Digitization in EMC simulation Dmytro Melnychuk, Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Warsaw, Poland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Exploiting VERITAS Timing Information J. Holder a for the VERITAS Collaboration b a) School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, UK b) For full.
Advertisements

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
1 ALICE EMCal Electronics Outline: PHOS Electronics review Design Specifications –Why PHOS readout is suitable –Necessary differences from PHOS Shaping.
The NO A APD Readout Chip Tom Zimmerman Fermilab May 19, 2006.
Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London.
ECAL Spike Plot Approval ECAL Anomalous Signal Plots Approval Adi Bornheim for ECAL
1 A Design of PET detector using Microchannel Plate PMT with Transmission Line Readout Heejong Kim 1, Chien-Min Kao 1, Chin-Tu Chen 1, Jean-Francois Genat.
ECAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson May 25, ECAL Digitization CaloHitResponse CaloSamples (analog signal) EcalElectronicsSim EBDataFrame EEDataFrame.
JC and Marina 04/02/01 Pixel Cross Talk Study  Modeling: Linear coupling between neighbor rows  Parameters in the simulation:  FPIX0-Pstop gain curve.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Development of novel R/O electronics for LAr detectors Max Hess Controller ADC Data Reduction Ethernet 10/100Mbit Host Detector typical block.
October-November 2003China - ALICE meeting1 PHOS in ALICE A PHOton Spectrometer with unique capabilities for the detection/identification of photons and.
MEG II 実験液体キセノンガンマ線検出器 における再構成法の開発 Development of the event reconstruction method for MEG II liquid xenon gamma-ray detector 小川真治、 他 MEG II
Studies on Module 0 HAC V. Fascianelli, V. Kozhuharov, M. Martini, T. Spadaro, D. Tagnani.
Preliminary Design of Calorimeter Electronics Shudi Gu June 2002.
Report on SiPM Tests SiPM as a alternative photo detector to replace PMT. Qauntify basic characteristics Measure Energy, Timing resolution Develop simulation.
INSTR-08, BINP, Novosibirsk 1 Belle calorimeter upgrade B.Shwartz, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk on behalf of BELLE calorimeter.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
1 Alessandra Casale Università degli Studi di Genova INFN Sezione Genova FT-Cal Prototype Simulations.
21-Aug-06DoE Site Review / Harvard(1) Front End Electronics for the NOvA Neutrino Detector John Oliver Long baseline neutrino experiment Fermilab (Chicago)
Digital analysis of scintillator pulses generated by high-energy neutrons. Jan Novák, Mitja Majerle, Pavel Bém, Z. Matěj 1, František Cvachovec 2, 1 Faculty.
T. Sugitate / Hiroshima / PHX031 / Nov.01 The Photon Spectrometer for RHIC and beyond PbWO 4 Crystal Density 8.29 g/cm 3 Radiation length 0.89 cm Moliere.
DAQ for 4-th DC S.Popescu. Introduction We have to define DAQ chapter of the DOD for the following detectors –Vertex detector –TPC –Calorimeter –Muon.
Optimization of Detectors for Time of Flight PET Marek Moszyński, Tomasz Szczęśniak, Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
16-Nov-2002Konstantin Beloous1 Digital Hadron Calorimeter Energy Resolution.
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
PHOTON RECONSTRUCTION IN CMS APPLICATION TO H   PHOTON RECONSTRUCTION IN CMS APPLICATION TO H   Elizabeth Locci SPP/DAPNIA, Saclay, France Prague.
SPIROC update Felix Sefkow Most slides from Ludovic Raux HCAL main meeting April 18, 2007.
ASIC Activities for the PANDA GSI Peter Wieczorek.
SiPM for CBM Michael Danilov ITEP(Moscow) Muon Detector and/or Preshower CBM Meeting ITEP
Slide 1Turisini M. Frontend Electronics M.Turisini, E. Cisbani, P. Musico CLAS12 RICH Technical Review, 2013 June Requirements 2.Description of.
BESIII EMC Simulation & Reconstruction He Miao
Calibration of uniformity between LYSO crystals Zhigang Wang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS The Third International Workshop on the High.
Jean-François Genat Fast Timing Workshop June 8-10th 2015 FZU Prague Timing Methods with Fast Integrated Technologies 1.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
May 10-14, 2010CALOR2010, Beijing, China 1 Readout electronics of the ALICE photon spectrometer Zhongbao Yin *, Lijiao Liu, Hans Muller, Dieter Rohrich,
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
P. Lecoq CERN2 February ENVISION WP2 Meeting CERN Group contribution to ENVISION WP2 Paul Lecoq CERN, Geneva.
Introduction of my work AYAKO HIEI (AYA) Hiroshima Univ 2008/5/30 me.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
Forward Tagger Calorimeter Prototype tests at Jlab: report CLAS12 Workshop February 22, 2012 A. Celentano.
Ilhan TAPAN* and Fatma KOCAK
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
Full Simulation Session SuperB General Meeting
The Electromagnetic Calorimetry of the PANDA Detector at FAIR
Status of Electronics Simulation and Energy Resoluton Estimation
L. Ratti, M. Manghisoni Università degli Studi di Pavia INFN Pavia
High rate capability of gas ionization chamber with flash ADC
New pre study The setup results.
BNL electronics: first tests
Analysis of FADC single-crystal data
Pulse Shape Fitting Beam Test September, October CERN
EMC Electronics and Trigger Review and Trigger Plan
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
On behalf of the GECAM group
A Low Power Readout ASIC for Time Projection Chambers in 65nm CMOS
Deng Ziyan Jan 10-12, 2006 BESIII Collaboration Meeting
BESIII EMC electronics
Presented at 2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium - N28-32
High Rate Photon Irradiation Test with an 8-Plane TRT Sector Prototype
Calorimeter Backgrounds
md-NUV PET project meeting
Conceptual design and R&D Progress of STCF ECAL
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
BESIII TOF Digitization
CAL crosstalk issues and their implications
Presentation transcript:

Digitization in EMC simulation Dmytro Melnychuk, Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Warsaw, Poland

General scheme of digitization PWO Preamplifier/ shaper FADC Digi APD ● Conversion from deposited energy to photons ● Signal conversion in APD ● Signal transformation in pre-amplifier/shaper ● FADC ● Extraction of signal amplitude from FADC output (digital filter or simple parabolic fit)

Design parameters which affect digitization ● Noise (preamplifier + APD) ● Photon statistics (photoelectrons per MeV) ● Shaping time (integration, differentiation) ● Scintillation time constant ● FADC frequency Foreseen but not used at the moment: ● Noise dependency on the channel (measured values which will be taken from Condition Data Base (CDB)) ● Non-uniformity of light production

Values of parameters 2 options for read-out electronics: - Quad-preamplifier (developed by Basel group), noise value = 1600 e- at -25 C (0.12 MeV), external shaping = 250 ns - ASIC read-out, noise 4400 e- at -25 C (0.34 MeV), built-in shaping = 100 ns (?) Other parameters: ● APD contribution to noise – excess noise factor F=1.38 at gain M=50, dark current (?) ● 400 photoelectrons per MeV at -25 C, QE=70% ● 80 MHz FADC ● crystal scintillation time 6 ns

Energy resolution dependence on digitization 1) Single gammas with different energies were generated with uniform angular distribution (10, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000 MeV) 2) Dependence of energy deposited in 1 cluster on parameter of electronics (cluster – group of neighboring crystals) Energy threshold for single crystal = 1MeV

Photon statistic dependence E=10 MeVE=50 MeV RMS (MeV)

Noise dependence RMS (MeV)

Shaping time dependence RMS (MeV)

Summary 1) Energy resolution is sensitive to photon statistic only at lowest energies 2) Noise contribution to energy resolution is on the level of 3% and decrease with growth of energy 3) Energy resolution does not depend significantly on the shaping time but it a little bit worse for smaller values To do: ● Event mixing ● Realistic digi format from DAQ