Visualization-based Reasonable Goals Method and its Web Application for Supporting e-Participation in Environmental Decision Making Alexander V. Lotov.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Atlas Server – A Tool for Atlas Mapping Altai State Technical University Public Fund Altai 21-st Century Barnaul, Russia Irina Mikhailidi.
Advertisements

Defining Decision Support System
Presentation by Prabhjot Singh
High-order Pareto frontier approximation and visualization: 30 years of experience and new trends Abstract of the paper at MCDM 2011 Alexander V. Lotov.
Optimum Allocation of Discharged Pollutant Loads from Nonpoint Sources in a Watershed using GIS Alok Kumar Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering Division.
Approximation and Visualization of Interactive Decision Maps Short course of lectures Alexander V. Lotov Dorodnicyn Computing Center of Russian Academy.
Challenges to model solving software in the internet era Adrie J.M. Beulens Huub Scholten (Wageningen University, Information Technology Group)
Decision Making: An Introduction 1. 2 Decision Making Decision Making is a process of choosing among two or more alternative courses of action for the.
Charles Delort Markus Hartikainen Dorothy Miller Jouni Pousi
Selecting Preservation Strategies for Web Archives Stephan Strodl, Andreas Rauber Department of Software.
Evaluation of Advertising Effectiveness Using Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation Junwei Cao Department of Computer Science University of Warwick.
Approximation and Visualization of Interactive Decision Maps Short course of lectures Alexander V. Lotov Dorodnicyn Computing Center of Russian Academy.
Approximation and Visualization of Interactive Decision Maps Short course of lectures Alexander V. Lotov Dorodnicyn Computing Center of Russian Academy.
S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology 1 We have the tools How to attract the people? Creating a culture of Web-based participation.
Approximation and Visualization of Interactive Decision Maps Short course of lectures Alexander V. Lotov Dorodnicyn Computing Center of Russian Academy.
Multiple Criteria Analysis and Water Resources Risk Management David L. Olson –James & H.K. Stuart Chancellor’s Distinguished Chair –Professor, Department.
Institut für Softwarewissenschaft - Universität WienP.Brezany 1 Toward Knowledge Discovery in Databases Attached to Grids Peter Brezany Institute for Software.
Towards Participatory Geographic Information Systems for Community Planning and Environmental Decision Making Piotr Jankowski Department of Geography San.
Approximation and Visualization of Interactive Decision Maps Short course of lectures Alexander V. Lotov Dorodnicyn Computing Center of Russian Academy.
10.1 © 2007 by Prentice Hall 10 Chapter Improving Decision Making and Managing Knowledge.
1 Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory Classical Exploration Methods for Design Space Exploration (multi-criteria.
A decision support system (DSS) is a computer program application that analyzes business data and presents it so that users can make business decisions.
1 Enviromatics Decision support systems Decision support systems Вонр. проф. д-р Александар Маркоски Технички факултет – Битола 2008 год.
DASHBOARDS Dashboard provides the managers with exactly the information they need in the correct format at the correct time. BI systems are the foundation.
Operations Research I Lecture 1-3 Chapter 1
Lecture 5 Geocoding. What is geocoding? the process of transforming a description of a location—such as a pair of coordinates, an address, or a name of.
The Academy of Public administration under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan APPLICATION MODERN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY IN DECISION.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
The Software Development Cycle Defining and understanding the problem.
By Saparila Worokinasih
Osyczka Andrzej Krenich Stanislaw Habel Jacek Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Krakow, Al. Jana Pawla II 37,
Introduction to MCDM Slim Zekri Dept. Natural Resource Economics Sultan Qaboos University.
Development of a Decision Aiding Framework For Energy Infrastructure Siting Ganesh Doluweera & Joule Bergerson Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment.
1 SCNR State Cadastres of Natural Resources of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Approximation and Visualization of Interactive Decision Maps Short course of lectures Alexander V. Lotov Dorodnicyn Computing Center of Russian Academy.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
Approximation and Visualization of Interactive Decision Maps Short course of lectures Alexander V. Lotov Dorodnicyn Computing Center of Russian Academy.
Development of lake Druksiai/Drisviaty Basin Management Program Feasibility study.
A GENERIC PROCESS FOR REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING Chapter 2 1 These slides are prepared by Enas Naffar to be used in Software requirements course - Philadelphia.
LINDA’S INTERVIEWSGAP ANALYSES Task 1: DEVELOP OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS AND INTERFACE ELEMENTS IMPORTANT TO STAKEHOLDERS Drivers, Goals, Barriers Spatial habitat.
Managerial Decision Making and Problem Solving
Introduction A GENERAL MODEL OF SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION.
Visualization-based Reasonable Goals Method and its Web Application for Supporting e-Participation in Environmental Decision Making Alexander V. Lotov.
Designing the alternatives NRMLec16 Andrea Castelletti Politecnico di Milano Gange Delta.
Big Ideas Differentiation Frames with Icons. 1. Number Uses, Classification, and Representation- Numbers can be used for different purposes, and numbers.
8 th Grade Integers Natalie Menuau EDU Prof. R. Moroney Summer 2010.
CS 782 – Machine Learning Lecture 4 Linear Models for Classification  Probabilistic generative models  Probabilistic discriminative models.
Transboundary Trust Space February 16, 2012 Ensuring trust in information exchange – proposal and approaches from Russia and CIS-states (RCC states) National.
Knowledge Representation of Statistic Domain For CBR Application Supervisor : Dr. Aslina Saad Dr. Mashitoh Hashim PM Dr. Nor Hasbiah Ubaidullah.
Tanja Magoč, François Modave, Xiaojing Wang, and Martine Ceberio Computer Science Department The University of Texas at El Paso.
Finnish-Russian Doctoral Seminar on Multicriteria Decision Aid and Optimization Iryna Yevseyeva Niilo Mäki Institute University of Jyväskylä, Finland
MBA7020_01.ppt/June 13, 2005/Page 1 Georgia State University - Confidential MBA 7020 Business Analysis Foundations Introduction - Why Business Analysis.
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
Chapter 1 Introduction n Introduction: Problem Solving and Decision Making n Quantitative Analysis and Decision Making n Quantitative Analysis n Model.
Approximation and Visualization of Interactive Decision Maps Short course of lectures Alexander V. Lotov Dorodnicyn Computing Center of Russian Academy.
16469 Low Energy Building Design Conflict and Interaction in Environmental Engineering Design.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights reserved Whitten Bentley DittmanSYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN METHODS5th Edition.
Development of a community-based participatory network for integrated solid waste management By: Y.P. Cai, G.H. Huang, Q. Tan & G.C. Li EVSE, Faculty of.
National Public Health Institute, Finland Open Risk Assessment Lecture 2: General assessment framework Mikko Pohjola KTL, Finland.
Logical Framework Approach 1. Approaches to Activity Design Logical Framework Approach (LFA) – Originally developed in the 1970s, this planning process.
1 INTRODUCTION TO COMPUTER GRAPHICS. Computer Graphics The computer is an information processing machine. It is a tool for storing, manipulating and correlating.
Presentation on Decision support system
Multi-Criteria Decision Aiding with the Use of DECERNS WebSDSS
Water Quality Acquisition Systems in Australia
Quantitative Techniques
Introduction of Week 9 Return assignment 5-2
Improving Decision Making and Managing Knowledge
Planning process in river basin management
Panel “Key performance indicators for Serbian higher education“
Chapter 12 Analyzing Semistructured Decision Support Systems
Presentation transcript:

Visualization-based Reasonable Goals Method and its Web Application for Supporting e-Participation in Environmental Decision Making Alexander V. Lotov Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia; and Dorodnicyn Computing Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia

Plan of the talk 1. Pareto frontier methods 2. Reasonable Goals Method for databases 3. Interactive Decision Maps (IDM) technique and visualization of Pareto frontier 4. Environmental applications of RGM/IDM 5. Two main tasks of e-participation: a) informing lay stakeholders; and b) negotiation support 6. RGM/IDM in Web for informing lay stakeholders 7. RGM/IDM in Participatory Decision Support for River Basin Planning (Werra River, Germany) 8. Using Web for informing lay stakeholders on environmental decision problems related to risk

Classification of MCDA methods according to the role of the Decision Maker MCDA no-preference methods a priori preference methods interactive methods a posteriori preference (Pareto frontier) methods

Examples of Web application  A priori preference methods -- Web-HIPRE J.Mustajoki and R.P.Hämäläinen  Interactive Methods -- WWW-NIMBUS K.Miettinen and M.M.Mäkelä  Pareto frontier methods – RGDB for Web (Reasonable Goals for DataBases) A.Lotov, A.Kistanov and A.Zaitsev

Pareto frontier methods Pareto frontier methods are devoted to approximation of the Pareto set and informing DM concerning it. In contrast to preference-oriented methods, Pareto frontier methods inform the users and help them in forming their preferences. First method: parametric LP method for generating the efficiency frontier for linear bi-criterion problem (S.Gass and T.Saaty, 1955)

Parametric LP is used: changes from 0 to 1. Result: Pareto frontier is displayed

How to approximate the Pareto frontier How to inform the stakeholders about the Pareto frontier Two main problems must be solved in the framework of the Pareto frontier methods

Two basic ways for informing a stakeholder about the Pareto frontier By providing a list of the criterion points that belong to the Pareto frontier By visualization of the Pareto frontier

We apply VISUALIZATION — why it is needed? Visualization is a transformation of symbolic data into geometric information that must aid in the formation of mental picture of the symbolic data.

Structure of a mental model (result of psychological studies)

Visualization can influence all levels of human thinking!

Application of Pareto frontier visualization in finite multi-attribute choice problems The Reasonable Goals Method

A decision matrix is considered, i.e., table of N decision alternatives given by a finite number of attributes

We use visualization aimed at selecting a small number of «interesting» alternatives. It can be considered as a special form of data mining.

Example: real estate on sale

For illustrative purposes, let m=2 (criterion points are displayed on the plane)

Enveloping the criterion points

Approximating the Edgeworth-Pareto hull of Y C (the so-called CEPH)

Pareto frontier is analyzed by user and a preferred combination of criterion values (reasonable goal) is identified

The alternatives that are close to the goal are selected

General case (m from 3 to 8) Visualization of the Pareto frontier is based on approximation of the CEPH and application of the Interactive Decision Maps (IDM) technique.

The IDM technique consists in interactive and animated visualization of collections of bi-criterion slices of the CEPH (decision maps).

Approximation Before the start of interactive visualization, approximation of the CEPH is carried out. The main problem that was solved by us: optimal algorithms for polyhedral approximation of convex multi-objective bodies were developed.

Several applications of the IDM/RGM technique

Example application of the RGM/IDM for decision screening in local water quality planning (Kolomna city region at the Oka River) About decision alternatives were considered

Decision map that describes properties of decision alternatives

Decision map with the goal

Selected alternatives that are close to the goal

Exploration of pollution abatement cost in the Electricity Sector – Israeli case study (jointly with D. Soloveitchik and others from Ministry of National Infrastructures, Israel) Several hundreds of pollution reduction alternatives for the Israel electricity sector were developed for the period 2003 – 2013 by application of a complicated non-linear mathematical model. Then, the IDM-based screening was applied.

Web application of the RGM/IDM technique (Web RGDM software) for supporting e-participation index.htm

Scheme of the Web RGDB application server

Two main tasks to be solved in the framework of e-participation in environmental decision problems a) informing lay stakeholders on environmental decision problems (especially on possible strategies for solving the problems); and b) supporting negotiations (or aggregating stakeholders’ preferences).

Informing lay stakeholders on environmental problems Lay stakeholders (non-experts) usually have minimal knowledge on environmental problems and on the ways how to solve the problems. Nevertheless, they want and often are involved into actions related to such problems. It is clear that the gap between knowledge and actions of lay stakeholders can be misused by irresponsible politicians.

Web tools based on the RGM/IDM technique (RGDB) can help lay stakeholders better understand the feasibility frontiers and express preferences by selecting one or several strategies that best fit their concerns. It important that it can be done independently of mass media that can help thrusting the strategies selected by an expert on lay stakeholders.

Then, lay stakeholders can base their problem-related legal and political actions (including e-participation) on such knowledge. Web applications of the RGM/IDM technique are aimed, first of all, at supporting the first, pre-negotiation phase. However, they can be used for supporting negotiations, too.

The Web RGDB application server

Data input

Example of the RGDB display

Selected alternatives

Participatory Decision Support for Integrated River Basin Planning (Funding: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research) The Web RGDB was used as a part of DSS developed by Jörg Dietrich and Andreas H. Schumann, Ruhr University Bochum, Institute for Hydrology, Water Management and Environmental Engineering

DSS was calibrated for the Werra River Basin Weser Rhein EmsElbe Werra

For the Participatory Decision Support System, a special form of the Web RGDB was developed. It can support negotiations. It applies selecting several goals and related small groups of alternatives.

Architecture of the Web-based DSS

Applications of the IDM/RGM technique in decision problems with stochastic models (finite number of alternatives)

Model Let us consider N alternatives, while the i-th alternative is given by its cumulative distribution function F i (x)=P{v<x}, i=1,..,N, where v is a value to be maximized (or minimized).

Approach proposed by Y. Haimes (University of Virginia) Criteria are selected on the basis of the function F(x), i.e., y k =F(x)=P{v<v k }, k=1,..,m, where the values v k are specified by the DM. Then, any multi-criteria method can be applied. We use the IDM/RGM technique.

Example of the IDM/RGM application in decision making under risk In the example problem (variants of a dam), three criteria are used: expectation of losses (including known annual cost); probability of high losses denoted by P_h; and probability of catastrophic losses denoted by P_c. We are interested to minimize the values of all three criteria.

List of the alternatives

Decision map

Selected alternatives

Informing lay stakeholders on risks Using the approach of Y. Haimes, one can use the Web RGDB application server for informing lay stakeholders on environmental risks just in the same way as concerning any other environmental problem.

Detailed information on the approach is given in the book Lotov A.V., Bushenkov V.A., and Kamenev G.K. Interactive Decision Maps. Approximation and Visualization of Pareto Frontier. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.

Our Web address