Kirsten Gallo (CHDN), Andy Hubbard (SODN) & Nita Tallent-Halsell (MOJN)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monitoring Watershed Restoration Effectiveness Nez Perce Tribe DFRM-Watershed Division Rebecca A. Lloyd, Project Leader.
Advertisements

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
Great Basin Restoration Initiative GBRI Field Office to On-the Ground Project.
Department of Interior/U.S. Geological Survey Water Programs National Water Programs (
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives Integration and Prioritization of Science Support Needs.
Daren Carlson – MN DNR 14 April Overview Prairie monitoring – Change analysis – Status/trend monitoring – Grassland adaptive management collaborative.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mountain-Prairie Region Landscape Conservation Implementation Status Report: Summer, 2010.
Information Learning Research Evolution of the Library Commons Charles Forrest, Director, Library Facilities American Library Association Annual Conference.
Setting a Course for a Sustainable Landscape December 2013 Steering Committee Call code:
Look photos ABSTRACT: Phenology is the study of seasonal biological events such as flowering, leaf-out, insect emergence, and animal migration. Long-term.
 Update on MOJN I&M Staff and Partners  MOJN I&M accomplishments & significant events  Summary of FY 2012 Activities  Discuss amendment to MOJN I&M.
Bureau of Land Management NAIP Information Meeting July 19 th, 2006.
C3C3 1 Bryan Horsburgh Bureau of Reclamation Regional Deputy Manager, Resource & Technical Services Lief Horwitz USGS Northwest Area Science Program Officer.
Climate Change Response Program Angie Richman Communication Specialist Climate Change Response Program Angie Richman Communication Specialist.
Brent Frakes, Functional Analyst.  Need to discover, share, have access to large holdings of data and information to address rapid climate change  e.
Development, implementation and lessons learned from the Northwest Forest Plan Michael W. Collopy Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science.
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
National Incident Organization National Incident Management Organization Final Recommendations.
USA National Phenology Network’s Nature's Notebook A tool for educational programs: Teaching science literacy and climate change LoriAnne Barnett USA National.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Advanced Satellite Products to Better Understand I&M Data within the Context of the Larger.
 Secretarial Order No establishes Landscape Conservation Cooperatives, which focus on on-the-ground strategic conservation efforts at the landscape.
Daniel Oppenheimer Tamarisk Coalition May 20, 2014.
Impact of Climate Change on Plant Community Composition and Ecosystem Function in MOJN Parks Seth Munson, Jayne Belnap, Robert Webb (USGS) Nita Tallent.
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives The Right Science in the Right Places.
Adaptation Human and Otherwise: Lessons from Evolving US Climate Change Policy and Programs Nora N. Devoe, PhD. Director, Research and Innovation Northern.
The Southern Rockies LCC John Rice Science Coordinator December 18, 2013.
Standardization of the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail (CDNST) Data Management Kerry Shakarjian University of Denver Department of Geography Masters.
A.T. MEGA- Transect Laura Belleville – Appalachian Trail Conservancy Elizabeth Crisfield– Penn State University Fred Dieffenbach – National Park Service.
Reclamation provides water to more than 31 million people and is the second largest producer of hydroelectric power in the west We are a water management.
Promoting a Culture of Evidence and Use of Data through Program Evaluation Session Theme 2 Presentation to: OSEP Project Directors’ Conference July 21,
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Advanced Satellite Products to Better Understand I&M Data within the Context of the Larger.
Charlie Walthall AC Meeting Update 9/11/13. Secr. Vilsack announced June 5, 2013 Options of things to do for climate change….. Undersecretaries: Dr. Bartuska.
1 Monitor and Evaluate Planning Step 9. 2 Social Science Activities in Land Use Planning Planning StepsSocial Science Activities Steps 1 & 2: Identify.
© All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Project Outline: Landscape Restoration Team CY 2014 Goals CY 2014 Deliverables Scope Why this? Why.
 What are the seasonal and annual status and trends in climate conditions at existing monitoring stations in and nearby the MOJN parks?  How do localized.
Geoff Moret, U. Idaho Jean Pan, MOJN I&M Ecologist Research Permits.
March 11, 2010 Planning for Priority Species and Vegetation: Monitoring Framework A Systematic Framework to Plan for Biological Resources In the BLM’s.
FCRPS Adaptive Management Implementation Plan (AMIP) 1 September 15, 2009.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey History of the Southwest Biological Science Center A Short Overview.
SEQUOIA NATIONAL FOREST AND GIANT SEQUUOIA NATIONAL MONUMENT.
MOJN – June 2007 DM Presentation 1 Data Management; Yesterday and Today The Mojave Network from the Data Management Perspective –Data Management; Tabular.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Normalized Difference Vegetation Index for Restoration Monitoring Bruce K. Wylie 1, Steve Boyte.
An Overview of the 2007 Mojave Network Meeting June 28, 2007 Lake Mead National Recreation Area National Park Service Mojave Network.
Jean Pan, Protocol Lead, MOJN I&M Ecologist Donovan Craig, UNLV Invasives Cooperator Dana Robinson, MOJN I&M GIS Specialist Debbie Soukup, UNLV Soils Cooperator.
Center for Institutional Studies Research in higher education Maria Yudkevich Workshop “Equity in Higher Education: International Context”, Moscow, April.
Tools to Inform Protection, Restoration, and Resilience in the Hudson River Estuary The North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC)
E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A A.T. MEGA-Transect National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Northeast Temperate Network Fred Dieffenbach.
Donovan Craig R.A., UNLV Scott Abella, P.I. UNLV; Sara McPherson G.A., UNLV; Jean Pan, MOJN Ecologist; Bob Truitt, MOJN Data Manager; Jennifer Burke, MOJN.
Agency Update U.S. Forest Service Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest.
1. Adaptation – management actions to help fish and wildlife and their habitats adapt to climate change, using a Strategic Habitat Conservation Framework.
Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation: The Prairie Adaptation Research Cooperative Mark Johnston Forest Ecosystems Branch, Environment and Resource Management.
National Parks in a Changing World
Jennifer L. Burke MOJN Protocol Data Manager Bob Truitt MOJN Data Manager Dana Robinson GIS Specialist.
As a primary goal, we would recommend that the biotic associations within each park be maintained, or where necessary recreated, as nearly as possible.
U.S Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Designing an Integrated Monitoring Program for Coniferous Forests: beyond the forest and the trees.
Mojave Network Data Mining Jean VonSchriltz June 28, 2007 Mojave Inventory & Monitoring Network Annual Meeting Data Mining Presentation Courtesy of Jean.
Science Translation, Conservation Adoption and Delivery: Revised process for needs and projects related to science translation and adoption Steve Fuller.
Progress Under Guidance Documents Northeast Conservation Framework LCC Conservation Science Strategic Plan USFWS Science Investment and Accountability.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Overview & Implementation January 30, Large geographic area (22,360 square miles primarily in VA, NC, and TN)
Planning for Restoration at the Landscape Scale: Desert LCC Case Study National Forest Foundation Collaborative Restoration Workshop April 26-27, 2016.
Crafting a Resilience Program
Educators Exploring the Solar System, OSIRIS-REx Mission to Bennu
From: Can We Afford to Conserve Biodiversity?
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives
FIRES IN RIPARIAN AREAS AND WETLANDS
Department of Geography Geographic Information Science
North Shore Restoration Project
Landscape Approach to Resource Management
Presentation transcript:

Kirsten Gallo (CHDN), Andy Hubbard (SODN) & Nita Tallent-Halsell (MOJN)

 Secretarial Order No September 14, 2009: climate change strategy to integrate the work of each DOI bureau to mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change  Landscape Conservation Cooperatives (LCC) ….with a geographically defined area.  NPS – monitoring indicators of climate change in arid lands ◦ SODN & CHDN & MOJN collaboratively implement & manage enhanced monitoring for climate change in deserts 2

 6-8 April 2010  Final Report: Science Learning Center of the American Southwest:  d/outreach/workshops/climate/aridlands d/outreach/workshops/climate/aridlands 3

 Monitoring collaboratively across 3 networks  $400,000 shared  Focus: ◦ Seeps and springs ◦ Vegetation Sampling along ecotonal gradients ◦ Climate ◦ Phenology and Snowpack 4

 Develop & implement monitoring protocols in all 3 networks in concert ◦ Funding:  Field crews (2 MOJN, 1 CHDN, 1 SODN)  Shared training & laboratory contracts  Common data management & databases  Reports in common format. CHDN and MOJN will share a report writer (SODN has a writer already)  Annual reports for each Park  Status and Trend Report 5 year 5

 4 Parks in SODN and CHDN  As MOJN develops and implements an Integrated Uplands protocol explore whether sampling ecotonal gradients in MOJN parks (JOTR, DEVA) would be sensitive enough to detect change in productivity over space in time. [GRBA is not in the Arid Lands LCC) 6

 3 will work together to develop climate protocol ◦ Landscape Ecologist position shared among three networks in the Desert LCC and the Great Northern LCC. ◦ MOJN, CHDN & SODN develop and share data management ◦ Reports for the networks will have common formats. The shared ecologist will have the lead on reporting for each of the networks. 7

 Drawn from existing or developing processes. ◦ MOJN – springs 8

 Allocation Summary  $ 97,000 SODN  $120,000 MOJN  $143,000 CHDN  $ 40, acct (shared ecologist) 9

 Ecologist GS11 Term – phenology & climate protocol (March 2011)  Science writer GS9 – shared CHDN and MOJN (March 2011)  2 MOJN Springs Crews (4 person) for 6 months ◦ Complement 1 Riparian Crew 10

11 4/2010 8/2010 9/2010 4/2011 – 11/2011 DEVELOP PROTOCOLS WORKSHOPDEVELOP WORKPLAN IMPLEMENT FIELD COLLECTION