On Detecting Strange Quark Matter with GLAST-LAT 1 Department of Physics, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden Contact:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mass, Quark-number, Energy Dependence of v 2 and v 4 in Relativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions Yan Lu University of Science and Technology of China Many.
Advertisements

Excited Charm and K0sK0s Resonance Production at ZEUS V. Aushev For the ZEUS Collaboration XXXIX International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics ''Gold.
Physics Results of the NA49 exp. on Nucleus – Nucleus Collisions at SPS Energies P. Christakoglou, A. Petridis, M. Vassiliou Athens University HEP2006,
Properties and Decays of Heavy Flavor S-Wave Hadrons Rohit Dhir Department of Physics, Yonsei University, Seoul Dated:11 th June, 2012.
"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds." Robert Oppenheimer after the first test of the atomic bomb.
Particle interactions and detectors
Tau dilepton channel The data sample used in this analysis comprises high-p T inclusive lepton events that contain an electron with E T >20 GeV or a muon.
Spontaneous Parity Violation in Strong Interactions Dhevan Gangadharan (UCLA) On behalf of the STAR Collaboration WWND
Search for Strange Quark Matter and Q-Balls with the SLIM Experiment. Zouleikha Sahnoun Astrophys. Dept. CRAAG, Algiers & INFN Bologna, Italy.
Cosmology The Origin and Future of the Universe Part 2 From the Big Bang to Today.
Search for spontaneous muon emission from lead nuclei with OPERA bricks M. Giorgini, V. Popa Bologna Group OPERA Collaboration Meeting, LNGS, 19-22/05/2003.
March 13thXXXXth RENCONTRES DE MORIOND 1 The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station Carmen Palomares CIEMAT (Madrid) On behalf.
24/04/2007ALICE – Masterclass Presentation1 ALICE Hannah Scott University of Birmingham.
Henrik Tydesjö May O UTLINE - The Quark Gluon Plasma - The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) The PHENIX Experiment - QGP Signals Event-by-Event.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Henrik Tydesjö March O UTLINE - The Quark Gluon Plasma - The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) - The PHENIX Experiment - Event-by-Event Net-Charge.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Charged Particles. Nuclear Physics Charged particles can come from nuclear decay. Nuclear physics figures into particle detection. Use terminology from.
January 12, 2007J. Sandweiss Two Important Long Range Programs for RHIC In addition to the many important RHIC research programs that are currently underway.
University of Birmingham Master class,23rd April 2008 Ravjeet Kour Journey into the heart of matter Introducing Particle Physics.
Identification of Upsilon Particles Using the Preshower Detector in STAR Jay Dunkelberger, University of Florida.
TIME-LIKE BARYON FORM FACTORS: EXPERIMENTAL SITUATION AND POSSIBILITIES FOR PEP-N Roberto Calabrese Dipartimento di Fisica and I.N.F.N. Ferrara, Italy.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
Intro to Particle and Nuclear Physics and the Long Island Gold Rush Steven Manly Univ. of Rochester REU seminar June 1, 2006
The Physics Potential of the PHENIX VTX and FVTX Detectors Eric J. Mannel WWND 13-Apr-2012.
Modern Physics Introduction To examine the fundamental nuclear model To examine nuclear classification To examine nuclear fission and fusion.
Particle Physics Intro. What’s Stuff Made Of…Really? All particles can be grouped into two categories: Fermions and Bosons Things to know about Fermions:
30 Ge & Si Crystals Arranged in verticals stacks of 6 called “towers” Shielding composed of lead, poly, and a muon veto not described. 7.6 cm diameter.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
Christina Markert Physics Workshop UT Austin November Christina Markert The ‘Little Bang in the Laboratory’ – Accelorator Physics. Big Bang Quarks.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Sayfa 1 EP228 Particle Physics Department of Engineering Physics University of Gaziantep Dec 2014 Topic 5 Cosmic Connection Course web page
Discovery of the Higgs Boson Gavin Lawes Department of Physics and Astronomy.
The Higgs Boson: without the maths and jargon David Hall Graduate Seminar Series St Catherine’s College MCR 11 th May 2011.
Point 1 activities and perspectives Marzio Nessi ATLAS plenary 2 nd October 2004 Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
Identified Particle Ratios at large p T in Au+Au collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV Matthew A. C. Lamont for the STAR Collaboration - Talk Outline - Physics.
Search for Strangelets in Lunar Soil Ke Han / May 26, Alexei Chikanian, Evan Finch, Ke Han, Richard Majka, Jack.
March 13thXXXXth RENCONTRES DE MORIOND 1 The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station Carmen Palomares CIEMAT (Madrid) On behalf.
D 0 Measurement in Cu+Cu Collisions at √s=200GeV at STAR using the Silicon Inner Tracker (SVT+SSD) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University For the STAR Collaboration.
Jeopardy Jeopardy PHY101 Chapter 12 Review Study of Special Relativity Cheryl Dellai.
Modern Physics. Answer Me!!! How much energy does a photon have if the light beam has a wavelength of 720 nm?
Introduction to CERN David Barney, CERN Introduction to CERN Activities Intro to particle physics Accelerators – the LHC Detectors - CMS.
COSMIC RAY PHYSICS WITH AMS Joseph Burger MIT On behalf of the AMS-02 collaboration EPS2003 Aachen Particle Astrophysics July 17, 2003
Direct Detection of Supersymmetric Particles in Neutrino Telescopes Z. Chacko University of Arizona I. Albuquerque & G. Burdman.
Measurement of J/  -> e + e - and  C -> J/  +   in dAu collisions at PHENIX/RHIC A. Lebedev, ISU 1 Fall 2003 DNP Meeting Alexandre Lebedev, Iowa State.
Introduction to CERN Activities
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #15.
Total photoabsorption on quasi free nucleons at 600 – 1500 MeV N.Rudnev, A.Ignatov, A.Lapik, A.Mushkarenkov, V.Nedorezov, A.Turinge for the GRAAL collaboratiion.
Yukawa and scalar interactions induced by scalar relevant for neutrino masss generation are: Since is assumed to be an exact symmetry of the model has.
Nucleon Decay Search in the Detector on the Earth’s Surface. Background Estimation. J.Stepaniak Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw, Poland FLARE Workshop.
CEBAF - Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility.
N. Poljak, FPD++ N. Poljak, U. of Zagreb.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #9.
1 The Standard Model of Particle Physics Owen Long U. C. Riverside March 1, 2014.
Methodology to Search for Massive Particle in Cosmic Rays Takeshi SAITO Institute for Advanced Studies, Shinjyuku , Shinjyuku, Tokyo, Japan.
Simultaneous photo-production measurement of the  and  mesons on the nucleons at the range 680 – 1500 MeV N.Rudnev, V.Nedorezov, A.Turinge for the GRAAL.
In Bayesian theory, a test statistics can be defined by taking the ratio of the Bayes factors for the two hypotheses: The ratio measures the probability.
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
1 Recent Results on J/  Decays Shuangshi FANG Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS International Conference on QCD and.
M. Cobal, PIF 2006/7 Quarks. Quarks are s = ½ fermions, subject to all kind of interactions. They have fractional electric charges Quarks and their bound.
07/05/20041 Pentaquark search at HERA-B A. Sbrizzi - NIKHEF Motivation Pentaquark:  + (1540)  pK 0 Conclusion.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
A Precision Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark Abazov, V. M. et al. (D0 Collaboration). Nature 429, (2004) Presented by: Helen Coyle.
Introduction to Particle Physics II Sinéad Farrington 19 th February 2015.
Anisotropic flow of charged and strange particles in PbAu collisions at 158 AGeV measured in CERES experiment J. Milošević 1),2) 1)University of Belgrade.
Review of ALICE Experiments
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope
History of Particle Nuclear Physics!
Performance of the STAR Heavy Flavor Tracker in measuring the charged B meson through B  J/Ψ + X decay Elizabeth Brost Department of Physics, Grinnell.
Presentation transcript:

On Detecting Strange Quark Matter with GLAST-LAT 1 Department of Physics, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden Contact: Experimental Signatures The prime signature for a strangelet is its very low charge to mass ratio (Z/A), for example in the colour flavour locking scheme [3]: (1) Meaning for a given velocity a strangelet has larger rigidity than normal nuclei (R = p/z). Measurements of the charge to mass ratio are possible with satellite-borne experiments such as PAMELA [4] or the future ISS experiment AMS [5]. Another possibility is searching for massive nuclei in lunar or earth soils with high precisions mass spectrometers (see reference in [2]). In GLAST, we propose to indirectly search for strangelets by their characteristic interaction products (see below). Stable Strange Quark Matter Strange Quark Matter (SQM) is a proposed state of nuclear matter made of roughly 1/3 of up, down and strange quarks which are bound in a hadronic bag of baryonic mass as small as A=2 and as large as stars (see for example [1]) This type of matter can be stable or meta-stable in a wide range of strong interaction parameters and could form the true ground state of nuclear matter. The question of stability, however, can not be answered from first principles in QCD, thus must be settled experimentally by detecting SQM, small chunks of which are called strangelets. Detecting stable SQM would have important implications by not only shedding new light on the understanding of strong interactions, but also for practical applications such as high Z material and clean energy sources [2]. In addition SQM, produced primordially in the Big Bang, might provide part of the Dark Matter. Why does stable SQM not contradict common sense ? Experimental evidence shows that nuclear matter consists of protons and neutrons and not some bag of up, down and strange quarks. So, how can SQM be the true ground state of nuclear matter ? In order for SQM to be stable, a significant fraction of strange quarks needs to be present. Considering an iron nucleus (A=56) would require a simulataneous change of many u and d quarks into s-quarks via the weak interaction, a process with very low probability. Signature in GLAST The signature which we propose for the detection of strange quark matter in GLAST is the decay of the Λ 0 (uds) particle into protons and pions: Here X is the target material (in this case we consider the converter and silicon of the tracker) and n is the number of Λ 0 produced. It is difficult to make general statements about how many Λ 0 will be produced. Under the approximation that a SQM of mass A has the quark content A(uds) and that the colour flavour locking condition holds we can make following prediction (for Z > 0): Right: Best case estimate of the LAT sensitivity to SQM for one year exposure (blue solid and dotted lines) Here we optimistically assume that we have 100 % efficiency for tagging Λ 0 produced by SQM particles in the tracker and that our result will be no events seen with no remaining background. This result depends on the cross-section, which we assume to be of the order of the strong interaction and from simple geometrical considerations: Also included in this figure is the expected sensitivity of the AMS experiments (which might be flying on the International Space Station (ISS-AMS) [5], the expected limit from a search for SQM in lunar soil [5] and already obtained limits from Earth samples using high precision mass spectroscopy [8]. We also show one candidate for a Z=2 strangelet detected by AMS-01 [9] GLAST sensitivity uud u u u u u u u u u d d d d d d d d d s s s s s s s s s 12 C: Z/A = 0.5 Strangelet: Z/A = Courtesy: WMAP Primordial Strange Quark Matter In the first order phase transition from the Quark Gluon Plasma, stranglets migt have formed which than could contribute to the Dark Matter. The flux of these strangelets can be estimated to [7]: (2) Where ρ = ρ g cm -3 and v = v km s -1. ρ 24 = 1 corresponds to approximately the dark matter density. Strange Star Collisions If indeed SQM is stable, than it is very likely that what commonly is called neutron stars are in fact very large strangelets, called strange stars. In binary systems, these stars would undergo collision and thereby eject strangelets. It might be assumed that those strangelets accelerate and propagate similar to normal cosmic rays and together with the estimated rate of coalescence of neutron stars a flux can be estimated to, assuming colour flavour locking [8]: (2) uud udd uud Introduction Potential Sources of stable SQM Backgrounds Courtesy David Bock, NCSA Photons and leptons Contrary to e + e - pairs, the pπ - will give hadronic signal in the calorimeter. There are many possible ways of separating hadronic from electromagnetic signal. For illustration, we show the correlation between the energy deposited in the last layer of the calorimeter and the energy deposited in whole calorimeter as one possible discrminant (uppermost plot on the right) Also the tracker gives handles to separate the Λ 0. The opening angle of the Λ 0 decay vertex can be calculated from kinematics and is on average signficantly larger than the opening angle from an e + e - -vertex. The middlle plot on the right shows the opening-angle distribution for the complete DC2 set of detected photons (55 days) together with the expected number of SQM events. Following [8] for this figure we assumed a flux as given in equation (3) which depends on energy as E The energy distribution of the Λ 0 is taken to be exponentially decreasing. Furthermore, we postulated that all Λ 0 are tagged and the resolution of the opening angle determination is 30 %. Hadrons For hadrons the expected background will be depending on the charge Z. Strangelets with Z=0 might produce a hadronic signal in the calorimeter with the only possible background being neutrons or inefficiency of the Anti- Coincidence Detector (which is on the level of ). The presence of neutral SQM seems quite unlikely, though stable solutions exist. Stranglets with Z=1. Keeping strangelets with Z=1 means that the ACD can not be used for rejection of protons. Assuming colour flavour locking those strangelets typically would produce 3 vertices from lambda decay which will be an efficient way to distinguish them from protons. For strangelets with Z >=2 there are several potential handles to be employed for discrimination. Protons can be rejected using the ACD signal which would reduce the background to a large extent by only keeping heavier nuclei. Additional rejection can be gained by considering the vertex. SQM with Z>=2 would produce several vertices from Λ 0 decay, whereas protons would typically produce only 1 -2 vertices. Conclusions The detection of stable strange quark matter would be a major achievement with implications for the knowledge of the strong interaction as well as potential practical applications. The GLAST-LAT has the potential to detect SQM or to set competitive limits. The prime signal would be events with large track multiplicity and many vertices. The major challenge for the search of SQM is the rejection of background mainly photons and protons. However, the present tracker vertexing is not designed to find multiple vertices. A simpler discrimination can be done using the number of tracks detected in the tracker. The lowermost plot on the right shows the number of tracks found in the tracker for protons (yellow shaded area) and the excess caused by SQM (no shading). In this plot we assumed a ratio of protons/SQM of 10 5 and an efficiency of ACD rejection of Z=1 tracks of Furthermore we assume colour flavour locking and a flux of SQM which is proportional to Z -0.6 [8]. Under this assumptions GLAST could detect a clear signal of events with >10 tracks. References: [1] E. Witten, Phys. Rev. D (1984) [2] E. Finch, J. Phys.G32:S251-S258 (2006) [3] J. Madsen, Phys. Rev. Lett (2001) [4] P. Picozza et. al. astro-ph/ , accepted for publication by Astropar. Phys. [5] F. Barao et. al. Nucl. Instr. Methods A (2004) [ 6] J. Madsen, Proceedings of EPNT 2006, Uppsala, Sept [7] J. Madsen, Phys. Rev. D. 71: (2005) [8] ´T. K. Hemmick, Phys. Rev. D (1990) [9] V. Choutko, 28th ICRC 1765 (2003) Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Jes Madsen for useful discussions. Existing experimental limits Arbitrary units P. Carlson 1 and J. Conrad 1 representing the GLAST-LAT collaboration Dark Matter and New Physics WG