH Indiana University School of Medicine
Advertisements

Reductions in Regimen Distress Are Associated With Improved Management and Glycemic Control Over Time Featured Article: Danielle Hessler, Lawrence Fisher,
THE DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAM RESEARCH GROUP*
Ambulatory Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in the U.S., 1997–2012 Featured Article: Lydia W. Turner, David Nartey, Randall S. Stafford, Sonal Singh, and G.
Genetic Predictors of Weight Loss and Weight Regain After Intensive Lifestyle Modification,Metformin Treatment, or Standard Care in the Diabetes Prevention.
Individual Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy and Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Treating Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Diabetes: Results of a.
The Cost-Effectiveness of Providing DAFNE to Subgroups of Predicted Responders J Kruger 1, A Brennan 1, P Thokala 1, S Heller 2 on behalf of the DAFNE.
Dual Add-on Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Poorly Controlled With Metformin Monotherapy: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial of Saxagliptin Plus Dapagliflozin.
Economic Analysis and Management Todd Wagner, PhD.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence March-April 2006.
The Effect of a Diabetes-Specific Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Program (DIAMOS) for Patients With Diabetes and Subclinical Depression: Results of a Randomized.
Liraglutide and the Preservation of Pancreatic β-Cell Function in Early Type 2 Diabetes: The LIBRA Trial Featured Article: Ravi Retnakaran, Caroline K.
Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide Added Onto Pioglitazone and Metformin Versus Exenatide in Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Controlled Trial (AWARD-1)
Improved Glucose Control With Weight Loss, Lower Insulin Doses, and No Increased Hypoglycemia With Empagliflozin Added to Titrated Multiple Daily Injections.
Diabetes PREVENTION Lifestyle Change Program
Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
An Automated Internet Behavioral Weight-Loss Program by Physician Referral: A Randomized Controlled Trial Featured Article: J. Graham Thomas, Tricia M.
The Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions in Health and Medicine William H. Herman, M.D., M.P.H. University of Michigan.
Cost-Effectiveness Problem l You have a $1.5 billion budget to spend on any combination of these programs:
Presented at The 129th Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association Atlanta, GA, October 21–25, 2001 Presented by Amanda Honeycutt Abigail.
The cost-effectiveness of providing a DAFNE follow- up intervention to predicted non-responders J Kruger 1, A Brennan 1, P Thokala 1, S Heller 2 on behalf.
Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes. Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: Changing Treatment Paradigms.
Rapid Rise in Hypertension and Nephropathy in Youth With Type 2 Diabetes The TODAY clinical trial Featured Article: TODAY Study Group* Diabetes Care Volume.
A Systems Approach to Preventing and Controlling Non-communicable Diseases in Low Resource and Emerging Economies: K.M.Venkat Narayan Ruth and O.C. Hubert.
Ali Ardestani, David Rhoads, Ali Tavakkoli
The Economic Burden of Elevated Blood Glucose Levels in 2012: Diagnosed and Undiagnosed Diabetes, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, and Prediabetes Featured.
Social Determinants of Care The following module is designed as a basic overview of the social determinants of care for providers of healthcare, particularly.
After eating, most food is turned into glucose, the body’s main source of energy. What Happens When We Eat? American Diabetes Association.
The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the CDC. Diabetes Prevention Ann.
Antibiotics Versus Conservative Surgery for Treating Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Randomized Comparative Trial Featured Article: José Luis Lázaro-Martínez,
2011 Diabetes Update Forum.  1) Be familiar with the evidence supporting the role of physical activity in the prevention of chronic disease  2) Develop.
Risk and Recurrence of Serious Adverse Outcomes in the First and Second Pregnancies of Women With Preexisting Diabetes Featured Article: Peter W.G. Tennant,
1 Cost Effectiveness  Jan J.V. Busschbach, Ph.D.  Viersprong Institute for studies on Personality Disorders VISPD  Erasmus.
Overnight Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in Young People With Type 1 Diabetes: A Free- Living, Randomized Clinical Trial Featured Article: Roman Hovorka,
Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP)
Efficacy and Safety of Canaglifozin, a Sodium- Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor, as Add-on to Insulin in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Featured Article:
Cost-Effectiveness and Outcomes Research Setting value to what we do.
1 Improving Care for the Uninsured by Providing Links to Primary Care Susan H. Busch, Ph.D. 1 Sarah McCue Horwitz, Ph.D. 2 Kathleen M. B. Balestracci,
Clinical and Economic Benefits Associated With the Achievement of Both HbA1c and LDL Cholesterol Goals in Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes Featured Article:
CDA exercise guidelines 150 minutes moderate – intensity (60 – 70% of max) aerobic over minimum 3 non consecutive days PLUS resistance exercise 3.
Contributions to Type 2 Diabetes. Glucose in balance meal Time in minutes Blood glucose levels, mg/dL Insulin levels, uU/mL Glucagon.
Trends in Death Rates Among U.S. Adults With and Without Diabetes Between 1997 and 2006 Featured Article: Edward W. Gregg, Ph.D., Yiling J. Cheng, Ph.D.,
Racial Comparisons of Diabetes Care and Intermediate Outcomes in a Patient-Centered Medical Home Featured Article: Joseph A. Simonetti, Michael J. Fine,
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Can Be Prevented by Lifestyle Intervention: The Finnish Gestational Diabetes Prevention Study (RADIEL): A Randomized Controlled.
Short- and Long-Term Mortality After Myocardial Infarction in Patients With and Without Diabetes Featured Article: Sjoerd T. Nauta, M.S.C., Jaap W. Deckers,
Risk Factors Associated With Severe Hypoglycemia in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Featured Article: Ruth S. Weinstock, Stephanie N. DuBose, Richard.
Characteristics of studies on lifestyle interventions included in review Gillies CL, et al. BMJ 2007;334:
Featured Article: Wayne H.-H. Sheu, Ira Gantz, Menghui Chen, Shailaja Suryawanshi, Arpana Mirza, Barry J. Goldstein, Keith D. Kaufman, and Samuel S. Engel.
Angela Aziz Donnelly April 5, 2016
Diabetes and Gestational Diabetes Trends Among Adults in the U. S
Long-term effects of lifestyle intervention or metformin on diabetes development and microvascular complications over 15-year follow-up: the Diabetes.
A Meta Analysis of the Impact of SBI on Healthcare Utilization
Nat. Rev. Nephrol. doi: /nrneph
A Meta Analysis of the Impact of SBI on Healthcare Utilization
The Rising Crisis of Prediabetes Diagnosis and Management of the Patient With Prediabetes.
Engagement in recommended behaviors to prevent type 2 Diabetes (n=82)
Subgroup analysis. Subgroup analysis. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on outcome variables in subgroups defined by baseline levels of the respective.
Payment and Funding Mechanisms
Change in (A) total cholesterol; (B) LDL-cholesterol; (C) HDL-cholesterol and (D) triglycerides over 5 years in response to 12-week intensive lifestyle.
Offer the National DPP lifestyle change program to your patient population Thank you for considering the National Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle.
Change in %A1C over 5 years in response to 12-week intensive lifestyle intervention used in a real-world clinical practice. Change in %A1C over 5 years.
Change in (A) systolic blood pressure and (B) diastolic blood pressure over 5 years in response to 12-week intensive lifestyle intervention in a real-world.
Algorithm for the metabolic management of type 2 diabetes; Reinforce lifestyle interventions at every visit and check A1C every 3 months until A1C is
Saxagliptin improves glycemic control in younger and older individuals with type 2 diabetes. Saxagliptin improves glycemic control in younger and older.
Current insulin dose (units/kg/day) during the DCCT/EDIC study by sex (black line for females) (A), DCCT intensive vs. conventional treatment group (black.
Percentage of weight loss over 5 years in response to 12-week intensive lifestyle intervention in a real-world clinical practice. Percentage of weight.
HRs for type 2 diabetes by category of age at menarche in the EPIC-InterAct study. HRs for type 2 diabetes by category of age at menarche in the EPIC-InterAct.
Per-patient annual costs of diabetes care components (among articles reporting on these components). Per-patient annual costs of diabetes care components.
WM volume did not show the expected increase in volume with age in children with type 1 diabetes (●), in contrast with HC subjects (▲) who showed the (expected)
Presentation transcript:

THE DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAM RESEARCH GROUP* The 10-Year Cost-Effectiveness of Lifestyle Intervention or Metformin for Diabetes Prevention Featured Article: THE DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAM RESEARCH GROUP* Diabetes Care Volume 35: 723-730 April, 2012

Study Objective   Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) and its Outcomes Study (DPPOS) demonstrated that either intensive lifestyle intervention or metformin could prevent type 2 diabetes in high-risk adults for at least 10 years after randomization Study reports 10-year within-trial cost-effectiveness of the interventions THE DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAM RESEARCH GROUP* et al. Diabetes Care 2012;35:723-730

Study Design Data on resource utilization, cost, and quality of life collected prospectively   Economic analyses were performed from health system and societal perspectives THE DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAM RESEARCH GROUP* et al. Diabetes Care 2012;35:723-730

Table 1- Undiscounted, per capita, direct medical costs of the DPP/DPPOS interventions by intervention group and study year ($)* *See Supplementary Table 1 for details. †Sensitivity analysis. Assumes that the core curriculum and follow up visits were conducted as group sessions with 10 participants during the 3 years of the DPP. THE DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAM RESEARCH GROUP* et al. Diabetes Care 2012;35:723-730

DPP/DPPOS cost-effectiveness Figure 1- A: Cumulative, undiscounted, per participant, direct medical costs of the DPP/DPPOS interventions by intervention group and study year. B: Cumulative, undiscounted, per participant, direct medical costs of medical care received outside the DPP/DPPOS by intervention group and study year. C: Cumulative, undiscounted, per participant, total direct medical costs of the DPP/DPPOS interventions and medical care received outside the DPP/DPPOS by intervention group and study year. D: Cumulative, undiscounted, per participant, total Quality of Well-Being Index by intervention group and year. THE DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAM RESEARCH GROUP* et al. Diabetes Care 2012;35:723-730

Table 2- Undiscounted, per capita, direct medical costs of care outside the DPP/DPPOS by intervention group and study year, and distribution of undiscounted, per capita, 10-year, direct medical costs of care outside the DPP/DPPOS by intervention group and type ($) THE DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAM RESEARCH GROUP* et al. Diabetes Care 2012;35:723-730

Table 3- Differences in costs and QALYs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for lifestyle and metformin versus placebo and lifestyle versus metformin over 10 years from three alternative perspectives *Sensitivity analysis. Assumes that the core curriculum and follow-up visits were conducted as group session with 10 participants during the 3 years of DPP. †Includes total direct medical costs. **Both costs and QALYs discounted at 3%. ‡Includes direct medical costs and direct nonmedical costs excluding participant time. #Includes direct medical costs and direct nonmedical costs including participant time. THE DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAM RESEARCH GROUP* et al. Diabetes Care 2012;35:723-730

Conclusions   Over 10 years, from a payer perspective, lifestyle was cost-effective and metformin was marginally cost-saving compared with placebo Investment in lifestyle and metformin interventions for diabetes prevention in high-risk adults provides good value for the money spent THE DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAM RESEARCH GROUP* et al. Diabetes Care 2012;35:723-730