How to target your review Genevieve Damico U.S. EPA (312) 353-4761

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006.
Advertisements

METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June 2006.
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
Compliance Dates The final rule was published on January 25, 1995,
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) CAIR Requirements for SIPs Office of Air and Radiation March 2005.
1 The Credible Evidence Rule and Compliance Certifications Peter Westlin OAQPS, EMAD.
Harmonization of Part 60 and Part 75 CEM Requirements Robert Vollaro
© Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP CAA Title V Regulatory Requirements Malcolm C. Weiss, Esq. (310) Jeffer, Mangels, Butler.
APAI Environmental Workshop FESOP Recordkeeping/Plans James (Jim) Heim, C.T.C., E.P. Bruce Carter Associates, L.L.C February 9, 2012.
Compliance Overview Motor Vehicle Diesel Fuel Rule.
ADEC Air Permits Title V Permit Renewal Project Workshop Jim Baumgartner Title V Section Manager.
Public Review vs “affected state” Review: advantages of TAS for section 505 Reviewing NSR and Title V Permits Natalene Cummings Forest County Potawatomi.
2015 NCMA EPA Enforcement Policies and How They Affect Your Facility Michael Pjetraj, P.E. DAQ Stationary Source Compliance Branch Supervisor.
NCMA Workshop March 19 and 24, 2015 Betty Gatano, P.E. Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919)
New Source Review in the SCAQMD November 2, 2005 Judy B. Yorke Yorke Engineering, LLC x25
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Nonattainment Area New Source Review Updates Rule Development Workshop Chapters and October.
1 Lead Emissions from Piston-Engine Powered Aircraft: EPA Activities & Next Steps For National Tribal Forum on Air Quality Meredith Pedde May 21, 2015.
Managing Air Quality Data 101 Presented by: Chris Bellusci & Claire Lund, PE (Sanborn Head) International Conference for Environmental.
Approaches for forest certification System versus performance ? Presentation prepared by Pierre Hauselmann for the WWF / WB Alliance Capacity building.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
1 Improving Environmental Protection and Reducing Administrative Burden North Carolina Division of Air Quality Improving Environmental Protection and Reducing.
Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world GHG Mandatory Reporting Rule – Implications for PSD Review for GHG September 2012 Ramesh Narasimhan.
Environmental Quality Service Council Mint Distilling Operations August 30, 2011 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of.
Where to find Information About Facilities. Overview of Title V Permits.
Indiana New Source Review Reform Plantwide Applicability Limitations (PALs) IDEM/Office of Air Quality September 7, 2004.
10/1/ Air Quality Permitting Air Quality Committee William D. Willets, P.E. Engineering Supervisor DAQ Permitting Section May 7, 2014.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of the Rules and Applications Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
Guidance on Establishing Monitoring to Comply with CAM and Other Title V Requirements A Summary of Technical and Policy Materials Barrett Parker, EPA,
ALTERNATIVES TO BART -TRADING- Lily Wong USEPA – Region 9 September 1, 2005.
Title V Operating Permit Program 1 Section 1: Intro to Title V Laura McKelvey U.S. EPA.
Title V: The Big Picture
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
Environmental Justice & Air Permitting Training - August 15, 2012 EPA Region IV – Atlanta, Georgia.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of Rules and Permitting Issues Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
Developing an In-House Air Quality Audit Program March 22, 2006 Judy B. Yorke Yorke Engineering, LLC x25
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Other Aspects of PSD Title V Permitting.
RECLAIM Seminar October 26, 2005 Judy B. Yorke, P.E., C.P.P. Yorke Engineering, LLC x25
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
June 13, 2013 Joy Wiecks Fond du Lac Reservation 1.
Region 9 Title V Permit Review Guidelines Ray Vogel EPA/OAQPS.
1 Non-Attainment NSR Program Donald Law EPA Region 8.
Minor NSR Program and Highlights of the Proposed Tribal Major Nonattainment and Minor NSR Rules Jessica Montañez U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office.
Title V, Preliminary Completeness Review. What do I need to do?  I need to find out if the application contains the required information.  Initial Title.
Best Available Control Technology/Lowest Achievable Emission Rate Evaluation Sarah Fuchs Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
1 NSR Rule Review and Guidance 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121. General Provisions Chapter 127 Subchapter E. New Source Review The Allegheny Mountain Section.
Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) November 24, 2009.
Update on Methane Regulations Affecting Landfills Pat Sullivan Senior Vice President SCS Engineers Nov. 10, 2015.
2005 NSR Regulation Changes Dwight Wylie. Old Units vs. New Units  There is a broad disparity between air pollution control requirements and emissions.
Alternatives to BART Rule Discussion with WRAP Nov , 2006.
Tribal Permitting Conference 2013 Steve Dunn, P.E., Construction Permit Team Leader; Bureau of Air Management (608) ;
Checking and Corrective Action EPA Regions 9 & 10 and The Federal Network for Sustainability 2005.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
1 Draft Landfill Methane Control Measure California Air Resources Board April 22, 2008.
Kevin McLeod & Chris Horton OCE, Region 12 Houston 1.
Climate: ANPR, SIPs and Section 821 WESTAR October 2, 2008.
1 New Sources in Nonattainment Areas: Citizens Against Refinery’s Effects Action to review EPA approval of Virginia SIP SIP included: Permit for refinery.
Final Rulemaking: 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 139 Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions Environmental Quality Board Meeting.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
Preparing for Permit Review
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Practically Enforceable Permit Conditions
Environmental Management Systems The ISO Approach Initial Environmental Review & Gap Analysis Presented by: NC Division of Pollution Prevention.
AIR PERMITTING GUIDANCE
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
How To Target Your Review
Air Quality Committee May 13, 2015
Presentation transcript:

How to target your review Genevieve Damico U.S. EPA (312)

What should I review in a permit? Programmatic issues Monitoring Reporting Inclusion of regulatory standards Emission units

Background Title V requires monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting (MRR) to assure compliance. Practically enforceable permit limitations include MRR that reasonably demonstrate compliance. Note: The ability for Title V to require additional monitoring is the subject of some debate

Evaluation MRR and testing work together. It is important to evaluate these aspects of the permit holistically. The frequency of the MRR should be appropriate to measure compliance with the emission limitations and operational restrictions.

Evaluation Chart Operational Restriction or Emission Limitation MonitoringRecordkeepingReportingTesting

Some things to consider Are emission factors appropriate? Is the emissions test performed “periodically”? Is the data collected reliable?

Questions to Ask Would the permittee, the permitting authority, and I have sufficient information to measure compliance? Is the frequency of the MRR sufficient to determine compliance? Do I have access to the results of the MRR and testing? Does the permit contain all the required MRR and testing requirements from the Federal rules and the SIP?

Best bang for the buck Units subject to pre – 1990 rules Units subject to a SIP requirement for which there is no reasonable compliance assurance method specified Units subject to old NSR permits Voluntary terms created in the Title V permit

What you need to make comments List the areas you feel are not sufficient to measure compliance and suggestions for practically enforceable MRR and testing. List the MRR and testing that you feel are applicable from Federal rules and the SIP and the corresponding rule citation.

Evaluation Chart Operational Restriction or Emission Limitation MonitoringRecordkeepingReportingTesting 30 widgets/ day 3.5 lbs VOC/gal of coating Keep MSDSManufact urer will test 4,000 tpy NO x rolled monthly Monitor SCR temperatu re Amount of fuel burned Report deviations No greater than 30% opacity Do method 9 monthly

Why is it important to develop an enforceable Title V permit? If an applicable requirement was missing from the Title V permit, the facility may argue that they are not liable for any potential violations If a condition is written unclearly and ambiguously, the facility may argue that they followed the condition based upon their interpretation

Why is it important to develop an enforceable Title V permit? The source may not have sufficient monitoring, recordkeeping, or reporting to determine if it is in compliance There may be conditions in the permit that prevent enforcement by the EPA and state agencies

Items to look for to ensure practical enforceability Applicable requirements must be properly translated into the permit Wording changes must not affect the meaning of the requirement Conditions should be enforceable as a practical matter Proper averaging times and recordkeeping frequencies are to be specified Permit shields should be properly applied

Applicable requirements must be properly translated into the permit Does the permit contain… An emission limit or work practice standard for each emission point subject to a standard? Monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting “General Provision” requirements All pre-construction permit requirements

Enforceable as a practical matter If an inspector were to visit a facility, would s/he be able to easily determine if the facility is in compliance

Proper averaging times and recordkeeping frequencies are specified Make sure an averaging time is specified (ex: 15 ppm over a 24-hr period) Frequency of recordkeeping corresponds to the averaging time

Permit shields should be properly applied Title V permit should explicitly state that a condition is not applicable to the facility Comment on permit shields you believe were given in error

Additional things to look for when reviewing an emission limit The emission units subject to the limit are specifically identified The limit is clearly written The reference diluent concentration is included (ex: 15% O2) The source is required to comply with the limit at all times unless exceptions are specifically allowed for by the applicable requirement The reference test method is identified

Which of the following is not practically enforceable? The permittee must regularly change the filters in the baghouse Boiler #1 can emit not more than 39 tons per year of NO x The emission test shall be conducted while the emissions unit is operating at or near maximum capacity