Campaign Finance Unit 4: The Electoral Process. Some terms to start FECA – Federal Election Commission BCRA – Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act Hard money.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Campaign Finance Reform
Advertisements

The Federal Election Commission and campaign finance Regulation
Nature of Modern Campaigns Most electoral contests are similar in a number of ways. Nomination campaign aimed at winning primary. General election campaign.
Money and campaigning.
Interest Groups and the Political Process Post-Citizens United
 “Bypassing Campaign Contribution Regulation” warm up Bell ringer.
Federal Campaign Finance Law. Federal Election Commission  Established by Congress in 1974, the FEC in an independent agency in the executive branch.
What you need to know about campaign finance
Money and Politics Reference Ch 7.3.
Primary Elections Lecture 6.7. A.A primary election is an election in which voters decide which of the candidates w/in a party will represent the party.
Campaign Finance 101 What is the difference between hard money and soft money? What is FECA? What is the BCRA? Why is campaign finance so controversial?
Campaign Finance Objective: To better understand campaign finance and its influence on political campaigns November 13, 2014
Campaign Finance Federal Election Campaign Act Buckley v. Valeo
ISSUES Contributions: From what sources does money come? Where does it go? Should amounts be controlled? Expenditures: What can different “players” in.
Paying For Election Campaigns
As you read… Annotate the text. Be Prepared to Discuss: What did you find most shocking about campaign finance? How are interest groups connected to or.
Campaign Finance Reform. Federal Election Campaign Act (1974)  FEC created  Contributions disclosed to FEC  Limit on campaign contributions  Public.
Campaign Finance. Why is money necessary to political campaigns? Why is money in campaigns problematic for representative democracy? Can we restrict money.
Campaign Financing Cost of Modern Campaigns Campaign Reform Legislation Post-Watergate Reforms (FECA) Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) Sources of.
CAMPAIGN FINANCE. MONEY Politicians need money to win elections election cost over $1.1 billion!
Campaign Finance & Reform AP GoPo. Court Cases Research the following court cases and record the 5 W’s (who, what, where, etc.) and the outcome – Buckley.
Financing Campaigns. Running for office is very expensive; for example, presidential candidates spend about 1 billion dollars each in the 2012 election.
* Independent Expenditures – spending by political action committees, corporations, or labor unions to help a party or candidate but done independently.
* A committee set up by a corporation, labor union, or interest group that raises and spends campaign money from voluntary donations. * PAC must give.
Campaigns Campaign Organization Reaching Voters: Campaigns and Media Negative Campaigning Campaign Financing Euroquest Travel Grou.
American Government Campaign Finance. Money in Congressional Elections The Cost of U.S. House Seat –$1 million for incumbents (4x as much as average challenger)
 Presidential Primaries  Part private, part public money Federal matching funds for all individuals’ donations of $250 or less (incentive to raise money.
Write 2 newspaper headlines for the following events – you must use the vocab words! 1. John McCain won the Republican nomination in (primary election,
 Presidential Primaries  Part private, part public money Federal matching funds for all individuals’ donations of $250 or less (incentive to raise money.
Campaign Finance & Political Speech Political speech – inseparable from the concept of self-government –Limits: 1907 Tillman Act 1910 Federal Corrupt Practices.
Unit II Election Process.  FEC – Federal Election Commission  BCRA – Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act  Buckley vs. Valeo  Citizens United vs. FEC 
The Electoral Process Chapter 7.
Campaign Finance. Corrupt Practices Act First passed in 1925First passed in 1925 Limits primary and general election contributionsLimits primary and general.
NOMINATIONS AND CAMPAIGNS CHAPTER 8/10. THE NOMINATION GAME Nomination:  The official endorsement of a candidate for office by a political party.
WHAT DOES THIS POLITICAL CARTOON SUGGEST ABOUT
Campaign Finance How to fund a race for government office.
Money and Elections. Strategies to prevent abuse in elections Impose limits on giving, receiving, and spending political money Requiring public disclosure.
Campaigns The Message and the Money. The Media and Campaigns Campaigns attempt to gain favorable media coverage: Isolation of candidate (Biden, Palin)
 Presidential Primaries  Part private, part public money Federal matching funds for all individuals’ donations of $250 or less (incentive to raise money.
Money and Elections Objective 26H. Campaign Spending Total spending for all party efforts in the 2004 presidential election reached over $2 billion. Sums.
The Election Process Module 6.2: Campaign Finance.
Sources of Campaign Money Presidential Primaries Part private, part public money Federal matching funds for all individuals’ donations of $250 or less.
Campaign Finance The connection between money and the elections.
Money and Campaigning American Government. FEC  In 1974 Congress passed the Federal Election Campaign Act  This act was passed in response to illegal.
Campaign Financing STEPHANOW, The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is the independent regulatory agency charged with administering and enforcing.
Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning CAMPAIGNING FOR OFFICE Chapter Ten.
Campaign Finance Sources of Campaign Money Presidential Candidates –Private Donors –Federal Government Congressional Candidates (& all other) –Private.
Summary of the Rules Governing Campaign Financing The New Rules of the Game.
Campaign Financing. Major Issues How much can candidates raise How much can donors contribute How does the government influence campaign spending How.
Campaign Finance The connection between money and the elections.
Campaign Finance. $8.29 per MN resident Over 1 Billion dollars spent on 2008 presidential race 2012: $2.3 Billion by registered groups $4 Billion.
Money and Campaigning: FEC and ‘74 The Maze of Campaign Finance Reforms –Federal Election Campaign Act (1974) Why The Need? –Cost of campaigning and tv.
Interest Groups and the Political Process Post-Citizens United
Interest Groups and the Political Process Post-Citizens United
Hard Money: Federal Election Campaign Act (1971, 1974) – increased disclosure of contributions for federal campaigns and 1974 amendments placed legal.
Money in Elections and Improving the Election Process
Interest Groups and Campaign Finance
Campaign Finance 527, PAC, SuperPAC ads fec
12.2 Campaign Funding and PACs
QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER Why does money matter? What is it paying for?
Ap u.s. government & politics
Unit 2: Pol. Beliefs, Behaviors & Unit 4: Institutions
Interest Groups and the Political Process Post-Citizens United
Interest Groups and the Political Process Post-Citizens United
Money and Campaigning The Maze of Campaign Finance Reforms
Campaigns 5.8.
ISSUES Contributions: From what sources does money come? Where does it go? Should amounts be controlled? Expenditures: What can different “players”
Campaign finance.
Campaign Finance Reform
Presentation transcript:

Campaign Finance Unit 4: The Electoral Process

Some terms to start FECA – Federal Election Commission BCRA – Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act Hard money = Federal money Political donations raised from federally permissible sources within the limits established by BCRA Soft money = Nonfederal money Political donations made in such a way as to avoid federal regulations.

1971 Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) Attempt to regulate Campaign Finance in FEDERAL ELECTIONS Sidenote: The most illegal part of Watergate was Nixon’s campaign committee violating these rules Provisions Restricted the amount of money that can be spent on advertising Required disclosure of campaign contributions and expenditures Limited the amount of personal money a candidate and his/her family could spend Taxpayers allowed to designate a donation to major political party candidates on their tax forms

1974: FECA Amended After Watergate, Congress further amended the FECA FEC (Federal Election Commission) created to monitor and enforce FECA Established public (government) financing in primaries and the general election (provided the candidate follow rules) Restricted contributions from foreign donors Established limits on individual contributions Banned direct contributions by Unions and Corporations

Political Action Committees (PACs) Organizations formed by special interest groups to donate money to political campaigns for candidates they support Reaction to FECA’s ban on direct contributions from Unions and Corporations Subject to spending limits and activities

1976: Buckley v. Valeo Challenge to FECA Original ProvisionImpact of Buckley Expenditure Limits Overall Spending (Congressional and Presidential) Partially Struck Down (Freedom of Speech) Limits on Candidate’s Personal Spending Entirely Struck Down (Freedom of Speech) Limits on Overall Spending Entirely Struck Down (Freedom of Speech) Limits on Independent Spending Entirely Struck Down (Freedom of Speech)

1976: Buckley v. Valeo Original ProvisionImpact of Buckley Contribution Limits Individual Limits: $1k/candidate/electionAffirmed PAC Limits: $5k/candidate/electionAffirmed Party Committee Limits: $5k/candidate/electionAffirmed Individual Cap per election: $25k Struck Down (Freedom of Speech) Cap on spending “on behalf of the candidate” by parties Affirmed

1996: The Problem With Soft Money “Soft Money” Questions Arise Original intent of money was to be used for voter registration drives, national party conventions, and issue ads. Because the money wasn’t going to be used for campaigning, it was not limited Ultimately the money would be used to help individual candidates By 2000 soft money donations exceeded $400 million between the two major parties.

2002: Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act (BCRA) Also referred to a McCain-Fiengold Banned the use of “soft money” in federal campaigns Increased the 1974 limits on individual and group contributions to candidates

Citizens United v. FEC 2010: Citizens United v. FEC An advocacy group excepted money to make a move about Hilary Clinton. It was ruled an “attack funded by an outside group” and the FEC ruled it could not be shown 90 days prior to elections. Courts ruled that corporations have speech rights too. Result: lifted the prohibition on corporations, unions, trade/membership associations, and other entities from engaging in independent expenditures and electioneering communications, and from doing so with unlimited dollars

Impact of Citizens United SuperPACs: A Political Action Committee that is an “independent- expenditure only” PAC. Meaning they do not donate money directly to candidates and campaigns. Because of Citizens United, these SuperPACs now have no limits on amount they can raise and spend, although they are required to disclose their donor list 527s: Refers to a IRS code number. Issue advocacy groups that, by law, does NOT have to reveal their donor list. Before however they could not “endorse” a candidate. After Citizens United that restriction was thrown out. 527s can donate to SuperPACs but the individuals who donated to the 527 do not have to be named (only the 527’s name is disclosed)