26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 1 RTML (2.6.1) and Main Linac Beamline Design (2.7.1) PT SLAC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on ILC ML Lattice Design Alexander Valishev, for the FNAL LET group FNAL AP Dept. Meeting March 7, 2007.
Advertisements

Summary of First ILC-LET Workshop PT for K. Kubo, D. Schulte, PT 11-Feb-2006.
Update of RTML, Status of FNAL L-band and CLIC X-band BPM, Split SC Quadrupole Nikolay Solyak Fermilab (On behalf of RTML team) LCWS2010 / ILC 10, March.
10/23/07RTML EDR Oct GDE1 Cornell Plans for RTML EDR Work G. Dugan Cornell LEPP.
Issues in ILC Main Linac and Bunch Compressor from Beam dynamics N. Solyak, A. Latina, K.Kubo.
SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
Update on ILC ML Lattice Design Alexander Valishev, for the FNAL LET group FNAL AP Dept. Meeting March 7, 2007.
27-Nov-2007 SLAC-ILC- AP Meeting Global Design Effort 1 Lucretia Developments PT SLAC.
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
March 7, 2007 LET Issues (Cai/Kubo/Zisman) Global Design Effort 1 Low-Emittance Tuning Issues and Plans Yunhai Cai, Kiyoshi Kubo and Michael S. Zisman.
8/28/07RTML EDR KOM1 Cornell Plans for RTML EDR Work G. Dugan Cornell LEPP.
For Draft List of Standard Errors Beam Dynamics, Simulations Group (Summarized by Kiyoshi Kubo)
ILC Start-End Simulations Glen White, SLAC May 13, 2014 AWLC14, Fermilab.
@ Fermilab May 15-17, 2006, FNAL KIRTI RANJAN – DOE Review1 ILC Simulation for RDR Kirti Ranjan Fermilab.
Summary of WG1 K. Kubo, D. Schulte, P. Tenenbaum.
DESY GDE Meeting Global Design Effort 1 / 12 Status of RTML Design and Tuning Studies PT SLAC.
S2E optics design and particles tracking for the ILC undulator based e+ source Feng Zhou SLAC ILC e+ source meeting, Beijing, Jan. 31 – Feb. 2, 2007.
J. Turner 02/07/05 SLAC PEPII Accelerator Physics LER WIGGLER PLAN J. Turner, M. Donald, M. Sullivan, U. Wienands, J. Yocky Motivation and Concerns Details.
Date Event Global Design Effort 1 ILC UPDATE Vancouver to Valencia Ewan Paterson Personal Report to SiD Collaboration Oct 27, 2006.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ILC AD&I MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP UPDATE V.
December Ground Motion Group Global Design Effort 1 LET Status report, December 06 Paul Lebrun Fermilab CD/AMR.
N.Solyak, RTMLALCPG 2009,Albuquerque, Oct.2 1 ILC RTML Upgrade in SB2009 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab.
Report of 2 nd ILC Workshop (Snowmass) Working Group Kiyoshi KUBO references: Slides of the plenary talks in the workshop by P.Tenembaum and.
16 August 2005PT for US BC Task Force1 Two Stage Bunch Compressor Proposal Snowmass WG1 “It’s the latest wave That you’ve been craving for The old ideal.
SINGLE-STAGE BUNCH COMPRESSOR FOR ILC-SB2009 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop (BAW-2) SLAC, Jan , 2011 N.Solyak, Single-stage.
Nick Walker – SA meeting KEK Treaty Points and Costing Guidance Nick Walker 1 st System Area Managers Meeting KEK –
July 19-22, 2006, Vancouver KIRTI RANJAN1 ILC Curved Linac Simulation Kirti Ranjan, Francois Ostiguy, Nikolay Solyak Fermilab + Peter Tenenbaum (PT) SLAC.
Introduction: Tasks of “Information for simulations”, hardware specs K.Kubo
17 th November, 2008 LCWS08/ILC08 1 BDS optics and minimal machine study Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC & The Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
Positron source beamline lattice Wanming Liu, ANL
1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.
20 July 2006 Vancouver GDE Meeting Global Design Effort 1 Ring to Main Linac Peter Tenenbaum SLAC.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
13 September 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ML (x.7) Goals and Scope of Work to end FY09 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab Peter Tenenbaum SLAC.
Placet based DFS simulations in the ILC Main Linac. Some preliminary results of error scans open for discussion Javier Resta Lopez JAI, Oxford University.
1 ILC RTML overview Nikolay Solyak Fermilab RTML Lattice update in TDR Emittance preservation overview Other effects Conclusion ECFA Linear Collider Workshop.
Low Emittance Generation and Preservation K. Yokoya, D. Schulte.
Ring to Main Linac (RTML): Status and Plans ILC January Meeting (KEK) Peter Tenenbaum 19-Jan-2006.
Task Lists of ATF2 commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi ATF2 Project Meeting 12 / 17 / 2008.
Status of RTML design in TDR configuration A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
Tor Raubenheimer KEK Mtg Goals KEK January 19 th, 2006.
N. Walker, K. Yokoya LCWS ’11 Granada September TeV Upgrade Scenario: Straw man parameters.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
Design of a one-stage bunch compressor for ILC PAL June Eun-San Kim.
April Recent work on Low Emittance Transport, Main Linac Paul Lebrun CD/FNAL.
Emittance preservation in the RTML of ILC and CLIC Andrea Latina (CERN) Nikolay Solyak (FNAL) LCWS University of Texas at Arlington - Oct
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
07 June 2006Peter Tenenbaum1 Ring to Main Linac and Low Emittance Transport SLAC DOE Review Accelerator Breakout.
Global Design Effort RTML KOM Close-out Ross, Walker.
N.Solyak, RTMLLCWS’08, Chicago Nov.16-20, RTML progress 2008 Nikolay Solyak.
Global Design Effort Close-Out Points EDR time-scale (2010) –No demonstrations to ILC-like RF unit –3(?) CMs constructed at FNAL – not RDR baseline –2(?)
ILC Main Linac Beam Dynamics Review K. Kubo.
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
DR Interface to Sources and RTML
Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Emittance Dilution and Preservation in the ILC RTML
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
Update on ILC ML Lattice Design
Summary of Beam Dynamics Working Group
Status and Plan of GDE Design Work (Including Road Map for RDR)
RTML Design and Cost reduction Nikolay Solyak Fermilab
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
Accelerator Physics Technical System Group Review
RTML and Main Linac Design (2.6.1 and 2.7.1)
Analysis of Multi-Turn ERLs for X-ray Sources
ILC - Global Design Effort
Reliability, MPS, Operations and Tuning Work Packages
Presentation transcript:

26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 1 RTML (2.6.1) and Main Linac Beamline Design (2.7.1) PT SLAC

26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 2 Participants Y. Nosochkov, J.M. Paterson, S. Seletskiy, PT, M. Woodley, F. Zhou SLAC: Non-SLAC: K. Kubo, I. Reichel, D. Schulte, J. Smith, A. Wolski

26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 3 RTML – What we promised for FY07 The FY07 plan presented to ART leadership in April 2006 had the following milestones: –December 2006 Complete static, standalone tuning studies of full RTML Complete RTML chapter of RDR Begin static, integrated RTML + ML tuning studies –March 2007 Complete next iteration RTML lattice based on engineering input Begin dynamic, standalone tuning studies of full RTML Begin detailed studies of RTML component specifications –September 2007 Complete dynamic, standalone tuning studies of full RTML

26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 4 RTML – What we’re promising now The FY07 plan presented to ART leadership in October 2006 assumed the following FY07 progress: –Complete RTML portion of RDR –Begin work on engineered RTML lattice –Perform static, standalone tuning studies Note that this massive descoping was despite receiving basically full funding of from ART. WHAT HAPPENED?

26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 5 What Happened? The RTML efforts for FY07 were redirected into 2 areas which were not anticipated in April of 2006: –Design for support of central injector Wasn’t on the radar in April 2006, no way to anticipate it –Initial cost estimation and cost reduction efforts My mistake – I should have foreseen that this was going to be a MAJOR focus of RTML activity in FY07 and planned accordingly Also, some RTML labor siphoned off into “off the books” editorial work on RDR

26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 6 New RTML Design Why change the design? –Support for central injector –Reduce cost of pre-CI design Fewer magnets Fewer RF stations Fewer access points to surface (“shafts”) Full-power pulsed dump after BC2  1/3 power dump Proved to be a major job –Very little of pre-CI optics is left in the design!

26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 7 New Optics and Layout Note: Vertical curvature of return line suppressed in these images, but it is properly represented in the lattice e+ beamline floor coords (e- lattice is 1.2 km longer)

26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 8 New Optics (2) Bunch length out of DR increased –Was 6 mm RMS before Valencia –Now 9 mm RMS –Saves RF cavities in DR Significant R 56 in DRX arc and turnaround Need new BC configs Generated two –Final length 0.3 mm –Final length 0.2 mm These look pretty good –Voltages –SR emit growth –Energy spread at end BC1 and end BC2 0.2 mm approaching limits of the achievable

26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 9 New Optics (3) Remaining Issues: –Connection to DRX not yet designed Needs to be fully compatible with geometry of e- and e+ injection lines so we can all share one tunnel –Matches around BC2 linac are bad M. Woodley is taking a look –Match into linac probably wrong Just needs to be taken care of –Should redo designs of pulsed extraction lines They were already poor in pre-CI optics –Space charge in return line FNAL group agreed to take a look Hope to also get LBL group involved With all this done, we’d like to do a fresh bottoms-up cost estimate with all new parts counts, magnet families, etc.

26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 10 Plans for EDR RTML costs dominated by CFS and RF systems –Those two items make up ~80% of RTML –Outside of RTML WBS IE, not our problem! Focusing EDR efforts on DRX arc, return line, and BC1 wiggler, especially magnets –Main cost, schedule, and technical risks inside RTML WBS

26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 11 Emittance studies Mainly done with pre-CI optics –Need to migrate everyone to new optics Expect no trouble upstream of BC1 –KM steering + dispersion knobs can correct down to wire scanner resolution Corroborated study –Decoupler right in front of emit wires can correct coupling down to wire scanner resolution Uncorroborated study Expect these results to still hold for post-CI optics –Some simple and uncorroborated studies done to determine this

26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 12 Emittance Studies (2) Recent study found some issues in BC –Emit growth from quad misalignments  2.1 nm even with knobs (90% CL = 4.7 nm) –With cavity pitches added, mean emit growth balloons out to 9.2 nm (90% CL = 17.6 nm) Attempt to repeat this study got much better results –Emit growth from quad misalignments  1.5 nm with knobs (90% CL = 3.3 nm) –With cavity pitches added, mean emit growth goes to 3.9 nm (90% CL = 7.5 nm) Discrepancy not yet understood May be able to further improve even the good results –Not clear what the best tuning signal is, nor is it clear what the best tuning figure of merit is

26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 13 Main Linac Design MDW has Full set of lattices, including –Earth’s curvature and dispersion match –Undulator insertion in electron linac With room for 200 m of undulator –Needed for polarization –Undulator energy makeup But only enough for 100 m of undulator (3 GeV) –Cryo system segmentation All of Peterson’s bells and whistles (as of 31-May-2006) and all the associated aperiodicity of the linac optics and dispersions BUT: –It’s still got the 8-8Q-8 cryomodule configuration

26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 14 Main Linac Design (2) Straightforward to get to 9-8Q-9 –All the matching etc is automated –Just need the time to get back to it for a couple of days –While we’re at it, can do some misc. cleanup of the lattice, improve the dispersion match, etc.

26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 15 Main Linac Design (3) ART funding request specified a lot of emittance studies as part of the package Currently none of these are happening at SLAC –The good news is that is consequently well under budget right now Lots of activity in this area outside of SLAC –Fermilab (K. Ranjan, mat-LIAR and Lucretia; N. Solyak and A. Valishev) –KEK (K. Kubo, SLEPT) –CERN (D. Schulte, PLACET) –LEPP (J. Smith, BMAD / TAO) But he’s writing his thesis right now Should we re-think SLAC’s commitment to this work package? –Economic theory of comparative advantage…

26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 16 Simulation Codes DIMAD –New version with some bugfixes in test –Possibly last ILC-supported version? Lucretia –New release on 13 February Some bugfixes SR integral calculator Improvements in floor coordinates calculation and matched Twiss computation Documentation website now includes links to original Lucretia My Reflection video on YouTube, plus a live version by some garage band

26 Feb 2007 R & D Meeting Global Design Effort 17 Questions / Comments? “What’s the matter with your life? Is the poverty bringing u down? Is the mailman jerking u round? Did he put your million dollar check in someone else’s box?” -Prince, “Pop Life”