Safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin – fluoropyrimidine regimens with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC):

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

The Very Best, Most Perfect Possible Way to Treat Advanced Colorectal Cancer in 2005: Agent Choice and Ideal Sequencing Charles D. Blanke, M.D. OHSU Cancer.
1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
Have the OPTIMOX-2, CAIRO-3, COIN, DREAM and other recent trials settled the question of maintenance versus observation in advanced CRC? Yes Deborah Schrag,
Herceptin® (trastuzumab) in combination with chemotherapy: pivotal metastatic breast cancer survival data 1.
A Meta Analysis of Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Treated with Anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
AVADO PFS Analysis (ITT Population) All P values vs. placebo Adapted from Miles et al. ASCO 2008, abstract LBA 1011.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Avastin ® : setting the standard in treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) Fairooz Kabbinavar David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles,
Vascular issues associated with bevacizumab Stuart M. Lichtman, MD, FACP 65+ Clinical Geriatric Program Associate Attending Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
ESMO/ECCO Presidential Session III
Phase III studies of Xeloda® in colorectal cancer (CRC)
Is surgical resection of an asymptomatic primary colorectal tumor beneficial for patients with incurable Stage IV disease? A Phase II Trial of 5-Fluorouracil,
Intermittent oxaliplatin administration improves time-to-treatment failure in metastatic colorectal cancer: Final results of the phase III CONcePT trial.
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
Bevacizumab (Bev) in combination with XELOX or FOLFOX-4: updated efficacy results from XELOX-1 / NO16966, a randomized phase III trial in first-line metastatic.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Eastern cooperative oncology group Impact of Bevacizumab Dose Reduction on Clinical Outcomes for Patients Treated on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group’s.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Herceptin ® : leading the way in metastatic breast cancer care Steffen Kahlert.
Poster #382 XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line XELOX vs. FOLFOX-4 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): Updated.
Targeting VEGF for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Herbert Hurwitz Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
Phase I/II Trial of Docetaxel plus Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (D-FOX) in Patients with Untreated, Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Cancer Jaffer.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
MAX: International multi-centre randomised phase II/III study of capecitabine (Cap), bevacizumab (Bev) and mitomycin C (MMC) as first-line treatment for.
Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Best of ASCO Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Ali Shamseddine, MD Professor of Medicine Head of Hematology/Oncology.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
XELOX vs. FOLFOX4: survival and response results from XELOX-1 / NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line treatment for patients with metastatic.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
The Combination of Bevacizumab (Bev) with capecitabine/irinotecan (CapIri/Bev) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CapOx/Bev) is highly active in advanced colorectal.
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
. Background Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in Platinum Refractory or Resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Galician Lung Cancer.
Kang Y et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA4007.
Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Niall C. Tebbutt International randomised phase III study of capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin C in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal.
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer: Where are we now ? Leonard Saltz, MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Reviewer: Dr Scott Berry Date posted: June 21, 2007 CAPEOX vs. FOLFOX4 +/- Bevacizumab: survival results from NO16966, a randomized.
Phase III Study of First-Line XELOX Plus Bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 Cycles Followed by XELOX Plus BEV or Single Agent (s/a) BEV as Maintenance Therapy in.
A three-arm randomized phase III trial of FOLFOX4 vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab vs XELOX + bevacizumab in the adjuvant treatment of patients with stage III.
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Eribulin Mesylate versus Capecitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast.
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Phase I/II study of oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 plus oral Leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer T. Yoshino 1, W. Koizumi 2,
Mok TS, Wu SL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: Gefitinib Superior.
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
Y-K Kang, A Ohtsu, E Van Cutsem, SY Rha, A Sawaki SR Park, H-Y Lim, J Wu, B Langer, MA Shah on behalf of AVAGAST investigators AVAGAST: a randomized, double-blind.
Phase I/II CheckMate 032: Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab in Advanced SCLC
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: safety results of a randomized phase III.
Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, CPT-11: Use and Sequencing (MRC FOCUS)
1 Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
R Hermann6, P Sportelli7, L Gardner7 and J Bendell8
and the NSABP Investigators
Effect of intravenous calcium and magnesium versus placebo on response to FOLFOX+bevacizumab in the CONcePT trial Hochster HS,1 Grothey A,2 Shpilsky A3,
1Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
Presentation transcript:

Safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin – fluoropyrimidine regimens with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Final analysis of the TREE study HS Hochster H. S. Hochster, L. L. Hart, R. K. Ramanathan, J. D. Hainsworth, S. Griffing, R. D. Mass, Y. Nagarwala, G. Jirau-Lucca, A. Shpilsky, B. H. Childs

Background Oxaliplatin – fluoropyrimidine regimens: standard combination chemotherapy for stage III and IV CRC TREE-1 trial: comparison of three different oxaliplatin – fluoropyrimidine regimens (mFOLFOX, bFOL, CapeOx) for toxicity Bevacizumab: promising results in mCRC when added to first-line chemotherapy (bIFL or 5-FU – LV) 1,2 TREE-2 trial: TREE-1 trial modified to include bevacizumab 1. Hurwitz H, et al. N Engl J Med 2004; 2. Kabbinavar F, et al. J Clin Oncol 2003

Study design mFOLFOX CapeOx R bFOL (n=50) Nov 2002 – Oct 2003 mFOLFOX + bevacizumab bFOL + bevacizumab CapeOx (reduced dose) + bevacizumab (n=75) (n=74) Nov 2003 – Apr 2004 R TREE-1 TREE-2 n=150 n=223

mFOLFOX6: 14-day cycle bFOL: 28-day cycle LV (350 mg IV, 2 h) OX (85 mg/m 2 IV, 2 h) 5-FU (400 mg/m 2, IV bolus) 5-FU (2400 mg/m 2 IV, 46 h) Day 1 CapeOx: 21-day cycle OX (130 mg/m 2 IV, 2 h) Day 1Days 1 – 15 CAPE (1000 mg/m 2 orally bid a ) a 28 doses in total Day 1 Day 8 OX (85 mg/m 2 IV, 2 h) 5-FU (500 mg/m 2, IV bolus) LV (20 mg/m 2, IV bolus) Day 15 Day 2 OX (85 mg/m 2 IV, 2 h) Treatment regimens: TREE-1

mFOLFOX6 + bev: 14-day cycle bFOL + bev: 28-day cycle LV (350 mg IV, 2 h) OX (85 mg/m 2 IV, 2 h) 5-FU (400 mg/m 2, IV bolus) 5-FU (2400 mg/m 2 IV, 46 h) Day 1 CapeOx + bev: 21-day cycle OX (130 mg/m 2 IV, 2 h) Day 1Days 1 – 15 CAPE (850 mg/m 2 orally bid a ) a 28 doses in total; 650 mg/m 2 bid for patients with creatinine clearance 30–50 mL/min Day 1 Day 8 OX (85 mg/m 2 IV, 2 h) 5-FU (500 mg/m 2, IV bolus) LV (20 mg/m 2, IV bolus) Day 15 Day 2 OX (85 mg/m 2 IV, 2 h) Treatment regimens: TREE-2 BEV (5 mg/kg IV, 30–90 min) BEV (7.5 mg/kg IV, 30–90 min)

Inclusion criteria Histologically documented adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum Inoperable metastatic disease No prior chemotherapy for metastatic/recurrent disease Age ≥18 years; ECOG performance status 0 – 1 At least 1 unidimensional measurable lesion

Exclusion criteria Prior treatment with oxaliplatin or bevacizumab Myocardial infarction within 6 months, current clinical evidence of congestive heart failure, or non-stable coronary artery disease Blood pressure >160/110 mmHg on medication; symptomatic peripheral vascular disease a Peripheral neuropathy a TREE-2 cohort only

Objectives Primary:  Incidence of grade 3/4 toxicity during initial 12 weeks of therapy Secondary:  Response rate (RECIST)  TTP (censored for second-line treatment)  TTF (treatment discontinuation, progression, or death)  Survival

Demographic and baseline characteristics a TREE-1TREE-2 mFOLFOX (n=49) bFOL (n=50) CapeOx (n=48) mFOLFOX + bev (n=71) bFOL + bev (n=70) CapeOx + bev (n=72) Median age (years) [range] 62 [35 – 79] 62 [31 – 84] 62 [32 – 84] 64 [31 – 83] 57 [30 – 85] 62 [32 – 82] Male (%) ECOG PS 0 (%) Prior adjuvant chemotherapy (%) a With the exception of tumor response, all data are presented for the as-treated population, defined as all patients who received at least one dose of treatment

Grade 3 /4 adverse events during first 12 weeks Patients (%) TREE-1TREE-2 (primary endpoint) mFOLFOX (n=49) bFOL (n=50) CapeOx (n=48) mFOLFOX + bev (n=71) bFOL + bev (n=70) CapeOX + bev (n=72) Related event a [95% CI] 59 [44 – 73] 36 [ 23 – 51] 67 [52 – 80] 59 [47 – 71] 51 [39 – 64] 56 [43 – 67] All events [95% CI] 76 [61 – 87] 44 [30 – 59] 73 [58 – 85] 65 [53 – 76] 60 [48 – 72] 58 [46 – 70] a Determined by the investigator to be related (possibly or probably) to study drug

Grade 3 /4 adverse events occurring in ≥5% of patients Patients (%) TREE-1TREE-2 mFOLFOX (n=49) bFOL (n=50) CapeOx (n=48) mFOLFOX + bev (n=71) bFOL + bev (n=70) CapeOX + bev (n=72) Neutropenia Dehydration a Diarrhea a Hypertension TE, arterial TE, other Nausea Vomiting Neurotoxicity Hand – foot Any grade 3/ a The high incidence of dehydration and diarrhea in the CapeOx arm in TREE-1 was effectively reduced by capecitabine dose reduction in TREE-2. TE, Thromboembolic events

Adverse events of special interest Adverse event (all grades), n (%) of patients TREE-1TREE-2 mFOLFOX (n=49) bFOL (n=50) CapeOx (n=48) mFOLFOX + bev (n=71) bFOL + bev (n=70) CapeOX + bev (n=72) Sepsis0 (0) 2 (4.2)3 (4.2)3 (4.3)1 (1.4) Bowel perforation 0 (0) 03 (4.2)2 (2.9)2 (2.8) Impaired wound healing 0 (0) 1 (2.1)4 (5.6)1 (1.4)4 (5.6) Treatment- related death 0 (0)1 (2.0)3 (6.3)0 (0)3 (4.3)3 (4.2)

Best confirmed tumor response (per-protocol population) a Tumor response (RECIST) (% patients) TREE-1TREE-2 mFOLFOX (n=46) bFOL (n=45) CapeOx (n=37) mFOLFOX + bev (n=70) bFOL + bev (n=63) CapeOX + bev (n=69) CR PR SD PD NE ORR (CR+PR) [95% CI] 43 [29 – 59] 22 [11 – 37] 35 [20 –53 ] 53 [41 – 65] 41 [29 – 54] 48 [36 – 60] a All patients who received at least 1 treatment with oxaliplatin  fluoropyrimidine ± bevacizumab and who have sufficient data to allow assessment of response

Time to treatment failure Probability 0510 Time to treatment failure (months) Probability 0510 Time to treatment failure (months) TREE-1TREE-2 mFOLFOX bFOL CapeOx mFOLFOX + bevacizumab bFOL + bevacizumab CapeOx + bevacizumab CapeOx (n=48) bFOL (n=50) mFOLFOX (n=49) Median (months) 3.0–5.83.5–6.15.4–8.395% CI mFOLFOX + bev (n=71) 4.9– bFOL + bev (n=70) 4.0– CapeOx + bev (n=72) 4.7– Median (months) 95% CI

Time to tumor progression a a With censoring for second-line treatment CapeOx + bev (n=72) bFOL + bev (n=70) mFOLFOX + bev (n=71) 8.6– –9.97.9–11.795% CI Median (months) CapeOx (n=48) bFOL (n=50) mFOLFOX (n=49) 5.1– – –9.8 95% CI Median (months) Time to tumor progression (months) Probability Time to tumor progression (months) Probability TREE-1TREE-2 mFOLFOX bFOL CapeOx mFOLFOX + bevacizumab bFOL + bevacizumab CapeOx + bevacizumab

Survival: TREE-1 CapeOx mFOLFOX bFOL Survival time (months) Probability CapeOx (n=48) bFOL (n=50) mFOLFOX (n=49) 12.5– – – % CI Median (months)

Survival: TREE-2 CapeOx + bevacizumab mFOLFOX + bevacizumab bFOL + bevacizumab Survival time (months) Probability CapeOx + bev (n=72) bFOL + bev (n=70) mFOLFOX + bev (n=71) 21.8–NE18.8– – NE 95% CI Median (months) NE, not evaluable

Survival: chemotherapy regimens combined TREE-1 (n=147) TREE-2 (n=213) Patients who have died, n (%)101 (69)111 (52) Patients alive at last follow-up, n (%)46 (31)102 (48) Median survival time, months [95% CI] 18.2 [14.5 –21.6] 24.4 [21.4 –26.8] Survival probability, % [95% CI] 12 months 18 months 24 months 67.3 [58.9 – 74.3] 50.1 [41.5 – 58.1] 35.8 [27.6 – 44.1] 79.1 [73.0 –84.0] 64.7 [57.8–70.8] 50.7 [43.6–57.4]

Survival: oxaliplatin-based regimens combined a 21.4– –21.695% CI Median survival (months) TREE-2 (n=213) TREE-1 (n=147) Survival time (months) Probability TREE-1 TREE-2 a Sequential cohorts without (TREE-1) and with bevacizumab (TREE-2)

Efficacy summary TREE-1TREE-2 ORR a (% patients)22 – 4341 – 53 TTP b (months)6.1 – – 10.3 TTF (months)4.4 – – 5.8 Median survival time (months) c a Per-protocol population. b Censored for second-line therapy. c All three treatment arms combined

Conclusions (1) Oxaliplatin, in combination with bolus, infusional, or oral fluoropyrimidine regimens, is active and well tolerated in previously untreated mCRC No major differences in activity were observed between the three fluoropyrimidine regimen, but bFOL may be the least efficacious (response and TTP in both cohorts) With dose reduction a of capecitabine, CapeOx with bevacizumab was tolerated much better (compared with CapeOX in TREE-1)  equivalent activity to FOLFOX with bevacizumab a From 1000 mg/m 2 (TREE-1) to 850 mg/m 2 orally bid (TREE-2),

Conclusions (2) Bevacizumab, when added to oxaliplatin –f luoropyrimidine regimens results in increased efficacy with the expected toxicity profile  Addition of bevacizumab did not change TTF but improved TTP Overall survival was improved with the addition of bevacizumab (sequential historical cohorts)  Median survival time was: 18.2 months in TREE-1 a (95% CI:14.5–21.6 months) 24.4 months in TREE-2 a (95% CI: 21.4–26.8 months) a All three treatment arms combined

Acknowledgment Investigators  Lowell Hart, Florida Cancer Specialists  R. Ramanathan, Univ Pittsburgh  John Hainsworth, Sarah Cannon Cancer Center  Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente  Yusif Abubakr, Florida Oncology  Lee Schwartzberg, West Cancer Clinic  Peter Eisenberg, California Cancer Care  James Atkins, Southeastern Medical Oncology  Maunuel Modiano, Arizona Clinical Research Center  Marshall Levine, Greater Baltimore Medical Center  Joaquina Veranda, Kansas City VA Hospital  Gladys Rodriguez, South Texas Oncology  Michael Wertheim, Treasure Coast  George Geils, Charleston Hematology Oncology  Margaret Deutsch, Raleigh Hematology Oncology  Renato LaRocca, Kentuckiana Cancer Institute  David Mintzer, Pennsylvania Hematology Oncology  Other investigators sanofi aventis  Gilbert Jirau-Lucca, MS  Arkady Shpilsky, PhD  Yasir Nagarwala  Lauri Wells, MD  Barry Childs, MD Genentech  Robert Mass, MD  Eric Hedrick, MD  David Emanuel, MD OTHERS  Nursing personnel  Data Personnel  Research Staff  PATIENTS