Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting February, 2007 0/8 Development of New Kaon Selectors Kalanand Mishra University of Cincinnati.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting Sept 26, /12 Development of New SPR-based Kaon, Pion, Proton, and Electron Selectors Kalanand Mishra University.
Advertisements

14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
Current Status on ZHH Analysis ’08 5/31 GLD ZHH-group.
Measurement of non BB Decays of Y(4S) to Y(1S)     and Y(2S)     Silvano Tosi Università & INFN Genova.
August 12, 2000DPF Search for B +  K + l + l - and B 0  K* 0 l + l - Theoretical predictions and experimental status Analysis methods Signal.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
Optimization of Signal Significance by Bagging Decision Trees Ilya Narsky, Caltech presented by Harrison Prosper.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
16 April 2005 APS 2005 Search for exclusive two body decays of B→D s * h at Belle Luminda Kulasiri University of Cincinnati Outline Motivation Results.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
Preliminary Measurement of the BF(   → K -  0  ) using the B A B AR Detector Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London for the B A B AR.
Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) Introduction to Single-Top The measurement.
1 CC analysis update Repeat of CC analysis with R1.9 ntuples –What is the effect of improved tracking efficiency? Alternative PID methods: likelihood vs.
Analysis work by: Rachid Ayad Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang CBX note available: /homes/cleo/sls/ds4pi.ps Status of B  D  (4  )   analysis Jianchun.
DPF 2009 Richard Kass 1 Search for b → u transitions in the decays B → D (*) K - using the ADS method at BaBar Outline of Talk *Introduction/ADS method.
The HERMES Dual-Radiator Ring Imaging Cerenkov Detector N.Akopov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A479 (2002) 511 Shibata Lab 11R50047 Jennifer Newsham YSEP.
1 g g s Richard E. Hughes The Ohio State University for The CDF and D0 Collaborations Low Mass SM Higgs Search at the Tevatron hunting....
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
LOGO Ensemble Learning Lecturer: Dr. Bo Yuan
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
B-tagging Performance based on Boosted Decision Trees Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan (with X. Li and B. Zhou) ATLAS B-tagging Meeting February 9,
Combining multiple learners Usman Roshan. Bagging Randomly sample training data Determine classifier C i on sampled data Goto step 1 and repeat m times.
MiniBooNE Event Reconstruction and Particle Identification Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (for the MiniBooNE Collaboration) DNP06, Nashville,
Measurement of the Atmospheric Muon Neutrino Energy Spectrum with IceCube in the 79- and 86-String Configuration Tim Ruhe, Mathis Börner, Florian Scheriau,
Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb
Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Training of Boosted DecisionTrees Helge Voss (MPI–K, Heidelberg) MVA Workshop, CERN, July 10, 2009.
Kalanand Mishra Kaon Neural Net 1 Retraining Kaon Neural Net Kalanand Mishra University of Cincinnati.
Electron-hadron separation by Neural-network Yonsei university.
Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting December, /11 New Kaon Neural Net Selectors Kalanand Mishra University of Cincinnati  Overview  New selectors’
PANDA GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers PANDA Technical Assessment Group PID Status Report G. Schepers for the PID TAG GSI PID TAG.
Particle Identification at BESIII Kanglin He April 23, 2007, Amsterdam.
Physics of the B-factories, MVA chapter 12nd workshop, KEK, May 2010 José Ocariz LPNHE – IN2P3 et Université Paris Diderot On behalf of the MVA chapter.
A measurement of the B 0 B 0 oscillation frequency and determination of flavor-tagging efficiency using semileptonic and hadronic B 0 decays S. Bolognesi.
I.BelikovCHEP 2004, Interlaken, 30 Sep Bayesian Approach for Combined Particle Identification in ALICE Experiment at LHC. I.Belikov, P.Hristov, M.Ivanov,
Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN.
Particle Identification. Particle identification: an important task for nuclear and particle physics Usually it requires the combination of informations.
Analysis of H  WW  l l Based on Boosted Decision Trees Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan (with T.S. Dai, X.F. Li, B. Zhou) ATLAS Higgs Meeting September.
B-tagging based on Boosted Decision Trees
Cincinnati, May Kalanand Mishra Kalanand Mishra University of Cincinnati Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K.
1 Studies of Heavy Flavour Jet Tagging with ZVTOP in JAS3 Overview Jet flavour tagging in JAS3 Cosθ dependence Primary vertex momentum Use of neutral energy.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Single top quark physics Peter Dong, UCLA on behalf of the CDF and D0 collaborations Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallee d’Aoste Wednesday, February.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Kalanand Mishra February 23, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 decay Giampiero.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
Single Top Quark Production at D0, L. Li (UC Riverside) EPS 2007, July Liang Li University of California, Riverside On Behalf of the DØ Collaboration.
Studies of the Higgs Boson at the Tevatron Koji Sato On Behalf of CDF and D0 Collaborations 25th Rencontres de Blois Chateau Royal de Blois, May 29, 2013.
14/06/2010 Stefano Spataro Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Stefano Spataro III Panda.
Converted photon and π 0 discrimination based on H    analysis.
Low Mass Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta Physics at LHC, Split, Croatia, September 29th 2008 On behalf of the CDF and.
Study of the electron identification algorithms in TRD Andrey Lebedev 1,3, Semen Lebedev 2,3, Gennady Ososkov 3 1 Frankfurt University, 2 Giessen University.
On behalf of the BABAR Collaboration
Yet another approach to the ToF-based PID at PANDA
Charmless Hadronic B Decays at BaBar
for Particle Identification
First step to Reconstruction of PANDA Barrel DIRC in PandaRoot
First Evidence for Electroweak Single Top Quark Production
Theoretical Motivation Analysis Procedure Systematics Results
Implementing Boosting and Convolutional Neural Networks For Particle Identification (PID) Khalid Teli .
COMP61011 : Machine Learning Ensemble Models
STAR Geometry and Detectors
ISTEP 2016 Final Project— Project on
For the BaBar Collaboration
CP Violation lectures Measurement of the time dependence of B0B0bar oscillation using inclusive dilepton events [BABAR-CONF-00/10] G. Cerminara.
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
Search for Lepton Flavour Violation in the decay  → BaBar
Pattern Recognition: Statistical and Neural
Presentation transcript:

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting February, /8 Development of New Kaon Selectors Kalanand Mishra University of Cincinnati

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting February, /8 The input variables for neural net are: likelihoods from SVT, DCH, DRC (both global and track-based) and momentum and polar angle (  ) of the tracks. Separate neural net training for ‘Good Quality’ and ‘Poor Quality’* tracks: gives two family of selectors - “KNNGoodQual“ and “KNNNoQual”. Overview of Neural Net Training * Poor Quality tracks are defined as belonging to one of the following categories: - outside DIRC acceptance - passing through the cracks between DIRC bars - no DCH hits in layers > 35 - EMC energy < 0.15 GeV

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting February, /8 Performance of ‘KNNxQual’ selectors Signal Efficiency Bkgd. Rejection The higher curve/ point represents better performance GoodQual NoQual GoodQual 0.3 < P < 0.5 An overall improvement An absolute improvement Deterioration Most of the tracks used in B-tagging have low momenta. And, the biggest consumer for such a selector is B- tagging group.

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting February, /8 Tried different algorithms …. Fisher Binary Ada Boost Simple Binary Split Bagger Decision Tree Ada Boost Decision Tree ( Provides the best separation ) Classifier Output Events

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting February, /8 AdaBoost Decision Tree Bkgd. Sgnl. Classifier Output Events For details on the algorithms and software used, see: arXiv:physics/ (by Ilya Narsky) Decision Tree splits nodes recursively until a stopping criteria is satisfied. AdaBoost combines weak classifiers by applying them sequentially. At each step it enhances weights of misclassified events and reduces weights of correctly classified events.

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting February, /8 Ada Boost Decision Tree Training on “real data”. Visual inspection shows a significant improvement over the neural network performance. Need to retrain after randomizing the momentum dist. and with additional input variables.

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting February, /8 Performance in select momentum bins Low momentum: 0.3 < P < 0.5 GeV/c dE/dx - DRC transition region: 0.8 < P < 1.0 GeV/c Intermediate range: 1.9 < P < 2.1 GeV/c High momentum: 3.0 < P < 3.2 GeV/c

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting February, /8 Randomize the momentum distributions of signal and background events before training Add additional input discriminating variables : - # signal and bkgd. Cherenkov photons in the ring - # total drift chamber hits and hits in the last 5 layers - # hits in the silicon detector - …… other suggestions ! Add other background categories - proton, ….. Finalize the cuts and implement the selectors : - it will be a single family of selectors : no separate selectors for “good” and “poor” quality tracks - should we still call it a KNN selector ? Things to do ….

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting February, /8 Significant efforts underway to develop a “new version” of the KNN selectors. The goal is to develop a powerful non-LH kaon selector using the best performing classifier (or a combination of classifiers). Such a selector is expected to be able to replace the current KNN selectors for B-tagging purposes, and should be a meaningful alternative of the LH selectors for Physics analyses. Summary