Demand Response Programs: An Emerging Resource for Competitive Electricity Markets Charles Goldman (510) 486-4637 E. O. Lawrence Berkeley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
Advertisements

2013 Statewide BIP Load Impact Evaluation Candice Churchwell DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 7, 2014.
Demand Response in Connecticut Presented by: Bob Laurita ISO New England December 2, 2004.
Duke Energy Ohio Standby Rates Jim Ziolkowski, P.E., Rates Manager September 13,
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
The California Energy Crisis Continuing Update Lon W. House, Ph.D ACWA Energy Advisor.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
ERCOT Emergency Load Response Sam Jones Paul Wattles Steve Krein PUC Demand Response Workshop Sept. 15, 2006.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
PG&E’s General Market Virtual Net Metering Schedule NEMV
Herbert E. Hirschfeld, P.E. and Joseph S. Lopes Applied Energy Group, Inc. Metering America 2005 April 13, 2005 Submetering Case Studies with Load Management.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
Overview of Residential Pricing/Advanced Metering Pilots Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SMPPI Board Meeting August 3, 2005.
California’s Electricity Crisis: What Happened and Why? Joe Eto and Chris Marnay Electricity Markets and Policy Group EETD’s.
Floyd Trefny Director of Product Development Future of Demand Response In ERCOT A Presentation to the Workshop – September 15, 2006 Project Number
Battling Load Growth in NYC Chris Smith NYSERDA NARUC 2007 Summer Meeting.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
Pricing Enabled by AMI What Types? What are the Benefits? Dr. Steven D. Braithwait Christensen Associates Energy Consulting EUCI Webinar September 12,
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Restructuring BUSINESS PROCESSES IN MAINE. Business Transactions Contracts Metering Usage History Enrollments & Drops Billing, Collections & Payments.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
ERS Update for DSWG June 1, Agenda June – September 2012 Procurement XML Project Update Clearing Price discussion NPRR 451 Q & A.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
Page 1 Schedule Experimental Energy Reduction (EER) updated 2005 Note: This program is available to qualified participants within the EntergyArkansas,
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
Demand Response Products. Discussion Points 1.Setting the scene….. 2.Virtual Power Station 3.Reserves deployment order 4.Demand Response Products.
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Existing Demand Response Programs Kurt Castleberry Director, Operating Committee Support May 24, 2007.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.
Charles Goldman E. O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Michael Kintner-Meyer Pacific Northwest National Laboratory DOE Office of.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Energy Analysis Department Cost-Effectiveness Valuation Framework for Demand Response Resources: Guidelines and Suggestions Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley.
Summer 2004 and Beyond Lon W. House, Ph.D ACWA/Edison Joint Presentation June 24, 2004.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Time of Use Base Interruptible Program (TOU-BIP) Aggregation June 2007.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
ISO Outlook Summer 2005 and Beyond Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee February 22, 2005 Jim Detmers Vice President of Grid Operations.
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
Leading the Way in Electricity TM Tariff Programs & Services Customer Services Business Unit Overview of Demand Response At Southern California Edison.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Reliability Demand Response Product February 25, 2011
1March 24, 2000California PX Demand Responsiveness Workshop Christensen Associates Lessons from California The Role of Demand Response Energy Markets in.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
© 2004 San Diego Gas and Electric. All copyright and trademark rights reserved Demand Response Programs Backup Material.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
Demand Response as a Distributed Energy Resource presented by: Mark S. Martinez Manager, Program Development PLMA Fall Conference September 2004.
Proxy $G and other Loads in SCED 2 Litmus Tests Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Dec. 2, 2014.
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop March 3, Update on the CPUC’s Demand Response and Advanced Metering Proceedings Bruce Kaneshiro Energy Division.
San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.
Demand Response 2010 and Beyond April 28, 2011 Pete Pengilly.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
Matinee Pricing Opt-in Pilot Rate Proposal (R ) Commission Workshop February 24, 2016 Manager, Pricing Design.
1 City of Palo Alto Utilities Large Commercial Customer Pilot Demand Response Program Customer Meeting March 8, 2012.
California Independent System Operator 1 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July,
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
California Product Offerings
Overview of the NYISO Demand Response Programs
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
New England Electricity Restructuring Roundtable
DECISION
NYS Department of Public Service
Presentation transcript:

Demand Response Programs: An Emerging Resource for Competitive Electricity Markets Charles Goldman (510) E. O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory WGA CREPC Workshop Scottsdale, AZ April 18, 2001

Energy Analysis DepartmentOverview Why the Renewed Interest in Demand Management Typology of Demand Response Programs Key Program Design Features and Pricing

Energy Analysis Department Why the Renewed Interest in Load Management?  Network congestion and generation shortfalls  Price volatility in bulk power markets  Continuing electric emergencies in California  FERC rulings encouraging more use of price- responsive demand management  Improved capabilities & economics of control & communications technology  Emergence of energy-internet entrepreneurs

Energy Analysis Department Demand Response Program Types Traditional C/I Interruptible Tariffs -Up-front payment; typically bill or rate discounts for curtailments to Firm Service Level Direct Load Control -Utility control of customer loads (e.g., cycle or shed a/c, water heating, pool pump) VDRP - Call option -Customers selects Strike Price. LSE can exercise the Call Option and require customer to reduce load or face penalties when projected Mkt. Price > Strike Price VDRP - Quote option -Customers specify when and at what price they are willing to voluntarily curtail demand (“pay-per-interruption event”) Dynamic Pricing (e.g., real-time pricing)

Energy Analysis Department Key Program Characteristics & Design Features Target Market -“Mass market” vs. Large C/I Operational threshold -Emergency (system condition) vs. Economic programs Dispatchability -Utility vs. customer-controlled loads Resource Firmness -Call Option (participation is pre-paid) vs. Quote program (participation is fully voluntary)

Energy Analysis Department Key Program Characteristics & Design Features (cont.) Payment scheme -specified, fixed price vs. variable price, based on market conditions -upfront, reservation payments; energy credits -adjustments for performance Exposure to & assignment of forecast risk -day-ahead vs. day-of vs. real-time demand & prices Role of aggregators and/or third parties

Energy Analysis Department Demand Response Program: Some Examples

Energy Analysis Department Demand Response Program: Some Examples

Energy Analysis Department Financial Incentives: CA Interruptible vs. Demand Response Programs

Energy Analysis Department California Demand Response Programs: Background CPUC D orders: -Changes to Current Interruptible Program -New Base Interruptible Program (BIP) -Voluntary Demand Response Program (VDRP) -Optional Binding Mandatory Curtailment (OBMC) Program -Direct Load Control Programs (Res. A/C Cycling, Irrigation pumping)

Energy Analysis Department California’s Current Non-Firm “Interruptible” Rate Program 15% Rate discounts for ~1500 large customers ($220M/year) to curtail up to hrs/year on occasions Available curtailable load at peak during 2000: PG&E (500 MW), SCE (1800 MW), and SDG&E (40 MW) Actual curtailable load during 2000: PG&E (490 MW), SCE (1213 MW) Fairly dependable “Reliability” resource until But rarely utilized -~600 MW at SCE failed to interrupt when requested and incurred substantial penalties ($92M) -25%, or 124 MW, of PG&E’s load dropped out in 2000 CA would have had “rolling blackouts” on at least 5 occasions in 2000 in absence of Non-Firm program -Program demand reductions up to 2190 MW (8/2/2000)

Energy Analysis Department CPUC Changes to Current Interruptible, “Non-Firm” Tariff Current Program: 15% rate discount to customers willing to interrupt service for hrs/yr. with30 minutes notice; substantial penalties for failure to comply ($ /kWh) SCE Customers may elect to opt-out or change firm service level during 15 day notice window, with effective date of 11/1/00 or next billing cycle If SCE customers opt out, can’t participate in any other program that pays a Capacity payment (e.g., BIP, CA ISO DRP) Extend existing programs through 12/31/02 Program use limited to one 6 hour event/day; 4 events per calendar week and 40 hrs/month Current program open only to Existing Customers & lift suspension of penalty provisions

Energy Analysis Department New Base Interruptible Program (BIP) Designed primarily as replacement for current PG&E program which is fully exhausted Open year-round Key program elements -one 4-hour event/day -10 events per month and 120 hours/yr. -Incentive: $7 per kW-month credit on bill -$6/kWh penalty for usage above Firm Service Level -15% of load, with minimum drop of 100kW per event -No “double dipping” - Customer must complete obligations to current Utility Interruptible program or CA ISO DRP before eligible

Energy Analysis Department Voluntary Demand Response Program Utility solicits bids from customers when ISO notifies utility of need for demand relief Customer offers kW reduction for specified hours; Utility either accepts or rejects bids Customer paid for performance at $350/MWh with no penalties Baseline = average hourly usage during 10 immediate, similar days New Participants receive interval meter & communication equipment without CHARGE (if stay in program for 1 yr. and respond to 10 events) Customer minimum peak demand & reduction of 100 kW -Customer with 300 kW demand must drop 33% to participate -Customer with 100 kW demand must drop 100%

Energy Analysis Department Optional Binding Mandatory Curtailment (OBMC) Program Exempts participating customers from Stage 3 rotating outages if customer can reduce Circuit load by 15% during System Firm Load Reductions (I.e., concurrent with rotating outages) Load reductions requested in 5% increments Utility will facilitate circuit aggregation Program participants pay equipment costs and receive No payment Penalty for failure to reduce load = $6/kWh for excess energy Baseline -5% increments measured against average hourly demand during previous 10 similar business or weekend days -15% total peak reduction measured against prior year’s usage for the same month

Energy Analysis Department CAISO Demand Response Programs Demand Relief Program -Emergency curtailment program, prior to Stage 3 during Summer Months from 11 AM to 7 PM -First Request for Bids (~596 MW awarded; contracts signed) -Second Request for Bids for Loads without Back-up Generation (due 5/1/01; ISO wants 6/1 or 7/1start) -Third Request for Bids for Loads WITH Back up Generation (issued 4/3/01; WITHDRAWN 4/5/01) Discretionary Load Curtailment Program -RFP issued 4/11/01; ISO prefers responses by 4/23/01 Participating Load Program -Loads can bid in Ancillary Services markets

Energy Analysis Department CA ISO: Operation of Demand Response Programs Normal Operation Operating Reserves above 7% Stage 1 Emergency Operating Reserves forecast below 7% Stage 2 Emergency Operating Reserves forecast below 5% Stage 3 Emergency Operating Reserves actually below 1.5% Public alert Voluntary conservation Curtail UDC interruptible Loads Curtail DRP Load Blocks Curtail DRP Load with BUG Begin firm Load shedding Disc. Load Curtailment Program Utility VDRP ?? BUG = Back-up Generator

Energy Analysis Department CA ISO Demand Relief Program Emergency curtailment program prior to Stage 3 for 4 summer months (June - Sept 2001) Minimum bid = 1 MW; need hourly interval meter Mandatory curtailment limited to 24 hrs/month between 11 AM- 7 PM (4 hour blocks); must respond within 35 minutes Reservation payment = $20,000 per MW-month Energy performance payment = $500/MWh ISO can also issue Additional Optional Curtailment request or Contracted Load can offer “Voluntary” Curtailment under certain conditions

Energy Analysis Department CA ISO Discretionary Load Curtailment Program Provides additional resource to Grid for management of potential system emergency conditions Availability: 4/23/01- 3/31/02 between 7 AM - 8 PM Curtailed Energy payment = $350/MWh Minimum demand reduction: 1 MW Metering & Performance Measurement -Hourly interval meter or appropriate measuring devices as required by CAISO-approved Perf. Meas. Plan -Load Aggregator proposes Baseline Load profile Use of generation - <1MW behind each interval meter with approval from AQMD; not intended for Back-up generators